<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; Chris Cillizza</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/chris-cillizza/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Is Gay Marriage Still An Issue?&#8221; Um, Yeah.</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/09/is-gay-marriage-still-an-issue-um-yeah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/09/is-gay-marriage-still-an-issue-um-yeah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Cillizza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Oh, stop making such a big deal about this non-issue.
In yesterday's The Fix, Chris Cillizza poses the question: "Is Gay Marriage Still An Issue?"
Hey, let me take this one, Chris: Yes.
But let's back up a bit and see why Cillizza labors over whether or not one of the biggest issues the states are grappling with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3274/2626730909_f02b9cf8a3.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="420" height="280" /><br />
<em>Oh, stop making such a big deal about this non-issue.</em></p>
<p>In yesterday's<em> The Fix</em>,<strong> Chris Cillizza</strong> poses the question: "<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/cheat-sheet/white-house-cheat-sheet-12.html">Is Gay Marriage Still An Issue?</a>"</p>
<p>Hey, let me take this one, Chris: Yes.</p>
<p>But let's back up a bit and see why Cillizza labors over whether or not one of the biggest issues the states are grappling with today is simply a sneaky non-issue in disguise!:</p>
<p><span id="more-3503"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Twin decisions in Iowa and Vermont legalizing gay marriage over the past five days have reinvigorated the debate over same sex unions and raised questions about whether the issue continues to have the same political potency for Republicans as it did as recently as four years ago.</p></blockquote>
<p>As recently as four <em>years</em> ago? Proposition 8, the legislation that overturned gay marriage in one of the biggest, gayest states in the union, was passed four<em> months</em> ago, dude. But continue:</p>
<blockquote><p>By and large, however, Republican national leaders&#8212;-particularly those running for president&#8212;have condemned the recent decisions. Former Massachusetts governor <strong>Mitt Romney</strong> said the "definition of marriage should be left to the people and <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/eye-on-2012/iowa-same-sex-marriage-and-the.html">not to activist courts</a>" while former House speaker <strong>Newt Gingrich</strong> (Ga.) <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97DOT903&amp;show_article=1">called the decision "outrageously wrong"</a> and said it revealed "judicial arrogance."</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Conversations with a handful of high level Republican party strategists, however, produced a far more mixed view of gay marriage as a campaign issue.</p></blockquote>
<p>Let's pick one of the anonymous GOP sources from the handful who suggests that gay marriage ain't no big thing:</p>
<blockquote><p>Another Republican consultant said that the issue is a complicated one for GOP candidates in the context of a political campaign. "It's sort of a no-win," said the source. "You often need to be on one side of the issue to win the primary, then you're in trouble for the general."</p></blockquote>
<p>Who is this consultant, and who is he consulting? No major party candidate&#8212;Democrat or Republican&#8212;has ever openly supported gay marriage in the primary or the general election.<strong> Barack Obama</strong>, socialist Democrat/<a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/02/girls-kiss-to-counter-anti-gay-protest/">Antichrist</a>, supported civil unions but not gay marriage.</p>
<p>Thankfully, after a long discussion of whether or not this issue is an issue, Cillizza comes around: The issue is, in fact, an issue.</p>
<blockquote><p>What seems clear is that as gay marriage becomes more prevalent in the country, the issue will almost certainly continue to animate the bases of the two parties&#8212;Democrats in support, Republicans in opposition.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nerdcoregirl/2626730909/"><strong>nerdcoregirl</strong></a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/09/is-gay-marriage-still-an-issue-um-yeah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Palin: 2012 Obama Crushing Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/19/daily-palin-2012-obama-crushing-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/19/daily-palin-2012-obama-crushing-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bristol Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britney Spears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Cillizza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greta Van Susteren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Coale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madonna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Cruuuuush heeeer
IF SHE DID RUN, HE WOULD CRUSH HER, a new poll finds [PDF]. "A new national [Public Policy Polling] poll finds that nominating Palin could be a death wish for the party, with Barack Obama leading Palin 55-35 in a hypothetical contest. The key reason Palin would lose to Obama by so much is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3639/3367552458_86aba3c846.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="420" height="315" /><br />
<em>Cruuuuush heeeer</em></p>
<p>IF SHE DID RUN, HE WOULD CRUSH HER, <a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_National_318.pdf">a new poll finds</a> [PDF]. "<span style="font-family: verdana;">A new national [Public Policy Polling] poll finds that nominating Palin could be a death wish for the party, with <strong>Barack Obama</strong> leading Palin 55-35 in a hypothetical contest.</span> <span style="font-family: verdana;">The key reason Palin would</span><span style="font-family: verdana;"> lose to Obama by so much is that even though she might be the top choice for a certain segment of voters within her party, there's also a number of Republicans who say they would vote for Obama</span><span style="font-family: verdana;"> if their party nom</span><span style="font-family: verdana;">inated Palin." [via <a href="    Several national polls of Republican voters since the election last fall have shown Sarah Palin as the top choice of the party faithful to be the GOP's nominee for President in 2012. But a new national PPP poll finds that nominating Palin could be a death wish for the party, with Barack Obama leading Palin 55-35 in a hypothetical contest. The key reason Palin would lose to Obama by so much is that even though she might be the top choice for a certain segment of voters within her party, there's also a number of Republicans who say they would vote for Obama if their party nominated Palin. The Alaska Governor leads Obama just 66-17 among GOP voters. By comparison, John McCain beat Obama 90-9 with the party faithful. So Palin would be losing a lot of ground even with the base if she was the nominee. Obama leads 89-7 with Democrats and has a more narrow 46-42 advantage with independents.">ThunderPig</a>].</span></p>
<p><span id="more-3226"></span></p>
<p>ALASKANS STILL LOVE HER: Palin enjoys a <a href="http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjRkMjQyNzRlM2EwMTZmZWIwODJhNmNkZjMxZWFjOTg=">high approval rating</a> in her state:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Very positive</strong> 40.5<br />
<strong>Somewhat positive </strong>20.8 percent<br />
<strong>Somewhat negative</strong> 12.5 percent<br />
<strong>Very negative</strong> 20.2 percent<br />
<strong>Don't know/Didn't answer</strong> 6 percent</p></blockquote>
<p>Her staff <a href="http://www.adn.com/palin/story/726702.html" >still sucks</a>, though.</p>
<p>WHY IS <strong>GRETA V.S.</strong> SARAH PALIN'S OFFICIAL JOURNO? <strong>Greta Van Susteren</strong> has bombarded the populace with interviews with Palins big and small. The <em>Washington Post</em>’s <strong>Chris Cillizza</strong> knows why: Her husband, <strong>John Coale</strong>, <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2009/03/palins_team.html">is a friend of the governor:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Coale, a well-known Washington lawyer and the husband of Fox News Channel’s <strong>Greta Van Susteren</strong>, drew national media attention when <a href="http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/tamcam/archive/2008/09/01/top-hillary-supporter-switches-to-mccain.aspx">he endorsed Sen. <strong>John McCain</strong>’s presidential bid</a> in protest of the way in which Sen. <strong>Hillary Rodham Clinton</strong>, who he backed in the primary, was treated. Coale, in an interview with the <em>Fix</em>, described himself simply as a “friend” of the Alaska governor but acknowledged that he suggested she start a leadership PAC and helped her navigate through some of the questions surrounding her family that lingered after the campaign. Others familiar with Palin’s political team insist that Coale has far more power than he is letting on—essentially helping to run Sarah PAC. Coale demurred on that front, noting only that he talks to Palin regularly and that she is a “fascinating person” who is “definitely not what the right thinks or the left thinks.”</p></blockquote>
<p>GRETA ON WHY SHE'S A NEUTRAL PALIN REPORTER:</p>
<p>[youtube:v=8PF17zpUBIM&amp;]</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/03/18/greta-husband-palin/">ThinkProgress</a>]</p>
<p>PALIN HEADLINE OF THE DAY, from <em>Politico</em>'s<strong> Ben Smith</strong>: "<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0309/Palin_clashes_with_feds_on_wolves.html">Palin Clashes With Feds on Wolves</a>"</p>
<p>MADONNA is to <strong>Hillary Clinton</strong> as <strong>Britney Spears </strong>is to <strong>Sarah Palin: </strong>“Britney is not Madonna,” writes  <a href="http://papundits.wordpress.com/2009/03/18/baby-drama-and-podunk-means-spears-palin/">Spears tour reviewer</a> <strong>Jed Gottlieb</strong>. “She just ain’t. Madonna is Hillary Clinton. She’s whip smart and survives, even thrives by adapting. And Lord knows she wants it more than anyone. Britney is Sarah Palin. Baby drama headlines. Podunk back story and a massive industry machine behind her. She’s a manufactured star aimed at the lowest common denominator.”</p>
<p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kurisu/3367552458/"><strong>Kurisu</strong></a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/19/daily-palin-2012-obama-crushing-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

