<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; bowel movements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/bowel-movements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Note to Bridal Bloggers: &#8220;BM&#8221; Does Not Mean &#8220;Bridesmaid&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/05/not-to-bridal-bloggers-bm-does-not-mean-bridesmaid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/05/not-to-bridal-bloggers-bm-does-not-mean-bridesmaid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bowel movements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridesmaids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC NearlyWeds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Because I am a riddle wrapped in an enigma, I frequent a blog called &#8220;DC NearlyWeds,&#8221; a coterie of local pre-brides who while away their dwindling singledom by posting on the Internets about their betrothals. In my research of this Web log, I&#8217;ve found this disturbing trend: Many of these single ladies whose men have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/115/295824886_0fcd792f2d.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="420" height="287" /></p>
<p>Because I am a riddle wrapped in an enigma, I frequent a blog called &#8220;<a href="http://www.dcnearlyweds.com/">DC NearlyWeds</a>,&#8221; a coterie of local pre-brides who while away their dwindling singledom by posting on the Internets about their betrothals. In my research of this Web log, I&#8217;ve found this disturbing trend: Many of these single ladies whose men have put a ring on it favor calling their bridesmaids &#8220;BMs.&#8221;</p>
<p>One blogger asks if her <a href="http://www.dcnearlyweds.com/2009/01/bridesmaids-makeup.html">BMs ought to pay for their own makeup</a>. Half of this blogger&#8217;s <a href="http://www.dcnearlyweds.com/2008/11/bm-attire.html">BMs have already bought their dresses.</a> Another blogger seeks <a href="http://www.dcnearlyweds.com/2008/11/adorable-flower-girl-dress.html">something yellow, like the &#8220;BM dresses,&#8221;</a> for her flower girl. Yet another expounds on a BM <a href="http://www.dcnearlyweds.com/archives/2006_07_01_archives.html">who has had gastric bypass surgery</a>!</p>
<p>This nickname ranks up there with the most humiliating of bridesmaid rituals: The intentionally unflattering pastel dresses, the scuttle to catch the bride&#8217;s bouquet, and now, sharing an abbreviation with &#8220;bowel movement.&#8221; Oh, the humanity.</p>
<p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mahalie/295824886/"><strong>mahalie</strong></a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/05/not-to-bridal-bloggers-bm-does-not-mean-bridesmaid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
