<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; gloria steinem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/gloria-steinem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Morning After: First Cougar Supreme Court Justice Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/05/25/the-morning-after-first-cougar-supreme-court-justice-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/05/25/the-morning-after-first-cougar-supreme-court-justice-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 13:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Morning After]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elena kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[femininity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gloria steinem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kim catrall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[masculinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robin givhan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samantha jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex and the City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wendy kaminer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=10464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In a 7-2 decision, the Court decided those shoes are to die for.

Rating recent commentaries on issues related to Elena Kagan's appearance:

* WIN: NPR on how Kagan's success informs our speculation over her gender conformity: "Forty years after the birth of modern feminism, we are still not able to  think about women who attain [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/05/satc.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-10487" title="satc" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/05/satc.jpg" alt="satc" width="500" height="334" /></a><br />
<em>In a 7-2 decision, the Court decided those shoes are to die for.<br />
</em></p>
<p>Rating recent commentaries on issues related to <strong>Elena Kagan</strong>'s appearance:</p>
<p><span id="more-10464"></span></p>
<p>* WIN: <strong>NPR</strong> on how Kagan's success informs our <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127086007">speculation over her gender conformity</a>: "Forty years after the birth of modern feminism, we are still not able to  think about women who attain certain kinds of professional success as  normatively gendered," writes <strong>Patricia J. Williams</strong>. It's not just Kagan's short haircut, her interest in poker and softball, and her wardrobe that have critics questioning her femininity: For women, "success itself is masculinized."</p>
<p>* LOSE: Beyond her concern that Kagan does not cross her legs when she sits in a skirt, <strong>Robin Givhan </strong>is also <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/21/AR2010052101670_pf.html">apparently dismayed</a> that Kagan is not the nation's first cougar Supreme Court Justice:</p>
<blockquote><p>Kagan is only 50 years old, which might be the equivalent of 100 in  Hollywood years, but within the Washington establishment she would be  classified as a young'un. Her style, however, makes her seem so much  older. There's little that could be described as fun, impish or creative  in her dress. It's a wholly middle-age approach to a wardrobe &#8212; if one  stubbornly and inaccurately defines that transitional period in life as  the beginning-of-the-end of sex appeal, effervescence and  sprightliness. Kagan's version of middle-age seems stuck in a time warp,  back when 50-something did not mean <strong>Kim Cattrall</strong> or <strong>Sharon Stone</strong>,  "Cougar Town" or "Sex and the City."</p></blockquote>
<p>Givhan adds: "Looking drab has its advantages for both men and women in the nation's  capital because it insulates them from accusations of superficiality&#8212;a  sure-fire political career killer." ORLY? Because from where I'm sitting (with my legs positioned in an unladylike spread-eagle formation), "looking drab" has inspired plenty of accusations against Kagan, thanks to people like . . . Robin Givhan.</p>
<p>* DRAW: The <em>Atlantic</em>'s <strong>Wendy Kaminer</strong> rejects <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2010/05/kagan-palin-and-lipstick-feminism/57184/">the high standards for Kagan's appearance</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>What do<strong> Elena Kagan</strong> and <strong>Sarah Palin</strong> have in common?  They each offer  complementary cautionary tales about the continuing appeal of an ersatz,  "Sex in the City" feminism that rewards beauty and punishes plainness  with all the subtlety and compassion of a <em>Playboy</em> centerfold.  Kagan's  appearance and fashion sense are mocked or savaged, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/201005110058">especially</a> but <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/21/AR2010052101670.html">not  exclusively</a> by pundits on the right, following a familiar script.   <strong>Hillary Clinton</strong> and <strong>Janet Napolitano</strong> endured similar hazings. Sarah  Palin, to say the least, did not.</p>
<p>Palin's fans would  counter that, conversely, she has paid a political price for her  beauty.  Liberal feminists dislike Palin partly because she is "very  attractive," feminist psyche expert <strong>Bill Bennett</strong> <a href="http://msmagazine.com/blog/blog/2010/04/01/happy-b-day-rachel-maddow-you-put-the-ms-in-msnbc/">declared </a>during the 2008 campaign.  He didn't explain how the equally  attractive <strong>Gloria Steinem</strong> became a greatly admired liberal feminist  leader, despite feminism's presumed disdain for good-looking women.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well . . . that's an easy one. People of all political stripes (even feminists!) are more likely to use sexist attacks against <em>women they really don't like</em>. Why don't feminists ridicule Steinem based on her good looks? Because they like her politics, and it's easy to refrain from leveling anti-feminist attacks against women you <em>don't want to attack</em>. So why have some feminists ridiculed Palin's good looks? Because they don't like her politics, and it's really easy to fall into anti-feminist attacks against women you are<em> eager to attack</em>. Republicans were playing the same little game when they defended Palin against detractors who would ridicule her appearance, while condoning sexist remarks against certain other candidates (uhhh Hillary).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/05/25/the-morning-after-first-cougar-supreme-court-justice-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Blame Glenn Beck&#8217;s Hot Mormon Wife</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/17/dont-blame-glenn-becks-hot-mormon-wife/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/17/dont-blame-glenn-becks-hot-mormon-wife/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cindy sheehan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glenn beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gloria steinem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mormon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nancy pelosi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[youtube:v=wKtAPT9KEfM]
"I'm so blessed to be able to have a wife who will tell me 'you're coming home now,' and I want that from her."
I don't know what I did to deserve this, but I just received this little gift in my inbox courtesy of Ayn Rand philosophy emporium / Objectivist dating site  "The Atlasphere." [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[youtube:v=wKtAPT9KEfM]<br />
<em>"I'm so blessed to be able to have a wife who will tell me 'you're coming home now,' and I want that from her."</em></p>
<p>I don't know what I did to deserve this, but I just received <a href="http://www.theatlasphere.com/columns/090617-stossel-glenn-beck.php">this little gift</a> in my inbox courtesy of<strong> Ayn Rand</strong> philosophy emporium / Objectivist dating site  "<a href="http://www.theatlasphere.com/">The Atlasphere</a>." It's called "Who Is Glenn Beck?," and it's written by <strong>John Stossel</strong>.</p>
<p>Usually, the photograph of Stossel's sensuous mustache would be enough to make me click through to an Atlasphere column. Here, we've got an even sweeter prize, however. <strong>Glenn Beck</strong>'s sexism: explained!<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><span id="more-4514"></span></p>
<p>Stossel notes that he's not the first to tackle the "Who Is Glenn Beck" question. <strong>Kieth Olbermann</strong>, <strong>Whoopie Goldberg</strong>, and<strong> Jon Stewart</strong> have all claimed to have figured the guy out, concluding that Beck is "the worst person in the world," a "lying sack of dog mess," and "a guy who says what people who aren’t thinking are thinking," respectively.</p>
<p>But Stossel may be the first to get to the deep psychological core of "Who Is Glenn Beck." After ticking off his parents' divorce, his mother's alcoholism, and her eventual suicide, Stossel lands on the woman behind the sexist: Beck's hot Mormon wife.</p>
<p>When Stossel asked Beck why he decided to become a Mormon, Beck replied:</p>
<blockquote><p>"I apologize, but guys will understand this. My wife is, like, hot, and she wouldn’t have sex with me until we got married. And she wouldn’t marry me unless we had a religion."</p></blockquote>
<p>Beck's wife,<strong> Tania</strong>, confirmed it to Stossel: "He’s not joking."</p>
<p>So far, "Who Is Glenn Beck" is providing more questions than answers. Why would you marry someone to have sex with them? Why would you become a Mormon to marry someone to have sex with them? Does making a man become a Mormon before having sex with him actually make you hotter? Which "guys" will understand this?</p>
<p>Still, Stossel thinks he's hit on something with the hot Mormon wife thing:</p>
<blockquote><p>Now Beck says that Mormonism has grounded him, so he’s grateful to his wife.</p>
<p>Whatever grounded him, I’m glad something did. Because it’s good to have a super-successful cable-TV host arguing that life would be better if government&#8212;Democrats and Republicans&#8212;just left Americans alone.</p></blockquote>
<p>Listen, I'm not going to blame Tania Beck for Glenn Beck's idea of limited government, or for convincing anyone else that Glenn Beck is "grounded." Still, Glenn Beck's assertion that marrying a no-sex-until-Mormon babe is the thing that really leveled his head may have <a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Glenn_Beck">affected Beck's perspective</a> on women in general:</p>
<blockquote><p>* On<strong> Nancy Pelosi</strong>: "Girl, you better check yourself before you wreck yourself!"</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>* "<strong>Cindy Sheehan</strong> is a tragedy slut."</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>* On <strong>Gloria Steinem</strong>: "You self-centered self-righteous socialist out of control dangerous man-hating bitch. Shut your mouth. We might have bought into this crap in the 1960s because too many people were doing LSD. We're not on LSD anymore&#8212;we need to start making sense."</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/17/dont-blame-glenn-becks-hot-mormon-wife/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

