<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; ugly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/ugly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:23:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>This Week In Sexist History: Swimming Makes You Ugly Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/20/this-week-in-sexist-history-swimming-makes-you-ugly-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/20/this-week-in-sexist-history-swimming-makes-you-ugly-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misogyny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pretty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexist history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swimming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swimsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ugly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newspaper stories from the good old days say the darndest things. So every week on the Sexist, let’s take a ride on journalism’s way-back machine, to a time when male reporters did not prefer their women to be dripping wet from head to toe. I know&#8212;it was a crazy, crazy, time kids. This week, our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newspaper stories from the good old days say the darndest things. So every week on the <em>Sexist</em>, let’s take a ride on journalism’s way-back machine, to a time when male reporters <em>did not</em> prefer their women to be dripping wet from head to toe. I know&#8212;it was a crazy, crazy, time kids. This week, our intrepid <em>NYT</em> columnist goes on&#8212;and on, and on, and on&#8212;about &#8220;what the fair sex wears in the surf,&#8221; insulting everyone. Pages upon pages of beach-bound misogyny, footnoted for modern readers, below.</p>
<p><strong>This Week In Sexist History:</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6002" title="Picture 54" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Picture-54.png" alt="Picture 54" width="372" height="165" /><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span id="more-5978"></span>Good Ol’ Day</strong>: August 20, 1883</p>
<p><strong>Dateline</strong>: Long Branch, NJ</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6004" title="Swim1" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim1.jpg" alt="Swim1" width="420" height="681" /></p>
<p><strong>1. </strong>Women must be pretty.</p>
<p><strong>2. </strong>But they are born ugly, so we must make them pretty.</p>
<p><strong>3</strong>. Women who go to the beach make this task very difficult for us.</p>
<p><strong>4.</strong> And women who actually <em>swim </em>are nearly beyond help.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>5.</strong> It <em>is </em>rather amusing, however, just <em>how</em> ugly swimming makes women!</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6005" title="Swim2" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim2.jpg" alt="Swim2" width="420" height="726" /></p>
<p><strong>6. </strong>Women who swim are so ugly, they don&#8217;t even want men to look at their ugly bodies! But we do look at them, and then detail their hideousness in the pages of the <em>New York Times.</em></p>
<p><strong>7. </strong>Well, at least they are still wealthy.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>8. </strong>Though these ugly, oceanic women allow no one to see how profoundly uncomfortable they are, I know they are profoundly uncomfortable<strong>, </strong>because I <em>understand women.</em><strong> </strong>Even the ugly ones.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>9. </strong>If a woman is not pretty, then she does not enjoy herself. As is proper.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>10.</strong> But perhaps the water will help to cure her extreme ugliness anyhow.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>11.</strong> And remember, even Butterfaces could be hiding a sensual ankle in the surf.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6006" title="Swim 3" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim-3.jpg" alt="Swim 3" width="420" height="725" /></p>
<p><strong>12</strong>. [Obligatory rhapsodic account of historical beach leering].</p>
<p><strong>13.</strong> [Obligatory rhapsodic account of modern beach leering].</p>
<p><strong>14.</strong> Foreign women! They are kind of hot, but so ignorant of the customs of our modern American beach leering!</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6007" title="Swim 4" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim-4.jpg" alt="Swim 4" width="420" height="741" /></p>
<p><strong>15.</strong> This one hot foreign actress wore the ugliest swimsuit one time.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>16. </strong>She was a shitty actress, too.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>17.</strong> Yes, I am using the term &#8220;dudes.&#8221; In 1883.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>18. </strong>Girls can&#8217;t swim!<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>19. </strong>Well, at least they display their pearly white arms when they&#8217;re trying. Oh, did I mention that I am also a racist?</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6009" title="Swim 5" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim-51.jpg" alt="Swim 5" width="420" height="468" /></p>
<p><strong>20.</strong> One reason for women to swim, of course, is to wear an outfit which mimics an animal&#8217;s yoke, in order to infer that she would make a good, obedient wife.</p>
<p><strong>21. </strong>Have I not sufficiently compared women to animals? Women women zebras.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6010" title="Swim 6" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim-6.jpg" alt="Swim 6" width="420" height="650" /></p>
<p><strong>22. </strong>Now I am leering at children.</p>
<p><strong>23.</strong> Aaaaand back to the racism.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6011" title="swim 7" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/swim-7.jpg" alt="swim 7" width="420" height="424" /></p>
<p><strong>24.</strong> Old women are disgusting and must be kept indoors.</p>
<p><strong>25. </strong>I like watching girls fall down.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>26. </strong>Middle-aged women are the most heinous, for they insist upon swimming, though their bodies are universally reviled.</p>
<p><strong>27. </strong>Have I mentioned swimming is for men?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/20/this-week-in-sexist-history-swimming-makes-you-ugly-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sears &#8220;Busted Moms&#8221; Contest Perhaps Ill-Conceived</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/27/sears-busted-moms-contest-perhaps-ill-conceived/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/27/sears-busted-moms-contest-perhaps-ill-conceived/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[busted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[busted moms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ugly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Sears is currently holding a contest encouraging mothers to share their worst recession stories in the  hopes of winning &#8220;a $2500 Mommy Makeover Package.&#8221;  The promotion is titled &#8220;Busted Moms.&#8221;

Sears explains:
Has the ECONOMY left you feeling BUSTED?
Being a mom isn’t easy. Being a mom right now is even harder. Sears is here to help you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://photos-h.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs031.snc1/2658_61022423245_61021903245_1719679_5762737_n.jpg" alt="" width="396" height="264" /></p>
<p>Sears is currently holding a contest encouraging mothers to share their worst recession stories in the  hopes of winning &#8220;a $2500 Mommy Makeover Package.&#8221;  The promotion is titled &#8220;<a href="http://bustedmoms.com/">Busted Moms</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-3351"></span></p>
<p>Sears explains:</p>
<blockquote><p>Has the ECONOMY left you feeling BUSTED?</p>
<p>Being a mom isn’t easy. Being a mom right now is even harder. Sears is here to help you out with a cool contest, great deals and random acts of kindness.Being a mom right now is even harder. Sears is here to help you out with a cool contest, great deals and random acts of kindness.</p></blockquote>
<p>Let&#8217;s see what urban dictionary has to say about being &#8220;<a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=busted">busted</a>&#8220;:</p>
<blockquote><p>1. 	<strong>busted</strong></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>A way to describe a very ugly female, who can barely be described as female. A &#8220;busted&#8221; female is not even considered for Mercy Sex simply because they are so ugly.</p>
<p><em> Yo Jamal, I saw you with your chick at the movies, she so busted she couldn&#8217;t even get a date with a convicted killer in jail for the past 50 years. Wanna go to KFC?</em></p></blockquote>
<p>No. Just, no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/27/sears-busted-moms-contest-perhaps-ill-conceived/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New GPS Chastity Belt Very Unattractive</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/11/10/new-gps-chastity-belt-very-unattractive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/11/10/new-gps-chastity-belt-very-unattractive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chastity belt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lingerie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ugly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unattractive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underwear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UK&#8217;s Daily Mail is reporting that &#8220;Feminists around the world have reacted with horror&#8221; to a new lingerie product that attaches a GPS tracker to a very unattractive underwear set. The bra and panties set, which includes a hideous faux-pearl choker along with a high-tech global positioning system, sells for 500 pounds and is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/11/03/article-1082707-024DEC48000005DC-955_233x423.jpg" alt="" width="233" height="423" />The UK&#8217;s <em>Daily Mail</em> is reporting that &#8220;Feminists around the world have reacted with horror&#8221; to a <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1082707/Outrage-chastity-belt-lingerie-fitted-GPS-tracking-system.html">new lingerie product that attaches a GPS tracker</a> to a very unattractive underwear set. The bra and panties set, which includes a hideous faux-pearl choker along with a high-tech global positioning system, sells for 500 pounds and is extremely ugly.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is outrageous to think that men can buy this, programme it and give it to their partners and then monitor them,&#8221; Berlin feminist leader <strong>Claudia Burghart</strong> said about the unfortunately designed lingerie. &#8220;It is nothing more than a chastity belt for insecure men.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also offensive to women are the disgusting maroon rose print, the trashy sheer bodice, the inexplicable white strings emanating from the vaginal area, and what appears to be a set of satin wings attached to the woman&#8217;s arms by elastic straps.</p>
<p>Brazilian designer <strong>Lucia Lorio</strong> defended her lingerie, describing it as a product for the &#8220;modern, techno-savvy woman&#8221; who has no taste. Lorio added that the collection &#8220;is a wink to women and a challenge to men because, even if she gives him the password to her GPS, she can always turn it off.&#8221; Women should note that they may also take off the lingerie, and never, ever put it on again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/11/10/new-gps-chastity-belt-very-unattractive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
