<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; Citizens United</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/citizens-united/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Man Madness: The Winner of the Manliest Workplace Tournament!</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/23/man-madness-the-winner-of-the-manliest-workplace-tournament/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/23/man-madness-the-winner-of-the-manliest-workplace-tournament/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[man madness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manliest Workplace in D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Last week we narrowed down D.C.'s workplaces to the four manliest organizations in the District (okay, due to several close manly ties, it was really six). They are: conservative moonie news source The Washington Times; obscure U.S. representative body the Senate; a whole bunch of unionized dudes; and bald eagle/Ronald Reagan advocacy group Citizens United [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/assets/sexist/2008/10/15/man-madness/man-madness" alt="" width="382" height="68" /></p>
<p>Last week we narrowed down D.C.'s workplaces to the <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/19/man-madness-the-emasculating-eight-is-revealed/">four manliest organizations in the District</a> (okay, due to several close manly ties, it was really six). They are: conservative moonie news source <em>The Washington Times</em>; obscure U.S. representative body the Senate; a whole bunch of unionized dudes; and bald eagle/Ronald Reagan advocacy group Citizens United (<a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/assets/sexist/2008/10/15/man-madness/">relive the madness with the full 64-workplace bracket here</a>).</p>
<p>Now, it's time to fight out the ties of our top-tier man-stitutions and crown a winner! First off: <em>The Washington Times</em> vs. Senate. This contest is an easy one&#8212;the Senate is perfect, the <em>Times</em> is not&#8212;sending the <strong>Cheney-Biden </strong>squadron of male lawmakers into the finals. The Unions vs. Citizens United face-off presents a tougher fight&#8212;three perfectly manly unions (<strong></strong><a href="../2008/12/01/man-madness-union-bracket-finale/">United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers, and Allied Workers; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers; International Brotherhood of Teamsters</a>)  versus a perfectly manly conservative advocacy organization. Add in the Senate, and that's five perfectly manly D.C. workplaces! How ever will I choose between them?</p>
<p>Indiscriminantly! I'll grade these five remaining workplaces on these three factors, on a scale from one to ten:</p>
<blockquote><p>1. <strong>Manliness in Name</strong><br />
2. <strong>Manliness in Purpose</strong><br />
3. <strong>Enduring Manliness</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Let's see how they do!</p>
<p><span id="more-1753"></span></p>
<p><strong></strong><strong>THE SENATE</strong>:</p>
<blockquote><p>1. <strong>Manliness in Name</strong>. According to internationally renowned reliable resource Wikipedia, "The word <em>senatorial</em> is derived from the Latin word <em>senātus</em> (senate), which comes from <em>senex</em>, "old man."<strong> 10 POINTS.</strong></p>
<p>2. <strong>Manliness in Purpose. </strong>The Senate is the upper house of Congress, and takes on such manly duties as deciding things and appointing people. Some of its duties, however, are downright feminine. "Consenting" to treaties? The manly decide. The feminine consent. <strong>5 POINTS</strong></p>
<p>3. <strong>Enduring Manliness. </strong>The Senate has been going strong for 220 years. However, the Senate's manliness has been receding steadily since 1922, 1922 when <strong>Rebecca Felton</strong>&#8212;a <em>lady</em>!&#8212;temporarily filled a senate vacancy for two days. <strong>6 POINTS.</strong></p>
<p><strong>TOTAL: 21 POINTS</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>UNITED UNION OF ROOFERS, WATERPROOFERS, AND ALLIED WORKERS:<br />
</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>1. <strong>Manliness in Name</strong>. Roofers, Waterproofers, Men. <strong> 8 POINTS.</strong></p>
<p>2. <strong>Manliness in Purpose. </strong>This union works to "organize workers" (manly) and work with "various groups on safety and health issues" (hardly). <strong>3 POINTS</strong></p>
<p>3. <strong>Enduring Manliness. </strong>This union's roots only go back so far as a 1903 AFL charter. However, the union has this to say about its history: "Roofs have been necessary since our ancestors first stepped out of their caves and began building shelters using indigenous materials." I'm convinced. <strong>9 POINTS.</strong></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong>TOTAL: 20 POINTS</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>1. <strong>Manliness in Name</strong>: Brotherhood, bro. <strong>8 POINTS.<br />
</strong><br />
2.<strong> Manliness in Purpose: </strong>The Brotherhood<strong> "</strong>represents some 725,000 members in construction, utilities, manufacturing, telecommunications, broadcasting, railroads and government." That's a lot of men! <strong>9 POINTS.</strong></p>
<p>3. <strong>Enduring Manliness.</strong> The Brotherhood claims that as far back as 1890, the IBEW "Dream is Born." On the one hand, that's a long time for manliness to endure. On the other hand, "dream" is nothing other than the idle dilly-dallying of those who cannot "do." <strong>ZERO POINTS.</strong></p>
<p><strong>TOTAL: 17 POINTS</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>1. <strong>Manliness in Name</strong>. Brotherhood, brah. <strong>8 POINTS.</strong></p>
<p>2. <strong>Manliness in Purpose</strong>. The Teamsters not only represent the nation's transportation and "freight-related" workers&#8212;they also built Las Vegas! Plus, funnest Teamster ever, <strong>Jimmy Hoffa</strong>, went to prison before mysteriously disappearing, earning him a prominent spot in the Encyclopedia of Manliness. <strong>10 POINTS</strong>.</p>
<p>3.<strong> Enduring Manliness</strong>. Then again, Hoffa's been "missing" for 33 years. <strong>ZERO POINTS.</strong></p>
<p><strong>TOTAL: 18 POINTS</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>CITIZENS UNITED</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>1. <strong>Manliness in Name</strong>. I see a missed opportunity: Male Citizens United? Citizens Man-nited? Manly Man Men? Get real. <strong>ZERO POINTS.</strong></p>
<p>2. <strong>Manliness in Purpose.</strong> Citizens United aims to restore "traditional American values" set down by the "founding fathers," including "strong families." Read: Man, man, man, man, man! <strong>10 POINTS.</strong><em></em></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>3. <strong>Enduring Manliness</strong>. Citizens United was founded in 1988, which doesn't give it a very manly track record. Hell, it's younger than me (a woman)! However, perhaps we can see CU's relatively recent formation as a sign that America's manliness is still healthy enough to spawn another inane right-wing advocacy group. <strong>8 POINTS.</strong></p>
<p><strong>TOTAL: 18 POINTS</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>That leaves only the victor: the incomparably manly:</p>
<blockquote><p>U.S. SENATE!!!!1</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, yes, rah rah, celebrate now, U.S. Senate&#8212;women's rights activist<strong> Joe Biden </strong>will be lording over your activities soon enough! Then where will you be? Utter mannishness!</p>
<p>(It's not over just yet&#8212;later this week, I'll announce the winner of our fill-in bracket competition).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/23/man-madness-the-winner-of-the-manliest-workplace-tournament/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man Madness: Citizens United Vs. D.C. Vote</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/12/man-madness-citizens-united-vs-dc-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/12/man-madness-citizens-united-vs-dc-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[man madness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C. Vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this, OUR FINAL INSTALLMENT IN THE HISTORIC FIRST AND ONLY PROBABLY EVER MAN MADNESS TOURNAMENT, Citizens United takes on D.C. Vote (Relive the full manly bracket here!). Next week, we'll recap our standings, complete our tie-breakers between the winners, and reveal the manliest institution in D.C.&#8212;as well as the bracket filler-outer who most closely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this, OUR FINAL INSTALLMENT IN THE HISTORIC FIRST AND ONLY PROBABLY EVER <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/15/the-manliest-workplace-competition/">MAN MADNESS TOURNAMENT</a>, Citizens United takes on D.C. Vote (<a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/assets/sexist/2008/10/15/man-madness/">Relive the full manly bracket here!</a>). Next week, we'll recap our standings, complete our tie-breakers between the winners, and reveal the manliest institution in D.C.&#8212;as well as the bracket filler-outer who most closely predicted the results. They will win something! But first&#8212;Citizens United! D.C. Vote! Bang? Whimper? Let's find out!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2008/12/picresized_1229066946_cu.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1597 alignright" title="picresized_1229066946_cu" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2008/12/picresized_1229066946_cu.jpg" alt="" width="188" height="194" /></a><strong>CITIZENS UNITED</strong>: Citizens United aims to "reassert the traditional American values of limited government, freedom of enterprise, strong families, and" blah dee blah dee blah, booooring. But look at that shining bald eagle logo (pictured)! I can't stay mad at you, Citizens United. Go ahead. Show me your men (again, information about this nonprofit comes from its 2006 990 form, as well as from its staff list on its Web site):</p>
<p><span id="more-1596"></span></p>
<p><span class="bodylinks">President </span><strong><span class="bodylinks">David N. Bossie</span></strong><span class="bodylinks"> (Male, 10 points)</span><br />
<span class="bodylinks">Vice President </span><strong><span class="bodylinks">Michael Boos</span></strong><span class="bodylinks"> (Male, 9 points)<br />
</span>Chairman<strong> Floyd Brown</strong> (Male, 8 points)<br />
Media Consultant <strong>Brian Berry</strong> (Male, 7 points)<br />
Secretary-Treasurer<strong> </strong><strong>Douglas L. Ramsey</strong> (Male, 6 points)<br />
Director <strong>Ron Robinson</strong> (Male, 5 points)<br />
Director <strong>John Bliss </strong>(Male, 4 points)<br />
Director<strong> </strong><strong>Kirby Wilbur</strong> (Male, 3 points)</p>
<p>Though Citizens United only lists eight staffers, its showing is so impressive, I'm going to go ahead and take its word for it and give the org. a 100 percent on the Manly Index. That's 55 out of the possible 55 points&#8212;<em>all of them</em>. In at the buzzer, Citizen United takes the advocacy bracket! You guys are going to the finals! That is, as long as you can soundly destroy the folks over at . . .</p>
<p><strong>D.C. VOTE:</strong> These people would be just ecstatic if they every person in dee-cee was represented in Congress by someone who could like, vote and shit, and didn't have to ineffectually brandish their token Senate badges in front of traffic cops when they got pulled over for Duis, which they are Certainly Not Very Guilty Of. Hmm, sounds rather progressive, I'm not sure how many this whole&#8212;SHOW ME YOUR MEN!<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p>Executive Dir. <strong>Ilir Zherka </strong>(Male, 10 points)<br />
Chair <strong>Bruce Spiva</strong> (Male, 9 points)<br />
Vice Chair<strong> Lorelie S. Masters</strong> (Female, ZERO)<strong><br />
</strong>Treasurer<strong> Elizabeth A. Allen</strong> (Female, ZERO)<br />
Secretary <strong>John Klenert</strong> (Male, 6 points)<br />
Comm. &amp; Devel. Dir. <strong>Kevin Kiger</strong> (Male, 5 points)<br />
Outreach Dir. <strong>Eugene Dewitt Kinlow</strong> (Male, 4 points)<br />
Operations Dir. <strong>Antonette E. Russell</strong> (Female, ZERO)<br />
Comm. Manager <strong>Jaline Quinto </strong>(Female, ZERO)<br />
Outreach Associate<strong> Erica Spell </strong>(Female, ZERO)</p>
<p>With 34 minutes out of a possible 55, D.C. Vote casts its ballot for mediocrity! CITIZENS UNITED IT IS! Return next week when we get this whole business tied up in a manly little bow and declare the ultimate victor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/12/man-madness-citizens-united-vs-dc-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

