<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; anti-abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/anti-abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Planned Parenthood Fence Protest: The Video</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/06/10/the-planned-parenthood-fence-protest-the-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/06/10/the-planned-parenthood-fence-protest-the-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=10819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[youtube:v=rVMwU6N74sQ]
More on Tuesday's anti-abortion protest of downtown D.C.'s Planned Parenthood's new fence: Prolifeunity.com has posted video of some of the protest. Count the comparisons to the civil rights movement.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[youtube:v=rVMwU6N74sQ]</p>
<p>More on Tuesday's <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/06/09/anti-abortion-activist-gets-arrested-attention/">anti-abortion protest</a> of downtown D.C.'s Planned Parenthood's new fence: <a href="http://www.prolifeunity.com/index.php/site/article/video_-_pastor_arrested_for_praying_on_a_washington_d.c._public_sidewalk/">Prolifeunity.com</a> has posted video of some of the protest. Count the comparisons to the civil rights movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/06/10/the-planned-parenthood-fence-protest-the-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Morning After: Anti-Abortion Infighting Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/05/20/the-morning-after-anti-abortion-in-fighting-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/05/20/the-morning-after-anti-abortion-in-fighting-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 13:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bayonetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bitch magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nerve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prophylactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the abortioneers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=10384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
* The Abortioneers ask: Why can't anti-abortion activists get along?

A grumpy anti and a soft-spoken priest [were] protesting at the same  clinic.
Priest was youngish, bright-eyed and eager to start doing God's  work. Grumpy was a veteran with a gruff voice and quivering jowls.  Priest was not amused by his hollering; he only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/files/2010/01/MFL-3.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333.1" /></p>
<p>*<strong> The Abortioneers </strong>ask: <a href="http://abortioneers.blogspot.com/2010/05/segmentation.html">Why can't anti-abortion activists get along</a>?</p>
<p><span id="more-10384"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>A grumpy anti and a soft-spoken priest [were] protesting at the same  clinic.</p>
<p>Priest was youngish, bright-eyed and eager to start doing God's  work. Grumpy was a veteran with a gruff voice and quivering jowls.  Priest was not amused by his hollering; he only wanted to pray for the  women and their dying babies. He inched away slowly at first, then took  giant steps towards the other end of the sidewalk, leering at Grumpy all  the time. By noon, as Priest prepared to depart, he put his hand on  Grumpy's shoulder, made sure he looked him in the eye, and asked, "Do  you really think you can help these women by screaming at them?" It was a  genuine, reasonable question.</p>
<p>Priest never came back.</p></blockquote>
<p>* Via<strong> Nerve</strong>: A Swiss prophylactic manufacturer has begun producing <a href="http://www.nerve.com/scanner/2010/05/18/super-small-condoms-aimed-at-prepubescents-guys-with-small-ones">extra-small condoms</a> for sexually active preteens. From the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/2010/03/04/2010-03-04_switzerland_company_offers_young_boys_extra_small_condom_dubbed_the_hotshot.html">New York Daily News</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Dubbed the Hotshot, the prophylactic was developed in response to a  study that indicated young teens were regularly engaging in unprotected  sex.</p>
<p>"The result that shocked us concerned young boys who display  apparently risky behaviour," said<strong> Nancy Bodmer</strong>, who oversaw the research  for the study at the Center for Development and Personality Psychology  at Basel University in Switzerland.</p>
<p>"They have more of a tendency not to protect themselves," she said,  adding that because of their young age, they also do not know much about  sexuality.</p></blockquote>
<p>A friend's take: "<span id=":33" dir="ltr">I like the concern about unwise sexual activity  shown by the manufacturers, who named it . . . 'The Hotshot.'"</span></p>
<p><span dir="ltr">* <em>Bitch</em></span> takes on the <a href="http://bitchmagazine.org/post/mad-world-is-the-bayonetta-campaign-innovative-advertising-or-sexual-harassment-training">"innovative" new </a><span dir="ltr"><a href="http://bitchmagazine.org/post/mad-world-is-the-bayonetta-campaign-innovative-advertising-or-sexual-harassment-training">marketing campaign</a> used to promote popular videogame<strong> Bayonetta</strong>. Bayonetta, for the uninitiated, stars a sexy heroine who kills bad guys via stripping, rolls on the ground in porny poses while killing said bad guys, and restores her power by sucking on a lollipop. How could this videogame ever spawn a misogynistic marketing campaign, you ask?<em> Bitch </em>answers:<br />
</span></p>
<p><span dir="ltr">[youtube:</span>v=hcaKvZLNVek]</p>
<p><span dir="ltr">* On another note, try <a href="http://www.meatcards.com/">Meat Cards</a>: the "</span>one-and-only laser etched beef jerky business cards."</p>
<p><em>Photo via<strong> <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/01/22/photos-march-for-life/">Darrow Montgomery</a></strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/05/20/the-morning-after-anti-abortion-in-fighting-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sexist Comment of the Week</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/05/01/sexist-comment-of-the-week-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/05/01/sexist-comment-of-the-week-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 16:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bus rides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craig howell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crisis pregnancy centers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lisa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This one's a two-fer, in response to my post on the omnipresent anti-abortion Metro ads, "Metro Swathed in Anti-Abortion Shame."
Craig Howell writes:
Um, there’s a First Amendment issue here, folks. As a government agency, Metro cannot indulge in viewpoint discrimination. This matter was settled 30 years ago when the courts told Metro it could not refuse [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3621/3486818755_36dd3a49fe.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="420" height="274" /></p>
<p>This one's a two-fer, in response to my post on the omnipresent anti-abortion Metro ads, "<a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/30/metro-swathed-in-anti-abortion-shame">Metro Swathed in Anti-Abortion Shame</a>."</p>
<p><strong>Craig Howell</strong> writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Um, there’s a First Amendment issue here, folks. As a government agency, Metro cannot indulge in viewpoint discrimination. This matter was settled 30 years ago when the courts told Metro it could not refuse to run bus ads sponsored by the Gay Activists Alliance. I have been a member of what is now the Gay &amp; Lesbian Activists Alliance since 1973, and this victory remains one of our signature achievements.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Lisa</strong> responds:</p>
<p><span id="more-3823"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Amanda, you pointed out the legal problem with this ad campaign yourself. When you say, “but when ad bombardments are targeted specifically on a captive audience of economically vulnerable women, they can be outright threatening,” you hit the nail on the head.</p>
<p>In Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights, Justice Douglas says in a concurring opinion, “the right of the commuters to be free from forced intrusions on their privacy precludes the city from transforming its vehicles of public transportation into forums for the dissemination of ideas upon this captive audience.”</p>
<p>I think this applies here, and the revenue from the Crisis Pregnancy Crap Houses should be turned down. I don’t want to be forced to ride a shame mobile.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Photo via <a href="http://barefootbrevity.blogspot.com/2009/03/ads-for-crisis-pregnancy-centers-on-my.html"><strong>This is Everything</strong></a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/05/01/sexist-comment-of-the-week-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

