<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Young &#38; Hungry &#187; Reagan National</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/youngandhungry/tag/reagan-national/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/youngandhungry</link>
	<description>D.C. Restaurants and Food</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:01:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Reagan Airport Still Sucks for Healthy Food</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/youngandhungry/2008/11/25/reagan-airports-still-sucks-for-healthy-food/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/youngandhungry/2008/11/25/reagan-airports-still-sucks-for-healthy-food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Carman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan National]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/youngandhungry/?p=540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Reagan National landed at the very bottom of this year&#8217;s Airport Food Review, the annual survey in which the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine scours the nation&#8217;s busiest airports, looking for the ones that serve the healthiest cuisine. The best airports for keeping your cholesterol grounded are Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport and Detroit Metropolitan Wayne [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/youngandhungry/files/2008/11/179161247_2a3e79fa13.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-545" title="179161247_2a3e79fa13" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/youngandhungry/files/2008/11/179161247_2a3e79fa13.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="390" /></a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.metwashairports.com/national/">Reagan National</a> </strong>landed at the very bottom of this year&#8217;s <a href="http://www.pcrm.org/health/reports/Airport_Food_Review_08.html"><strong>Airport Food Review</strong></a>, the annual survey in which the <strong>Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine</strong> scours the nation&#8217;s busiest airports, looking for the ones that serve the healthiest cuisine. The best airports for keeping your cholesterol grounded are <strong>Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport </strong>and <strong>Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport</strong>, which tied for first in the PCRM&#8217;s survey. Ninety-five percent of the restaurants at both airports serve at least one &#8220;low-fat, high-fiber, cholesterol-free breakfast, lunch, or dinner option,&#8221; which is the criteria for being labeled a &#8220;healthy&#8221; eatery.</p>
<p>You have to admit, that&#8217;s a pretty damn low threshold&#8212;I mean, just <em>one dish all day long</em>&#8212;and still only 60 percent of <a href="http://www.mwaa.com/reagan/shopping_dining_3/dining/on-site_business_meetings">Reagan National&#8217;s restaurants</a> make the grade. PCRM tried to throw Reagan National, that last-place dog, a bone for not being a complete sniveling mess:</p>
<blockquote><p>While National Airport remained in last place for a second year, the airport was also the most improved. National had the largest increase in percentage of restaurants offering healthful options—from 42 percent in 2007 to 60 percent this year.</p></blockquote>
<p>The whole survey got me to thinking about why National doesn&#8217;t rate better, particularly when measured against the two main airports in Texas (DFW and <strong>Bush Intercontinental</strong>, which were first and third on PCRM&#8217;s list), where folks measure their success by the size of their ranches, their belt buckles, and their bellies. So I decided to check <a href="http://www.mensfitness.com/city_rankings/463"><strong>Men&#8217;s Fitness</strong> magazine&#8217;s latest survey on America&#8217;s fittest and fattest cities</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-540"></span>Sure enough, Dallas, Fort Worth, Chicago, and Houston all placed on the magazine&#8217;s list of the fattest cities. Fort Worth is No. 4, Dallas No. 6, Houston No. 10, and Chicago No. 20.</p>
<p>So what conclusion can you draw from this thin data? Well, that maybe chubby cities are trying to control their citizens&#8217; widening waistbands by mandating healthier eats at their airports? Yes? Possibly? I mean, don&#8217;t these towns get embarrassed by these annual surveys labeling them the fattest asses in America?</p>
<p>Well, it sounds like a logical theory until you look at Las Vegas. <strong><a href="http://www.mensfitness.com/index">Men&#8217;s Fitness</a></strong> calls it the fattest city in America. Its airport is also one of the poorest performers on PCRM&#8217;s list, coming in at No. 10.</p>
<p>So much for that theory.</p>
<p><em>Image courtesy of Flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/brucethomson/">Thombo2</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/youngandhungry/2008/11/25/reagan-airports-still-sucks-for-healthy-food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
