The Future Is Vow How can I get married without feeling guilty that my gay friends can't?
My partner and I have a dilemma.
We’re a straight couple. Our lives and finances are intertwined, and we are already essentially living as a married couple. Now we want to hold a ceremony with family and friends to make public the commitment we’ve already made privately. That said, we are in favor of marriage equality and are considering joining the marriage boycott (www.unmarried.org) until DOMA is repealed and every state allows gay marriage.
Our friends and family say we should get married and fight for equality “from the other side of the fence.” On the other hand, a number of the people in attendance at our wedding would not have access to the rights we’d be signing up for, and that feels unfair to us.
We’d like to know what you think. Is boycotting legal marriage a worthwhile statement for straight couples to make? Or do you think we should put gay-rights groups on our registry and fight for marriage equality as a married couple? —Hoping to Render Change
Funny you should ask, HTRC, as last weekend the boyfriend-in-America/husband-in-Canada and I attended the wedding of some dear straight friends. We weren’t the only same-sex couple at the wedding; there were “a number of people in attendance [without] access to the rights” our straight friends were signing up for.
All us homos were delighted to be there and deliriously happy for our friends, and not one of us would’ve asked them to wait to marry until gay marriage is legal in all 50 states—something that isn’t going to happen until 2024 at the earliest, according to number-crunchin’ superstar political blogger Nate Silver. That’s when Silver predicts that the final holdout—Mississippi—will finally legalize same-sex marriage.
Here’s what I think you should do, HTRC: get married, make a donation to the fight for marriage equality, and encourage your guests to do the same. And, hey, are you guys getting married in the next four weeks? Because there’s a ballot measure in Maine that would strip same-sex couples in that state of their newly won right to wed. Help protect marriage equality in Maine by making a donation—right now—at protectmaineequality.org. And religious bigots in Washington State, where I live, are attempting to repeal a domestic-partnership law at the ballot box. Protect the rights of same-sex couples in Washington by making a donation—right now—at approvereferendum71.org.
And in addition to throwing some money around, HTRC, I think you should consider lifting a reading from my friends’ ceremony.
“Marriage is a vital social institution,” the reading began. “The exclusive commitment of two individuals to each other nurtures love and mutual support. Civil marriage is at once a deeply personal commitment to another human being and a highly public celebration of the ideals of mutuality, companionship, intimacy, fidelity, and family. Because it fulfills yearnings for security, safe haven, and connection that express our common humanity, civil marriage is an esteemed institution and the decision whether and whom to marry is among life’s momentous acts of self-definition.”
Who could argue with those sentiments? Everyone at the wedding was nodding. And the reading continued…
“It is undoubtedly for these concrete reasons, as well as for its intimately personal significance, that civil marriage has long been termed a ‘civil right.’ Without the right to choose to marry, one is excluded from the full range of human experience.”
After the reading—which was done by a gay friend of the couple—the officiant identified the source: It was from the 2003 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage in that state. It would be wonderful if this caught on as a wedding reading, HTRC. The gay people in the pews will be touched, and with any luck, any straight guests who oppose marriage equality will take a moment to reconsider their positions. At the very least, they’ll know where the bride and groom stand. —Dan
I’m a high-school student, gay, but whenever someone asks me, I lie and say I’m not. I feel like I’m ashamed of who I am and that I’m dishonoring every openly gay person. But I don’t know what else to do. Most of the other students at my school use the words “gay” and “faggot” in a derogatory way. I’ve only been in high school for four weeks, and I’m not sure how they would react. What should I do? Should I come out? —Gay Boy Seeking Serious Help
“I’m a big fan of telling people what to do (just ask my poor boyfriend), but coming out is a deeply personal decision, one you’re going to have to negotiate yourself,” says Benoit Denizet-Lewis, who wrote a cover story for the New York Times Magazine about gay kids coming out in middle school.
“With that said, here’s what you should do. First, the fact that you’re worrying about ‘dishonoring every gay person’ speaks volumes about your character and tells me that you have a heart and a conscience, both of which will serve you well in your life as an openly gay man. Second, consider coming out first to an adult you trust (a school counselor, your gay uncle). Third, try to come out to one friend, preferably one who loves the show Glee. Having a peer ally is critical to your mental health. Finally, when you do come out to your parents, just be sure you’re not in a moving vehicle.”
Denizet-Lewis’s first book, America Anonymous, is out now, and it’s pretty genius. But for the record: I do not love the show Glee. —Dan
Greetings from Portland, Ore. Our fair city is totally overflowing with cute, young, scruffy boys. Which is awesome, of course, for gay guys like me. The only problem is, it seems like a disproportionate number of these boys are, well, boys without dicks—trans guys. Seems like every dance party, every art-fag event, is packed with non-bio boys. But where are all the trans girls? None of my lesbo friends talk about all the new trans girls running around town.
I know that this could strictly be region-specific, but it seems to be a bigger issue. Why is it that the butch girls all seem to become dudes, yet so few of the femme boys identify as women? —GGG in PDX
I’m just theorizing here: There seem to be fewer MTFs out there, and the MTFs who are out there mostly seem to have been straight-identified before their transitions, unlike most FTMs, who seem, for the most part, to have been lesbian-identified beforehand. So MTFs weren’t integrated into the queer community prior to their transitions the same way FTMs were before theirs.
Confused? Me too.
So MTFs are less likely to frequent places—bars, clubs, art-fag events—where you, a gay guy, might encounter them.
As for why there are so many trans guys in Portland, trans guys clump up for the same reasons other sexual minorities do. It’s not just about safety in numbers but also about the romantic odds. The more trans guys in one place, the more trans guys there are to date; and the more trans guys in one place, the likelier non-trans guys and girls are to meet, get to know, and perhaps consider dating trans guys. —Dan Savage
Send your Savage Love questions to mail@savagelove.net.
Oct. 8 - 14, 2009 (Vol. 29, #41)








Comments
9:04 pm
well, first a flippant answer popped into my head, based on the facts that gays can get married anywhere they want, following the same rules that straights have to follow. It's just that they want special "gay rules".
But then, an even better idea occurred to me. Why can't gays marry in pairs and then just swap partners? That way they can be married legally, yet still be with their lovers. Just like straight couples can!
It's even better than an immigration scam because it's perfectly legal. Instead of trying to find 5 million people to argue that the law should be changes so that you can marry another guy? Just find two girls who would legally marry you and let you fuck your boyfriend. Why not? That's what gays used to do before, except they wouldn't let their wives in on the secret.
9:33 pm
Because, jfc1, that would be taking, oh, no less than 47 steps backward. We aren't marching, petitioning, signing, asking, pleading for the right to marry simply because we didn't think of what you suggested. We are addressing these issues because This Should Be A Right For Everyone, without the backdoor shenanigans, (pardon that awful pun).
The right to marry, openly and legally, one person that we love — or get drunk with in Vegas — is something every American should have. Done.
And a few problems with your idea are that if I married my best gay duder friend, and delighted in the tax breaks and so forth, I'd still have to live with him, regardless of whether I had a partner or not, which defeats the purpose of this plan. You can't marry someone and then move in with someone else. Also. If my partner ended up in the hospital, I still wouldn't have the visitation rights other married people have. Why? Because I'm married to Mr. Gay Friend. End of discussion.
P.S. Dan, I love your writing. Your Advocate article on President Obama had me underlying sentences and reading them aloud to my loving girlfriend. Keep up the good work (and writing).
8:30 pm
Sara,
A "right" is not something that someone gives to you, or can take away. It certainly is not something that a *judge* gives to you (no matter what they want to call it) much less a legislative body.
And you wouldn't have to live with him.
And you could work it out that you exchange financial benefits.
Just follow the idea to its logical conclusion. If you're going to marry and then swap partners, you swap everything, it's understood.
ps you certainly don't, and never will, have the right to marry anyone you want. That's just not how it works. Even for straights. You're just not thinking.
8:39 pm
..or you could just do it the old-fashioned way. Elope and then take out a life-insurance policy and have your "partner" declare you to be their beneficiary on whatever policies they have. Become legal guardians for each other in case one becomes mentally-incompetent.
You don't have to get formally "married" according to the law, and it's been that way all along...and besides, why would you, as a gay person, want to engage in an activity that is a hallmark of a pro-heterosexual/anti-homosexual lifestyle? It's like a black man wanting to join the Klan.
And trust me, if they would make married couples actually live up to their wedding vows ("til death do we part" and all that) half of these straights wouldn't get married anyway. People nowadays have 50 excuses for getting a divorce, in the old days, there *weren't* no excuses. You got married, you *stayed* married. Marriage today is one big fat lie because it only has meaning until one of them no longer wants to be married and gets a judge to void the marriage AND they usually get all sorts of financial benefits as a result. LOL they say that it's "financial slavery" otherwise but what woman knowingly marries a man who won't make a good living for them both, and exactly what sort of "financial freedom" is it when the man owes both alimony and child-support to his ex?
It's all nonsense anyway. You should put yourself above it and just promise your "loved one" that you will be with them forever and ever. And then actually do it.
8:50 pm
"The right to marry, openly and legally, one person that we love — or get drunk with in Vegas — is something every American should have. Done."
LOL you're making half the guys reading this hyperventilate, just thinking about all the "sweet young things" they'd like to take to Vegas, get drunk and marry in a quickie ceremony. That's not even beginning to be a good idea. Marriage is, rightfully, regulated according to "community standards" one of which is, in many areas, that it's illegal for two people of the same sex, or of vastly-disparate age, to have sex, not to mention both. Why should they be allowed to marry if it's illegal for them to even have sex with each other?
They can't even pass a reciprocity agreement for handgun ownership and concealed-weapons permits to formalize the understanding that many states already have in place, a good 30% of the adults in this country (not to mention minors) can't even own firearms in direct violation of their 2nd amendment rights (which, you know, is written right there in the Constitution). How are they ever going to nationalize gay marriage? Get real.
11:57 am
I find it so hard to wrap my head around the fact that some people care so much about what other people want to do, related to life, love, sex, and marriage. If two people are really committed to each other, they deserve a chance to screw everything up just like the rest of us. I really don't see what the big deal is, and why it is anyone's else's right to tell someone that they can't get married, but then again, women in this country have had the "right" to vote less than 100 years. I also find it so bizarre that California, the one place I expected to easily pass gay marriage, voted it down.