<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; swimming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/swimming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>This Week In Sexist History: Swimming Makes You Ugly Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/20/this-week-in-sexist-history-swimming-makes-you-ugly-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/20/this-week-in-sexist-history-swimming-makes-you-ugly-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misogyny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pretty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexist history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swimming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swimsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ugly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newspaper stories from the good old days say the darndest things. So every week on the Sexist, let’s take a ride on journalism’s way-back machine, to a time when male reporters did not prefer their women to be dripping wet from head to toe. I know&#8212;it was a crazy, crazy, time kids. This week, our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newspaper stories from the good old days say the darndest things. So every week on the <em>Sexist</em>, let’s take a ride on journalism’s way-back machine, to a time when male reporters <em>did not</em> prefer their women to be dripping wet from head to toe. I know&#8212;it was a crazy, crazy, time kids. This week, our intrepid <em>NYT</em> columnist goes on&#8212;and on, and on, and on&#8212;about "what the fair sex wears in the surf," insulting everyone. Pages upon pages of beach-bound misogyny, footnoted for modern readers, below.</p>
<p><strong>This Week In Sexist History:</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6002" title="Picture 54" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Picture-54.png" alt="Picture 54" width="372" height="165" /><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span id="more-5978"></span>Good Ol’ Day</strong>: August 20, 1883</p>
<p><strong>Dateline</strong>: Long Branch, NJ</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6004" title="Swim1" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim1.jpg" alt="Swim1" width="420" height="681" /></p>
<p><strong>1. </strong>Women must be pretty.</p>
<p><strong>2. </strong>But they are born ugly, so we must make them pretty.</p>
<p><strong>3</strong>. Women who go to the beach make this task very difficult for us.</p>
<p><strong>4.</strong> And women who actually <em>swim </em>are nearly beyond help.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>5.</strong> It <em>is </em>rather amusing, however, just <em>how</em> ugly swimming makes women!</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6005" title="Swim2" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim2.jpg" alt="Swim2" width="420" height="726" /></p>
<p><strong>6. </strong>Women who swim are so ugly, they don't even want men to look at their ugly bodies! But we do look at them, and then detail their hideousness in the pages of the <em>New York Times.</em></p>
<p><strong>7. </strong>Well, at least they are still wealthy.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>8. </strong>Though these ugly, oceanic women allow no one to see how profoundly uncomfortable they are, I know they are profoundly uncomfortable<strong>, </strong>because I <em>understand women.</em><strong> </strong>Even the ugly ones.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>9. </strong>If a woman is not pretty, then she does not enjoy herself. As is proper.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>10.</strong> But perhaps the water will help to cure her extreme ugliness anyhow.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>11.</strong> And remember, even Butterfaces could be hiding a sensual ankle in the surf.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6006" title="Swim 3" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim-3.jpg" alt="Swim 3" width="420" height="725" /></p>
<p><strong>12</strong>. [Obligatory rhapsodic account of historical beach leering].</p>
<p><strong>13.</strong> [Obligatory rhapsodic account of modern beach leering].</p>
<p><strong>14.</strong> Foreign women! They are kind of hot, but so ignorant of the customs of our modern American beach leering!</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6007" title="Swim 4" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim-4.jpg" alt="Swim 4" width="420" height="741" /></p>
<p><strong>15.</strong> This one hot foreign actress wore the ugliest swimsuit one time.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>16. </strong>She was a shitty actress, too.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>17.</strong> Yes, I am using the term "dudes." In 1883.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>18. </strong>Girls can't swim!<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>19. </strong>Well, at least they display their pearly white arms when they're trying. Oh, did I mention that I am also a racist?</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6009" title="Swim 5" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim-51.jpg" alt="Swim 5" width="420" height="468" /></p>
<p><strong>20.</strong> One reason for women to swim, of course, is to wear an outfit which mimics an animal's yoke, in order to infer that she would make a good, obedient wife.</p>
<p><strong>21. </strong>Have I not sufficiently compared women to animals? Women women zebras.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6010" title="Swim 6" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/Swim-6.jpg" alt="Swim 6" width="420" height="650" /></p>
<p><strong>22. </strong>Now I am leering at children.</p>
<p><strong>23.</strong> Aaaaand back to the racism.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6011" title="swim 7" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/08/swim-7.jpg" alt="swim 7" width="420" height="424" /></p>
<p><strong>24.</strong> Old women are disgusting and must be kept indoors.</p>
<p><strong>25. </strong>I like watching girls fall down.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>26. </strong>Middle-aged women are the most heinous, for they insist upon swimming, though their bodies are universally reviled.</p>
<p><strong>27. </strong>Have I mentioned swimming is for men?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/20/this-week-in-sexist-history-swimming-makes-you-ugly-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Week In Sexist History: Bathing Beauties Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/07/22/this-week-in-sexist-history-bathing-beauties-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/07/22/this-week-in-sexist-history-bathing-beauties-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1893]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bathing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baywatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexist history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sketch artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swimming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swimsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newspaper stories from the good old days say the darndest things. So every week on the Sexist, let’s take a ride on journalism’s way-back machine, to a time when beach-bound girls were sexy, confident, and refreshingly childlike!
This Week In Sexist History:

Good 'Ol Day: July 22, 1893
Dateline: Long Branch, N.J.
Subject: The summer of 1893 is nearly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newspaper stories from the good old days say the darndest things. So <a href="../2009/07/14/tag/sexist-history/">every week on the Sexist</a>, let’s take a ride on journalism’s way-back machine, to a time when beach-bound girls were sexy, confident, and refreshingly childlike!</p>
<p><strong>This Week In Sexist History:</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5178" title="Picture 4" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/07/Picture-4.png" alt="Picture 4" width="384" height="343" /></p>
<p><span id="more-5177"></span><strong>Good 'Ol Day: </strong>July 22, 1893</p>
<p><strong>Dateline</strong><strong>:</strong> Long Branch, N.J.</p>
<p><strong>Subject:</strong> The summer of 1893 is nearly ruined for this sad sack New Jersey scene reporter&#8212;until the sexiest underage bather this side of puberty catches his roving eye!</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5182" title="Picture 5" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/07/Picture-5.png" alt="Picture 5" width="386" height="77" /></p>
<p>What's lifting these male vacationers from the depths of their pathetic existences? If you've been studying your Sexist History, you'd know that the answer probably <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/30/this-week-in-sexist-history-girls-girls-girls-edition/">starts with Pretty and ends with Girls</a>:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5179" title="Picture 6" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/07/Picture-6.png" alt="Picture 6" width="386" height="175" /></p>
<p>Oh, it makes no difference what shape you are in the freewheeling social scene of the Jersey surf! Unless, of course, you're "pretty girl" shaped, in which case your body will likely be obsessively detailed in the pages of the <em>New York Times.</em> Proceed:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5181" title="Picture 7" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/07/Picture-7.png" alt="Picture 7" width="386" height="211" /></p>
<p>Euugh! How old is the young lady in the red swimsuit, anyway? One the one hand, it's great that this girl is still in her spluttering-around-in-the-water bathing suit phase, and not yet in her crippled-by-body-issues bathing suit phase. On the other hand, I'm willing to bet the girl's sexy childhood innocence was shattered riiiiiight arrroooound July 23, 1893&#8212;the day this Skeevy Turn-Of-The-Century Reporter's ruminations on her sexy childhood innocence was printed in the pages of the<em> New York Times</em>.</p>
<p>How can Skeevy Turn-of-the-Century<em> </em>Reporter possibly redeem himself from the true skeeviness of ogling bathing children? By turning next to an even sleazier specimen: The Skeevy Turn-Of-The-Century Sketch Artist.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5180" title="Picture 8" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/07/Picture-8.png" alt="Picture 8" width="386" height="157" /></p>
<p>Done and done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/07/22/this-week-in-sexist-history-bathing-beauties-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

