<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; WorldNetDaily</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/worldnetdaily/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Morning After: &#8220;Homosexual&#8221; Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/23/the-morning-after-homosexual-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/23/the-morning-after-homosexual-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amateur photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chelsea Schilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Goggles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain Blogette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WorldNetDaily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XX Factor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[* Chelsea Schilling of WorldNetDaily&#8212;which appears to be some sort of Ann Coulter-9/11-Real America news outfit&#8212;reports on former Washington City Paper staffer John Cloud's condemnation of Barack Obama as a "bigot" and a "problem for gays" following Obama's Rick Warren nod. A "homosexual" reporter versus our terrorist communist Leader? This is like some sort of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3229/3128832113_5949da830c.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="240" height="375" />*<strong> </strong><strong>Chelsea Schilling</strong> of WorldNetDaily&#8212;which appears to be some sort of <strong>Ann Coulter</strong>-9/11-Real America news outfit&#8212;reports on former <em>Washington City Paper</em> staffer <a href="http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=84344"><strong>John Cloud</strong>'s condemnation of </a><strong><a href="http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=84344">Barack Obama</a> </strong>as a "bigot" and a "problem for gays" following Obama's <strong>Rick Warren</strong> nod. A "homosexual" reporter versus our terrorist communist Leader? This is like some sort of fantasy WND morality play! How will it end?</p>
<p>WND sides for Obama! Schilling places scare quotes around the word "homosexual" in her headline, as in "'Homosexual' Time reporter: Obama is a 'bigot,'" then pepper her report on Cloud's smack-down with this description of Cloud's work for <em>CP</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In his earlier days as a reporter for the <em>Washington City Paper</em>, Cloud described his first-hand experience and arousal at a Washington, D.C., group-sex party for homosexuals in 1997. His report was sexually graphic and filled with expletives.</p></blockquote>
<p>Bravo, Schilling, but you left out the link! <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/display.php?id=12661">Read up on Cloud's arousal here</a>.</p>
<p>* <strong>Gender Goggles </strong>rants on the use of the term "<a href="http://gendergoggles.com/2008/12/22/a-rant-on-the-failure-of-feminism/">failure of feminism</a>" to describe shit that happens that's not great for women. Don't call it a failure of feminism when you mean "a failure of mainstream society to <em>embrace</em> feminism fully."</p>
<p>* Great conversations going on at<em> Slate</em>'s <strong>XX Factor: Eve Fairbanks</strong> on claims that t<a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/12/22/politico-says-the-press-is-sexist-great.aspx">he media turned sexist in 2008</a>; <strong>Melinda Henneberger</strong> asks, "<a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/12/22/are-traditional-christians-necessarily-haters.aspx">are traditional Christians necessarily haters</a>?" (Short answer: Mmmm, no).</p>
<p>* Some dude has started a blog of <a href="http://mykidtookthese.com/">photographs his three-year-old child took with his digital camera</a> that provide "a window into the perspective of a child." Are we're supposed to glean from this that a child has the perspective of a lazy, indiscriminate photographer?</p>
<p>* <strong>McCain Blogette </strong>is back!<strong> Meghan McCain</strong> <a href="http://www.mccainblogette.com/postings/122008_0906.shtml">jumps back into the blogosphere</a> to wish us a happy new year and update on her post-election "<span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Verdana,Geneva,Arial;">emotional rollercoaster." This is just a hunch, but I have a feeling there's a third-wave feminist blogger in Meghan just waiting to rise from the ashes of her aging parents' cold, political marital agreement (just look at those sassy red shoes!). Come, young Padawan. I will guide you to shed your earnestness and adopt left-leaning positions on women's health!<br />
</span></p>
<p><em>Photo via<strong> </strong><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/trialsanderrors/3128832113/"><strong>trialsanderrors</strong></a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/23/the-morning-after-homosexual-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

