<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; DC NearlyWeds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/dc-nearlyweds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Morning After: Kidney Vagina Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/02/04/the-morning-after-kidney-vagina-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/02/04/the-morning-after-kidney-vagina-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC NearlyWeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feministing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=2538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
* Slate intrudes on the Sexist beat, telling you how to donate a kidney through your vagina ("Good news: You can now get a kidney from a vagina. . . . The kidney doesn't start in the vagina, of course"), and asking whether sharing a bed with your baby is a good idea (Answer: No).

* [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2414/2159044661_6c37ee6ebd.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="288" height="216" /></p>
<p>*<strong> Slate </strong>intrudes on the <em>Sexist </em>beat, telling you <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2209528/?from=rss">how to donate a kidney through your vagina</a> ("Good news: You can now get a kidney from a vagina. . . . The kidney doesn't start in the vagina, of course"), and asking<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2210500/?from=rss"> whether sharing a bed with your baby is a good idea</a> (Answer: No).<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2210500/?from=rss"><br />
</a></p>
<p>* Progress! <strong>DC Nearlyweds </strong><a href="http://www.dcnearlyweds.com/2009/02/rebuffed-bridesmaids-dress-search-part.html">refers to "bridesmaids" as "bridesmaids</a>," not as <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/29/dc-nearlyweds-drop-another-bm/">an acronym shared by "Bowel Movement"</a>!</p>
<p>*<em>Girls Gone Wild </em>creator <strong>Joe Francis </strong>goes wild, evades taxes, <a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/013536.html">gets arrested</a>. Say hi to <strong>Daschle</strong> for us! [via<strong> Feministing</strong>].</p>
<p>* A 26-year-old Montgomory County couple was <a href="http://www.abc2news.com/news/local/story/Man-Indicted-for-Prostituting-Minors/VjZ5Z4t-cU6Ge6lR1OBlBA.cspx?rss=702//">indicted for prostituting minors</a> in Gaithersburg and Washington: "U.S. Attorney <strong>Rod Rosenstein</strong> says the two created a sex-trafficking scheme where the three girls were drugged using cocaine, PCP, and marijuana or alcohol before having sex in Montgomery County or D.C."<strong>Lloyd Royal </strong>and <strong>Angela Bentolila</strong> are also accused of forcing the girls to sell cocaine, forcing them to have sex with Royal, and using their home and car for prostitution.</p>
<p>* <em>Photo by <strong>Trevor Blake</strong>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/02/04/the-morning-after-kidney-vagina-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DC Nearlyweds Drop Another &#8220;BM&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/29/dc-nearlyweds-drop-another-bm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/29/dc-nearlyweds-drop-another-bm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acronyms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridesmaids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC NearlyWeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weddings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=2436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Earlier this month, I called out local bride-to-be website DC Nearlyweds (which appears to be, in general, a lovely resource for aspiring brides) for employing the acronym "BM" to refer to their dear bridesmaids. Last week, one nearlywed struck again with this post detailing the arrival of her "BM" dresses:

"My BM dresses have arrived! (minus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2407/2008105403_e324ea6e2c.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="420" height="218" /></p>
<p>Earlier this month, I called out local bride-to-be website <strong>DC Nearlyweds</strong> (which appears to be, in general, a lovely resource for aspiring brides) for <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/05/not-to-bridal-bloggers-bm-does-not-mean-bridesmaid/">employing the acronym "BM" to refer to their dear bridesmaids</a>. Last week, one nearlywed struck again with <a href="http://www.dcnearlyweds.com/2009/01/bm-dresses-minus-1.html">this post detailing the arrival of her "BM" dresses</a>:</p>
<p><span id="more-2436"></span></p>
<p>"My BM dresses have arrived! <em>(minus 1 &#8211; more about that later),"</em> writes blogger "Miss Glen Allen." Later, Miss G.A. fulfills her promise on explaining her missing dress scenario:</p>
<blockquote><p>Now, back to the "minus one" part.My younger sister (23), for some unknown reason me is opting not to be in the wedding and has not ordered any of her attire, which should have been ordered in November. Everyone else's dress and shoes are here. It's bothersome that she's choosing not to be in the wedding, but what's also bothersome is the way she going about it. She's just not ordering her stuff, and not taking my calls. I had to hear that she has no intention of participating in the wedding from my baby (17) sister. Has anyone else ever had a situation like this with a member of their bridal party?</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmm, maybe it's because you refer to your sister, repeatedly and publicly, with an acronym that refers to taking a shit?</p>
<p><em>Photo by<strong> </strong><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/janined/2008105403/"><strong>yananine</strong></a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/29/dc-nearlyweds-drop-another-bm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Morning After: Coulter Ban Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/12/the-morning-after-coulter-ban-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/12/the-morning-after-coulter-ban-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC NearlyWeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evil Slutopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLOV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homo Hotel Happy Hour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain Blogette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Beatdown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
* Tiger Beatdown questions, answers why she blogs&#8212;and lets readers in on a haunting truth all opinion bloggers must endure!: "What I thought privately was often dramatically at odds with what I posted."
* Evil Slutopia gives the smack-down treatment to Ann Coulter's recent remarks on single mothers&#8212;their kids grow up to be strippers, thugs, etc. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/202/493942203_7b0d9cc6b0.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="420" height="293" /></p>
<p>*<strong> Tiger Beatdown</strong> questions, answers <a href="http://tigerbeatdown.blogspot.com/2009/01/tiger-beatdown-apologia-or-why-i-spend.html">why she blogs</a>&#8212;and lets readers in on a haunting truth all opinion bloggers must endure!: "<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px;">What I thought privately was often dramatically at odds with what I posted."</span></p>
<p>* <strong>Evil Slutopia </strong><a href="http://evilslutopia.com/2009/01/strippers-rapists-and-murderers.html">gives the<strong> </strong>smack-down treatment to <strong>Ann Coulter</strong></a>'s recent remarks on single mothers&#8212;their kids grow up to be strippers, thugs, etc. The more you know! Wait, who is the scary blond lady? Why does anyone bother with her anymore? Boring.</p>
<p>* <strong>Meghan McCain</strong> <a href="http://www.mccainblogette.com/postings/010809_1028.shtml">blogs again!</a> Her friends are having babies and she gets to go the White House next week for a day for Barack Obama to make nice with her dad. <strong>McCain Blogette</strong> will return again in earnest in February, when hopefully McCain can spend more time developing an independent young voice (conservative or otherwise), less time posting <strong>Weezer</strong>'s "Pork &amp; Beans."</p>
<p>* Stop what you're doing! <strong>D.C. Nearlyweds</strong> provided you faulty bridesmaid dress advice last week! Do not buy your bridesmaid dresses online from J Crew! "I realized the dresses were NOT the color they <em>appeared</em> online," wrote one nearly-wed. Don't get me wrong, they are pretty dresses, but they were an orangey pink, and our wedding colors are wine, raspberry, and champagne." My God. I hope it's not too late.</p>
<p>* This Thursday: Proceeds from the <a href="http://thedccenter.blogspot.com/2009/01/homo-hotel-happy-hour-benefits-glov.html"><strong>Homo Hotel Happy Hour</strong> will benefit Gays and Lesbians Opposed to Violence</a> (GLOV) The monthly "4H" club will be held at the Carlyle Suites, at 1731 New Hampshire Ave. NW, at 5:30.</p>
<p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/trialsanderrors/493942203/"><strong>trialsanderrors</strong></a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/12/the-morning-after-coulter-ban-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note to Bridal Bloggers: &#8220;BM&#8221; Does Not Mean &#8220;Bridesmaid&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/05/not-to-bridal-bloggers-bm-does-not-mean-bridesmaid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/05/not-to-bridal-bloggers-bm-does-not-mean-bridesmaid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bowel movements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridesmaids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC NearlyWeds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Because I am a riddle wrapped in an enigma, I frequent a blog called "DC NearlyWeds," a coterie of local pre-brides who while away their dwindling singledom by posting on the Internets about their betrothals. In my research of this Web log, I've found this disturbing trend: Many of these single ladies whose men have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/115/295824886_0fcd792f2d.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="420" height="287" /></p>
<p>Because I am a riddle wrapped in an enigma, I frequent a blog called "<a href="http://www.dcnearlyweds.com/">DC NearlyWeds</a>," a coterie of local pre-brides who while away their dwindling singledom by posting on the Internets about their betrothals. In my research of this Web log, I've found this disturbing trend: Many of these single ladies whose men have put a ring on it favor calling their bridesmaids "BMs."</p>
<p>One blogger asks if her <a href="http://www.dcnearlyweds.com/2009/01/bridesmaids-makeup.html">BMs ought to pay for their own makeup</a>. Half of this blogger's <a href="http://www.dcnearlyweds.com/2008/11/bm-attire.html">BMs have already bought their dresses.</a> Another blogger seeks <a href="http://www.dcnearlyweds.com/2008/11/adorable-flower-girl-dress.html">something yellow, like the "BM dresses,"</a> for her flower girl. Yet another expounds on a BM <a href="http://www.dcnearlyweds.com/archives/2006_07_01_archives.html">who has had gastric bypass surgery</a>!</p>
<p>This nickname ranks up there with the most humiliating of bridesmaid rituals: The intentionally unflattering pastel dresses, the scuttle to catch the bride's bouquet, and now, sharing an abbreviation with "bowel movement." Oh, the humanity.</p>
<p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mahalie/295824886/"><strong>mahalie</strong></a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/05/not-to-bridal-bloggers-bm-does-not-mean-bridesmaid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

