<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; baseball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/baseball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Alex Rodriguez&#8217; Amazing 1997 Beefcake Photo Shoot</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/21/alex-rodriguez-amazing-1997-beefcake-photo-shoot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/21/alex-rodriguez-amazing-1997-beefcake-photo-shoot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1997]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex rodriguez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beefcake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[derek jeter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports illustrated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry I haven't been posting much today, but I've been mesmerized by this amazing photo of Derek Jeter all afternoon.
Remember 1997? Bill Clinton had just begun his second term in office, Titanic was a hit at the box office, and the nation's five most famous shortstops got together to lay around and pose topless&#8212;save for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I haven't been posting much today, but I've been <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/0910/derek.jeter.off.the.field/content.2.html">mesmerized by this amazing photo</a> of <strong>Derek Jeter</strong> all afternoon.</p>
<p>Remember 1997? <strong>Bill Clinton</strong> had just begun his second term in office, <em>Titanic </em>was a hit at the box office, and the nation's five most famous shortstops got together to lay around and pose topless&#8212;save for five matching gold chains&#8212;for a photo spread in <em>Sports Illustrated.</em> The image appears in a Sports Illustrated photo retrospective called "Derek Jeter: Off the Field." The set is accompanied by a collection of "<a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/more/specials/video_tips">tips from SI photographers on how to shoot sports</a>."</p>
<p>But the tips left me searching for answers on how an aspiring sports photographer might recreate this magnificent tableau: Like, when you're shooting five baseball players at a time, is one of them necessarily going to end up looking a little creepy&#8212;in this case, <strong>Rey Ordonez</strong>? Do you have to provide the chains, or do they just show up wearing them? What is the correct lens to shoot a shortstop beefcake photo? (A friend is betting on a slight fishbowl). How do you convince these guys that this is a good idea? Finally, how can we bring 1997 back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/21/alex-rodriguez-amazing-1997-beefcake-photo-shoot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Week In Sexist History: Girls, Girls, Girls Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/30/this-week-in-sexist-history-girls-girls-girls-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/30/this-week-in-sexist-history-girls-girls-girls-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivy league]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexist history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newspaper stories from the good old days say the darndest things. So every week on the Sexist, let’s take a ride on journalism’s way-back machine, to a time when descriptors like the following&#8212;"big girls and little girls, blonde girls and brunettes, dark-haired blondes, sunset blondes, Rhinegold blonde&#8212;blondes of all kind save the prescription pattern"&#8212;qualified as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newspaper stories from the good old days say the darndest things. So every week on the <em>Sexist</em>, let’s take a ride on journalism’s way-back machine, to a time when descriptors like the following&#8212;"big girls and little girls, blonde girls and brunettes, dark-haired blondes, sunset blondes, Rhinegold blonde&#8212;blondes of all kind save the prescription pattern"&#8212;qualified as college baseball commentary.</p>
<p><strong>T</strong><strong>his Week in Sexist History:</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong></strong> <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/06/picture-201.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-4740 aligncenter" title="picture-201" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/06/picture-201.png" alt="" width="420" height="171" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Good Ol' Day</strong>: June 23, 1909</p>
<p><strong>Dateline</strong>: New York, NY</p>
<p><strong>Subject</strong>: Reporter at Yale-Harvard rivalry baseball game fluffs up his flowery play-by-play with a rhapsodic account of the glorious array of girls in attendance. Collect one in every ethnicity!</p>
<p><span id="more-4738"></span></p>
<p>First, let us immerse ourself in the peculiar style of turn-of-the-century Ivy League baseball reporting:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/06/picture-21.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-4746 aligncenter" title="picture-21" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/06/picture-21.png" alt="" width="409" height="159" /></a></p>
<p>The "real old Jamake," guy? Whatever&#8212;this man has clearly got column inches to fill. And then:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/06/picture-15.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-4745 aligncenter" title="picture-15" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/06/picture-15.png" alt="" width="210" height="20" /></a></p>
<p>Who has a baseball game to report on when there are girls to scrupulously detail?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/06/picture-16.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-4744 aligncenter" title="picture-16" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/06/picture-16.png" alt="" width="413" height="367" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">At this point, you might be thinking that this guy should get back to the game at hand instead of ranking the glorious blossoms of the rose garden that is female college baseball enthusiasts. No? Okay. What were they wearing?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/06/picture-17.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-4743 aligncenter" title="picture-17" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/06/picture-17.png" alt="" width="409" height="434" /></a></p>
<p>That explains it: He fancies himself a novelist. Say what you will about this reporter's choice to obscure the whole ballgame with testimony on gowns "such as made Paris a memory" and excuses for his own lechery&#8212;it beats his baseball reporting:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/06/picture-19.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-4741 aligncenter" title="picture-19" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/06/picture-19.png" alt="" width="384" height="373" /></a></p>
<p>Yeah, where are the girls again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/30/this-week-in-sexist-history-girls-girls-girls-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

