<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; The Guardian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/the-guardian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:40:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Morning After: Poor Me, Born Sexy Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/02/03/the-morning-after-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/02/03/the-morning-after-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Health Reality Check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Frisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Beatdown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=2524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
* Great, women claim even more power over Children. The New York Times reports on scientists who have discovered &#8220;a surprising new mechanism by which women train their fetuses’ budding immune systems: the mother’s cells slip across the placenta, enter the fetus’s body and teach it to treat these cells as its own.&#8221;
* Strapped for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1319/1313218304_ebae74acbf.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="420" height="315" /></p>
<p>* Great, women claim even more power over Children. <em>The New York Times </em><a href="http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2009/02/transfer-of-mothers-cells-molds-babys-immunity.html">reports on scientists who have discovered</a> &#8220;a surprising new mechanism by which women train their fetuses’ budding immune systems: the mother’s cells slip across the placenta, enter the fetus’s body and teach it to treat these cells as its own.&#8221;</p>
<p>* Strapped for cash? <a href="http://www.thefrisky.com/post/246-mother-of-14-sees-dollar-sign-in-octuplets-eyes/#When:20:00:01Z?eref=RSS">Birth 14 babies through science</a> [via <em>The Frisky</em>].</p>
<p><span id="more-2524"></span></p>
<p>* When you open up <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/12/17/they-came-with-my-body">your<strong> Reproductive Health Reality Check </strong>essay on body image</a> with this:</p>
<blockquote><p>I was saddened to read Hannah Whittaker’s <a href="http://www.thefword.org.uk/features/2008/01/glamour_models" target="_blank">article on The F Word</a> about her eating disorder a while back. I did, however, want to share the experiences of someone from the other side of the fence. I have what, for many women, is an extremely enviable figure. If I open a copy of <em>FHM</em>, the models don’t look like unattainable visions of tiny-waisted pneumatic perfection. They look like me . . .</p></blockquote>
<p>I may not read the remainder of your<strong> Reproductive Health Reality Check </strong>essay on body image.</p>
<p>*<strong> Tiger Beatdown</strong> does not defend <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/jan/30/women-gayrights">the<em> Guardian</em>&#8217;s defense of &#8220;political lesbianism</a>.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>Because &#8220;political lesbianism&#8221; reinforces the stereotype that women are not sexual; because it encourages straight women to appropriate lesbian experience; because it reinforces the stereotype that lesbians are all &#8220;going through a phase&#8221; that they can be fucked out of by men; because it encourages straight women to deny themselves a necessary, liberating, and life-affirming form of pleasure; because it inevitably leads to one-sided and sexually catastrophic lesbian relationships . . .</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://tigerbeatdown.blogspot.com/2009/02/why-not.html">etc.</a></p>
<p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bugeaters/1313218304/"><strong>bugeaters</strong></a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/02/03/the-morning-after-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Morning After</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/07/the-morning-after-21/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/07/the-morning-after-21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Morning After]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Washington University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgetown University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gossip Girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimbo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juicy Campus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roissy in D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Gay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
* Juicy Campus has hit George Washington University. How do G.W. gossips compare to Georgetown&#8217;s finest? So far, Juciy Campus&#8217; G.W. page seems to have a lot more nonsense on it. That&#8217;s a good thing, writes Travis of G.W. student blog The Colonialist: &#8220;I spent the weekend surfing the site a lot, putting up things [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3184/2919078322_f4d18c7eb4.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="500" height="336" /></p>
<p>* Juicy Campus <a href="http://www.juicycampus.com/posts/gossips/all-campuses/">has hit George Washington University</a>. How do G.W. gossips compare to <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/09/26/squeezed-juicy/">Georgetown&#8217;s finest</a>? So far, Juciy Campus&#8217; G.W. page seems to have a lot more nonsense on it. That&#8217;s a good thing, writes <strong>Travis </strong>of <a href="http://www.thecolonialist.com/2008/10/how-to-defeat-juicy-campus/">G.W. student blog <em>The Colonialist</em></a>: &#8220;I spent the weekend surfing the site a lot, putting up things about myself and my roommates. I’d like to openly admit to writing all 10 of the comments calling The GW Patriot racist. I’d be willing to bet that 80% of the posts on the site are done with the same innocent prank attitude. It’s a playground.&#8221;</p>
<p>* <em>The New Gay</em> blogger inspired, depressed by gay couples. TNG&#8217;s <strong>Jon</strong> <a href="http://www.thenewgay.net/2008/10/hrc-dinner-sick-of-single.html">surveyed the scene at the annual HRC fundraiser on Saturday</a>: &#8220;Men were holding hands, women were kissing, and partners were snuggling up and laughing together at their tables,&#8221; Jon laments. &#8220;This is all wonderful of course, but it served as an in-your-face reminder that I’m currently partner-less.&#8221;</p>
<p>* Sex blogger dude <strong>Roissy in D.C</strong>. says <a href="http://roissy.wordpress.com/2008/10/06/a-recession-will-mean-better-sex/">the recession will mean better sex</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>If a protracted and deep recession leads to the average woman cutting costs at the supermarket and steering clear of the high calorie packaged foodstuffs, it could mean more slender women and, consequently, better sex. . . . Hard times bring “hard” times.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmm. Maybe it will also teach Roissy a lesson in <a href="http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2006/05/11/healthyeating/">economics</a>.</p>
<p>* Local blogger <strong>Jimbo</strong> makes an appearance at Maryland Renaissance Festival, <a href="http://www.jimbo.info/weblog/2008/10/drinking-mead-and-spotting-evi-2.html">hears best catcall ever</a>: &#8220;Oooh, gurl, he&#8217;s dressed up like an evil sex sorceror.&#8221;</p>
<p>* Before the presidential face-offs resume tonight, let&#8217;s remember just how far we&#8217;ve come since last Thursday&#8217;s veep debates. Thanks to <em>The Guardian&#8217;</em>s <strong>Michelle Goldberg</strong> for highlighting <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2008/oct/03/sarah.palin.debate.feminism">Palin&#8217;s most nonsensical non-answer</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Say it ain&#8217;t so, Joe, there you go again pointing backwards again. You preferenced [sic] your whole comment with the Bush administration. Now doggone it, let&#8217;s look ahead and tell Americans what we have to plan to do for them in the future. You mentioned education, and I&#8217;m glad you did. I know education you are passionate about with your wife being a teacher for 30 years, and god bless her. Her reward is in heaven, right? &#8230; My brother, who I think is the best schoolteacher in the year, and here&#8217;s a shout-out to all those third graders at Gladys Wood Elementary School, you get extra credit for watching the debate.</p></blockquote>
<p>Shit, is it possible to just place a [sic] around an entire quote? Or to have one floating over her head every time she speaks? Get on it, magic Jesus.</p>
<p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dumbonyc/2919078322/"><strong>dumbonyc</strong></a>, in mourning of last night&#8217;s re-run of </em>Gossip Girl.<em> &#8211;XOXO, The Sexist</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/07/the-morning-after-21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
