<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; Falls Church</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/falls-church/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Groping Victim: A Prompt Assault Report Does Not Guarantee A Prompt Police Response</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/02/15/groping-victim-a-prompt-assault-resport-does-not-guarantee-a-prompt-police-respone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/02/15/groping-victim-a-prompt-assault-resport-does-not-guarantee-a-prompt-police-respone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments of the week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emily ruskowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Falls Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=8864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to the commenter who thought that her story perpetuated the "myth" that sexual assault victims are too traumatized to report their assaults promptly to police, Fairfax groping victim Emily Ruskowski wants to clarify that she did report her grope to police promptly after her 1 a.m. assault&#8212;and was told to wait until the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to the commenter who thought that <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/02/15/sexist-comments-of-the-week-the-sexual-assault-trauma-myth-edition/">her story perpetuated the "myth"</a> that sexual assault victims are too traumatized to report their assaults promptly to police, Fairfax groping victim <strong>Emily Ruskowski </strong>wants to clarify that she <em>did</em> report her grope to police promptly after her 1 a.m. assault&#8212;and was told to wait until the next morning to file a report.</p>
<p><span id="more-8864"></span></p>
<p>After Ruskowski was <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/02/10/im-claimed-by-this-pervert-one-woman-who-reported-her-grope/">groped by a stranger in a Falls Church Metro parking garage</a> last September, she attempted to report her grope to police as soon as she could get to safety. In fact, she contacted two different<em> </em>police departments on the night of the attack, but because of strange jurisdictional issues, wasn't able to file an actual report until the next day. Here's what happened:</p>
<blockquote><p>I drove out of the garage, got home, (I didn't think driving while on the phone and shaking was a good idea) and called the Fairfax and Falls Church Police, who all said to call Metro Police the next day.  So I did report it right away, but was told to talk to someone else the next day. Fairfax said I lived outside of their jurisdiction so they wouldn't send cops to my house to make a statement, and Falls Church said the metro wasn't their jurisdiction.</p></blockquote>
<p>She adds: "Just wanted to be able to respond to the commenters who admonished me for not calling the police right away. Take that, commenters!"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/02/15/groping-victim-a-prompt-assault-resport-does-not-guarantee-a-prompt-police-respone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MVC Late Night Video Sees the Light of Day</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/07/29/mvc-late-night-video-sees-the-light-of-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/07/29/mvc-late-night-video-sees-the-light-of-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Godfrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Falls Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MVC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex shop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexdc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until very recently, motorists traveling along Leesburg Pike in Falls Church and shoppers at MVC Late Night Video, a sex shop that sits on that road’s busiest stretch, were blissfully unaware of each other.
Thanks to thick black tint that darkened MVC’s large front windows, folks looking for the latest adult DVDs, magazines, and sex toys [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_5460" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><img class="size-full wp-image-5460" title="MVC" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/07/MVC.jpg" alt="MVC, pre-makeover" width="400" height="301" /><p class="wp-caption-text">MVC, pre-makeover</p></div>
<p>Until very recently, motorists traveling along Leesburg Pike in Falls Church and shoppers at MVC Late Night Video, a sex shop that sits on that road’s busiest stretch, were blissfully unaware of each other.</p>
<p>Thanks to thick black tint that darkened MVC’s large front windows, folks looking for the latest adult DVDs, magazines, and sex toys could browse without fear of someone they know driving by and seeing them. Drivers could chug right past the nondescript building and pretend the place was just a regular ol’ video store that happened to stay open very, very late.</p>
<p>But a couple of months ago, the tint came off, and all of that changed. Drive by MVC today, and you’ll see a clear window filled with mannequins dressed in lingerie, as well as rows and rows of DVDs. The store is separated from the street by a small service road, so you won’t get close enough to get a good look at the cover of, say, <em>Team Squirt #10</em>, but you might be able to make out the face of the person thinking about buying it.</p>
<p><span id="more-5451"></span>An employee who declined to give his name says the removal of the tint was a strategic move to make the sex shop seem less shady and “more friendly to couples and women.”</p>
<p>“With the tint, it made it look worse than what it is,” he explains. “So, we took it off and put the lingerie up front so women drive by and can see it’s like Victoria’s Secret.”</p>
<p>MVC isn’t <em>exactly</em> like Vickie’s. The lingerie at MVC is a bit more tawdry and, well, Victoria’s Secret doesn't sell butt plugs the size of traffic cones. But the employee insists that more women visit now that they can see the place isn’t crowded with creepy guys in trenchcoats. He says a lady friend who lives in the area and never would’ve come in before is now a regular.</p>
<p>Still, what about the establishment’s base—the guys who like to sneak in on their lunch break and pick up a little porn without anyone knowing?</p>
<p>“Some guys may have preferred it, but this isn’t a porn store that needs tinted windows, it’s a sex shop for men, women, and couples,” the employee insists.</p>
<p>A survey of customers at the MVC today revealed that few of them had even noticed the change to the building. Most of them grunted some form of “didn’t see it ,” so either their attentions were, understandably, not on the building’s remodel during their visit, or they just didn’t feel like chatting up some woman standing outside of their favorite sex shop holding a notebook.</p>
<p>Only one man, a staunch opponent of the new look, stopped to express his outrage…on his way inside.</p>
<p>“They’ve gotta put the tint back—people wanna keep their business on the low-low,” he says. “And you don’t want a co-worker driving by like, ‘I know that person,’ and then saying, “Hey I saw you at MVC on your lunch break!’ They gotta put the tint back.”</p>
<p>The anonymous employee says the store has gotten a few more community complaints than usual since the curtain came down (“Don’t you know there’s a school nearby,” is a typical one, he says), but the store’s neighboring businesses don’t really seem upset by the change.</p>
<p>Sam, a manager at City Diner, across the street, says the new look is "nicer.” “You can see the girls, the mannequins, with their stuff on—it’s nice, you should be able to see that,” he says. So no complaints from families who frequent his eatery and now have a pretty clear view of MVC’s interior? “No way—what’s better than sitting down and having a hamburger and seeing some nice lingerie?” he says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/07/29/mvc-late-night-video-sees-the-light-of-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stripper Pole Or . . . Pole?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/07/22/stripper-pole-or-pole/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/07/22/stripper-pole-or-pole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[$90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craigslist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Falls Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stripper pole]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["That's right&#8212;a stripper pole," reads this NOVA Craigslist ad. Really? Because it looks a lot like a pole to me:

The pole can be yours for 90 bucks.
[Thanks to Molly Redden for the stripper tip].
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"That's right&#8212;a stripper pole," reads <a href="http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/nva/hsh/1280531684.html">this NOVA Craigslist ad</a>. Really? Because it looks a lot like a pole to me:<br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5189" title="stripperpole" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/07/stripperpole.jpg" alt="stripperpole" width="420" height="324" /></p>
<p>The pole can be yours for 90 bucks.</p>
<p>[Thanks to <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/mtredden">Molly Redden</a></strong> for the stripper tip].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/07/22/stripper-pole-or-pole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blame Falls Church for Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/30/blame-falls-church-for-palin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/30/blame-falls-church-for-palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Episcopal Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Falls Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galls-Church News Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Yorker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sad trombone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Falls-Church News Press extracts this fun fact from the recent New Yorker piece, "The Insiders: How John McCain Came to Pick Sarah Palin," by Jane Mayer:
Two prominent Falls Church members among those who voted to defect from the Episcopal Church in 2006 played a major role in promoting Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The<em> Falls-Church News Press </em>extracts <a href="http://www.fcnp.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=3703:palin-the-family-linked-to-fc-church-defectors-&amp;catid=13:news-stories&amp;Itemid=76">this fun fact</a> from the recent <em>New Yorker</em> piece, "The Insiders: How John McCain Came to Pick Sarah Palin," by <strong>Jane Mayer</strong>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Two prominent Falls Church members among those who voted to defect from the Episcopal Church in 2006 played a major role in promoting Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to be selected as the GOP vice presidential candidate . . .</p>
<p><strong>Fred Barnes</strong>, executive editor of the <em>Weekly Standard</em> magazine, and <strong>Michael Gerson</strong>, former chief speechwriter for President George W. Bush and a <em>Washington Post</em> columnist, were among two groups of arch-conservatives who visited Gov. Palin in Alaska in the summer of 2007, bringing back to Washington, D.C. rave reviews of the then barely known governor as potential v-p material.</p>
<p>Both Barnes and Gerson are high-profile members of the so-called Falls Church Anglican, the name the defecting members gave themselves after voting to leave the Episcopal Church in December 2006.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/30/blame-falls-church-for-palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

