<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; homosexuality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/homosexuality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bob McDonnell Suggests &#8220;Working Mom Government Simplicity Task Force&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/03/bob-mcdonnell-suggests-working-mom-government-simplicity-task-force/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/03/bob-mcdonnell-suggests-working-mom-government-simplicity-task-force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob mcdonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fornicators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Washington University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working moms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virginia gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell delivered a speech to George Washington University College Republicans last night, the G.W. Hatchet reports. McDonnell didn't explicitly mention his recently unearthed masters thesis which denigrated working women, homosexuals, and people who have sex. But he did make a nod to his commitment to right his past statements:
My wife has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virginia gubernatorial candidate <strong>Bob McDonnell</strong> <a href="http://media.www.gwhatchet.com/media/storage/paper332/news/2009/09/03/News/Virginia.Gubernatorial.Hopeful.Speaks.To.Crs-3762675.shtml?reffeature=htmlemailedition">delivered a speech</a> to George Washington University College Republicans last night, the<em> G.W. Hatchet</em> reports. McDonnell didn't explicitly mention his recently unearthed masters thesis which denigrated <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/01/robert-mcdonnell-thesis-introduces-world-to-radio-porn/">working women, homosexuals, and people who have sex</a>. But he did make a nod to his commitment to right his past statements:</p>
<blockquote><p>My wife has convinced me when I'm elected governor we're going to have a working mom government simplicity task force so all the smart women in Virginia can help tell me how to run Virginia," McDonnell said. "[They will] help cut down some of that bureaucracy, I think that would be a good idea."</p></blockquote>
<p>Any government program tentatively named the "Working Mom Government Simplicity Task Force" which aims to include the perspectives "all the smart women in Virginia" is sure to cut down on bureaucracy! Oh, and in case you were wondering: he got that idea <em>before </em>all the smart women in Virginia turned against him:</p>
<blockquote><p>When asked by a member of the media after the speech, McDonnell said he proposed that idea to his team before his thesis was brought to light.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/03/bob-mcdonnell-suggests-working-mom-government-simplicity-task-force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homosexuals Will Fuck Up Photosynthesis Video Corner</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/07/09/homosexuals-will-fuck-up-photosynthesis-video-corner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/07/09/homosexuals-will-fuck-up-photosynthesis-video-corner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam eve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leroy Swailes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photosynthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[youtube:v=FFFYYjWjVuE]
Now that out-of-state same-sex marriages are officially recognized in the District of Columbia, we can all finally behold the full testimony of Oxon Hill Minister Leroy Swailes, who attempted to shut down the legislation with an anti-gay tour de force. Arguments include: the positivity of discrimination; the missing link between homosexuality and bestiality; how gays [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[youtube:v=FFFYYjWjVuE]</p>
<p>Now that out-of-state same-sex marriages are <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/07/01/gay-marriage-in-washington-dc-coming-tuesday-at-1201-am/">officially recognized in the District of Columbia</a>, we can all finally <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/06/10/hundreds-watch-gay-marriage-referendum-hearing/">behold the full testimony</a> of Oxon Hill Minister <strong>Leroy Swailes</strong>, who attempted to shut down the legislation with an anti-gay<em> tour de force</em>. Arguments include: the positivity of discrimination; the missing link between homosexuality and bestiality; how gays will destroy the world by dismantling the process of photosynthesis [<a href="http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/video_homobigot_of_the_day_pastor_leroy_swailes/#When:18:21:00Z">via</a> <strong>Pandagon</strong>].</p>
<p>The highlights from the transcript after the jump:</p>
<p><span id="more-4923"></span></p>
<p>* "Now when I, when I was growing up here sex was only between a male and female. Now it’s between Adam and Adam Eve and Eve which I can’t understand."</p>
<p>* "If a man get with another man a woman get with another man. That’s it it’s inhuman."</p>
<p>* "Cause discrimination’s a negative and a positive. Me as a black men when they discriminated against me I came out of my mother’s womb like I didn’t have a choice. That was a negative discrimination. If you discriminate against a homosexual that’s a positive. Why? Cause of the children."</p>
<p>* "And you’re going to look in the eyes of a child and you’re going to tell a child that sex is between Adam and Adam Eve and Eve. You become a pedophile."</p>
<p>* "These books here. These books here. When they talk about King and King. And this and this Prince (unintelligible) Prince is a pedophile book. This book here that says Heather and Heather is a pedophile book. Pedophalia. Pha-Phaillia."</p>
<p>* "Everybody should have human rights but you have to be human."</p>
<p>* "That’s just like oxygen comes from plants. It goes up into the air. It mix with molecules with others in the air. It comes down hit Mother Earth. When they penetrate inserts Mother Earth we have what? What. We have life. Homosexuality’d destroy us."</p>
<p>* "The same sex. Which is a form of bestiality. Why is it a form of bestiality? Because a beast has four legs and one gender. If you put two men together they have four legs and two penises and still one gender. That’s a form of bestiality. That’s what we’re accepting here. If you put Adam Eve and Eve together two vaginas are still one gender. That’s a form of bestiality."</p>
<p>* "We have to separate it. And when you separate something you’re discrimination. If I put a glass of water here and a glass of poison, which one you’re gonna choose? You’re gonna choose the water. That’s discrimination. If you put a heterosexual girl here and a homosexual girl here I’m going choose a heterosexual. That’s discrimination."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/07/09/homosexuals-will-fuck-up-photosynthesis-video-corner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Demon Exorcism Video Corner</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/25/gay-demon-exorcism-video-corner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/25/gay-demon-exorcism-video-corner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exorcism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay demon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jesus christ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[youtube:v=vs8ZKPYg1i4]
Some think homosexuality is a choice. Others believe it's a social construct. And still more think that same-sex sexual attraction is the work of homosexual demons let loose by Lucifer, the Associate Press reports.
In this video from Manifested Glory Ministries, 16-year-old hyperventilates, vomits, and writhes on the floor while church members attempt to exercise the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[youtube:v=vs8ZKPYg1i4]</p>
<p>Some think homosexuality is a choice. Others believe it's a social construct. And still more think that same-sex sexual attraction is the work of homosexual demons let loose by Lucifer, the <a href="http://www.wtnh.com/dpp/news/fairfield_cty/news_ap_bridgeport_gay_exorcism_church_200906241205">Associate Press reports</a>.</p>
<p>In this video from Manifested Glory Ministries, 16-year-old hyperventilates, vomits, and writhes on the floor while church members attempt to exercise the homosexuality out of him "in the name of Jesus":</p>
<blockquote><p>"Rip it from his throat!" a woman yells. "Come on, you homosexual demon! You homosexual spirit, we call you out right now! Loose your grip, Lucifer!"</p></blockquote>
<p>The group has since removed the video from its Web site following criticism of the video as child abuse. The power of Christ has compelled some interested parties to continue to re-copy the video and post it to Youtube, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/25/gay-demon-exorcism-video-corner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Huffington Post Sexism Goes Green</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/23/huffington-post-sexism-goes-green/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/23/huffington-post-sexism-goes-green/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alicia silverstone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annalise braakensiek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlotte ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dita von teese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jamie bamber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jenna jameson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kathy najimy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maggie q]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pamela anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[people for the ethical treatment of animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PETA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sophie monk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t&a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tommy lee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Hey, this isn't the exploitation I signed up for!
The Huffington Post has finally discovered the porthole through which its sexist entertainment content can jump off of the Entertainment page and onto more explicitly political verticals. What is this valuable new discovery which suddenly makes sexy naked women so politically relevant? It starts with a P, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/06/dudes-kissing-1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-4599" title="dudes-kissing-1" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/06/dudes-kissing-1.jpg" alt="" width="420" height="201" /><br />
</a><em>Hey, this isn't the exploitation I signed up for!</em><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/06/dudes-kissing-1.jpg"></a></p>
<p>The <em>Huffington Post</em> has finally discovered the porthole through which <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/09/huffington-post-liberal-politics-sexist-entertainment/">its sexist entertainment content</a> can jump off of the Entertainment page and onto more explicitly political verticals. What is this valuable new discovery which suddenly makes sexy naked women so politically relevant? It starts with a P, ends with an Eople For the Ethical Treatment of Animals, and it has been pulling this liberal sexist bullshit for <em>years</em>.</p>
<p><span id="more-4598"></span></p>
<p>Well, PETA and <em>HuffPo </em>are together at last, with two super-sexy animal protection stories making their way onto the site's "<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/green/">Green</a>" page this week. After the photo-accompanied "<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/21/the-sexiest-peta-ads-of-a_n_217731.html">Lydia Guevarra, Che's Daughter, Poses Semi-Nude for PETA</a>" made a semi-nude splash in the Web site's Popular Stories last week, <em>HuffPo</em> cashed in on the theme with the full slide-show: "<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/21/the-sexiest-peta-ads-of-a_n_217731.html">The Sexiest PETA Ads of All Time</a>." Click on it for the environment!</p>
<p>To<em> HuffPo</em>&#8212;and PETA's&#8212;credit, the collection of PETA's notoriously naked ads includes its share of topless dudes alongside the unclothed women. But as the interactive poll feature demonstrates, <em>Huffington Post</em> readers are not so down with this nudity-for-all tactic.</p>
<p>Readers are allowed to rate each PETA rep's naked ad on a scale from 1 to 10, with 1 signifying "Rather have meat" and 10 "Pass the produce!" Here are the current rankings, from hottest to not-est:<br />
<strong></strong></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Charlotte Ross</strong> 8<br />
<strong>Alicia Silverstone</strong> 7.6<br />
<strong>Annalise Braakensiek</strong> 7.6<br />
<strong>Sophie Monk &amp; Maggie Q</strong> 7<br />
<strong>Dita Von Teese</strong> 6.9<br />
<strong>Jenna Jameson </strong>6.7<br />
<strong>Pam Anderson </strong>4.7<br />
<strong> Kathy Najimy</strong> 3.7<br />
<strong>Jamie Bamber </strong>3.7<br />
<strong>Two male models making out </strong>3.4<br />
<strong>Tommy Lee </strong>2.2</p></blockquote>
<p>Let's take a look at the hierarchy here. The nine women on the list all score higher than the four men. The women lose points as they get closer to the porn spectrum, with the exception of <strong>Kathy Najimy</strong>, who is un-young and un-skinny enough to rank just above the men. At the bottom, we have the four guys: The dude from <em>Battlestar Gallactica</em> ranks above the overt display of male homosexuality, but the kissing guys still beat out the universally reviled <strong>Tommy Lee</strong>.<strong> </strong>In my opinion, Tommy Lee's low-ranked bare chest alone is enough to debunk <em>HuffPo'</em>s "<a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/16/huffington-post-sometimes-a-cigar-is-just-a-nipple-is-just-sexist/">sometimes a nipple is just a nipple</a>" theory. Nobody wants to see that shit.</p>
<p>The<em> </em><em>Huffington Post</em> brushes off the idea that the female nudity focus on its Entertainment page has any impact on its progressive political cred. In passing off interactive nude slide-shows as environmentalism, however,<em> HuffPo</em> wades into explicitly political sexist territory. PETA paved the way here by exploiting women in the hopes of ending the exploitation of animals. <em>HuffPo</em> joins the fray not by presenting a  counterpoint to PETA's sexist tactics, but by reveling in it&#8212;asking its readers to rank the "hottest print promotions."</p>
<p>I have to wonder if PETA's T&amp;A has ever convinced a soft-core porn enthusiast to stop eating beef.  I bet the naked stuff is actually used more of a peace offering to the general public&#8212;they may be annoyed by PETA's radical vegetarianism, but at least there are naked chicks.</p>
<p>But unlike PETA, the <em>Huffington Post </em>is not a one-issue newspaper. PETA objectifies women in order to save the lives of the poor, helpless bunny rabbits, but it never professed to care about women. <em>HuffPo</em> objectifies women in order to save its entire politically progressive business model. Why not pull a fast one on PETA and stick to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/23/wallabies-are-the-new-law_n_219676.html">objectifying wallabies</a> instead?</p>
<p><iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/31390031#31390031" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #999; margin-top: 5px; background: transparent; text-align: center; width: 425px;">Visit msnbc.com for <a style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com">Breaking News</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">World News</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072" style="text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;">News about the Economy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/23/huffington-post-sexism-goes-green/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The HIV Blame Game: The Last Word!</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/18/the-hiv-blame-game-the-last-word/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/18/the-hiv-blame-game-the-last-word/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Informant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blame game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rimming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Finally, the debate is over, and we may finally know who is truly to blame for HIV!
As promised, blogger Black Informant has posted a response to my response to his response to my response to his call for a debate based on my response to a blog post he wrote about the District's new HIV [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/03/zz7eda72b0.jpg" alt="" width="420" height="279" /></p>
<p>Finally, the debate is over, and we may finally know who is truly to blame for HIV!</p>
<p>As promised, blogger <strong>Black Informant</strong> has <a href="http://www.blackinformant.com/commentary/part-deux-my-chat-wamanda">posted a response</a> to <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/18/the-hiv-blame-game-the-real-problem-is-money/">my response</a> to <a href="http://www.blackinformant.com/commentary/my-response-to-amanda-hess">his response</a> to <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/17/the-hiv-blame-game-let-the-debate-begin/">my response</a> to his <a href="http://www.blackinformant.com/our-health/calling-amanda-hess-of-the-washington-city-paper">call for a debate</a> based on <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/16/hiv-in-dc-let-the-gay-blaming-begin/">my response</a> to a <a href="http://www.blackinformant.com/headlines/quick-lets-blanket-them-with-more-education">blog post he wrote</a> about the District's new HIV numbers, thus concluding our virtual <em>tête-à-tête. </em>Let me begin by saying that it's been a blast, and I hope that Black Informant has a great summer and never changes.</p>
<p>Since Black Informant's post was to be the final one in our debate, which spanned fisting, rimming, irresponsible hedonism, and the importance of a good education, I won't respond to the points he's made here. If anyone would like to weigh in in the comments&#8212;by all means. Below, I've collected the greatest hits of Black Informant's closing statement.</p>
<p><span id="more-3222"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>"Africa is dealing with an almost completely different set of cultural issues that cannot be compared to the gay and lesbian community here in the West. The only real challenge for us Westerners is deciding whether or not we are going to take it too far in the bedroom. That is a far cry of what is taking place on the African continent."</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>"If you are an adult and of sound mind, economic position in life has NOTHING to do with self-control in the bedroom. While many of the various HIV/AIDS studies out there focus exclusively on those infected with this disease, you will be hard-pressed to find a study that focuses on those who are making the right personal choices. No matter what ethnic/economic demographic you study, <strong>the majority</strong> on this issue has managed to make the right choices and steer away from risky sexual behavior."</p>
<p>___</p>
<p>"For the sake of argument, let’s say the average cost of a pack of condoms is about $10. Do you really believe that the low income folks in your district can’t afford a $10 box of condoms? “Low income” does not mean <strong>“no income</strong>“. If people really wanted to make the right choices regarding their sexual practices, do you really think that a locked display at a local drug store would deter them? If that is the case, then cigarettes must not be selling too well in DC. The low-income population in DC may have its share of problems, but stupidity isn’t one of them.</p>
<p>Thanks for the discussion."</p></blockquote>
<p>Thank<em> you! </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/18/the-hiv-blame-game-the-last-word/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The HIV Blame Game: We Debate, You Decide!</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/16/the-hiv-blame-game-we-debate-you-decide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/16/the-hiv-blame-game-we-debate-you-decide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Informant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blame game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Today, I wrote a post calling out Black Informant, a blogger who called out homosexuals for the striking new HIV/AIDS numbers in the District. The blogger then proceeded to call me out, in a post titled "Calling Amanda Hess of the Washington City Paper." Black Informant wants to debate me!

"So now the ball is in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/03/zz7eda72b0.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3154" title="zz7eda72b0" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/03/zz7eda72b0.jpg" alt="" width="420" height="279" /></a></p>
<p>Today, I <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/16/hiv-in-dc-let-the-gay-blaming-begin/">wrote a post</a> calling out <strong>Black Informant</strong>, a blogger who <a href="http://www.blackinformant.com/headlines/quick-lets-blanket-them-with-more-education">called out homosexuals</a> for the striking new HIV/AIDS numbers in the District. The blogger then proceeded to call <em>me </em>out, in a post titled "<a href="http://www.blackinformant.com/our-health/calling-amanda-hess-of-the-washington-city-paper">Calling Amanda Hess of the Washington City Paper</a>." Black Informant wants to debate me!</p>
<p><span id="more-3153"></span></p>
<p>"So now the ball is in your court to make a full and complete case without resorting to cut and paste arguments that deny factual evidence," he writes. "At the end, we’ll let the readers decide their own conclusions." In order to make known the seriousness with which he was calling me out, Black Informant posted my photograph.</p>
<p>I agreed to the challenge, under the condition that Black Informant send over a personal photo, too. He readily complied (<em>above</em>).</p>
<p>Like me, Black Informant has written extensively on both <a href="http://www.blackinformant.com/?s=AIDS">AIDS</a> and <a href="http://www.blackinformant.com/?s=Homosexual">homosexuality</a>. We tend to come to different conclusions. I'll post my first response to Black Informant's positions tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/16/the-hiv-blame-game-we-debate-you-decide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

