<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; Lou Chibarro Jr.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/lou-chibarro-jr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Marriage in D.C.: How Soon Is Now?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/05/gay-marriage-in-dc-how-soon-is-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/05/gay-marriage-in-dc-how-soon-is-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Emerling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loose Lips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Chibarro Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Debonis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Blade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[City Paper's Loose Lips columnist, Mike DeBonis, has the run-down on a D.C. gay marriage timeline:
In the Blade, Lou Chibbaro Jr. runs down some of the challenges facing a ballot referendum banning gay marriage in the District. They are many: For one, 21,000 signatures is a lot.
Meanwhile, in WaTimes, Gary Emerling examines how gay-marriage advocates [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>City Paper</em>'s Loose Lips columnist, <strong>Mike DeBonis</strong>, has the run-down on a D.C. gay marriage timeline:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the Blade, <strong>Lou Chibbaro Jr.</strong> <a href="http://www.washblade.com/2008/12-5/news/localnews/13706.cfm">runs down</a> some of the challenges facing a ballot referendum banning gay marriage in the District. They are many: For one, 21,000 signatures is a lot.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Meanwhile, in WaTimes, <strong>Gary Emerling</strong> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/dec/05/same-sex-marriage-activists-regroup/">examines how gay-marriage advocates are “re-evaluating their strategy.”</a> Pretty much everybody says it’s all about timing. Emerling manages to get one minister on the record, the Rev. <strong>Derrick Harkins</strong> of Nineteenth Street Baptist, who says he doesn’t think a bill “would be met with great enthusiasm on the part of the African-American church.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/05/gay-marriage-in-dc-how-soon-is-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ex-Gays Not Sure What &#8220;Lawsuit&#8221; Means</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/24/ex-gays-not-sure-what-lawsuit-means/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/24/ex-gays-not-sure-what-lawsuit-means/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ex-gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Chibarro Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFOX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A group of ex-gays&#8212;people who claim they were once gay, but have turned straight&#8212;are now also claiming they've been snubbed by the D.C. Office of Human Rights, The Blade's Lou Chibarro, Jr. reports:
 Parents                 &#38;     [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A group of ex-gays&#8212;people who claim they were once gay, but have turned straight&#8212;are now also claiming they've been snubbed by the D.C. Office of Human Rights, The<em> Blade</em>'s <strong>Lou Chibarro, Jr</strong>. reports:</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="maintext"> Parents                 &amp;                 Friends                 of                 Ex-Gays                 &amp;                 Gays,                 a                 national                 group                 known                 as                 PFOX,                 last                 week                 announced                 it                 was                 “suing”                 the                 D.C.                 Office                 of                 Human                 Rights                 to                 overturn                 a                 decision                 that                 ex-gays                 do                 not                 belong                 to                 a                 protected                 category                 under                 the                 city’s                 Human                 Rights                 Act.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>Well, that depends by what you mean by "suing." According to Chibarro, "<span class="maintext">An                 office                 spokesperson                 called                 the                 PFOX                 announcement                 inaccurate,                 though,                 and                 noted                 the                 group                 filed                 a                 petition,                 not                 a                 lawsuit,                 before                 the                 D.C.                 Superior                 Court                 to                 appeal                 the                 2005                 decision."</span></p>
<p>PFOX fired back, calling the petition “a                 lawsuit                 of                 sorts.”</p>
<p>The fake lawsuit "<span class="maintext">stems                 from                 a                 decision                 to                 dismiss                 a                 complaint                 that                 PFOX                 filed                 against                 the                 National                 Education                 Association," which said that the NEA "discriminated                 against                 “ex-gays”                 as                 a                 class                 by                 denying                 a                 PFOX                 application                 to                 maintain                 an                 exhibit                 booth                 during                 a                 2003                 NEA                 convention."<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/24/ex-gays-not-sure-what-lawsuit-means/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

