<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; university sex columns reviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/university-sex-columns-reviewed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>University Sex Columns, Reviewed: Girls, Be More Grateful for Valentines Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/03/01/university-sex-columns-reviewed-girls-be-more-grateful-for-valentines-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/03/01/university-sex-columns-reviewed-girls-be-more-grateful-for-valentines-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bette midler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buster darkhole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cliches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgetown University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the first wives club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university sex columns reviewed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine's Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=9027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The battle for ideological dominance in our nation’s capital’s collegiate sex columns continues. Are our local campus columnists on the forefront of radical sex writing, or are they bringing back the good old days of instructing women to pretend to be grateful for the attention of men?
This week: How to erase your relationship doubts by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/firstwivesclub.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-9036 aligncenter" title="firstwivesclub" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/firstwivesclub.jpg" alt="firstwivesclub" width="301" height="300" /></a><br />
The battle for <a href="http://www.campusprogress.org/opinions/4657/the-problem-with-the-campus-sex-column-movement">ideological dominance</a> in our nation’s capital’s collegiate sex columns continues. Are our local campus columnists on the forefront of radical sex writing, or are they bringing back the good old days of instructing women to pretend to be grateful for the attention of men?</p>
<p>This week: How to erase your relationship doubts by conforming to stilted gender roles; <strong>Buster Darkhole</strong> is MIA; college students are getting relationship inspiration from <em>The First Wives Club</em> soundtrack. This time with feeling:</p>
<p><span id="more-9027"></span></p>
<p><strong>UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND:</strong> Girls must be girls.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Sex Tips</strong>: In a post-Valentines entry, UMD Diamondback advice columnist<strong> Esti Frischling</strong> <a href="http://www.diamondbackonline.com/opinion/advice-vices-of-v-day-1.1163293">administers a remedy to a female student</a> who is concerned that her new beau is getting a bit too sweet on her (his super-serious Valentine's Day plans "freaked [her] out." Frischling's advice: In order to foster romance, ignore your obvious incompatibility, shelve your feelings, and stick to reinforcing traditional gender roles. "To be honest, I very rarely hear of girls complaining about getting too much attention," Frischling writes. "What is appealing about all these niceties and cutenesses, though, is it means someone cares about you. . . .  Perhaps it’s best not to say anything about how you don’t approve of his Valentine’s Day efforts. Instead, slow things down in other ways that won’t reveal to him how picky and alternative you are. If Hallmark has taught us anything, it’s that no one wants those things in a girl."</p>
<p><strong>Life Lesson</strong>: A man doesn't like a complicated woman. Who cares if you don't even like him, either? "However you choose to handle it, don’t make him feel bad or insecure about trying to do nice things for you," Frischling writes. "It’s completely understandable that at this time it was too much for you, but unless you want to scare him away, just let it go."<br />
<strong><br />
Progressive Meter</strong>: And there's nothing worse than scaring away a guy who freaks you out, amirite ladies? <strong>:(<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>AMERICAN UNIVERSITY</strong>: Sex columnists are MIA.</p>
<p><strong>Sex Tips</strong><strong></strong>: None. The AU Eagle's trio of pseudonymned sex writers&#8212;<strong>Buster Darkhole</strong>, <strong>Maxwell Hillcrest</strong>, and <strong>Amber Sparkles </strong>haven't churned out a column since "<a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/24/university-sex-columns-reviewed-lesbians-dont-scissor-edition/">Stereotypes a Problem for Lesbian Community</a>," a piece which caused some problems for the lesbian community on campus, actually. (A sampling: “Many try and divulge the deep mystery that is lesbian sex. However, this is often met with much difficulty. Lesbians, being quite secretive, rarely give out the methods they use for sex, but we have done the research for you and found out some interesting facts.”)</p>
<p><strong>Life Lesson</strong>: Sometimes better to burn out than  to fade away. The "AU Threesome" started off their sex-writing careers with a<a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/24/youre-drunk-its-inside-you-it-kind-of-hurts-is-it-rape/"> vaguely non-consensual bang</a> back in September, and they've kept up the controversy since&#8212;until they fell off the <em>Eagle</em>'s map three-and-a-half months ago.</p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter</strong>: This one gets a big frowny face, because I miss these kids. <strong>:(</strong></p>
<p><strong>GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: Bette Midler</strong> is on the soundtrack to our lives.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Sex Tips</strong>: In <em>Hoya </em>"Rounding the Bases" columnist <strong>Colleen Leahey</strong>'s latest, undergrads are advised to avoid festering in "pseudo-relationships" that lie in the gray area between hooking up and exchanging Varsity letterman jackets. Leahey sketches the scene: "After many weeks (sometimes even months) of being together, you and your partner have yet to go on a real date. Many nights, your special friend has a bit too much Burnett’s and passes out, leaving your texts annoyingly unanswered. But when you’re together, everything is perfect. Suddenly, the good outweighs the bad. This, my friends, is another&#8212;and the most common for college students&#8212;example of when you should leave. Your optimism, hoping to make something good out of a total train wreck, is causing you to trap yourself in an unhealthy relationship. Stay too long and you will end up feeling insecure and unhappy."</p>
<p><strong>Life Lesson: </strong>If you suspect that Leahey is writing from a bit of an old-school perspective&#8212;beware the Dangers Of Hook-Up culture!&#8212; here's some more evidence: "Eventually, you will realize how much happier you are. As great as consistency is, enjoying you’re freedom is so much more fulfilling. And if you’re ever feeling really down, take a tip from my friends and I: Blast <em>The First Wives Club</em> version of 'You Don’t Own Me.' Trust me, you’ll be basking in the golden rays of your newfound singledom before you know it."</p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter</strong>: Th<em>e First Wives Club</em> is a film about three sassy, middle-aged divorcees who exact revenge on their ex-husbands after they are all discarded for younger women. Is it just me, or is it kind of freaky that a sex column for young people is gleaning relationship inspiration from a movie about cliched, messy divorces caused by hopelessly cliched young women? <strong>:-|</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/03/01/university-sex-columns-reviewed-girls-be-more-grateful-for-valentines-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>University Sex Columns, Reviewed: Valentine&#8217;s Blow Job Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/02/12/university-sex-columns-reviewed-valentines-blow-job-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/02/12/university-sex-columns-reviewed-valentines-blow-job-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aaliyah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blow jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college sex columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diamondback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esti frischling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Washington University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hatchet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oral sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sadie hawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statutory rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university sex columns reviewed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine's Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valentines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=8852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The battle for ideological dominance in our nation’s capital’s collegiate sex columns continues. Are our local campus columnists on the forefront of radical sex writing, or are they bringing back the good old days of romantically forward women being dismissed as aggressive bitches?
This week, our college sex columnists get romantic: Why you should go down [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3002/2987740048_70625407c6.jpg" alt="" width="420" height="285" /></p>
<p>The battle for ideological dominance in our nation’s capital’s collegiate sex columns continues. Are our local campus columnists on the forefront of radical sex writing, or are they bringing back the good old days of romantically forward women being dismissed as aggressive bitches?</p>
<p>This week, our college sex columnists get romantic: Why you should go down on your significant other this Sunday; who's allowed to date 18-year-olds; girls asking boys out is scary!</p>
<p><span id="more-8852"></span><strong>GWU: Say it with a blow job.<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Sex Tip</strong>: In a <a href="http://media.www.gwhatchet.com/media/storage/paper332/news/2010/02/12/ValentinesDayGuide/Sex-Column.Give.Like.You.Receive-3870725.shtml">Very Special Valentine's Day edition</a> of her <em>GW Hatchet</em> sex column, <strong>Layla</strong> offers up some specialized advice: If you don't know how to say it, just say it in your <em>GW Hatchet</em> sex column. "With the guy I've been seeing recently, Red, we tend to skip foreplay and move straight to having sex. Which is totally fine, because as soon as I get him naked, that's all I want. But at the same time, there is something to be said for prolonging that anticipation just a bit longer. I'm still working on a way to say, 'Babe, let's slow down a bit and just touch each other.'"</p>
<p><strong>Life Lesson</strong>: That, or say it with a blow job. "I think there's something incredibly hot about going down on a guy and hearing him moan with pleasure just from the way you're moving your mouth. Giving head can often be a lot more intimate than having sex&#8212;you can really focus on your partner and what gets him off. And that's what I think Valentine's Day is all about."</p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter</strong>: If preferring oral sex has any political implications, I'm not aware of them. <strong>EVEN</strong>.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><strong>UMD: Dating out of your age range.<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Sex Tips</strong>: UMD <em>Diamondback </em>advice columnist<strong> Esti Frischling</strong> informs co-eds that <a href="http://www.diamondbackonline.com/opinion/advice-being-an-ageless-wonder-1.1113034">Aaliyah was wrong</a>.To a 23-year-old super senior dude looking to hook up with an 18-year-old freshman girl, Frishcling writes: "Let’s not fool ourselves with the ol’ 'age-is-just-a-number' bullshit. People who say that are 15-year-olds with daddy issues who like to date their professors or are statutory rapists with conscience issues."</p>
<p><strong>Life Lesson:</strong> 23-year-olds can date 18-year-olds. But they don't have to. "As long as you don’t lie about your age, you are transgressing no moral issues that I’m aware of, which are most of them. If you’re still feeling concerned and you think these chicks are too young, try hitting up the downtown bars. Then you can be sure all the girls are at least 21."</p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter:</strong> I appreciate the super senior considering issues of maturity and experience when choosing his sex partners. <strong>EIGHT.</strong></p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><strong>GWU Extra: When girls ask the boys.<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Sex Tips: </strong>For the<em> Hatchet</em>'s special Valentine's Day Issue, <strong>Lauren Hoenemeyer</strong> brings the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/fashion/07campus.html"><em>New York Times</em> "shortage of men"</a> treatment to Foggy Bottom. GW's gender breakdown is 43 percent male, 57 percent female, leading some women on campus to commit what some students consider a "crime against nature." (The crime is asking a boy out, on a date). Hot tip: Some boys like it! "It's really romantic when a girl asks a guy out," freshman<strong> Jacob Zachs</strong> told Hoenemeyer. "Guys like it but girls don't like it. It takes the pressure off of us."</p>
<p><strong>Life Lesson</strong>: But beware, ladies: Some college-aged men still hate women. "Sophomore<strong> Blake Eisenberg</strong> said that girls who ask guys out are 'too aggressive and too demanding.' He said, 'They should just let things happen, because they will happen if it's meant to be. They shouldn't force it. For it to work out in the end, for it to be a positive relationship, you need the guy to also like the girl.' Aaaand end trend piece!</p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter</strong>: Hoenemeyer balances her piece with two students in favor of the Sadie Hawkins tactic, and two against. But is that really a fair representation of attitudes on this subject? The two guys quoted in the article who oppose the practice actually think that a girl asking a boy if he would like to do something with her constitutes a "demand" that does not take into consideration that boy's feelings. If half of the GW campus really thinks this way, we're fucked. <strong>THREE</strong>.</p>
<p><em>Photo via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/george_eastman_house/2987740048/"><strong>George Eastman House</strong></a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/02/12/university-sex-columns-reviewed-valentines-blow-job-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>University Sex Columns, Reviewed: No Condoms For &#8220;Dirty Jersey&#8221; Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/01/19/university-sex-columns-reviewed-no-condoms-for-dirty-jersey-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/01/19/university-sex-columns-reviewed-no-condoms-for-dirty-jersey-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colleen leahey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Washington University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgetown University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university sex columns reviewed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=8498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Welcome back from Winter Break, sexually active college students (and old people wondering what those darned kids are up to these days)! The battle for ideological dominance in our nation’s capital’s collegiate sex columns continues. Are our local campus columnists on the forefront of radical sex writing, or are they bringing back the good old [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3144/2626737533_19dec2cc3e.jpg" alt="" width="420" height="279.7" /></p>
<p>Welcome back from Winter Break, sexually active college students (and old people wondering what those darned kids are up to these days)! The battle for <a href="http://www.campusprogress.org/opinions/4657/the-problem-with-the-campus-sex-column-movement">ideological dominance</a> in our nation’s capital’s collegiate sex columns continues. Are our local campus columnists on the forefront of radical sex writing, or are they bringing back the good old days of pretending that sexual orientation is just a "phase."</p>
<p>This week: When you're fucking a guy named "Dirty Jersey," <em>and</em> he doesn't want to wear a condom; how to stop being friends and start getting laid; is bisexuality the new black?</p>
<p><span id="more-8498"></span><strong>HOWARD UNIVERSITY:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Sex Tips</strong>: in "<a href="http://www.thehilltoponline.com/is-bisexuality-the-new-black-1.2138412">Is Bisexuality the New Black?"</a>, <strong>Aaron Randol </strong>surveys Howard University students about this crazy new "trend." "Is college a catalyst for bisexual behavior? And if so, does this mean bisexuality is nothing more than a trend, the new black?" Randol writes. "The notion that bisexuality in college is just a trend proves controversial for[one bisexual man]; as he, like many others, have had feelings towards both sexes before college."</p>
<p><strong>Life Lessons: </strong>One of Randol's classmates describes the campus male bisexuality epidemic: "I am positive more guys at Howard than girls are trying bisexuality. Less than 5 percent of the girls that I know of here are trying or have tried it, but I’d say 50 percent of my guy friends have tried. I don’t know if it’s Howard or if it’s how people are leaning in general. But it seems like here, 1 in 3 guys are gay or bisexual. It’s not even weird to hear a guy is gay or bisexual at Howard any more.”</p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter:</strong> After setting up the trendy bisexual straw man argument, Randol is ready to smack down that particular theory. Let's hear it, Randol! "So is bisexuality the new black, nothing more than a trend, a staple on the public scene?" he concludes: "Maybe not." Bleh.<strong> ZERO</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Sex Tips: </strong>Georgetown <em>Hoya</em> dating columnist <strong>Colleen Leahey</strong> reflects on the <a href="http://guide.thehoya.com/node/281">Swiftian nature of her romantic life</a>.<strong> </strong>Taylor Swiftian."The entire situation was straight out of a silly Taylor Swift song: I had a thing for my best guy friend. While he dated various girls, I put myself in the friend zone, giving him advice and being there when he needed to vent to someone," she writes. "Secretly, though, I was hoping he would realize that I was the one he truly liked."</p>
<p><strong>Life Lessons: </strong>Refreshingly, Leahey combats this <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/12/03/patience-is-a-feminist-virtue/">trademark Swiftian passivity</a> by advising unrequited lovers how to step up and do something about it. "So, this new year, if you’re finally ready to admit to your inner desires, then do be more aggressive with your feelings," she writes. "Go with your impulse; if you think there’s a spark and it’s not one-sided, make a move. . . . Don’t overanalyze or freak your friend out, but you do have to make a slight effort if you want something to actually happen (unless you’re trying to be the next victim of the T. Swift syndrome)."</p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter:</strong> Slight effort! What can I say, I'm a sucker for refusing to fall victim to the T. Swift Syndrome. <strong>SEVEN.</strong></p>
<p><strong>GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY</strong></p>
<p><strong>Sex Tips: </strong><em>Hatchet</em> sex columnist <strong>Layla</strong> admits <a href="http://media.www.gwhatchet.com/media/storage/paper332/news/2010/01/19/Life/Sex-Column.A.Reformed.Condom.Abuser-3854537.shtml?reffeature=htmlemailedition">she's done it without a condom</a>&#8212;with a guy she calls "Dirty Jersey." "Since [the first night we had sex], despite his protests, I insisted on a condom every time like I knew I should," Layla writes. But that didn't last: "Somewhere during the next five or six times we had sex, my resolve dissolved. I went from being adamant about using protection, to making Dirty Jersey pull out to get a condom, to finally staying quiet about it. Part of me hoped that he would catch on to my desire to use a condom, but he never did. To be perfectly honest, it felt amazing without it and it was just as much my fault as it was his."</p>
<p><strong>Life Lessons</strong>: Fuck that guy! "I may be guilty of condom-use abuse in the past, but now, I am most definitely reformed," Layla writes. "It also helps that I'm not dating Dirty Jersey anymore."</p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter:</strong> What does strapping on a rubber say about your politics? According to <strong>Margaret Talbot</strong>'s "Red Sex, Blue Sex," teen pregnancy is higher and condom use lower in <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/11/03/081103fa_fact_talbot?currentPage=all">this country's red states</a>. So we'll count this prophylactic flip-flopper as a moderate. Feminist bonus: She ditched a guy who clearly didn't give a shit about what she wanted in the bedroom. Too bad she softens that with a healthy dose of self-blame.  <strong>FIVE</strong>.</p>
<p><em>photo via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nerdcoregirl/2626737533/sizes/m/"><strong>nerdcoregirl</strong></a>, Creative Commons Attribution License 2.0</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/01/19/university-sex-columns-reviewed-no-condoms-for-dirty-jersey-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>University Sex Columns, Reviewed: Drunken Flirting Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/12/10/university-sex-columns-reviewed-drunken-flirting-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/12/10/university-sex-columns-reviewed-drunken-flirting-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college sex column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgetown University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university sex columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university sex columns reviewed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The battle for ideological dominance in our nation’s capital’s collegiate sex columns continues. Are our local campus columnists on the forefront of radical sex writing, or are they bringing back the good old days of passive femininity, drunk-flirting double standards, and Jell-O Shot lesbianism?
This week: How to pick up guys sober; when gays and lesbians [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2398/2179143282_a8e68767af.jpg" alt="" width="420" height="294" /></p>
<p>The battle for <a href="http://www.campusprogress.org/opinions/4657/the-problem-with-the-campus-sex-column-movement">ideological dominance</a> in our nation’s capital’s collegiate sex columns continues. Are our local campus columnists on the forefront of radical sex writing, or are they bringing back the good old days of passive femininity, drunk-flirting double standards, and Jell-O Shot lesbianism?</p>
<p>This week: How to pick up guys sober; when gays and lesbians offend gays and lesbians; what to do when you pick up a guy drunk.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><strong>UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Sex Tips: </strong><em>Diamondback </em>advice columnist<strong> Esti Frischling</strong> tells UMD girls <a href="http://www.diamondbackonline.com/opinion/advice-staying-classy-1.950286">how to find dates</a> beyond the old standby of "flirting with random guys at the bars." Her venue of choice? "Class. Next time, just sit next to that stud and smoothly pass him an empty tic-tac-toe board&#8212;guaranteed to get you at least a smile and a game, possibly even a good lay."</p>
<p><strong>Life Lesson: </strong>"Just look approachable and wear stretchy pants."</p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter: </strong>I support any relationship advice column targeted at women that does not rely upon sitting around and waiting for the hottest dude ever to reveal his improbable love for you. Man, <em>Twilight </em>has really lowered my standards. <strong>6.<br />
</strong></p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><strong>AMERICAN UNIVERSITY:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Sex Tips: </strong>Since our AU Threesome of sex columnists has retired for the semester, this one's a <a href="http://www.diamondbackonline.com/opinion/advice-staying-classy-1.950286">rebuttal</a>. <strong>Sarah Brown</strong>, Senior, has this to say about the Threesome's treatment of <a href="http://www.theeagleonline.com/scene/story/stereotypes-a-problem-for-lesbian-community">lesbian sex</a>: "I can look past the inaccurate comparison of lesbian sex to Jell-O shots, the offensive implication that lesbians are all biologically the same and even the language that suggests that 'encountering a lesbian' is similar to running into a strange creature in the wild," she writes. "What I cannot seem to move past, though, is the Editor’s Note at the bottom of the column, which reads: 'In an attempt to prevent misinterpretation, we would like to acknowledge our sex columnists are of varying sexual orientations and genders.'”</p>
<p><strong>Life Lesson</strong>: Newsflash: Gays and lesbians can offend gays and lesbians. Writes Brown: "While I’m glad that <em>The Eagle </em>has taken a non-heteronormative approach to the sex column, what this note implies is that <em>The Eagle</em> staff does not regard members of the LGBT community to be capable of saying things that offend and hurt persons in their community."</p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter: </strong>Good points, all. But really, how is one expected to get through a semester of sex column writing without including at least one offensive analogy to Jell-O shots? <strong>9.<br />
</strong></p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><strong>GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Sex Tips: </strong>This time around, <em>Hoya</em> sex columnist <strong>Colleen Leahey</strong> invites us to learn from experience. In "<a href="http://guide.thehoya.com/node/173#">How To Avoid The Pitfalls Of Drunken Flirting</a>," Leahey tells the story of "<strong>Ian</strong>" and "<strong>Emma</strong>," two Georgetown co-eds who only talk when they're wasted. As the semester goes on, the drunken flirting gets heated: “I just think you’re so beautiful," drunk Ian tells her one night. <em>What exactly do you want from this whole thing? </em>drunk Emma texted back. Weeks later, the hangover sets in: Drunk Ian's girlfriend wants to fight drunk Emma!</p>
<p><strong>Life Lesson:</strong> When a dude with a girlfriend goes astray, there is always a woman to blame. "Emma walked home with tear-filled eyes. She went to bed upset, feeling like some kind of worthless tease. The next day, however, her sadness turned to anger. Since when had this whole situation even become a big deal? Nothing had happened. And how was it solely her fault? Albeit, she had crossed a line, actually recognizing their flirtation, whereas Ian had merely straddled it. Yet, once she realized how wrong her actions had been, she immediately backed off. So, why did she deserve such scrutiny an entire month later?"</p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter</strong>: Double standards are a bitch. <strong>7.</strong></p>
<p><em>Photo via the </em><strong><em><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/2179143282/sizes/m/">Library of Congress</a></em><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/12/10/university-sex-columns-reviewed-drunken-flirting-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>University Sex Columns, Reviewed: Pro-Life Gays Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/05/university-sex-columns-reviewed-pro-life-gays-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/05/university-sex-columns-reviewed-pro-life-gays-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[progressive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university sex columns reviewed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The battle for ideological dominance in our nation's capital's collegiate sex columns continues. Are our local campus columnists on the forefront of radical sex writing, or are they bringing back the good old days of romance born out of  aggressive homophobia?
This week: pro-life gay man worries that if he could have children, his pro-choice boyfriend [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2376/2049417390_88d3034a42.jpg" alt="" width="420" height="315" /></p>
<p>The battle for <a href="http://www.campusprogress.org/opinions/4657/the-problem-with-the-campus-sex-column-movement">ideological dominance</a> in our nation's capital's collegiate sex columns continues. Are our local campus columnists on the forefront of radical sex writing, or are they bringing back the good old days of romance born out of  aggressive homophobia?</p>
<p>This week: pro-life gay man worries that if he could have children, his pro-choice boyfriend might kill them; how to talk to a girl without being a creep; your boyfriend is cheating on you to avoid rumors he's on the down low.</p>
<p><span id="more-7346"></span></p>
<p><strong>AMERICAN UNIVERSITY</strong></p>
<p><strong> Sex Tips:</strong> In this edition of the AU<em> Eagle</em>'s triple-threat sex column, <strong>Buster Darkhole</strong>, <strong>Maxwell Hillcrest</strong>, and <strong>Amber Sparkles</strong> take on the issue of  . . . <a href="http://www.theeagleonline.com/scene/story/politics-shouldnt-make-or-break-relationships">ideological rifts in on-campus relationships</a>. How apropos!</p>
<p>The inspiration: A pro-life man writes in to ask if his crush on a pro-<em>choice </em>man is too immoral to pursue. "While he and I can’t have children, it’s more the idea that if we had children he would be OK with killing them," he writes. "Is this enough to kill a relationship?” I bet you weren't expecting Buster Darkhole's response: "let me just say that it is a relief to find another pro-life gay on this campus."</p>
<p><strong>Life Lesson: </strong>The American University community contains at least two pro-life gay men.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter</strong>: Sorry, my brain just exploded attempting to accurately gauge the progressiveness of this situation. I think we'll split the odds and go for a 5.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><strong>UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND</strong></p>
<p><strong> Sex Tips:</strong> The<em> Diamondback</em>'s <a href="http://www.diamondbackonline.com/opinion/advice-head-of-the-class-1.834004">latest advice column</a> schools undergrads on how to "start up a conversation without seeming creepy." Columnist Esti Frischling's suggestion: " The rule is this: Any guy can get any girl. . . .  If you approach this situation knowing without a doubt that you are going to get some serious ass, your actual chances improve drastically," she writes. "Seeing as you already know you’re going to get with this girl in the near future, you can certainly start to relax around her. Suddenly, imagining her naked in class changes from awkward and creepy to fun and clairvoyant. . . . Keep in mind: You are the man."</p>
<p><strong>Life Lesson</strong>: She wants to fuck you.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter: </strong>Assuming that a strange woman wants to have sex with you whenever you like will inevitably lead to complications. As one commenter notes, it <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/27/university-sex-columns-reviewed-chivalrous-hook-up-edition/#comment-20649">ain't the first time</a> she's doled out this advice. So much for the "without seeming creepy" part. Zero.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><strong>HOWARD UNIVERSITY</strong></p>
<p><strong>Sex Tips: </strong>In this Howard University<em> Hilltop</em> <a href="http://www.thehilltoponline.com/perspective-double-standard-1.1999424">opinion piece</a>, <strong>Morgan Winbush </strong>attempts to get to the bottom of Howard's "dating double standard." She writes: "in a man’s world; you have to be on top of everything including your woman and your relationships. . . . Messing around with other women feed into the need for a man to feel as if he is needed. The more women who 'need' him the more he is solidified as a man possessing the qualities that are 'manly' and thusly proving himself to be the leader of the pack when it comes to female dependency. 'Is he gay?' 'Is he on the DL?' &#8212; the more female partners a man has the less likely these labels will be placed on him." But aggressively proving one's heterosexuality ain't just for men any more: "times have progressed and women want just as much ego rubbing as their counterparts."</p>
<p><strong>Life Lesson:</strong> Your boyfriend is cheating on you so that nobody thinks he's gay. At least now you can get in on the homophobic fun, too.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter: </strong>Winbush makes a good-faith effort to encourage fellow students to embrace female promiscuity alongside the traditional male version. In the meantime, she raises the specter of the guy on the "down low" without even giving a positive shout-out to the campus LGBT contingent. <strong>Three.</strong></p>
<p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lollaping/2049417390/"><strong>Ollie Crafoord</strong></a>, Creative Commons Attribution License 2.0</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/05/university-sex-columns-reviewed-pro-life-gays-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>University Sex Columns, Reviewed: Chivalrous Hook-Up Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/27/university-sex-columns-reviewed-chivalrous-hook-up-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/27/university-sex-columns-reviewed-chivalrous-hook-up-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Washington University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university sex columns reviewed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The fight for ideological dominance of D.C.’s college sex column “movement” rages on. Are our local campus columnists on the forefront of radical sex writing, or are they bringing back the good old days of valiant male chivalry&#8212;only drunker? This week: G.W. student fucks Marine; UMD students are bitches, dicks, or pussies; American University issues [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/02/marines-1.jpg" alt="" width="420" height="280" /></p>
<p>The fight for ideological dominance of D.C.’s <a href="http://www.campusprogress.org/opinions/4657/the-problem-with-the-campus-sex-column-movement">college sex column “movement”</a> rages on. Are our local campus columnists on the forefront of radical sex writing, or are they bringing back the good old days of valiant male chivalry&#8212;only drunker? This week: G.W. student fucks Marine; UMD students are bitches, dicks, or pussies; American University issues a Very Special sex column. It must be sweeps week:</p>
<p><span id="more-7175"></span><strong>GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY:</strong></p>
<p><strong> Sex Tips:</strong> In <strong>Layla</strong>'s <a href="http://media.www.gwhatchet.com/media/storage/paper332/news/2009/10/26/Life/Sex-Column.Supporting.Our.Troops-3812792.shtml">latest heterosexual female romp</a>, G.W.'s resident sex columnist extols upon the virtues of fucking servicemen. She also floats a revised idea of traditional courtship: Men are still confined to the rules of chivalry, but everyone gets drunk and you can do it whenever you feel like it. "Leaning against the bar, I spotted Prince Charming, an incredibly sexy combination of chivalry and a hint of danger, walking down the stairs," she writes of a random Marine she spots while sitting alone, "double fisting" drinks at the bar. "Having stubbornly worn my three-inch heels, I literally stumbled into his arms and swooned at how valiantly and easily he caught me. In my opinion, there is nothing sexier than a man with an accent, especially if its southern and he happens to call me ma'am." They decide to get it on. "Prince Charming grinned and pulled out an umbrella, proving that even in the face of a certain hookup, chivalry is not dead."</p>
<p><strong>Life Lesson: </strong>Layla insists there is "something scandalously orgasmic about making out with a marine in the middle of a bar to bad 80s music," proving that people are into some freaky shit. Side-note: Layla may needs to take some life lessons from <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/02/sexist-beatdown-buster-darkhole-and-the-conservative-college-sex-column/">the <strong>Buster Darkhole</strong> school of sex column euphemisms</a>. Her target is called "Prince Charming." Her friend? "GI Jane."</p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter:</strong> I count six references to "Prince Charming," two to "chivalry," and one each to "swooned" and "valiantly." Layla's column describes a thoroughly modern tale&#8212;they meet at a bar and hook up&#8212;but the vocabulary is stuck in another century.<strong> Three.</strong></p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><strong>THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Sex Tips:</strong> This time around in UMD senior<strong> Esti Frischling</strong>'s regular advice column, she tackles the problem of a third-wheel friend who <a href="http://www.diamondbackonline.com/opinion/advice-time-to-stop-snitchin-1.795902">knows that one of the coupled-up friends is cheating on the other</a>. Frischling's advice&#8212;don't snitch, but encourage them to break up, and if they don't, go ahead and fuck the one who's getting screwed over&#8212;isn't as memorable as the way she tells it:</p>
<p>- "You better not rat either way (bitch)."<br />
- "I mean, he can’t possibly see her as marriage material if he’s having all this premarital sex with all the sluts, right?"<br />
- "approach the guy and say something along the lines of (and feel free to quote me directly) 'Dude stop being such a dick — your girl is hot, lay off the adulterous pussy.'”<br />
- "I say—and this is my final answer by the way—blow up his spot and f&#8212; his girl. Yeah."</p>
<p><strong>Life Lesson</strong>: Apparently, bitches, sluts, dicks, and pussies are A-OK in the <em>Diamondback</em>. But in the end, all we get is a "f&#8212;."</p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter:</strong> While it's difficult to discern a political bent in decisions over snitching, I do find the emphasis on "marriage material," "premarital sex," and "sluts" a bit off-putting here. You're in <em>college</em>. Stop rating the validity of your relationships on whether or not you're planning to get hitched to the person you're currently doing. On the other hand, the advice that the advice-seeker "f&#8212; his girl"  seems to be applied with no concern as to whether the advice-seeker is male or female. Cool. <strong>Five.</strong></p>
<p><strong>&#8212;<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>AMERICAN UNIVERSITY:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Sex Tips: </strong>This go-around, AU's trio of porn-named sex columnists&#8212;<strong>Amber Sparkles, Buster Darkhole, and Maxwell Hillcrest</strong>&#8212;have teamed up to deliver a Very Special sex column about <a href="http://www.theeagleonline.com/scene/story/planning-ahead-helps-ease-worries-in-bed">personal responsibility</a>. This conversation&#8212;how to avoid unwanted pregnancies, STIs, abuse, and disappointment&#8212;is important. But Sparkles, Darkhole, and Hillcrest may be biting off more than they can chew here. The column is a little bit about pleasure: "Many people enjoy sex without condoms—scratch that, nearly everyone enjoys the sensations of sex more without condoms." A little bit about shame: "it is your life. It is not the life of the girl who might yell 'slut' at you when you walk home from a fantastic evening." And a little bit about dying of AIDS: "imagine two boys at Apex going home together. They may have amazing sex, but if it is unprotected, the consequences can be fatal."</p>
<p><strong>Life Lesson: </strong>Sex undertaken without "planning ahead" can lead to babies, disease, and unhappiness.</p>
<p><strong>Progressive Meter:</strong> The column is titled "Planning ahead helps ease worries in bed," but the three-author treatment focuses entirely on sexual anxieties, and not on the peace of mind that can come with entering into sex fully prepared and ready to go. The intended take-away here&#8212;when you're having sex, you should be concerned with satisfying your personal needs and taking care of yourself, not conforming to societal expectations&#8212;is a fine one. Unfortunately, the message gets lost in a sea of downers about the possible outcomes of doin' it: campus shaming, misogyny, blood tests, abortion, and death. <strong>Four.</strong></p>
<p><em>Photo by <strong>Darrow Montgomery</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/27/university-sex-columns-reviewed-chivalrous-hook-up-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

