<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; knocked up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/knocked-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:40:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin And the &#8220;Hypocrisy&#8221; Trap</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/16/sarah-palin-and-the-hypocrisy-trap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/16/sarah-palin-and-the-hypocrisy-trap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abstinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beauty pageants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bristol Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jokes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knocked up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Craig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teen pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Willow Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It is a simple formula for both comedy and political commentary:
Take a public figure (Sarah Palin) who holds disagreeable views (abstinence-only education). Zero in on an aspect of her personal life counter to those views (her own teen daughter, Bristol Palin, becoming pregnant). Reveal the comedic irony and/or hypocrisy of the public/private contrast. Repeat ad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3245/2811932505_7e4f64cfac.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="420" height="280" /></p>
<p>It is a simple formula for both comedy and political commentary:</p>
<p>Take a public figure (<strong>Sarah Palin</strong>) who holds disagreeable views (abstinence-only education). Zero in on an aspect of her personal life counter to those views (her own teen daughter, <strong>Bristol Palin</strong>,<strong> </strong>becoming pregnant). Reveal the comedic irony and/or hypocrisy of the public/private contrast. Repeat ad nauseam on blogs, 24-hour news channels, and late night talk shows.</p>
<p>We should all beware this construction. Though very easy to pull off&#8212;and often journalistically and comedically sound&#8212;it is a trap. And it will render us all hypocrites. Three lessons from history, after the jump.</p>
<p><span id="more-4475"></span></p>
<p><strong>SARAH PALIN</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-X6FUwBmclo"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/-X6FUwBmclo/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p>
<p><strong>DISAGREEABLE VIEW:</strong> Too many to count, but in this case, it&#8217;s the abstinence thing.</p>
<p><strong>HYPOCRITICAL MOVE:</strong> When Palin&#8217;s 17-year-old daughter <strong>Bristol </strong>became pregnant months before Palin rose to political fame as<strong> John McCain</strong>&#8217;s running mate in the 2008 presidential election, political commentators and comedians held up Bristol&#8217;s pregnancy as evidence that abstinence is futile&#8212;even under the roof of your state&#8217;s no-sex-before-marriage Governor.</p>
<p><strong>IT&#8217;S A TRAP!</strong> The revelation came at the height of election season fervor, and liberal commentators ate Bristol&#8217;s sexual activity up with a spoon. The term &#8220;knocked up&#8221; became par for the course. When the baby&#8217;s father, <strong>Levi Johnston</strong>, told <strong>Tyra Banks</strong> that he and Bristol had practiced safe sex, Tyra et. al dismissed him as a liar. The late-night comedy cycle feasted on the Bristol-is-a-slut jokes. Even Palin family cheerleader <strong>Greta Van Susteren</strong> asked Bristol if she had been &#8220;lazy.&#8221;</p>
<p>We forgot that even the most responsible of 17-year-old condom users don&#8217;t put it on right every time. We forgot that condoms break. And we forgot that, when you&#8217;re the governor&#8217;s daughter in the small town of Wasilla, requesting birth control from your family doctor, seeking Plan B at a local pharmacy, or even buying condoms&#8212;anywhere&#8212;could cause such a shit-storm for you, your boyfriend, and your family, that it would have been hard to mount the courage to even approach the counter.</p>
<p>At some point, we forgot about why Bristol having sex was funny to begin with. The insane glee that we all derived from a teenage girl having sex before marriage became counter-intuitive&#8212;and downright creepy. We had crossed the hypocrisy bridge. We were no longer making a point about how young women should be free to choose to be sexually active. We no longer joked to show how bogus abstinence was. We joked to show that Bristol Palin was slutty, and that was enough to make it funny.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><strong>CARRIE PREJEAN</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XMvviFbkf0"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/8XMvviFbkf0/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p>
<p><strong>DISAGREEABLE VIEW:</strong> During the Q-and-A section of  the 2009 Miss USA pageant, Miss USA California <strong>Carrie Prejean</strong> described her views on same-sex marriage this way:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I think it&#8217;s great that americans are able to choose one or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage, and in my country, and my family, I think that I believe that marriage should be a man or a woman. No offense to anyone out there, but that was how I was raised, and that&#8217;s how I think it should be. Between a man and a woman. Thank you.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>HYPOCRITICAL MOVE:</strong> After rising to blogosphere infamy&#8212;with the help of question-asker <strong>Perez Hilton</strong>&#8217;s videoblog declaring her a &#8220;bitch&#8221;&#8212;Prejean&#8217;s past modeling career caught up to her. When topless photos of the 21-year-old Prejean surfaced on the Web, Prejean was accused of both violating her pageant contract and preaching inconsistent moral views. Who is she to preach good Christian values when she&#8217;s flaunting her assets for cash?</p>
<p><strong>IT&#8217;S A TRAP! </strong>Wait a second&#8212;since when did we start caring about women upholding the contractual obligations of beauty pageants? Pageants are among the most sexist and anti-feminist of American traditions. They encourage patriarchal views about the traditional roles women and men should hold in society. And guess what&#8212;gays don&#8217;t have a place there.</p>
<p>But the patriarchy is also responsible for one of the most damaging of all hypocrisy constructions: the virgin-whore dichotomy. Shaming Carrie Prejean&#8212;a woman we&#8217;ve elevated through beauty pageants&#8212;for taking topless modeling photos is a very short leap for shaming gays and lesbians for expressing their sexuality. That&#8217;s why this whole thing was hypocritical in the first place&#8212;but perhaps we&#8217;re all too distracted by Carrie Prejean&#8217;s boobs to remember. We may keep posting them in the interest of &#8220;revealing hypocrisy.&#8221; But we all know the real reason they&#8217;re on the Web: It&#8217;s not hypocrisy anymore; it&#8217;s hotness.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><strong>LARRY CRAIG</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWjXedX7pLA"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/xWjXedX7pLA/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p>
<p><strong>DISAGREEABLE VIEW:</strong> As a Republican Senator from Idaho, Craig often championed conservative moral values. <strong>William Saletan</strong> got specific in 2007, pointing out that Craig &#8220;<a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=103&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00380" target="_blank">helped to enact</a> the military&#8217;s &#8216;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8217; policy,&#8221; revealing his &#8220;anti-gay hypocrisy.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>HYPOCRITICAL MOVE: </strong>In June of 2007, Craig was arrested for soliciting sex from a male undercover cop in the Minneapolis airport:</p>
<blockquote><p>According to the <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2172982/">report</a> filed by the officer who arrested Craig at the Minneapolis airport in June, Craig stood outside the officer&#8217;s bathroom stall for two minutes, repeatedly looked at the officer &#8220;through the crack in the door,&#8221; sat in the stall next to the officer, tapped his foot, and gradually &#8220;moved his right foot so that it touched the side of my left foot … within my stall area.&#8221; Craig proceeded to &#8220;swipe his hand under the stall divider for a few seconds&#8221; three times, palm up, using the hand farthest from that side of Craig&#8217;s stall. Most of these gestures, the officer explained, were <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2173033/">known pickup signals</a> in a room known (and hence under surveillance for) public sex. When the officer took Craig outside and told him so, Craig claimed he had been reaching down with his hand to retrieve a piece of paper from the floor. The officer wrote that no such paper had been on the floor.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>IT&#8217;S A TRAP!</strong> I&#8217;ll admit it&#8212;this is rich, fertile ground for the hypocrisy construction. Craig blows Palin and Prejean out of the water with this Perfect 10 hypocritical move: enacting anti-gay policies in law, and being gay in private. Jokes at Craig&#8217;s expense were easy, valid, and very popular.</p>
<p>Conservatives, when not denying that any of this happened, joined in the shit-throwing. After all, this is the stuff homophobes&#8217; nightmares are made of&#8212;strange gay men attempting to have sex with them while they&#8217;re taking care of business in a public restroom. For them, Craig reinforced the idea that homosexuals are sick and disgusting individuals just waiting to pounce on your unsuspecting bare penis. In other words, gays can pose a very real threat to their heterosexuality, and Craig proved it.</p>
<p>And yet, those who railed against Craig&#8217;s institutionalized homophobia were the ones who took the most immense joy in the gay jokes. So&#8212;again&#8212;reveling in jokes about Larry Craig being gay began to lose their hypocritical anchor. On some level, the hypocritical construction allows people with pro-gay political views to indulge in some homophobic ribbing of their own. They see a rare window where making fun of gay sex is politically acceptable, and they sieze it. It&#8217;s the same tale with Sarah Palin: People who support progressive sexual health policies, like comprehensive sex education, sieze the opportunity to make jokes about sluts. It&#8217;s the same tale with Carrie Prejean: People who rail against patriarchal values, like &#8220;opposite marriage&#8221; and beauty pageants, sieze the opportunity to make sexist jokes.</p>
<p>So, let&#8217;s all try not to descend too deeply into the hypocrisy construction&#8217;s rabbit hole. Fall too far, and we become ripe for ironic commentary ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/16/sarah-palin-and-the-hypocrisy-trap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Judd Apatow, From All the Lady Douchebags</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/05/dear-judd-apatow-from-all-the-lady-douchebags/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/05/dear-judd-apatow-from-all-the-lady-douchebags/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[douche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[douchebag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judd apatow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knocked up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lady-douche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superbad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Alright Judd Apatow,
You did it. You made us cry. I want to blame it all on the Loudon Wainwright III track you craftily played over the end credits of &#8220;Knocked Up,&#8221; but I can&#8217;t. I&#8217;ll admit it. I believe that there is a part deep inside of you&#8212;way, way &#8220;Freaks and Geeks&#8221; deep inside&#8212;that understands [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Judd_Apatow.jpg/401px-Judd_Apatow.jpg" alt="" width="401" height="599" /></p>
<p>Alright Judd Apatow,</p>
<p>You did it. <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/05/sexist-beatdown-ladies-love-dude-comedies-edition/">You made us cry</a>. I want to blame it all on the <strong>Loudon Wainwright III </strong>track you craftily played over the end credits of &#8220;Knocked Up,&#8221; but I can&#8217;t. I&#8217;ll admit it. I believe that there is a part deep inside of you&#8212;way, way &#8220;<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0193676/">Freaks and Geeks</a>&#8221; deep inside&#8212;that understands characters that might appeal to the lady douchebags among us.</p>
<p><span id="more-4262"></span></p>
<p>First, we&#8217;d like to commend you on your achievement of crafting some of the most enduring male douchebags of film. The films you&#8217;ve written, directed, or produce have been rife with these lovable douche-cads: <strong>Seth </strong>of<em> Superbad</em>, who coined the term &#8220;shmashmortion&#8221;;<strong> Ben</strong> of <em>Knocked Up</em>, who endearingly cradled his bong instead of his pregnant girlfriend during an earthquake; <strong>David</strong> of <em>40 Year Old Virgin, </em>who memorably opined, &#8220;You know how you know you&#8217;re gay?&#8221;</p>
<p>And yet, that mastercraftsmanship was eerily absent when forming the <em>40 Year Old Virgin</em>&#8217;s three main female characters&#8212;you know, that one drunk slut, that one sober slut, and the one nice mom lady who didn&#8217;t have sex at all. I didn&#8217;t catch much of a glimpse of it in <em>Superbad</em>, either, which featured teen versions of the above&#8212;you know, the one sex object who didn&#8217;t drink and the other sex object who turned into a drunk slut at the film&#8217;s climax. And &#8220;knocked up&#8221; pretty much sums up the emotional states of the two main ladies in that film. Douchey, sure! Funny, not so much.</p>
<p>But we know you have it in you to create some supreme weed-smoking, Gandalf-impersonating, laundry-soaped-beer-stealing, shmashmortion-joking, responsibility-shirking, non-sex-object, non-mother, fun<em> lady </em>douchebags. We even caught sight briefly of this Apatowing lady-douche, in <em>Knocked Up</em>&#8217;s  stoner girlfriend <strong>Jodi</strong>. She was in the movie for like three seconds.</p>
<p>But we know there is a part of you that would like to create an entire 90-minute storyline around this elusive lady-douche. We suspect this part of you is right next to the part of you that introduced the women of the world to <strong>James Franco</strong> (THANK YOU for that, by the way).</p>
<p>Seriously, Apatow, all you really have to do is take the characters you already have and slap vaginas on them. That&#8217;s like, only one step further than what you usually do whenever you make a new movie.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Concerned Lady Douches of America</p>
<p><em>Photo via <strong>Wikipedia</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/05/dear-judd-apatow-from-all-the-lady-douchebags/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sexist Beatdown: Ladies Love Dude Comedies Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/05/sexist-beatdown-ladies-love-dude-comedies-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/05/sexist-beatdown-ladies-love-dude-comedies-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[date rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dude comedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dudes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judd apatow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knocked up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexist Beatdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superbad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Beatdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wayne's world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I have a confession to make: I love Dude Comedies. Any film where Two to Five Douchey Guys Shirk Their Societal Obligations to Embark on a Night They&#8217;ll Never Forget can probably coax ten bucks out of me. I&#8217;ll even watch the Dude Comedies where all female characters are relegated to the Fun-Hating-Wife or Slutty-Sex-Object [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGOOzE4MM60"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/GGOOzE4MM60/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p>
<p>I have a confession to make: I love Dude Comedies. Any film where Two to Five Douchey Guys Shirk Their Societal Obligations to Embark on a Night They&#8217;ll Never Forget can probably coax ten bucks out of me. I&#8217;ll even watch the Dude Comedies where all female characters are relegated to the Fun-Hating-Wife or Slutty-Sex-Object category, as long as it allows for maximum high jinks. <em>Superbad</em>: Loved it!<em> </em><em>Old School: </em>Great! <em>40 Year Old Virgin</em>: Totally convinced me to overlook the whole chastity message! <em>Talladega Nights</em>: Watched it!</p>
<p>I understand these movies are literred with sexism and homophobia and penises; I am simply immune to it. My condition has become so severe that <a href="http://hangovermovie.warnerbros.com/">this is looking pretty good to me</a>, honestly.</p>
<p>But no Dude Comedy can draw me in as douchily as the<strong> Judd Apatow</strong> Dude Comedy. I am powerless to it. I have a theory:<strong> Paul Rudd</strong> is often one of the dudes. But even a <em>Clueless</em> pedigree can&#8217;t justify my apparent obsession with man-children, marijuana-fueled<em> Lord of the Rings</em> fantasies, and underlying date-rape themes.</p>
<p>Help me.</p>
<p>In this week&#8217;s Sexist Beatdown, <strong>Sady</strong> of <a href="http://tigerbeatdown.blogspot.com">Tiger Beatdown</a> tries. We laughed, we cried, we had a shmashmortion.</p>
<p><span id="more-4254"></span></p>
<p>SADY: hello there lady. are you prepared &#8211; prepared, that is, to debate the fine points of dude comedy?</p>
<p>AMANDA: i can&#8217;t say i&#8217;m as prepared as you are, sady. but i am willing to confess: i believe that i enjoyed nearly all the films you profiled in <a href="http://tigerbeatdown.blogspot.com/2009/04/important-announcement.html">your apatow series</a>. when i saw them. in the theater.</p>
<p>SADY: yes, it&#8217;s true: apatow has become my great white whale. he is basically all i think about these days. i dream in Apatowvision. well: i enjoyed some of them too! (shhhhhh.) I enjoyed &#8220;Knocked Up&#8221; immensely, for example.</p>
<p>AMANDA: i CRIED at the end of knocked up. i was on a really bad date, which may have had something to do with it.</p>
<p>SADY: OH GOD. YOU SHARE MY TERRIBLE SECRET. i cried too. also, broke up with the dude i saw it with?</p>
<p>AMANDA: same. well i&#8217;m glad we&#8217;ve cleared the air.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVam-fshUgw"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/lVam-fshUgw/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a><br />
<em>Judd Apatow craftily inserted this song into the film&#8217;s end credits in order to make me cry.</em></p>
<p>SADY: yeah. my reactions to &#8220;knocked up&#8221; kind of define my relationship to the Apatow canon. I was totally digging Leslie Mann&#8217;s character &#8211; oh, that poor lady! She is totally at the end of her rope! &#8211; and then left the theater, and discussed it with people, and realized that YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO BE ROOTING FOR PAUL RUDD. In that particular sub-plot.</p>
<p>AMANDA: i think i had the same reaction as you did, honestly. i thought she was sympathetic, but totally pathetic. all of apatow&#8217;s male characters are pathetic, too, but they seem to ease out of that gracefully without having to think about it too much.</p>
<p>SADY: right &#8211; plus, they are pathetic in a totally fun way! they get to hang out and do bong hits and fart on each others&#8217; pillows and such! so, by the end, where it&#8217;s like, &#8220;sadly, we realize that procreative monogamy with one of these strange &#8216;woman&#8217; creatures is necessary to maturation&#8221; you kind of get their sadness at giving up the pillow farts and lightbub battles. whereas women are just grown-ass-adults by the time they hit puberty, apparently. or at least they&#8217;re scripted that way.</p>
<p>AMANDA: yeah, so the women are just haggard at the end. one thing your reviews always touch on are these coiteries of man-children that apatow scripts. and you mention the rejoinder from defenders of the movie that &#8216;you&#8217;re not supposed to LIKE or IDENTIFY with them.&#8217; and i do think that you are supposed to like these characters, and even like them for (and not despite of) their date rape punch-lines. but they&#8217;re still in a context, i think, where they&#8217;re there to provide a contrast to the hero of the story. their douchiness must be overcome, basically.</p>
<p>SADY: yeah, exactly. they&#8217;re given such loving attention, and their little world of date-rape jokes and vague bromosocial lady-avoidance is presented as so much fun. so you forgive them for being immature in order to forgive your own immaturity, like, &#8220;well, my wife may be at home sobbing but i can&#8217;t help it! i&#8217;m a regular bro!&#8221; and then you get a Valuable Life Lesson that sticks for maybe ten to fifteen minutes.</p>
<p>AMANDA: &#8230; but they&#8217;re funny!</p>
<p>SADY: it&#8217;s true! sometimes they really really are! I subconsciously repeat Jonah Hill&#8217;s pronunciation of &#8220;abortion&#8221; as &#8220;shmushmortion&#8221; at least once a week! and then i realize it&#8217;s a joke about making a lady have an abortion because obviously her fetus is YOUR decision!</p>
<p>AMANDA: yeah. and apatow&#8217;s versions of women i cannot excuse. they are either bitches or whores. but caricatures of douchebags, even lovable ones, i cannot resist.  see: paul rudd in wet hot american summer. i think it&#8217;s just possible to love the character and not the character if they were a real person / your boyfriend.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ND7yJ7sMosk"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/ND7yJ7sMosk/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p>
<p>SADY: exactly. question: where the lady douchebags at? where are the stoned ladies that can&#8217;t get it together to have an actual apartment, and get jobs that require nothing of them because they&#8217;re afraid real jobs would be too much of a commitment, and pretend to be gandalf or some business when no-one&#8217;s looking? the ladies who would rather watch &#8220;the muppet show,&#8221; again, than do anything useful with their lives? WHERE ARE THOSE LADIES? Because I want movies about them! They exist! So I am told in a way that has nothing to do with my own personal life, at all.</p>
<p>AMANDA: i know, which is why I desperately want Apatow to write a movie for them. partly because i think his brain might explode, but also because i think it would be funny.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4QVGcnjZeM"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/V4QVGcnjZeM/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p>
<p>SADY: exactly. like, writing a movie about a lady that is not a sexy/stupid harlot or a knife-tongued scold would be fantastic. because the closest we&#8217;ve got to an Apatowomany character, right now, is Juno. I DON&#8217;T WANT JUNO.</p>
<p>AMANDA: sometimes i look at popular culture and i think of the female characters who have had abortions and i get really sad that like carrie bradshaw is the only one i can think of. but that&#8217;s a tangent.</p>
<p>SADY: yes, well, my forthcoming feature movie film, &#8220;50 First Abortions,&#8221; will be an exciting new direction for film, i think.</p>
<p>AMANDA: indeed. I think we should start a letter campaign that mirrors the request of Pixar to <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2009/06/dear_pixar_from_all_the_girls.html?sc=fb&amp;cc=fp">make a film with a heroine who is not a princess</a>.</p>
<p>SADY: but, you know? i think that women have all the same maturity/commitment/not-being-an-idiot problems that these dudes have. PLUS, what with all the work we have to do to make our bodies presentable, there are many more occasions for gross jokes about our inherent schlubbiness. HUMOROUS BIKINI WAXING SCENE? I think so!</p>
<div id=":23q" class="ii gt">
<p>AMANDA: because us girl-women desperately need an Apatowian heroine who is not a boring slut</p>
<p>SADY: Right. Plus, I would love to see a movie that is just mostly women TALKING to each other, and having FUN. you never see that! unless it is in &#8220;Sex &amp; the City!&#8221; And then it&#8217;s like, &#8220;blah blah blah shoes new boyfriend!&#8221; ZZZZZZZZ.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNMVbr3HhGU"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/SNMVbr3HhGU/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a><br />
<em>Even several past abortions can&#8217;t endear these women to me </em></p>
<p>AMANDA: but does this mean our love interests are going to be Boring Professional Dude Who Doesn&#8217;t Understand?</p>
<p>SADY: deep in my soul, I say yes. Just to bother the dudebros. Make them all be played by John Corbett, and have them be like, &#8220;look! We have got to get married! Because, ADULTHOOD! Also, please stop playing the Wii for five seconds and clean the damn kitchen with me!&#8221; But no, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any reason, really, why you can&#8217;t have two equally funny and interesting genders. EVEN IN A MOVIE.</p>
<p>AMANDA: that&#8217;s crazy! i also think it might be interesting if apatow would produce a film with a female director. a la one of the greatest Dude Comedies of all time, Wayne&#8217;s World.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXEGGOjAe7I"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/bXEGGOjAe7I/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a><br />
<em>To Judd Apatow, it is the female douchebags who are not worthy.</em></div>
<div class="ii gt">
<p>SADY: WHAAAAAT. this was the work of A LADY? Tell me more! I knew there was a reason Tia Carrere sort of had a personality!</p>
<p>AMANDA: yeah, perhaps that&#8217;s why there is a &#8220;GRATUITOUS SEX SCENE&#8221; joke instead of a gratuitous sex scene? who can tell?</p>
<p>SADY: seriously. it&#8217;s just gross because there are (a) so few female directors and (b) so many stereotypes about women and comedy (namely, that we can&#8217;t do it because of our vaginas) that it&#8217;s kind of nuts to know that this huge &#8211; and, i believe, very humorous &#8211; dude comedy was directed by a lady and I don&#8217;t know who she is. I don&#8217;t know who ANY lady directors are. kathryn bigelow? kelly reichardt? SOFIA COPPOLA? yep, that&#8217;s it. i&#8217;m depressing myself now.</p>
<p>AMANDA: well, once 50 first abortions hits &#8230;</p>
<p>SADY: right? &#8220;you&#8217;ve got to stop having all these abortions!&#8221; &#8220;sorry, i forgot where the condoms were!&#8221; &#8220;let&#8217;s get totally married!&#8221; SUCH IS THE DIALOGUE OF MY FUTURE COMEDY HIT. you will laugh! you will cry! you will get an abortion!</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/05/sexist-beatdown-ladies-love-dude-comedies-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sexist Comment of the Week</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/08/sexist-comment-of-the-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/08/sexist-comment-of-the-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[date rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disgusting piece of shit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knocked up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[observe and report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seth rogen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
From Brohem Can Sukkit: In response to Observe and Report&#8217;s &#8220;edgy&#8221; date rape scene:
Rogen: “when we’re having sex and she’s unconscious…”
You’re not “having sex” when one of you is UNCONSCIOUS you disgusting piece of shit! Now I even regret just having rented Knocked Up. I’ll never see anything associated with this scumbag again. He Fatty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.aceshowbiz.com/images/news/00021838.jpg" alt="" width="420" height="280" /></p>
<p>From <strong>Brohem Can Sukkit</strong>: In response to <em>Observe and Report</em>&#8217;s <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/08/observe-and-reports-date-rape-apologism/">&#8220;edgy&#8221; date rape scene</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Rogen: “when we’re having sex and she’s unconscious…”</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>You’re not “having sex” when one of you is UNCONSCIOUS you disgusting piece of shit! Now I even regret just having rented <em>Knocked Up.</em> I’ll never see anything associated with this scumbag again. He Fatty Arbuckled himself here as far as I’m concerned.</p></blockquote>
<p>How many Hollywood stars can <strong>Seth Rogen</strong> drunk fuck on-screen before his illustrious career is over?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/08/sexist-comment-of-the-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
