<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; Rod Blagojevich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/rod-blagojevich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Palin: Andrew Sullivan Is Mean! Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/05/daily-palin-andrew-sullivan-is-mean-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/05/daily-palin-andrew-sullivan-is-mean-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Elton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rod Blagojevich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=2995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Watch out, Bobby J.: Palin makes an appearance at Mardi Gras
Welcome back to “Daily Palin,” in which we detail Sarah Palin’s refusal to go away—every day. The morning news from the biased, liberal, gay, mainstream media: 
* WHO WAS THE MEANEST TO SARAH OF ALL THE PEOPLE WHO WERE MEAN TO SARAH? Andrew Sullivan takes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3588/3297929850_4667437df3.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="420" height="315" /><em><br />
Watch out,<strong> Bobby J.</strong>: Palin makes an appearance at Mardi Gras</em><em></em></p>
<p><em>Welcome back to “Daily Palin,” in which we detail <strong>Sarah Palin</strong>’s refusal to go away—every day. The morning news from the biased, liberal, gay, mainstream media: </em></p>
<p>* WHO WAS THE MEANEST TO SARAH OF ALL THE PEOPLE WHO WERE MEAN TO SARAH? <strong>Andrew Sullivan </strong>takes the cake, says <strong> John Ziegler</strong>. Sez Zieg: "Andrew Sullivan is a guy who should never be allowed back in any remnant of the conservative movement after what he did, just on the Trig 'trutherism' issue. It’s just scandalous. I mean, this guy is still invited on major TV shows after coming forward with, and continuing, the theory that Gov. Palin faked a pregnancy of a Downs Syndrome child even after we found out that the daughter she was allegedly protecting was also pregnant, in a way made it absolutely biologically impossible."</p>
<p><span id="more-2995"></span></p>
<p>BUMMER: <strong>Curt Menard</strong>, mayor of Alaska's "Mat-Su Borough"(?), has died. You can thank Dr. Menard, <a href="http://sarahpalin-report.blogspot.com/2009/03/flags-lowered-for-mayor-menard.html">who was also a dentist</a>, for Sarah Palin's teeth, if you like them. Which is what she says at the end of this long, sprawling tribute to the man:</p>
<p>[youtube:v=6yyjhNd409g]</p>
<p>WHY LIBERALS REALLY HATE SARAH PALIN:<strong> <a href="http://race42008.com/2009/03/04/clarence-steele/">Clarence Thomas</a></strong><a href="http://race42008.com/2009/03/04/clarence-steele/"> redux</a>. "What’s happening to<strong> Michael Steele</strong> is what always happens to any conservative who happens to be a minority. Whether it was Clarence Thomas or Sarah Palin, <strong>Bobby Jindal </strong>and now Michael Steele, the liberal establishment simply cannot sit by while minority faces espouse a conservative belief.  It is the most threatening prospect to left wing power: the possibility that women, African Americans, Hispanics, and others would begin to embrace individual liberty rather than government dependency."</p>
<p>FIRST DUDE WINTER SPORTS CORNER: <strong>Todd Palin</strong> <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2008/09/24/bill/index.html">gets some advice from <strong>Bubba</strong></a>, via Palin family offical news conduit <strong>Greta Van Susteren</strong>:</p>
<blockquote><p>"When you break these gender roles there are all these subconscious expectations," [Clinton] said.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>"I think the trick is, if you're a husband and the woman is in the political role traditionally identified with men," said Clinton, "the trick is to give support that is unambiguous and clear and to also be there with advice privately, but to do it in a way that doesn’t, in a funny way, make her look weak."</p>
<p>. . . "Whenever you start changing the deck chairs and gender roles and family roles," said Clinton, “you have to be prepared for psychological as well as political sparks to fly, and my advice to [Todd Palin] is to keep that smile, don’t get defensive."</p></blockquote>
<p>SARAH PALIN: PLEEEEASE BE THE NEXT <strong>BLAGO</strong>. Now that <strong>Kim Elton</strong> has been whisked away on a standard-issue Obama administration unicorn to go serve his state in the liberal hell hole of Washington, D.C., <a href="http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/030409/loc_401010957.shtml">Sarah Palin has to find a replacement for him</a>: "Gov. Sarah Palin will make the appointment within 30 days, according to state law. Her appointment must be of a Democrat, and must be approved by the Senate's Democrats." My best wishes go out to the Governor that her appointment will be marred by profanity-filled wire-tapping tapes, or at least involve a protracted and reportedly callous consideration of <strong>Caroline Kennedy</strong>. Thanks.</p>
<p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/infrogmation/3297929850/"><strong>Infrogmation</strong></a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/05/daily-palin-andrew-sullivan-is-mean-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois Pharmacists Take Conscience to Court</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/19/illinois-pharmacists-take-consceince-to-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/19/illinois-pharmacists-take-consceince-to-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conscience rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergency contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmacists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rod Blagojevich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two Illinois pharmacists who refuse to provide emergency contraception will defend their right of denial in Illinois Supreme Court. The pharmacists, Luke Vander Bleek and Glen Kosirog, see themselves as conscientious objectors to some guy called Governor Rod Blagojevich's 2005 executive order requiring pharmacists to dispense contraception.
Their reasoning? "Deeply held religious convictions" coupled with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two Illinois pharmacists who <a href="http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/triage/2008/12/illinois-suprem.html">refuse to provide emergency contraception</a> will defend their right of denial in Illinois Supreme Court. The pharmacists, <span><span><strong>Luke Vander Bleek</strong> and <strong>Glen Kosirog</strong></span></span>, see themselves as conscientious objectors to some guy called Governor <strong>Rod </strong><span><span><strong>Blagojevich</strong>'s </span></span><span><span>2005 executive order requiring pharmacists to dispense contraception.</span></span></p>
<p>Their reasoning? "<span><span>Deeply held religious convictions" coupled with the belief "that the drug can act as an abortion-causing agent."</span></span></p>
<p>I'm interested to see how this pans out, especially in light of <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/18/bush-rules-conscience-over-contraception/">Bush's "conscience" rule, which was finalized yesterday</a>. <span><span>Illinois' ACLU reproductive rights project director </span></span><span><span><strong>Lorie Chaiten</strong> characterizes the conflict as between "</span></span><span><span>the right to free exercise of religion and the right to access reproductive health care.”</span></span></p>
<p>Well, if Vander Bleek and Kosirog lose, they can always <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/17/bitter-pill/">open up a pharmacy in Washington, D.C.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/19/illinois-pharmacists-take-consceince-to-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patricia Blagojevich: Well-Pay-to-Played</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/15/patricia-blagojevich-well-pay-to-played/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/15/patricia-blagojevich-well-pay-to-played/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feministing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patricia Blagojevich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political wives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rod Blagojevich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The feminist blogosphere is up in arms about coverage of Patricia Blagojevich's role in her husband's scandal. Lady Blagojevich is reported as saying, among other things, that they ought to "hold up that [expletive] Cubs [expletive] ... [expletive] them." Which is so [expletive], I can't even tell what it means! But some bloggers aren't into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/012678.html">feminist blogosphere is up in arms</a> about coverage of <strong>Patricia Blagojevich</strong>'s role in her husband's scandal. Lady Blagojevich is reported as saying, among other things, that they ought to "hold up that [expletive] Cubs [expletive] ... [expletive] them." Which is so [expletive], I can't even tell what it means! But some bloggers aren't into how "reporters" are covering her part in the mess. Let's take a look.</p>
<p>From <strong>Feministing</strong>'s analysis of the coverage:</p>
<blockquote><p>While many are in shock and awe over the "brash" phone conversations she took part in that resulted in the charges against the governor, the Times' tabloidy take on Blagojevich by painting her as this "first lady gone bad" is just tacky. . . . Taking any opportunity to paint women involved in politics as divisive and manipulating is sadly an old tactic by mainstream media. But when it specifically comes to women who are married to men involved in political scandals, the media seems to usually victimize them for not knowing about their husband's "double life." This case, however, is different; her knowledge of it immediately makes her not only his partner in crime, but the trophy wife turned trickster.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmm. I'm not sure, given the evidence, how the media is expected to cover either Blagojevich as <em>not</em> "divisive and manipulative." And isn't there something refreshing about that?</p>
<p>I, for one, far prefer Patricia's totally gun-ho <em>[expletive]-that-[expletive]-and-[expletive]-them</em> role in this scandal to the alternative: trotting out on stage with a big 'ol frowny face and being Very Disappointed in Your Husband. Sure, this not being a sex scandal makes it a lot easier for Patricia to jump on board here. But you know what they say: the couple that pays-to-play together, stays together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/15/patricia-blagojevich-well-pay-to-played/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rod Blagojevich Reproductive Rights Video Corner</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/11/rod-blagojevich-reproductive-rights-video-corner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/11/rod-blagojevich-reproductive-rights-video-corner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oopsie-daisies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rod Blagojevich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2006, Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich was busy supporting the reproductive rights of women in his state and sitting down for mock interviews with Daily Show correspondent Jason Jones. Now, Blagojevich is all, "oopsie-daisies, I engineered a pay-for-play move to auction off Barack Obama's vacant senate seat to the highest-bidding douchebag . . . but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2006, Illinois Governor <strong>Rod Blagojevich </strong>was busy supporting the reproductive rights of women in his state and sitting down for mock interviews with <em>Daily Show</em> correspondent <strong>Jason Jones</strong>. Now, Blagojevich is all, "oopsie-daisies, I engineered a pay-for-play move to auction off <strong>Barack Obama</strong>'s vacant senate seat to the highest-bidding douchebag . . . <em>but what if it is I who is the highest-bidding douchebag</em>." Who's laughing now, Blagojevich? Well, I guess <em>The Daily Show</em> is still laughing. Come, gentle reader, and take a trip through the annals of time to a year when Blagojevich was merely an unsuspecting douchebag, and not a totally universally fucked one.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="360" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:115852" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:115852" wmode="window" flashvars="autoPlay=false" bgcolor="#000000"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/11/rod-blagojevich-reproductive-rights-video-corner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

