<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; Hell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/hell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Morning After</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/06/the-morning-after-20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/06/the-morning-after-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Morning After]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love and other icky things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madeline Albright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Latifah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shelly Mandel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starbucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Fey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
* The Washington Post Magazine yesterday detailed the storied law office romance of Michelle and Barack Obama. Even with my hard, unfeeling heart, I managed to read this . . . almost all the way though. Here's the engagement story:
[Michelle] began to pressure Barack to get married . . . Barack put her off, arguing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/1/127542812_7c63f0f5cf.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>* The <em>Washington Post Magazine </em>yesterday <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/26/AR2008092602856_5.html?sid=ST2008100302144&amp;s_pos=">detailed the storied law office romance of <strong>Michelle </strong>and <strong>Barack Obama</strong></a>. Even with my hard, unfeeling heart, I managed to read this . . . almost all the way though. Here's the engagement story:</p>
<blockquote><p>[Michelle] began to pressure Barack to get married . . . Barack put her off, arguing that marriage was a meaningless institution and that the only thing that mattered was how they felt about each other. Michelle, whose parents had been married for some 30 years, wasn't buying it.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Then, one night in 1991, he took her to Gordon, an expensive Chicago restaurant, and she started to press him again. He went into his usual tirade against marriage, a dissertation that went on until they ordered dessert. When it came, the plate had a box on it, and in the box was an engagement ring.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>"'That kind of shuts you up, doesn't it?'" Michelle remembers Barack telling her.</p></blockquote>
<p>Plus this strange tidbit about Michelle's early legal work:</p>
<blockquote><p>The group went out of its way to give Michelle work suited to her interests. When an opportunity came in to handle the budding public television career of Barney, the purple dinosaur poised to become a phenomenon among American children, Goldstein says he and others felt it had Michelle's name written all over it.</p></blockquote>
<p><!&#8211; sphereit end &#8211;>* <strong>Sarah Palin</strong> reserved <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/05/palin-misquotes-albright_n_131967.html">her very own place in Hell</a> on Saturday. At a California rally, Palin (poorly) recited a quote from <strong>Madeline Albright </strong>in an attempt to re-affirm the "feminist" angle of her campaign. The speech began with <a href="ttp://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/10/05/email-sort-of-nows-shelly-mandel-by-posting-here/">an endorsement from L.A. National Organization for Women president <strong>Shelly Mandel</strong></a>, which I can only imagine is the way <strong>Andy Kaufman</strong> has chosen to tell us all that he's still alive. But don't worry, Palin didn't get the quote from her extensive research of Clinton-era foreign policy; she got it from Starbucks:</p>
<blockquote><p>I'm reading on my Starbucks mocha cup, okay? The quote of the day... It was Madeleine Albright, former Secretary of State [crowd boos] and UN ambassador. Now she said it, I didn't. She said, 'There's a place in Hell reserved for women who don't support other women.' [Crowd approval] . . . OK, now thank you so much for receiving that well—I didn’t know how that was going to go over . . . And now California, let’s see what a comment that I just made how that is turned into whatever it’ll be turned into tomorrow in the newspaper.</p></blockquote>
<p>I'm not sure that newspapers can really be blamed for twisting <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Albright's</span> <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Starbucks'</span> Palin's words, which  barely make sense on the level of the sentence. More confusing than the actual speech, though, is that the crowd first boos Albright, then cheers her words when filtered through the finely calibrated Starbucks-Palin machine.</p>
<p>* Last summer, the <em>New York Observer </em>found New York City's hottest transsexual woman, <a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/second-most-beautiful-girl-new-york">super fox <strong>Jamie Clayton</strong></a>. Now, Logo's got the first Clayton <a href="http://www.logoonline.com/news/">video interview</a>: [via <strong>Gawker</strong>]. Clayton talks about "blending in" and New York guys' pick-up lines.</p>
<p>* <strong>Tina Fey</strong> is Palin; <strong>Queen Latifah</strong> is Gwen Ifill:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="512" height="296" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/oRZOSPVCsFMTZ9Df3Y5LfQ" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="512" height="296" src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/oRZOSPVCsFMTZ9Df3Y5LfQ"></embed></object></p>
<p>Plus, why some are<a href="http://www.fourthwavefeminism.com/2008/10/how-many-times-have-you-seen-this-today.html"> amused, confused, by Fey's success at Palin's faults</a>:<span class="fullpost"> "Wow, she really looks like Tina Fey. Tina Fey has been doing a great job parodying her. Boy, I love Tina Fey. Ack, but I don't love Sarah Palin. Nononononononono! Bad mental association. Bad." </span>[via <strong>Feministe</strong>].</p>
<p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dvdmerwe/127542812/"><strong>DanieVDM</strong></a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/06/the-morning-after-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

