<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; ugly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/ugly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Morning After: Eyes on Road, Hand on Crotch Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/06/23/the-morning-after-eyes-on-road-hand-on-crotch-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/06/23/the-morning-after-eyes-on-road-hand-on-crotch-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cara kulwicki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[figleaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[masturbation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sady doyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the curvature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thomas mcaulay millar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ugly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yes means yes!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=11048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
* A new study suggests that 11 percent of male drivers under 30 are masturbating  on the road. No word on the habits of the ladies, who these days are cleared to both drive and touch their own genitalia&#8212;but can they do it at the same time? Get science on this.

* Figleaf supports Lindsay Beyerstein's [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3404/3591047991_6a6d72a304.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="358" /></p>
<p>* A new study suggests that 11 percent of male drivers under 30 <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/prweb/20100621/bs_prweb/prweb4167234_1">are masturbating  on the road</a>. No word on the habits of the ladies, who these days are cleared to both drive <em>and</em> touch their own genitalia&#8212;but can they do it at the same time? Get science on this.</p>
<p><span id="more-11048"></span></p>
<p>* <strong>Figleaf </strong>supports <strong>Lindsay Beyerstein</strong>'s assertion that Palin is a feminist&#8212;<a href="http://www.realadultsex.com/archives/2010/06/lindsay-beyerstein-sarah-palin-feminism-being-spectrum-and-not-point-there-can-be-b">-the<em> worst</em> feminist</a>, amirite? Of Palin's contribution to the movement, he writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Maybe 10-15 years ago Michael Moore had a television series where he  did his <em>Bowling for Columbine/Roger and Me</em> schtick in generally  nicely-paced 10-15 minute segments.  I didn’t see very many episodes  (I’m not sure how many episodes there were) but in one of them he  managed to get himself invited on a skeet-shooting trip with the wives  of a bunch of conservative Republican congressmen. He seemed to get along well enough with them, and they with him, but  at one point he made a leading statement like “you know, I didn’t think  women could be so handy with a shotgun.  You’re better than a lot of  men I know.”  There was a little general laughter and one or another of  the women said something like “women can be better at a lot of things.”   He said something like “maybe some of you could run for Congress, you  might be really good at that too.”  And the women just sort of clammed  up and looked at each other like that was a <em>terrible</em> idea.  And  that seemed like the point where he wore out his welcome.</p>
<p>Fast forward to today and, thanks in surprisingly large part to  Sarah Palin, I don’t think Moore would have gotten the same shocked or  embarrassed silence were he to try the same stunt now.</p></blockquote>
<p>* The Curvature's <strong>Cara Kulwicki</strong> on the efforts of Australian detectives to <a href="http://thecurvature.com/2010/06/21/former-detective-tells-of-intimidation-to-drop-rape-charges-against-football-players/">derail the investigation of a rape case</a>.</p>
<p>* <strong>Thomas McAulay Millar </strong>at Yes Means Yes! <a href="http://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2010/06/21/insults-independent-of-the-truth/">on "ugly"</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>some insults appear to be empirical claims, but are effective even  when demonstrably untrue.  “Ugly” is like that.  Antifeminist trolls  call even the most obviously conventionally attractive women ugly; and  it still has some power, even when used against women famous for their  beauty.  Why?Why indeed.  Because they’re not empirical claims at all.  They are  claims that assert a truth <strong>based in social structure. </strong> “Ugly” and “slut” work not because of the truth of the matter asserted,  but primarily and often exclusively because there are elements of the  culture that work to instill in every woman an insecurity that these  things are true.  The insult is really a claim about the existence of an  insecurity; and the hurling of the insult itself is part of the social  structure that creates and maintains the unsecurity.  And I know several  prominent feminists who admit that some of these insults sting even if  rationally they know it’s untrue, for just that reason.  It takes a  strong woman to really just remain unaffected by it.  A lot of women  I’ve talked to over the years remember vividly when Kathleen Hanna wrote  “slut” on herself in lipstick, because it was a difficult and radical  thing to do.</p></blockquote>
<p>* <strong>Sady Doyle</strong> is smart, and <a href="http://tigerbeatdown.com/2010/06/22/dirty-girls-and-bad-feminists-a-few-thoughts-on-i-love-dick/">talks about books</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/06/23/the-morning-after-eyes-on-road-hand-on-crotch-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Week In Sexist History: Swimming Makes You Ugly Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/20/this-week-in-sexist-history-swimming-makes-you-ugly-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/20/this-week-in-sexist-history-swimming-makes-you-ugly-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misogyny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pretty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexist history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swimming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swimsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ugly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newspaper stories from the good old days say the darndest things. So every week on the Sexist, let’s take a ride on journalism’s way-back machine, to a time when male reporters did not prefer their women to be dripping wet from head to toe. I know&#8212;it was a crazy, crazy, time kids. This week, our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newspaper stories from the good old days say the darndest things. So every week on the <em>Sexist</em>, let’s take a ride on journalism’s way-back machine, to a time when male reporters <em>did not</em> prefer their women to be dripping wet from head to toe. I know&#8212;it was a crazy, crazy, time kids. This week, our intrepid <em>NYT</em> columnist goes on&#8212;and on, and on, and on&#8212;about "what the fair sex wears in the surf," insulting everyone. Pages upon pages of beach-bound misogyny, footnoted for modern readers, below.</p>
<p><strong>This Week In Sexist History:</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6002" title="Picture 54" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Picture-54.png" alt="Picture 54" width="372" height="165" /><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span id="more-5978"></span>Good Ol’ Day</strong>: August 20, 1883</p>
<p><strong>Dateline</strong>: Long Branch, NJ</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6004" title="Swim1" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim1.jpg" alt="Swim1" width="420" height="681" /></p>
<p><strong>1. </strong>Women must be pretty.</p>
<p><strong>2. </strong>But they are born ugly, so we must make them pretty.</p>
<p><strong>3</strong>. Women who go to the beach make this task very difficult for us.</p>
<p><strong>4.</strong> And women who actually <em>swim </em>are nearly beyond help.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>5.</strong> It <em>is </em>rather amusing, however, just <em>how</em> ugly swimming makes women!</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6005" title="Swim2" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim2.jpg" alt="Swim2" width="420" height="726" /></p>
<p><strong>6. </strong>Women who swim are so ugly, they don't even want men to look at their ugly bodies! But we do look at them, and then detail their hideousness in the pages of the <em>New York Times.</em></p>
<p><strong>7. </strong>Well, at least they are still wealthy.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>8. </strong>Though these ugly, oceanic women allow no one to see how profoundly uncomfortable they are, I know they are profoundly uncomfortable<strong>, </strong>because I <em>understand women.</em><strong> </strong>Even the ugly ones.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>9. </strong>If a woman is not pretty, then she does not enjoy herself. As is proper.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>10.</strong> But perhaps the water will help to cure her extreme ugliness anyhow.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>11.</strong> And remember, even Butterfaces could be hiding a sensual ankle in the surf.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6006" title="Swim 3" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim-3.jpg" alt="Swim 3" width="420" height="725" /></p>
<p><strong>12</strong>. [Obligatory rhapsodic account of historical beach leering].</p>
<p><strong>13.</strong> [Obligatory rhapsodic account of modern beach leering].</p>
<p><strong>14.</strong> Foreign women! They are kind of hot, but so ignorant of the customs of our modern American beach leering!</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6007" title="Swim 4" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim-4.jpg" alt="Swim 4" width="420" height="741" /></p>
<p><strong>15.</strong> This one hot foreign actress wore the ugliest swimsuit one time.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>16. </strong>She was a shitty actress, too.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>17.</strong> Yes, I am using the term "dudes." In 1883.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>18. </strong>Girls can't swim!<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>19. </strong>Well, at least they display their pearly white arms when they're trying. Oh, did I mention that I am also a racist?</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6009" title="Swim 5" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim-51.jpg" alt="Swim 5" width="420" height="468" /></p>
<p><strong>20.</strong> One reason for women to swim, of course, is to wear an outfit which mimics an animal's yoke, in order to infer that she would make a good, obedient wife.</p>
<p><strong>21. </strong>Have I not sufficiently compared women to animals? Women women zebras.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6010" title="Swim 6" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim-6.jpg" alt="Swim 6" width="420" height="650" /></p>
<p><strong>22. </strong>Now I am leering at children.</p>
<p><strong>23.</strong> Aaaaand back to the racism.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6011" title="swim 7" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/swim-7.jpg" alt="swim 7" width="420" height="424" /></p>
<p><strong>24.</strong> Old women are disgusting and must be kept indoors.</p>
<p><strong>25. </strong>I like watching girls fall down.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>26. </strong>Middle-aged women are the most heinous, for they insist upon swimming, though their bodies are universally reviled.</p>
<p><strong>27. </strong>Have I mentioned swimming is for men?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/20/this-week-in-sexist-history-swimming-makes-you-ugly-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sears &#8220;Busted Moms&#8221; Contest Perhaps Ill-Conceived</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/27/sears-busted-moms-contest-perhaps-ill-conceived/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/27/sears-busted-moms-contest-perhaps-ill-conceived/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[busted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[busted moms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ugly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Sears is currently holding a contest encouraging mothers to share their worst recession stories in the  hopes of winning "a $2500 Mommy Makeover Package."  The promotion is titled "Busted Moms."

Sears explains:
Has the ECONOMY left you feeling BUSTED?
Being a mom isn’t easy. Being a mom right now is even harder. Sears is here to help you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://photos-h.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs031.snc1/2658_61022423245_61021903245_1719679_5762737_n.jpg" alt="" width="396" height="264" /></p>
<p>Sears is currently holding a contest encouraging mothers to share their worst recession stories in the  hopes of winning "a $2500 Mommy Makeover Package."  The promotion is titled "<a href="http://bustedmoms.com/">Busted Moms</a>."</p>
<p><span id="more-3351"></span></p>
<p>Sears explains:</p>
<blockquote><p>Has the ECONOMY left you feeling BUSTED?</p>
<p>Being a mom isn’t easy. Being a mom right now is even harder. Sears is here to help you out with a cool contest, great deals and random acts of kindness.Being a mom right now is even harder. Sears is here to help you out with a cool contest, great deals and random acts of kindness.</p></blockquote>
<p>Let's see what urban dictionary has to say about being "<a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=busted">busted</a>":</p>
<blockquote><p>1. 	<strong>busted</strong></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>A way to describe a very ugly female, who can barely be described as female. A "busted" female is not even considered for Mercy Sex simply because they are so ugly.</p>
<p><em> Yo Jamal, I saw you with your chick at the movies, she so busted she couldn't even get a date with a convicted killer in jail for the past 50 years. Wanna go to KFC?</em></p></blockquote>
<p>No. Just, no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/27/sears-busted-moms-contest-perhaps-ill-conceived/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New GPS Chastity Belt Very Unattractive</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/11/10/new-gps-chastity-belt-very-unattractive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/11/10/new-gps-chastity-belt-very-unattractive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chastity belt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lingerie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ugly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unattractive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underwear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UK's Daily Mail is reporting that "Feminists around the world have reacted with horror" to a new lingerie product that attaches a GPS tracker to a very unattractive underwear set. The bra and panties set, which includes a hideous faux-pearl choker along with a high-tech global positioning system, sells for 500 pounds and is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/11/03/article-1082707-024DEC48000005DC-955_233x423.jpg" alt="" width="233" height="423" />The UK's <em>Daily Mail</em> is reporting that "Feminists around the world have reacted with horror" to a <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1082707/Outrage-chastity-belt-lingerie-fitted-GPS-tracking-system.html">new lingerie product that attaches a GPS tracker</a> to a very unattractive underwear set. The bra and panties set, which includes a hideous faux-pearl choker along with a high-tech global positioning system, sells for 500 pounds and is extremely ugly.</p>
<p>"It is outrageous to think that men can buy this, programme it and give it to their partners and then monitor them," Berlin feminist leader <strong>Claudia Burghart</strong> said about the unfortunately designed lingerie. "It is nothing more than a chastity belt for insecure men."</p>
<p>Also offensive to women are the disgusting maroon rose print, the trashy sheer bodice, the inexplicable white strings emanating from the vaginal area, and what appears to be a set of satin wings attached to the woman's arms by elastic straps.</p>
<p>Brazilian designer <strong>Lucia Lorio</strong> defended her lingerie, describing it as a product for the "modern, techno-savvy woman" who has no taste. Lorio added that the collection "is a wink to women and a challenge to men because, even if she gives him the password to her GPS, she can always turn it off." Women should note that they may also take off the lingerie, and never, ever put it on again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/11/10/new-gps-chastity-belt-very-unattractive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

