<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; dreaminess</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/dreaminess/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:23:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>An Open Letter to Entertainment Weekly Re: Your Devaluation of the Film Work of James Spader</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/01/an-open-letter-to-entertainment-weekly-re-james-spader/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/01/an-open-letter-to-entertainment-weekly-re-james-spader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreaminess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Spader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Entertainment Weekly,
In your most recent issue, you published a list of the &#8220;50 Sexiest Movies Ever.&#8221; By your estimation, the sexiest movie ever, Stephen Soderberg&#8217;s Out Of Sight, outranks the next Soderberg film on the list, sex, lies, and videotape, by 35 films. One of these films is Cruel Intentions.
As a longtime non-subscriber to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear <em>Entertainment Weekly</em>,</p>
<p>In your most recent issue, you published a list of the &#8220;50 Sexiest Movies Ever.&#8221; By your estimation, the sexiest movie ever, <strong>Stephen Soderberg</strong>&#8217;s <em>Out Of Sight</em>, outranks<em> </em>the next Soderberg film on the list,<em> sex, lies, and videotape</em>, by 35 films. One of these films is<em> Cruel Intentions</em>.</p>
<p>As a longtime non-subscriber to <em>Entertainment Weekly</em> who sleeps on a mattress on the floor beneath a stunning portrait of <strong>James Spader</strong> in the 1985 vehicle<em> Tuff Turf</em> (also, strangely, omitted from your list), I am appalled. <em>[S]ex, lies, and videotape</em> is far sexier than <em>Out of Sight</em> for the following reasons: It (a) has &#8220;sex&#8221; in its very title, (b) stars<strong> </strong>James Spader, and (c) does not star <strong>Jennifer Lopez</strong>.</p>
<p>As you are clearly not familiar with the Spader canon, please admit this fan-edited promotional Internet video as evidence.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eV0XwxUtGM"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/7eV0XwxUtGM/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p>
<p>I await a correction in your next issue.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Amanda Hess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/01/an-open-letter-to-entertainment-weekly-re-james-spader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
