<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; alec baldwin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/alec-baldwin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sexist Beatdown: Liz Lemonist Feminism Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/03/26/sexist-beatdown-liz-lemonist-feminism-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/03/26/sexist-beatdown-liz-lemonist-feminism-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alec baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cherie xerox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liz lemon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sady doyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexist Beatdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Beatdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Fey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracy jordan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracy morgan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=9437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  
Exhibit A: Feminist white lady with glasses Liz Lemon; feminist white lady with glasses Sady Doyle.
According to Sady Doyle of Tiger Beatdown's ex-boyfriends, Sady Doyle bears a striking resemblance to 30 Rock anti-heroine Liz Lemon. "The popular television sitcom 30 Rock  premiered in the year 2006," Doyle writes. "Since that time, each [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/liz1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-9454" title="liz" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/liz1.jpg" alt="liz" width="240" height="159" /></a> <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/tumblr_kyl0syaldE1qzk29eo1_5002.jpg"><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/tumblr_kyl0syaldE1qzk29eo1_5002.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-9455" title="tumblr_kyl0syaldE1qzk29eo1_500" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/tumblr_kyl0syaldE1qzk29eo1_5002.jpg" alt="tumblr_kyl0syaldE1qzk29eo1_500" width="240" height="159" /></a></a> <em><br />
<strong>Exhibit A</strong>: Feminist white lady with glasses <strong>Liz Lemon</strong>; feminist white lady with glasses <strong>Sady Doyle</strong></em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">According to<strong> Sady Doyle</strong> of <a href="http://www.tigerbeatdown.com">Tiger Beatdown</a>'s ex-boyfriends, Sady Doyle <a href="http://tigerbeatdown.com/?p=972">bears a striking resemblance</a> to<em> </em><em>30 Rock</em> anti-heroine <strong>Liz Lemon</strong>. "The popular television sitcom 30 Rock  premiered in the year 2006," Doyle writes. "Since that time, each man that I have dated  has made a point of saying how much I remind him of the main character  on that show, Liz Lemon. They said this, in each case, while we  were breaking up."</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Doyle goes on to catalog all the ways in which the two have been compared: Being born to parents who enjoy gifting flavored popcorn; displaying marked difficulty in putting on clothes correctly; being a "shortish, thinnish, smartish brunette woman who writes, has fairly  stylish glasses, and is a bit high-strung"; feminism. It's that last bit that inspires Doyle to "both hate and love Liz Lemon"&#8212;for Lemon's particular form of feminism, which Doyle coins "Liz Lemonism," works to awkwardly reflect back all the horrific failures of the feminist movement.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">And so! In this edition of <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/sexist-beatdown">Sexist Beatdown</a>, join Sady Doyle and myself as we discuss Liz Lemon's insufferable and endearing flaws; the perceived space between <strong>Tracy Morgan </strong>and <strong>Tracy Jordan</strong>; and the other women of <em>30 Rock&#8212;</em>delusional <strong>Jenna Maroney</strong>, ditzy <strong>Cherie Xerox</strong>, and the perpetually absent<strong> Girl Writer</strong>.</p>
<p><span id="more-9437"></span><strong>AMANDA</strong>: Hi, Liz.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Why, hello, Fellow Liz! I have forgotten to ask you: Do you too suffer from Liz Lemon Identification Syndrome? It is a pervasive illness!</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: I look nothing like Liz Lemon. However, I do have some similar personality traits. For example, I am an annoying white lady who talks about feminism. And I'm really bad at eating without getting food everywhere.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Ah, yes. Such are the symptoms! I would say that you remind me, in face yet not in personality, of the other On-Screen Blogger Surrogate Of Our Times, Amy Adams.  BUT THAT IS A DIFFERENT STORY!</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: I talk to my cat! (I don't have a cat). But I would talk to it. To my fantasy cat.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/amandaboot.jpg"><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/amandaboot.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-9452" title="amandaboot" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/amandaboot.jpg" alt="amandaboot" width="210" height="155" /></a></a> <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/lobster.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-9456" title="lobster" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2010/03/lobster.jpg" alt="lobster" width="240" height="155" /></a><strong><em><br />
Exhibit B</em></strong>:<em> White lady blogger <strong>Amanda Hess</strong>, with glass boot; white lady blogger <strong>Julie Powell</strong>, with lobster. I don't see it, but seriously, doesn't Sady look a lot like Liz Lemon? It's uncanny!</em></p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>I think talking to an imaginary cat is even more Jane Sadwoman, as an experience, than talking to an actual cat that you own. So I would say this qualifies. Okay, SO. I have been watching 30 Rock a lot while I answer my e-mails this afternoon. And I was particularly fond of the recent episode "Anna Howard Shaw Day," which for me summarized the Lemonist problems really, really neatly. Because, like, Liz is all talking feminism and making up separate feminist holidays which coincide with The V, simply so that she will not have to deal with the fact that she does not have an&#8212;oh noes!&#8212;Boyfriend Who Loves Her. So that's one example of a pretty common form of feminist narcissism I fall prey to.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: That episode was brilliant. I'm of the opinion that Liz Lemon is the best TV feminist hero that we could ask for, because she is just so awful in all the ways that feminism is awful.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Haha, EXACTLY. And there's a moment where she's talking to a receptionist, who's like a Caribbean black woman, and she calls her "sister." And then is like, "not in a black way! Or, in a black way because I'm also black! OH FUCK NO I'M NOT!" And, like, on the one level that's a really neat puncturing of well-meaning white lady racism. And on the other hand, LIZ FOR FUCK'S SAKE.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: Yeah, but the amazing thing is that they manage to make her likable.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>You are so right: She shares the sins of a certain privileged feminist lady, and that is why we love her, and that is why we sometimes want to throw things at her. She just means so well and often knows so little. But she also really likes Batman, so.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: I mean she's racist, she is devoted to Oprah, she is adopting a baby for no reason, she has had sex to get ahead in her job, she blames her problems on other people, and she's awesome. What I'm interested in, though, are the points in the show where there are racist and sexist tropes that aren't employed simply to show how flawed the heroes are ... that are just racist and sexist tropes Tina Fey uses to make funny jokes. You know?</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Yeah. Like, I mean: We can talk about Tracy Jordan. Because my understanding is that Tracy Jordan, the character, is very much like Tracy Morgan, the comedian. But the way plots are structured around him, as a crazy irresponsible childlike black man who these white people have to look after and keep on track, are just kind of . . .  uncomfortable-making. And you've got other characters of color, like Jonathan and Dot Com and Grizz and Twofer, who DON'T fit stereotypes, and often serve to point up the racism, BUT. Tracy is the guy who gets the most focus.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: Right, and I wonder how much of Tracy Jordan is really Tracy Morgan, and how much of Liz Lemon is really Tina Fey, &amp; c., and how much the characters exist to comment on and poke fun at the people behind the show. I mean, I feel like everyone is a lot more eager to be like, "Tracy Morgan is JUST LIKE HIS CHARACTER!" than they are to do that with Tina Fey, who everyone sort of recognizes is this amazing writer, actor, and businesswoman and totally beautiful lady who is self-consciously commenting on her own character through this incredibly flawed person. Because Liz Lemon is none of these things. I mean, she's a terrible writer.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Yeah, exactly. The whole "Tracy Jordan IS Tracy Morgan" thing kind of serves to strip the actor of any credit for this character he's created. The idea is just that he's SO WACKY and they somehow manage to capture his innate wackiness on film. Through... carefully worked-out scripts that go through several drafts and are shot in several takes and probably take lots of rehearsing? Like, it's not like everyone else has a script and then Tracy Morgan just comes in drunk at three in the afternoon and says some silly shit and leaves. That wouldn't be as funny as what he's actually doing.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: Yeah.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>I would buy that Alec Baldwin does that, though!</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: It's interesting, because I think 30 Rock's great innovation was taking the idea of the Generic Stand Up Comic Who Plays Himself In A Different Situation and subverting that, so that Tina Fey is playing herself, but this completely bizarro version of herself. That's why I can get with the constant jokes about Liz being ugly, because I feel like there's a self-consciousness there. Although it does go overboard sometimes. But with Tracy, I feel like it's the opposite, and people really get a thrill out of thinking he is the guy, which, who knows how much of him is in that character.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Yeah. And, I mean, the dichotomy you pointed out fascinates me: actual Tina Fey is this huge celebrity who's happily married and has a daughter and seems like a very fulfilled lady and everyone in the world knows her to be pretty. Liz Lemon is none of the above, and maybe wants to be, but feels completely unsuited for it; it's like she's that girl who lives in your head, your worst-case scenario version of yourself, and that's why so many people love her. But I keep getting really frustrated with the way they write Jenna. I used to love Jenna! Liz and Jenna! That was a friendship that I would buy!</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: I know. Jenna has lately descended into ridiculousness.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Right. First they didn't write anything for her, and now they write shit for her, and it's the most shrill misogynist stereotyping. Thanks, but NO THANKS.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: She used to have this really interesting relationship with ridiculousness where she would always come back to being humanized after, like, skating around and singing about her muffin top.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Right! And you could tell that, like, she was the girl who'd hold you hostage at a party by singing to you because she was insecure about her job, or her friendship with Liz, or whatever, and it was a more human insecurity. And now it's just, like, she has exactly three qualities: 1. Kinda slutty, 2. Kinda whacked in the head, 3. Vain, and 4. Stupid. There are four qualities, apparently. THERE! ARE! FOUR! LIGHTS!</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: I have to admit that I really like 30 Rock's other misogynist construction, Cerie.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Really? Do tell!</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: I don't know! She's just so pretty and nice and her last name is Xerox. I like her!</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>And I actually think the actress is funny, though it's hard to tell because the character isn't supposed to be. That very chill stoner voice she uses in every situation: It's great.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: Yeah, I think a lot of the pleasure I get out of 30 Rock is more about the performance than anything else, and the space between the character and the actor, and I just really like her performance. The character, on the other hand ... not so awesome. I'm waiting for the episode where the stereotypes are upended a little bit for her, like when Frank becomes a lawyer.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Yes! That would be great. On the other hand, we got a show about Girl Writer, and that one... not so great. That's what really peeves me. We've gotten several good Frank episodes, good Twofer episodes although only in the early seasons, Lutz gets his jokes, there was even a JOSH episode, and then . . . It takes four years for the girl to get a speaking part and it ends with her getting date raped and Tracy not caring about it? YIIIIIIIKES.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: Yeah. What was that?</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>And that's where the whole joke of Liz, "oh it's so hard to be a girl Making It in a room full of boys," falls apart. There's a girl! A girl right there! Trying to Make It also! And you two never talk?</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: Haha, no, she does not give a shit about that woman.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>I have no idea. I actually think that 30 Rock makes some not-terrible, not pro-rape-culture rape jokes. Like saying that Elizabeth Banks was in MAXIM's "I'd Rape That 100," which: a) I'm always down for a joke at MAXIM's expense, and b) I think Tina Fey is too, because they had beef when MAXIM wrote about her not being pretty or funny or something a long time ago. But then it veers right into some weird shit. Like, I thought the "Jenna and her stalker" plot was funny, but I've know some ladies were just NOT. PLEASED.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: Yeah, I wasn't offended by that, but I wasn't really committed to the entire thing. I thought it was OK funny-wise. I mean, whenever we turn to Jack's stories it's a lot of jokes at the expense of conservatives, and when we turn to Liz's stories it's a lot of jokes at the expense of liberals, and there's never too much controversy there. It's just funny. When we get into the other characters' storylines it's pretty much a toss-up because there's not a particular ideology we're supposed to be laughing at.</p>
<p><strong>SADY: </strong>Right. Although, for me, the joy of 30 Rock is often in those side characters. Like, if I had thirty million dollars I would use it to fund a spin-off about Dot Com and Jonathan being roommates.</p>
<p><strong>AMANDA</strong>: HAHA.</p>
<p><strong>SADY:</strong> And Frank being their super.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/03/26/sexist-beatdown-liz-lemonist-feminism-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebrate National &#8220;Offend A Feminist&#8221; Week!</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/05/05/celebrate-national-offend-a-feminist-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/05/05/celebrate-national-offend-a-feminist-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 17:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alec baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national offend a feminist week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offensive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phyllis schlafly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Ooh boy, it's National Offend a Feminist Week!
You know, as a feminist blogger, I spend most weeks out of the year not getting offended by anything. Frankly, I'm sick of raking up obscure sexist bullshit to be offended by! That's why I always look forward to National Offend a Feminist Week, when I finally get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3604/3458884720_1ac7845a4c.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="420" height="315" /></p>
<p>Ooh boy, it's <a href="http://rsmccain.blogspot.com/2009/05/national-offend-feminist-week.html">National Offend a Feminist Week</a>!</p>
<p>You know, as a feminist blogger, I spend most weeks out of the year <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/29/an-open-letter-to-cvs-sensitive-lady-products-salespeople/">not</a> <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/17/bitter-pill/">getting</a> <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/03/19/washington-post-employs-faulty-pope-logic/">offended</a> by<em> <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/17/dont-fucking-tell-me-to-smile-baby/">anything</a></em>. Frankly, I'm sick of raking up obscure sexist bullshit to be offended by! That's why I always look forward to National Offend a Feminist Week, when I finally get to sit back, relax, and let the anti-feminists shower me with free sexist bullshit. Thanks for helping me do my job, fuckers!</p>
<p>But wait&#8212;AUUUUUUGH! <em>AUUUUUUUUUUGHHHHH!&#8212;</em>I'm <em>ALREADY OFFENDED</em> by this! The very idea of Offend a Feminist Week is offensive enough for me to write a blog post about why it offends me! The <a href="http://rsmccain.blogspot.com">anti-feminist bloggers</a> have caught me in an Offended Feminist Mind Meld! I can't stop using explanation points!<em> Nor italics! </em>NOR CAPS LOCK!<em> AUGH!</em></p>
<p><em>OFFEND A FEMINIST WEEK MALE PRIVILEGE SHADES OF RAPE PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY ALEC BALDWIN SOMETHING SOMETHING ABORTION!!<br />
</em></p>
<p>Whew. That was a close one.</p>
<p><em>Photo by<strong> </strong><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/memestate/3458884720/"><strong>Rich Anderson</strong></a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/05/05/celebrate-national-offend-a-feminist-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sexist Beatdown: It&#8217;s OK to Want to Do Your Dad As Long As Your Dad Is Alec Baldwin Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/24/sexist-beatdown-its-ok-to-want-to-do-your-dad-as-long-as-your-dad-is-alec-baldwin-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/24/sexist-beatdown-its-ok-to-want-to-do-your-dad-as-long-as-your-dad-is-alec-baldwin-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alec baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caitlin flanagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kim basinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexist Beatdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Beatdown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[youtube:v=8J0-ZatDHug]
Welcome back to Sexist Beatdown, a weekly ladyblog collaboration between myself and Sady of Tiger Beatdown: When our powers combine, etc.
Up for discussion this morning: Caitlin Flanagan's most recent book review, "The Passion of Alec Baldwin," an epic indulgence of armchair celebrity psychoanalysis in which Flanagan argues that:
(a) Alec Baldwin is a babe
(b) Ireland Baldwin [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[youtube:v=8J0-ZatDHug]</p>
<p>Welcome back to <em>Sexist Beatdown</em>, a weekly ladyblog collaboration between<strong> </strong>myself and <strong>Sady </strong>of <a href="http://tigerbeatdown.blogspot.com">Tiger Beatdown</a>: When our powers combine, etc.</p>
<p>Up for discussion this morning:<strong> Caitlin Flanagan</strong>'s most recent book review, "<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200905/alec-baldwin">The Passion of Alec Baldwin</a>," an epic indulgence of armchair celebrity psychoanalysis in which Flanagan argues that:</p>
<blockquote><p>(a) <strong>Alec Baldwin</strong> is a babe</p>
<p>(b) <strong>Ireland Baldwin</strong> totally has the hots for her babe dad, who has the hots for her, too</p>
<p>(c)<strong> Kim Basinger</strong> is a bitch<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p>(d) choosing to spend your modest professor's salary on expensive foreign perfumes to satisfy your wife's whims instead of paying to fix the broken heater in your home will ensure that your daughter, <strong>Caitlin Flanagan</strong>, is raised with a purer vision of romance</p>
<p>(e) who the fuck knows for what this woman is truly arguing??</p></blockquote>
<p>Begin.</p>
<p>SADY: hello! who wants to discuss DEEP PSYCHOSEXUAL TRAUMA? Specifically, the psychosexual trauma inflicted on me by Caitlin Flanagan and her latest piece.</p>
<p>AMANDA: sure dude</p>
<p><span id="more-3728"></span></p>
<p>SADY: I had actually forgotten how deeply weird and wrong Caitlin Flanagan is in the past few years. Back in '06, her strange psychological issues and/or politics were all the rage. Now she basically has to assert that a famous man wants to sex his daughter in order to get noticed, I guess.</p>
<p>AMANDA: yeah, i'm wondering how much this "book review" about the baldwin family's psychological problems is actually a concerted effort on flanagan's part to air her own psychological problems in order to create a cult of personality around herself? it's too obvious not to be intentional.</p>
<p>SADY: exactly. and flanagan is professionally a provocateur &#8211; writing that women should have sex with their hisbands when they don't want to because it's their "duty," writing that working mothers damage their children irreparably with their selfishness, etc. this seems like another Flanagan Launch Party for her new theory, which is: women are basically giant incestuous adolescents, sexually speaking. oh, and divorce -no matter WHAT THE CONTEXT IN WHICH IT OCCURS &#8211; will make your child even more incesty, so don't do it. EVER.</p>
<p>AMANDA: i'd like to indulge flanagan's presence for a second here. let's say that (a) alec baldwin is a total hunk, and (b) daughters are immediately sexual replacements for their desexualized mothers (even when their mothers are renowned beauty of film kim basinger)</p>
<p>SADY: sure! let's say that!</p>
<p>AMANDA: why is divorce bad? then your hunky dad is totally a-vail-able! and he can shower you with all the fancy perfumes flanagan's mom got or whatever</p>
<p>SADY: this would seem to be true! and yet, unless daddy and mommy are both there to show you the ruins of their faded yet once-torrid sexual passion for each other (which you will, of course, want to spend much time contemplating) you might have fewer chances to flirt with your dad!</p>
<p>AMANDA: i feel so bad for that girl. first, alec baldwin is her dad, and now flanagan seemingly wants to be her, but a version of her that wants to have sex with her dad, alec baldwin. all he did was call her a pig on the phone.</p>
<p>SADY: right? and while that crossed lines, and does seem like verbal abuse, it's also a thing that I, a person not married to or spawned from a Baldwin/Basinger, feel I have a legitimate right to obsess about. yet flanagan (a) spends a ton of time talking about how abusive baldwin is, (b) furthermore posits the abuse as "almost sexual," and (c) talks about how hot &#8211; and totally universal! &#8211; that is at length.</p>
<p>AMANDA: it's actually kind of awesome. i feel kind of strange that i have to make the point that i'm a woman who doesn't think her mom is a bitch and doesn't want to have sex with her dad (or alec baldwin). i guess i'm a boring person to review a book. i kind of like that style: review a book about something fucked up, and try to one-up how fucked up it is. see: linda hirshman!</p>
<p>SADY: which is why i'll be writing a review of "wetlands" entirely in my own feces at some point. the dad-as-romance thing kind of keys into the whole issue here, which is that flanagan also sees romance-as-dad. women are SUPPOSED to get turned on by guys who are bigger and stronger than they are, and have more authority than they do, in flanagan's betty draper version of sexuality.</p>
<p>AMANDA: this is why jessica simpson's marriage turned out so well.</p>
<p>SADY: hahaha. it's kind of medieval: you will belong to your dad until you belong to your husband, so treat your husband like your dad, and vice versa!</p>
<p>AMANDA: and you will also neglect your children (a broken space heater is still a space heater!) to do so. i can't really tell if she's endorsing baldwin's behavior toward his daughter. i mean she seems to endorse fathers who treat their daughters like girlfriends. i guess that only turns bad when you divorce your real girlfriend and start treating your daughter like your "mistress." i have so much to learn about parenting.</p>
<p>SADY: i, too, need to learn about parenting. fortunately, i will have plenty of time to read caitlin flanagan's advice on the issue once my beauty fades. i think she thinks that the only reason baldwin went all Glengarry Glenn Ross on his kid was the divorce. whereas, i submit to you, this could have made him a divorceable man in the first place!</p>
<p>AMANDA: it's the chicken and the egg, man. we will never know if alec baldwin's ex-wife drove him to abuse, or whether alec baldwin's abuse of his wife drove her to divorce him.</p>
<p>SADY: yes, but fortunately it's not our business: it is the business of noted columnist caitlin flanagan.</p>
<p>AMANDA: ok. i claim her. i will become as obsessed with her as she is obsessed with alec baldwin. i will pen long well-publicized columns insinuating that i want to have sex with her. and maybe her children.</p>
<p>SADY: JOURNALISM! Hurrah!</p>
<p>AMANDA: cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/24/sexist-beatdown-its-ok-to-want-to-do-your-dad-as-long-as-your-dad-is-alec-baldwin-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

