<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Sexist &#187; 1893</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/1893/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>This Week In Sexist History: Bathing Beauties Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/07/22/this-week-in-sexist-history-bathing-beauties-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/07/22/this-week-in-sexist-history-bathing-beauties-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beyond DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1893]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bathing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baywatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexist history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sketch artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swimming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swimsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newspaper stories from the good old days say the darndest things. So every week on the Sexist, let’s take a ride on journalism’s way-back machine, to a time when beach-bound girls were sexy, confident, and refreshingly childlike!
This Week In Sexist History:

Good 'Ol Day: July 22, 1893
Dateline: Long Branch, N.J.
Subject: The summer of 1893 is nearly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newspaper stories from the good old days say the darndest things. So <a href="../2009/07/14/tag/sexist-history/">every week on the Sexist</a>, let’s take a ride on journalism’s way-back machine, to a time when beach-bound girls were sexy, confident, and refreshingly childlike!</p>
<p><strong>This Week In Sexist History:</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5178" title="Picture 4" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/07/Picture-4.png" alt="Picture 4" width="384" height="343" /></p>
<p><span id="more-5177"></span><strong>Good 'Ol Day: </strong>July 22, 1893</p>
<p><strong>Dateline</strong><strong>:</strong> Long Branch, N.J.</p>
<p><strong>Subject:</strong> The summer of 1893 is nearly ruined for this sad sack New Jersey scene reporter&#8212;until the sexiest underage bather this side of puberty catches his roving eye!</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5182" title="Picture 5" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/07/Picture-5.png" alt="Picture 5" width="386" height="77" /></p>
<p>What's lifting these male vacationers from the depths of their pathetic existences? If you've been studying your Sexist History, you'd know that the answer probably <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/30/this-week-in-sexist-history-girls-girls-girls-edition/">starts with Pretty and ends with Girls</a>:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5179" title="Picture 6" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/07/Picture-6.png" alt="Picture 6" width="386" height="175" /></p>
<p>Oh, it makes no difference what shape you are in the freewheeling social scene of the Jersey surf! Unless, of course, you're "pretty girl" shaped, in which case your body will likely be obsessively detailed in the pages of the <em>New York Times.</em> Proceed:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5181" title="Picture 7" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/07/Picture-7.png" alt="Picture 7" width="386" height="211" /></p>
<p>Euugh! How old is the young lady in the red swimsuit, anyway? One the one hand, it's great that this girl is still in her spluttering-around-in-the-water bathing suit phase, and not yet in her crippled-by-body-issues bathing suit phase. On the other hand, I'm willing to bet the girl's sexy childhood innocence was shattered riiiiiight arrroooound July 23, 1893&#8212;the day this Skeevy Turn-Of-The-Century Reporter's ruminations on her sexy childhood innocence was printed in the pages of the<em> New York Times</em>.</p>
<p>How can Skeevy Turn-of-the-Century<em> </em>Reporter possibly redeem himself from the true skeeviness of ogling bathing children? By turning next to an even sleazier specimen: The Skeevy Turn-Of-The-Century Sketch Artist.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5180" title="Picture 8" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/files/2009/07/Picture-8.png" alt="Picture 8" width="386" height="157" /></p>
<p>Done and done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/07/22/this-week-in-sexist-history-bathing-beauties-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

