<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Is Gay Marriage Still An Issue?&#8221; Um, Yeah.</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/09/is-gay-marriage-still-an-issue-um-yeah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/09/is-gay-marriage-still-an-issue-um-yeah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Cillizza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Oh, stop making such a big deal about this non-issue.
In yesterday's The Fix, Chris Cillizza poses the question: "Is Gay Marriage Still An Issue?"
Hey, let me take this one, Chris: Yes.
But let's back up a bit and see why Cillizza labors over whether or not one of the biggest issues the states are grappling with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3274/2626730909_f02b9cf8a3.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="420" height="280" /><br />
<em>Oh, stop making such a big deal about this non-issue.</em></p>
<p>In yesterday's<em> The Fix</em>,<strong> Chris Cillizza</strong> poses the question: "<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/cheat-sheet/white-house-cheat-sheet-12.html">Is Gay Marriage Still An Issue?</a>"</p>
<p>Hey, let me take this one, Chris: Yes.</p>
<p>But let's back up a bit and see why Cillizza labors over whether or not one of the biggest issues the states are grappling with today is simply a sneaky non-issue in disguise!:</p>
<p><span id="more-3503"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Twin decisions in Iowa and Vermont legalizing gay marriage over the past five days have reinvigorated the debate over same sex unions and raised questions about whether the issue continues to have the same political potency for Republicans as it did as recently as four years ago.</p></blockquote>
<p>As recently as four <em>years</em> ago? Proposition 8, the legislation that overturned gay marriage in one of the biggest, gayest states in the union, was passed four<em> months</em> ago, dude. But continue:</p>
<blockquote><p>By and large, however, Republican national leaders&#8212;-particularly those running for president&#8212;have condemned the recent decisions. Former Massachusetts governor <strong>Mitt Romney</strong> said the "definition of marriage should be left to the people and <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/eye-on-2012/iowa-same-sex-marriage-and-the.html">not to activist courts</a>" while former House speaker <strong>Newt Gingrich</strong> (Ga.) <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97DOT903&amp;show_article=1">called the decision "outrageously wrong"</a> and said it revealed "judicial arrogance."</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Conversations with a handful of high level Republican party strategists, however, produced a far more mixed view of gay marriage as a campaign issue.</p></blockquote>
<p>Let's pick one of the anonymous GOP sources from the handful who suggests that gay marriage ain't no big thing:</p>
<blockquote><p>Another Republican consultant said that the issue is a complicated one for GOP candidates in the context of a political campaign. "It's sort of a no-win," said the source. "You often need to be on one side of the issue to win the primary, then you're in trouble for the general."</p></blockquote>
<p>Who is this consultant, and who is he consulting? No major party candidate&#8212;Democrat or Republican&#8212;has ever openly supported gay marriage in the primary or the general election.<strong> Barack Obama</strong>, socialist Democrat/<a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/02/girls-kiss-to-counter-anti-gay-protest/">Antichrist</a>, supported civil unions but not gay marriage.</p>
<p>Thankfully, after a long discussion of whether or not this issue is an issue, Cillizza comes around: The issue is, in fact, an issue.</p>
<blockquote><p>What seems clear is that as gay marriage becomes more prevalent in the country, the issue will almost certainly continue to animate the bases of the two parties&#8212;Democrats in support, Republicans in opposition.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nerdcoregirl/2626730909/"><strong>nerdcoregirl</strong></a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/09/is-gay-marriage-still-an-issue-um-yeah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-Gay Prop 8 Funder Joins Democratic Party</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/01/anti-gay-prop-8-funder-joins-democratic-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/01/anti-gay-prop-8-funder-joins-democratic-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Anti-gay, anti-abortion, anti-stem cell, anti-Obama Democrats unite!
In a bizarre case of if-you-can't-beat-'em-join-'em, Howard Ahmanson has jumped GOP ship in favor of joining the Democratic Party. You may remember Ahmanson from when he was the conservative Evangelical mogul who proved instrumental in funding California's Proposition 8. But that was as long ago as last year!

Ahmanson, who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_33xx4go5PxI/RvlCvFPySZI/AAAAAAAABCQ/2rowAaDfHoE/s400/Democrat+Donkey.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="356" /><br />
<em>Anti-gay, anti-abortion, anti-stem cell, anti-Obama Democrats unite!</em></p>
<p>In a bizarre case of if-you-can't-beat-'em-join-'em, <strong>Howard Ahmanson</strong> <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-03-29/a-prop-8-crusader-leaves-the-gop/">has jumped GOP ship in favor of joining the Democratic Party</a>. You may remember Ahmanson from when he was the conservative Evangelical mogul who proved instrumental in funding California's Proposition 8. But that was as long ago as last year!</p>
<p><span id="more-3400"></span></p>
<p>Ahmanson, who "characterizes himself as a social conservative and a fiscal moderate," says he left mostly because he disagreed with the Republicans' mantra of "No new taxes whatsoever no matter what." He does, however:</p>
<p>- oppose abortion and stem-cell research</p>
<p>- still believe that homosexuals are sinners in need of Christian healing</p>
<p>- will support Obama if he does anything that would traditionally be supported by the Republicans.</p>
<p>So why did Ahmanson join the Democrats? Some nonsense about how Independents are "cowards" who are "stereotyped as social liberals and fiscal conservatives," unlike Ahmanson, who is socially conservative and fiscally slightly less conservative.</p>
<p>Plus, it's hilarious! Now that Ahmanson has established himself as a Democrat, he gets to describe himself as "now a blue-dog Democrat for <strong>Bobby Jindal</strong> for 2012."</p>
<p>Nevermind, I love this dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/01/anti-gay-prop-8-funder-joins-democratic-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Far-Right Anti-Abortion Group Harasses Other Far-Right Anti-Abortionists</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/31/far-right-anti-abortion-group-harasses-other-far-right-anti-abortionists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/31/far-right-anti-abortion-group-harasses-other-far-right-anti-abortionists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Right to Life Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ann coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitt romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do far-right anti-abortion conservatives do while Democrats busy themselves in Congress and the White House with the economic crisis? They harass each other for not being far enough right and anti-abortion enough.
[youtube:v=ywvqMAnHZd8]
This time, it's the  American Right to Life Action group repeatedly harassing Ann Coulter for her support of Mitt Romney, who is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do far-right anti-abortion conservatives do while Democrats busy themselves in Congress and the White House with the economic crisis? They harass each other for not being far enough right and anti-abortion enough.</p>
<p>[youtube:v=ywvqMAnHZd8]</p>
<p>This time, it's the  <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/03/30/ann-coulter-bushwacked-radio-conservative-christian-abortion-foes">American Right to Life Action group repeatedly harassing</a> <strong>Ann Coulter</strong> for her support of <strong>Mitt Romney</strong>, who is maybe pro-choice and also Mormon! (She gets pissed). This is all still relevant because Romney might come back in 2012 to secure his polygamous alien reign and abort your teenagers, or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/31/far-right-anti-abortion-group-harasses-other-far-right-anti-abortionists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast: Five Minutes* You&#8217;ll Never Get Back</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/11/13/podcast-five-minutes-youll-never-get-back-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/11/13/podcast-five-minutes-youll-never-get-back-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Five Minutes You'll Never Get Back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Allyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Summers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Riggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[* Admittedly: Even I am unsure how long the podcast is this time. You know, when City Paper's resident libertarian and I get to talkin', it's anyone's guess how long it will take us both to tire of speaking directly to the other. And yet, Mike Riggs and I brave the conversational waters again today [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* Admittedly: Even I am unsure how long the podcast is this time. You know, when <em>City Paper</em>'s resident libertarian and I get to talkin', it's anyone's guess how long it will take us both to tire of speaking directly to the other. And yet, <strong>Mike Riggs</strong> and I brave the conversational waters again today in this, our post-election podcast! With us, as always, is intrepid <em>City Paper</em> intern and off-the-cuff interviewer extraordinaire, <strong>Bobby Allyn</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>T</strong><strong>opics discussed:</strong> Post-election sex, Prop 8, making nice, hugging it out, <strong>Larry Summers</strong>, innate mathematical ability, Democrats vs. Republicans, girls vs. boys.</p>

<p><em>Download the podcast <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2008/11/sexist-episode-4.mp3">here</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/11/13/podcast-five-minutes-youll-never-get-back-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2008/11/sexist-episode-4.mp3" length="5900247" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

