<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; Congressional Quarterly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/congressional-quarterly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Man Madness: Washington Post Vs. Congressional Quarterly</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/22/man-madness-washington-post-vs-congressional-quarterly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/22/man-madness-washington-post-vs-congressional-quarterly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[man madness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Quarterly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manliest Workplace in D.C. Tournament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports metaphores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It's day two of the Sexist's Manliest Workplace in D.C. tournament, and things are beginning to heat up. In day one of our contest, the Washington Times positively manhandled Washingtonian Magazine, proving that its storied man-heavy organizational chart can't fall to any old progressive employer. Today, the fight continues in the media bracket as Congressional [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/assets/sexist/2008/10/15/man-madness/man-madness" alt="" width="382" height="68" /></p>
<p>It's day two of the <em>Sexist</em>'s <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/15/the-manliest-workplace-competition/">Manliest Workplace in D.C. tournament</a>, and things are beginning to heat up. In day one of our contest, the <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/21/man-madness-washington-times-vs-washingtonian-magazine/"><em>Washington Times</em> positively manhandled <em>Washingtonian Magazine</em></a>, proving that its storied man-heavy organizational chart can't fall to any old progressive employer. Today, the fight continues in the <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/assets/sexist/2008/10/15/man-madness/">media bracket</a> as <em>Congressional Quarterly</em> tests its man mettle against the <em>Washington Post</em>. Let the unscientific and, in fact, highly arbitrary games begin!</p>
<p><strong><em>CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY</em></strong><em>: <a href="http://corporate.cq.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=12">Congressional Quarterly</a></em> sure has its share of dudes to look after. As the publication of record for Congressional goings-on, <em>CQ</em> covers two of the Manliest Workplace Tournament's most promising contenders: the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives. But when it comes down to its own employment record, is <em>CQ</em> more <em>Ms.</em> than <em>GQ</em>? And when will I begin to run out of puns relating to men? Find out below!<br />
<strong><br />
</strong>President &amp; Editor-in-Chief <strong>Bob Merry</strong> (Male, 10  points)<br />
Publisher &amp; Senior Vice President<strong> Keith White</strong> (Male, 9 points)<br />
Editor &amp; Senior Vice President <strong>Michael Riley</strong> (Male, 8 points)<br />
Executive Editor, Publications <strong>Susan Benkelman</strong> (Female, ZERO)<br />
Executive Editor, News <strong>Anne Q. Hoy</strong> (Female, ZERO)<br />
Executive Editor, Innovation<strong> Ken Sands</strong> (Male, 5 points)<br />
Circulation Sales Vice President: <strong>Jim Gale</strong> (Male, 4 points)<br />
Chief Marketing Officer: <strong>Greg Hamilton</strong> (Male, 3 points)<br />
Chief Financial Officer: <strong>Diane Atwell </strong>(Female, ZERO)<br />
Chief Information Officer: <strong>Larry Tunks </strong>(Male, 1 point)</p>
<p><em>Wah-Wahhhh.</em> Scoring only a 40 out of 55 points on the manly index, CQ weighs in with a barely respectable 72 percent manliness. Around here, we call that a C minus.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><em><strong>T</strong><strong>HE WASHINGTON POST</strong></em><strong>: </strong>This one could go either way, folks. When <strong>Katharine Weymouth</strong> took over <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/07/AR2008020701162.html">publishing duties at the paper</a> earlier this year, she reclaimed a role for women carved out by grandma <strong>Katharine Graham</strong> in the 1970s. But this 131-year-old broadsheet has its share of <strong>Marcus</strong>es, <strong>Milton</strong>s, and <strong>Boisfeuillet</strong>s (dude name!) to go around. Let's go straight to the masthead!</p>
<p>Chairman <strong>Boisfeuillet Jones, Jr.</strong> (Male, 10 points)<br />
Publisher and CEO <strong>Katharine Weymouth</strong> (Female, ZERO)<br />
Executive Editor <strong>Marcus W. Brauchli </strong>(Male, 8 points)<br />
President and General Manager <strong>Stephen P. Hills</strong> (Male, 7 points)<br />
Chairman of the Board  <strong>Donald E. Graham </strong>(Male, 6 points)<strong><br />
</strong>Vice President At Large <strong>Benjamin C. Bradlee </strong>(Male, 5 points)<br />
Vice President At Large <strong>Leonard Downie, Jr. </strong>(Male, 4 points)<br />
Vice President of Operations <strong>Michael Clurman </strong>(Male, 3 points)<br />
Managing Editor <strong>Philip Bennett</strong> (Male, 2 points)<br />
Deputy Managing Editor <strong>Milton Coleman </strong>(Male, 1 point)</p>
<p>That comes to an impressive 46 out of 55 on the Manly Index, or roughly 84 percent manliness. For one woman, Weymouth has managed to significantly affect the manliness of a paper simply littered with Y chromosomes. For what it's worth, we're willing to bet she was a legacy.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p><strong>GLASS CEILING CRACK WATCH:</strong> With three women suiting up at <em>Congressional Quarterly</em> and Weymouth weighing in over at the<em> Post</em>, our current crack count rises to a robust 12. (That's 12 positions filled by females in the 40 positions surveyed so far in the media division)<strong><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/22/man-madness-washington-post-vs-congressional-quarterly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

