<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; cabinet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/cabinet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:56:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>White House &#8220;Women&#8217;s Council&#8221; In the Works</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/11/white-house-womens-council-in-the-works/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/11/white-house-womens-council-in-the-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cabinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Cilliza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valerie Jarrett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Council on Women and Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
No, not that kind of women&#8217;s group.
According to Chris Cilliza&#8217;s The Fix, &#8220;President Obama will sign an executive order tomorrow [that's today now, readers] to establish a White House Council on Women and Girls.&#8221; Cilliza&#8217;s intel may be good, but his analysis of the move leaves something to be desired.
Writes Cilliza: &#8220;Obama has both personal&#8212;his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/70/226244356_bf9c7d0cc8.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="500" height="265" /><em><br />
No, not that kind of women&#8217;s group.</em></p>
<p>According to <strong>Chris Cilliza</strong>&#8217;s <em>The Fix</em>, &#8220;<strong>President Obama</strong> will sign an executive order tomorrow [that's today now, readers] to establish a <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2009/03/obama_creates_white_house_wome.html">White House Council on Women and Girls</a>.&#8221; Cilliza&#8217;s intel may be good, but his analysis of the move leaves something to be desired.</p>
<p>Writes Cilliza: &#8220;Obama has both personal&#8212;his wife and two daughters&#8212;and political reasons to make this sort of high profile move to ensure that women&#8217;s needs are being addressed by his administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, allow me to retort.</p>
<p><span id="more-3076"></span></p>
<p>Is it really necessary to note that men should be interested in women&#8217;s issues because they, like, know a few of them? Does Cilliza report on the stimulus bill by writing, &#8220;Obama has personal reasons to pass his bill, because he knows several humans&#8221;? Does he report on Obama&#8217;s FDA appointments by writing, &#8220;Obama clearly has a personal stake in this issue, seeing as the President himself consumes food to sustain life&#8221;?</p>
<p>No&#8212;only women&#8217;s issues would need to be explained through &#8220;personal&#8221; reasons. Obama&#8217;s a man! What the hell would he want to help women for? Oh, he has two lovely daughters.</p>
<p>Ugh. Okay. Back to less infuriating details on the new ladies&#8217; group:</p>
<p>According to a White House memo, &#8220;The mission of the Council will be to provide a coordinated federal response to the challenges confronted by women and girls to ensure that all Cabinet and Cabinet-level agencies consider how their policies and programs impact women and families.&#8221;</p>
<p>The council will be headed by <strong>Valerie Jarrett</strong>.</p>
<p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/christophererin/226244356/"><strong>Bascom Hogue</strong></a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/11/white-house-womens-council-in-the-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Pro-Choice Cabinet for Obama?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/11/10/a-pro-choice-cabinet-for-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/11/10/a-pro-choice-cabinet-for-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cabinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Health Reality Check]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reproductive Health Reality Check has some advice for our next president on the importance of choosing pro-choice cabinet appointees&#8212;and not just in Health and Human Services.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Reproductive Health Reality Check</strong> <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/11/07/the-next-prochoice-cabinet">has some advice for our next president</a> on the importance of choosing pro-choice cabinet appointees&#8212;and not just in Health and Human Services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/11/10/a-pro-choice-cabinet-for-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
