<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; condom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/condom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sexist Beatdown: &#8220;So I Was Inserting The Female Condom Into My Vagina&#8221; Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/03/19/sexist-beatdown-so-i-was-inserting-the-female-condom-into-my-vagina-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/03/19/sexist-beatdown-so-i-was-inserting-the-female-condom-into-my-vagina-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anal sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FC2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female condom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sady doyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexist Beatdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Beatdown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=9328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It's all female condom all the time this week on the Sexist. Female condom in a rubber vagina! Female condom in the anus! But despite the exhaustive orifice coverage (do not insert the female condom into your mouth!), questions remain. Like, what does illustrious ladyblogger Sady Doyle of Tiger Beatdown think about putting the female [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/FC2-1.jpg" alt="" width="420" height="280" /></p>
<p>It's all female condom all the time this week on the<em> Sexist</em>. Female condom <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/03/17/is-500000-dollars-enough-to-get-anyone-to-use-the-female-condom/">in a rubber vagina!</a> Female condom <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/03/18/the-female-condom-goes-anal/">in the anus!</a> But despite the exhaustive orifice coverage (do not insert the female condom into your mouth!), questions remain. Like, what does illustrious ladyblogger <strong>Sady Doyle </strong>of <a href="http://www.tigerbeatdown.com">Tiger Beatdown</a> think about putting the female condom into <em>her</em> vagina? And so on. In this edition of <a href="../tag/sexist-beatdown">Sexist  Beatdown</a>, join Sady and I as we wipe off our female-condom-pre-lubed hands (<em>pictured</em>), prep our vaginas for FC2 landing, and get down to ladybusiness.</p>
<p><span id="more-9328"></span></p>
<p><strong>AMANDA:</strong> Sorry I'm late: I was inserting my female condom in anticipation of having sex up to eight hours from now.</p>
<p><strong>SADY:</strong> Amanda, you know how much I value our friendship. Which is why I want you to understand something. PLEASE NEVER SAY THE PHRASE "I WAS INSERTING MY FEMALE CONDOM" EVER EVER AGAIN.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA:</strong> Deal. But the next 30 minutes of this female condom chat are going to be <em>excruciating</em> for me.</p>
<p><strong>SADY:</strong> It's hard for me to think of "female condom chats" WITHOUT thinking "excruciating." I know I am judgey and a poor former condom merchant and/or safe sex advocate for feeling this way.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA:</strong> Hey Sady, we're just two ladies hanging out talking frankly about our vaginas. The most natural thing for two women to talk about! (Actually we have talked a lot about vaginas, I am realizing, in this series).</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Well, I guess we... have them in common? Okay, let's talk about something that is NOT vaginas. Let's talk about dicks. Because here's how I feel about dicks.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA:</strong> I'm listening.</p>
<p><strong>SADY:</strong> HERE'S HOW I FEEL ABOUT DICKS! Dicks don't get pregnant. Dicks don't get their periods. Dicks don't get ANYTHING except boners, and also occasionally hilarious Hits in the Crotch on old episodes of<em> America's Funniest Home Videos.</em></p>
<p><strong>AMANDA:</strong> Haha, yeah!</p>
<p>[youtube:v=0zGLas2q31E]</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Dicks have like one responsibility in the world, which is to put condoms on themselves when they are having the penetrative intercourse. AND NOW THEY'VE PUT THAT ONE ON US TOO?</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA: </strong>Yes they have! And women around the world are as skeptical as you are. The thing about the female condom is that it's really great for women who can't force their male partners / clients whatever to use the male condom, and so they need a first line of defense.</p>
<p><strong>SADY:</strong> Yeah. Fair enough.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA:</strong> For women who don't have that very terrible problem, though, I'm not seeing it really catching on? However, I have this idea that I would like to sell to the female condom manufacturers, which is that they give a grant to porn manufacturers who will work to eroticize the female condom in their work. So then one day like 10 years from now, old people will be like, "what are these 'money shots' and 'bikini waxes' and 'female condoms' the young kids are using nowadays?" And then there will finally be gender equity in condom sales.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Wow. Porn truly does solve everything! But can we go back to that "you won't put on a condom and we need a barrier/STD-preventing method" thing?</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA: </strong>Sure.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Because here's my theory: You, A Dude, want to sleep with me. I, A Lady, am not sure if we are monogamous and/or STD free. You are like, "but baby, why can't YOU put this bag up your bits?" I am like, "this is the quickest I have ever lost interest in a sexual encounter. See you later, dude!" Like: If you are not responsible enough to wear the condom, you're not responsible enough to be having sex with me, basically.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA: </strong>Yeah. I have never heard of a man who would prefer the lady coat her vagina with a bag? But I did speak to one man who has sex with men who has used the female condom, and he had this to say about it: "When I’ve been a top&#8212;the insertive partner&#8212;what I’ve liked about the bottom wearing the device is that my penis wasn’t wrapped in plastic.” So, there's that.</p>
<p><strong> SADY: </strong>I mean, okay. Sure. I get that. Did your interview subject mention the fit issues? I mean, I hear it fits well, but the thing I have always admired about condoms &#8212; the skinny jeans of the birth control world &#8212; is that they are so specifically tailored. Does the female condom, according to your journalistic research, share this virtue?</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA:</strong> OK, so I'm not going to repeat the phrase that must never be repeated.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>OH JEEZ.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: But I did shminshmert the shmemale shcondom the other day, when I was, you know, just hanging out and bein' a lady, and it does, like shconform to the insides of your shvagina.</p>
<p>[youtube:v=mnyC_v0-DQ4]<br />
<em>How to shminshmert the female condom </em></p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Okay, so here's the thing: you like put it in and then hang out, though? Like, actually that might be a virtue! Because you don't have to go through that "oh crap where are the condoms rummage rummage rummage HANG ON additional rummaging" deal.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA: </strong>Well, you don't have to hang out, but you can hang out. (Up to eight hours before intercourse!) I mean, personally, I never really stopped feeling it so I wouldn't exactly suggest it. But maybe you get used to it. The thing is, nobody like, actually <em>prefers </em>sex with a condom, but it's a necessity in a lot of sexual situations, and it's conceivable that some couples might prefer the female condom. I just think it's really difficult to get that trend to pick up enough speed that those specific people a) actually try the condom and b) feel comfortable using it.</p>
<p><strong>SADY:</strong> Oh, sure. And let me respond to your very serious and useful and responsible point with this: I am one of those people who occasionally gets all "OH WHAT THE CRAP WHERE ARE MY GLASSES," and looks for them for about fifteen minutes, and then looks at A MIRROR, and is like, "oh." I have looked for my headphones whilst wearing my headphones. If I ever shminsmerted the shmemale shmondom, basically it would be in there for life, is what I'm saying. I would seriously forget about it.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA:</strong> Yeah, the other thing is, like, peeing? You will have to pee at some point.</p>
<p><strong>SADY:</strong> Oh, yeah, THAT.<br />
<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>AMANDA:</strong> Because it's really a full-coverage device, so I imagine it would get some pee on it? Perhaps there is some sort of accessory you can buy that aids in that process.<br />
<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>SADY:</strong> God. Somehow this ends with people getting like a female condom and one of those Shenis things you pee through and vajazzling ALL OF IT and... So yeah, I think we've established that I am one of those backward ladies that is like, "a FEMALE condom? Never!" Although, yeah, new barrier methods are good. That's undeniably true. And now, based on my reactions, I can see what it would be like to be one of those "I hate condoms" dudes. I HAVE BECOME THE THING I HATED.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA: </strong>And now I know what it's like to walk around with a condom in my vagina. Minimum rustling, I must say!</p>
<p><strong>SADY:</strong> Okay, like, I have to say... Nobody is making these dudes put the condoms on over their lunch breaks so that they can come and have sexy dates with us later.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA: </strong>That's the weirdest thing about the female condom promotion, to me: They say that because you can pre-insert it, it "doesn't interrupt lovemaking." But it interrupts, like, other shit? Like my lunch break, or my peeing schedule, or what have you.</p>
<p><strong>SADY:</strong> Yeah. I mean, I think your idea for a line of Female Condom-Centric Porn is actually a good one. Because right now this is like the least erotic idea in the world. But... dude condoms weren't initially perceived as a great idea, EITHER?</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA: </strong>Right.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Like, I read this old issue of I think<em> Cosmo</em> from the sixties or seventies once, for a feminist media project, and it had this "revolutionary" article about all the different kinds of birth control there were. And condoms were mentioned. And the article, AS I RECALL (I am not quoting) was like, "I know you think these are for prostitutes, but you can use them too," and also they interviewed a guy who had tried this Strange New Birth Control Method, and he was like, "OMG so unnatural! Like having sex with a garbage bag!" And now it's just like... condoms, you know? They're at Duane Reade, they're understood to be commonplace, and nobody wants to hear you whine about them. Like I said: The very NOTION of a condom that I myself might wear has somehow transformed me into a person who thinks like a gross-ish dude.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA: </strong>Yes. And either you'll look back on this moment 30 years from now and say, "That is the moment I officially became an old person who is resistant to change," or, "That is the moment I officially became an old person because I even know what a female condom is, and no young people have ever heard of that shit, in the Future." Time will tell!</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Right. When we're all wearing our Holo-Helmets and having Virtual Sex on our Google Entire Fake Universe Dates, the female condom, and indeed the male one, will be unnecessary. I for one look forward to that day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/03/19/sexist-beatdown-so-i-was-inserting-the-female-condom-into-my-vagina-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Female Condom Goes Anal</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/03/18/the-female-condom-goes-anal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/03/18/the-female-condom-goes-anal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anal sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female condom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael petrelis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=9250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
As the District launches a new campaign encouraging women to put female condoms into their vaginas, some activists are focused on getting the device into a different orifice. Michael Petrelis, 51, has been promoting the use of the female condom among gay men since the 90's. “When I first learned about the device, I thought [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/FC2-1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-9272" title="FC2-1" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/FC2-1.jpg" alt="FC2-1" width="420" height="280" /></a></p>
<p>As the District launches a new campaign encouraging women to <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/03/17/is-500000-dollars-enough-to-get-anyone-to-use-the-female-condom/">put female condoms into their vaginas</a>, some activists are focused on getting the device into a different orifice. <strong>Michael Petrelis</strong>, 51, has been promoting the use of the female condom among gay men since the 90's. “When I first learned about the device, I thought the only barrier prevention involved covering the dick,” says Petrelis. Then he found out there was a way to cover his partner's anus instead. “The female condom put the bottom in charge, in control, and that was such a good thing. And when I’ve been a top&#8212;the insertive partner&#8212;what I’ve liked about the bottom wearing the device is that my penis wasn’t wrapped in plastic.”</p>
<p>The female condom was approved by the FDA for use in the vagina in 1993. The regulatory body has yet to deem the device safe and effective for use in anal sex, but that hasn't stopped Peterlis and other public health advocates from noting the device's anal benefits:</p>
<p><span id="more-9250"></span>For one, the female condom can adhere to the lining of  the anus and provide a roomier experience than the male condom. It also opens up  the field for a wider range of sexual accessories: “With the penile  device you have to use the water based lubricants. You can’t use  Crisco,” says Petrelis. The female condom also allows receptive partners to protect themselves against HIV with partners who refuse to use a male condom. The only thing that’s <em>not</em> sexy about the female  condom? The name. “I  mean, when you say female condom, I don’t think a  gay guy is going to  listen, because it’s for a woman. It says ‘female.’ I  think it can be a  turn-off to gay men,” says Petrelis.</p>
<p>Some female condom activists have pushed to re-brand the device with a more inclusive title, like the "receptive partner condom" or the “reality  condom.” But the female condom's branding limitations go beyond the name. Some activists are reluctant to promote an item that hasn't received the FDA's official stamp. That's why <a href="http://www.communityeducationgroup.org">Community Education Group</a>, one of the five nonprofits distributing female condoms around D.C., is currently only engaged in promoting the device among<em> heterosexual </em>men (and women). "We haven't  received permission to publicly promote the condom [for anal sex] because it’s not FDA approved for that," says the Group's <strong>Hilary Viens</strong>. "Even though we do know it can be effective, that's not something that we can really state yet."</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/FC2-4.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-9273" title="FC2-4" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/FC2-4.jpg" alt="FC2-4" width="420" height="280" /></a></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Other female condom promoters are concerned that a focus on gay men might alienate the female condom's main target audience. "Eventually, we want the female condom to be accepted as a tool for women  having sex with men, men having sex with men, women having anal sex,”  says <strong>Zoe Lehman</strong>, who promotes female condom use through the Chicago  Women’s AIDS Project. Last week, Lehman helped launched Web-based initiative <a href="http://ringonit.org/">ringonit.org</a>, which takes its  tagline&#8212;“Put a ring on it!”&#8212;from <strong>Beyonce</strong>’s  Grammy-winning single “Single Ladies.” The Web site announces up-front that  female condoms "are a great safer sex option  that can be used by both  women and men for vaginal and anal sex." But Lehman has encountered some reluctance to promote the device for all its potential uses. “Unfortunately, there are some places in this country that  are still uncomfortable with anal sex," she says. "People get very uncomfortable  about that, and it’s already going to be difficult to sell to the  general public." The media has also tended to shy away from anal;  Petrelis was miffed that the <em>Washington Post</em>'s recent story on female    condoms <a href="http://mpetrelis.blogspot.com/2010/03/wapo-female-condom-story-omits-gays.html">failed  to mention the device's use among gay men</a>.</p>
<p>Pitching the condom to gay men will require promoters to get real comfortable with anal sex: Using the female condom anally requires some slight modifications  to the device. Anal instructions are not currently included in the  female condom's packaging, but the D.C.  Department of Health <a href="http://doh.dc.gov/doh/cwp/view,a,1371,q,602668.asp">posts  online guidelines</a> for how to insert the device. In short, you can either insert the condom by draping it over the penis, or sticking it directly into the anus; many users choose to ditch the condom's  removable inner ring to aid comfort; if the penis is hitting against the end of the female condom, it could compromise the device's effectiveness.<span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,Geneva; font-size: x-small;"> </span></p>
<p>In order for everyone to get comfortable shilling the female condom to gay men, Peterlis says that the public must first acknowledge that anal sex isn't just a gay thing. "I hope you're sitting down for this: <em>Straight people have anal sex, too</em>," says Petrelis. "It's not just gay men who need to know how to use it anally." Promoting the condom's anal use among straight women could be a vital tool in preventing the spread of HIV: Women who engage in anal sex are at a higher risk of contracting the virus, particularly if they are chiefly using condoms for pregnancy prevention. "I've got to put my hair down here and say that regardless of straight, gay, in-between, vaginal, anal, there is still a great reluctance to talk honestly in America about s-e-x," says Petrelis. "We're going to have to get over that if we're going to protect ourselves."</p>
<p><em>Photos by<strong> Darrow Montgomery</strong>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/03/18/the-female-condom-goes-anal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside the Virginity-Faking Condom</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/30/inside-the-virginity-faking-condom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/30/inside-the-virginity-faking-condom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hymen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle east]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shahram Shawn Omrani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vagina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
An Egyptian scholar has called for the death penalty for people caught importing a new "female virginity-faking device" into the country. The product, a condom which simulates vaginal bleeding, is seen as a "cheap and simple alternative to hymen repair surgery" for a woman who must "feign virginity on her wedding night" in order to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/09/Picture-310.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6728" title="Picture 3" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/09/Picture-310.png" alt="Picture 3" width="413" height="175" /></a></p>
<p>An Egyptian scholar has <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/ukfs_news/hi/newsid_8270000/newsid_8279200/8279276.stm">called for the death penalty</a> for people caught importing a new "female virginity-faking device" into the country. The product, a condom which simulates vaginal bleeding, is seen as a "cheap and simple alternative to hymen repair surgery" for a woman who must "feign virginity on her wedding night" in order to avoid the social repercussions of premarital sex. The condom, produced in China, is currently being sold in Syria for $15 a pop. So, how does it work?</p>
<p><span id="more-6724"></span>Ten years ago, the design (or a very similar one) was patented in the United States by <span><strong>Shahram Shawn Omrani </strong>of Passaje, N.J.</span> The product, called the "<a href="http://www.google.com/patents?printsec=abstract&amp;zoom=4&amp;pg=PA1&amp;id=8AYYAAAAEBAJ#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false">Condom Simulating Virginity</a>," <span>consists of a flexible, open-ended sheath (like your regular Trojan), but is outfitted with an additional burstable pouch "</span>containing a red colored fluid simulating blood." The pouch is constructed from a weaker material than the condom itself so that the blood compartment "ruptures during sexual intercourse, while the sheath remains intact." Unlike your standard translucent condom, this prophylactic is meant to be made from a dark material to help conceal the red liquid stored inside. If all goes according to plan, the man straps on the condom before sex, the woman appears to bleed during intercourse, and nobody is the wiser.</p>
<p>According to the patent application, the condom was designed to serve cultures where "virginity is demanded of a bride." Writes Omrani, "it is possible that a prospective bride is no longer a virgin, and hence risks being undesirable or subject to scorn and disapproval should her status become known after a marriage. In extreme cases, some cultures even sanction killing of a non-virgin bride. The applicant is unaware of apparatus which will simulate discharge of blood which ordinarily accompanies first sexual intercourse undertaken by a virgin woman, this being the effect of the present invention."</p>
<p>I'm troubled that a product like the "Condom Simulating Virginity," which should never even exist, appears to be in high demand in some corners of the world. I'm saddened that female virginity is still considered a requirement for marriage in some cultures. I'm frustrated that the presence of an intact hymen (which can break under a variety of conditions, including rape) is considered proof of that virginity, and bleeding (not everybody bleeds) is considered proof of an intact hymen. Mostly, though, I'm concerned that the condom is not going to work.</p>
<p>The virginity condom theory has a few serious holes in it. Though condoms are said to have originated in Egypt, the use of any condom&#8212;much less a blood-filled virginity condom&#8212;is <a href="http://www.thedailynewsegypt.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=5228">still stigmatized</a> in the country. What if the man does not want to use a condom on his wedding night? What if he doesn't want to use a strange, dark-colored condom on his wedding night? What if the condom breaks too early, or doesn't break? What if he realizes that the condom he is rolling on his penis is outfitted with a pouch of liquid? What if he realizes that the condom, which is designed to rupture, has strangely broken?</p>
<p>It's already clear that for some Egyptian women, the consequences of premarital sex are high. Now that the virginity-simulating device has been relatively popularized in the country, I'm afraid we'll hear more about the consequences reserved for women forced to fake it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/30/inside-the-virginity-faking-condom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Uses the Female Condom?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/12/who-uses-the-female-condom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/12/who-uses-the-female-condom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female condom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The FDA has approved a new version of the female condom, known awesomely as "FC2." The new female condom will sell for about 30 percent less than its predecessor, the "FC1." But is cost really the deciding factor in female condom use?

The new FC2 is cheaper to manufacture than the FC1 because it's made out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.femalehealth.com/homepage/home_images/FC_Condom_hres.jpg" alt="" width="273" height="269" /></p>
<p>The FDA has approved <a href="http://www.theindiapost.com/2009/03/12/us-food-and-drug-administration-approves-new-female-condom/">a new version of the female condom</a>, known awesomely as "FC2." The new female condom will sell for about 30 percent less than its predecessor, the "FC1." But is cost really the deciding factor in female condom use?</p>
<p><span id="more-3102"></span></p>
<p>The new FC2 is cheaper to manufacture than the FC1 because it's made out of "a different material&#8212;a synthetic rubber called nitrile." Still, the main roadblock to female condom use is cultural, not economic.</p>
<p>The female condom is the only barrier method that is proven effective in preventing sexually transmitted diseases&#8212;and is completely controlled by the female. Despite the empowerment factor, the device is unpopular in the United States, where "it is more expensive than the male condom, makes noise during sex, and sometimes causes discomfort," HIV/AIDS resource <em>The Body</em> reports. I've never heard of a woman using one, much less seen one in the nitrile flesh.</p>
<p>But the female condom has been hailed as a prophylactic savior for women living in countries where <a href="http://www.thebody.com/content/art2774.html">HIV rates are high and male condom use is low</a>. In cultures where refusing a rubber is a matter of course, it's a lot easier for a woman to place a barrier in her own body than to force a man to apply one as a condition of sex.</p>
<p>But female condom use abroad also depends on attitudes at home. Despite the reluctance to male condom use in many countries, the U.S. <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2006/11/17/condom-use.html">shipped 486 million condoms abroad</a> in 2006. According to the <em>India Post,</em> "only 1.6 percent of U.S. international condom shipments" are female condoms, and the devices "account for only 0.2 percent of the world’s total condom supply."</p>
<p>A worldwide acceptance of the female condom will involve more than a price-slash. First, U.S. leaders (listen up, <strong>Barack Obama</strong>) will have to make female condom shipments a priority. Then, men with aversions to condoms of all kinds will have to learn to accept the method, too. AIDS activist &lt;strong&gt;Noerine Kaleeba&lt;/strong&gt; told &lt;em&gt;The Body&lt;/em&gt; in 1998 that "this  gadget is difficult to use without the cooperation of men," as it's easily removed with a bit of force, or thwarted by "misrouting" the penis to go "under the pouch instead of in it."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/12/who-uses-the-female-condom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

