<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin&#8217;s Entire Existence Is Sexist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:24:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-24254</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-24254</guid>
		<description>wow!!!!
now that is super hot
what a hot set of legs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow!!!!<br />
now that is super hot<br />
what a hot set of legs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sexism and the &#8220;If It Were A Man&#8221; Defense - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-24024</link>
		<dc:creator>Sexism and the &#8220;If It Were A Man&#8221; Defense - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-24024</guid>
		<description>[...] was recently tested out on a particularly incendiary Sarah Palin Newsweek cover. The magazine ran a photo of Palin posing in short shorts alongside the cover line: &#8220;How do you solve a problem like Sarah? She&#8217;s bad news for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was recently tested out on a particularly incendiary Sarah Palin Newsweek cover. The magazine ran a photo of Palin posing in short shorts alongside the cover line: &#8220;How do you solve a problem like Sarah? She&#8217;s bad news for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sexist Comments of the Week: Sarah Palin Hot Or Not? Edition - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23962</link>
		<dc:creator>Sexist Comments of the Week: Sarah Palin Hot Or Not? Edition - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23962</guid>
		<description>[...] covers. One cover, which ran last week, was criticized for depicting the former Alaskan governor as too sexy (left). Another, which ran last year, was criticized for depicting the Republican vice-presidential [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] covers. One cover, which ran last week, was criticized for depicting the former Alaskan governor as too sexy (left). Another, which ran last year, was criticized for depicting the Republican vice-presidential [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dev</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23807</link>
		<dc:creator>Dev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23807</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t even think this photograph is &quot;sexy&quot;. Palin&#039;s face is attractive as ever, but she&#039;s only wearing running shorts here, not a bikini. Give a woman a break for wearing running shorts! Would Obama be said to be exposing if he&#039;s shown exercising in shorts?

Signed, 
 A non-American from a moderately conservative Asian country</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't even think this photograph is "sexy". Palin's face is attractive as ever, but she's only wearing running shorts here, not a bikini. Give a woman a break for wearing running shorts! Would Obama be said to be exposing if he's shown exercising in shorts?</p>
<p>Signed,<br />
 A non-American from a moderately conservative Asian country</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23772</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23772</guid>
		<description>The United States Goverment and Rest Of World Leaders.
Countries Globely she would Be a Good Role Model Set a Good Example: Current Leaders would love their Country(s)
Would start improving Life Of The way they Live,1) Take-Good Care of World Leaders Single-Family Wifes Childern
ect.2) No More Complaints,3) Set A Good Example: LeaderShip,Reshape, Reform, Reorganization, Many Others on and on and on.... Sarah Palin Go For It...Vote For Her and the Poor will beome rich turn things around pancake rich people cannot help poor but poor people can
help rich people. Life Would Improve With Sarah Palin.
This is Real News The Law Of The Land &amp; Water Belongs To Real People 1) Health Improvement 2) Education Improvement 3) Economy Improvement 4) WORLD IMPROVEMENTS on &amp; on &amp; on Continue Next Time SARAH GO FOR IT Its Not End oF THE WORLD YET.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States Goverment and Rest Of World Leaders.<br />
Countries Globely she would Be a Good Role Model Set a Good Example: Current Leaders would love their Country(s)<br />
Would start improving Life Of The way they Live,1) Take-Good Care of World Leaders Single-Family Wifes Childern<br />
ect.2) No More Complaints,3) Set A Good Example: LeaderShip,Reshape, Reform, Reorganization, Many Others on and on and on.... Sarah Palin Go For It...Vote For Her and the Poor will beome rich turn things around pancake rich people cannot help poor but poor people can<br />
help rich people. Life Would Improve With Sarah Palin.<br />
This is Real News The Law Of The Land &amp; Water Belongs To Real People 1) Health Improvement 2) Education Improvement 3) Economy Improvement 4) WORLD IMPROVEMENTS on &amp; on &amp; on Continue Next Time SARAH GO FOR IT Its Not End oF THE WORLD YET.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odds and ends for 11/20 &#171; Blog on the Run: Reloaded</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23770</link>
		<dc:creator>Odds and ends for 11/20 &#171; Blog on the Run: Reloaded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23770</guid>
		<description>[...] Amanda Hess, for the win: Why is sexism only a problem when it affects Sarah [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Amanda Hess, for the win: Why is sexism only a problem when it affects Sarah [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinkfirst</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23732</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinkfirst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23732</guid>
		<description>I am puzzled by some of Sarah Palin’s thinking.

Sarah Palin poses for a series of pictures some of which were used in an article by “Runner’s World.”

One picture of her that she posed for, in a provocative way, during the photo shoot, but not used by “Runner’s World” is then used by Newsweek on the cover of their magazine.

Now she says that this was a “sexist” action. How can it be sexist now when Newsweek uses it if it was not sexist when she posed for it?

She posed voluntarily. She certainly could have told the photographer while she was posing the she felt that it was a sexist pose and did not want to pose that way.

That, combined with her winking and flirting during her debate with Biden does not provide me the kind of information that I need when evaluating the intellectual qualifications of someone running for a political office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am puzzled by some of Sarah Palin’s thinking.</p>
<p>Sarah Palin poses for a series of pictures some of which were used in an article by “Runner’s World.”</p>
<p>One picture of her that she posed for, in a provocative way, during the photo shoot, but not used by “Runner’s World” is then used by Newsweek on the cover of their magazine.</p>
<p>Now she says that this was a “sexist” action. How can it be sexist now when Newsweek uses it if it was not sexist when she posed for it?</p>
<p>She posed voluntarily. She certainly could have told the photographer while she was posing the she felt that it was a sexist pose and did not want to pose that way.</p>
<p>That, combined with her winking and flirting during her debate with Biden does not provide me the kind of information that I need when evaluating the intellectual qualifications of someone running for a political office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Bent-Me</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23707</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Bent-Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23707</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, that great EXECUTIVE position she held in Alaska, she quit before accomplishing anything to go prostitute her family and temporary fame for as much money as she can make.  Her future doesn&#039;t involve politics, it involves the pulpit, and she&#039;ll milk every one of you idiots of your money as she can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, that great EXECUTIVE position she held in Alaska, she quit before accomplishing anything to go prostitute her family and temporary fame for as much money as she can make.  Her future doesn't involve politics, it involves the pulpit, and she'll milk every one of you idiots of your money as she can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Bent-Me</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23705</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Bent-Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23705</guid>
		<description>Chris- You are a fucking dumbass.  If you really believe McCain and his handlers chose Palin because of the depth of her experience, you&#039;re fucking delusional.  She lost him any real chance of being elected because as we all saw, she&#039;s a fucking retard.  I guess you need to suport your own, so that&#039;s undertsandable.  

And the swipes at Obama, who&#039;s been actually in office, for less than 10 months now and who inherited a royal fuckfest courtesy of Dub-ya, that really is telling.  If I didn&#039;t care about what happens to this country, I would have wished McCain and her in office.  Then who would all your fuck-nuts blame then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris- You are a fucking dumbass.  If you really believe McCain and his handlers chose Palin because of the depth of her experience, you're fucking delusional.  She lost him any real chance of being elected because as we all saw, she's a fucking retard.  I guess you need to suport your own, so that's undertsandable.  </p>
<p>And the swipes at Obama, who's been actually in office, for less than 10 months now and who inherited a royal fuckfest courtesy of Dub-ya, that really is telling.  If I didn't care about what happens to this country, I would have wished McCain and her in office.  Then who would all your fuck-nuts blame then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Sarah Palin Is A Better Feminist Than Nancy Pelosi - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23704</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Sarah Palin Is A Better Feminist Than Nancy Pelosi - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23704</guid>
		<description>[...] piece&#8217;s titular question, of course, is &#8220;fuck no.&#8221; Sarah Palin is, officially, the worst. But Siskind defies feminist conventional wisdom by throwing out this compelling argument:  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] piece&#8217;s titular question, of course, is &#8220;fuck no.&#8221; Sarah Palin is, officially, the worst. But Siskind defies feminist conventional wisdom by throwing out this compelling argument:  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23693</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23693</guid>
		<description>Seriously ,  you people who think Sarah Palin was picked as McCain&#039;s running mate simply because she was a woman need to stop drinking that koolaid and look at the facts.
 She is a conservative. He wasn&#039;t trying to win women voters as much as he was trying to bring conservatives onboard when he picked her. McCain was too centrist/moderate/McAmnesty ridden to appeal to many conservatives which is the main reason why he picked her.
 The cover of the Newsweek magazine was absolutely sexist.  Think about it,  the (perhaps)dozens of people who reads that rag use sexism , racism and victimism as tools to accomplish thier objectives so they were playing to thier audience.  .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously ,  you people who think Sarah Palin was picked as McCain's running mate simply because she was a woman need to stop drinking that koolaid and look at the facts.<br />
 She is a conservative. He wasn't trying to win women voters as much as he was trying to bring conservatives onboard when he picked her. McCain was too centrist/moderate/McAmnesty ridden to appeal to many conservatives which is the main reason why he picked her.<br />
 The cover of the Newsweek magazine was absolutely sexist.  Think about it,  the (perhaps)dozens of people who reads that rag use sexism , racism and victimism as tools to accomplish thier objectives so they were playing to thier audience.  .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23692</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23692</guid>
		<description>This assertion that she was picked because she was attractive is bullcrap. I guess holding an elcted office EXECUTIVE position had nothing to do with it. I think her qualifications are more impressive than the marxist  tool that is in office now.
  I love how you feminazis foam at the mouth when an attractive and intelligent woman who believes in Christian values is successful and popular.
 Stacey  suggests that our &quot;fears and panic&quot; about the economy are baseless but if you look at the numbers it is easy to see that Obama and his policies have failed.
  Cloward and Piven strategy is what is going on here and while you fools want to bury your heads in the sand others have connected the dots and are about to take our government back.
 I enjoy watching and listening to liberals in full blown panic over a female politician that they have no chance of stopping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This assertion that she was picked because she was attractive is bullcrap. I guess holding an elcted office EXECUTIVE position had nothing to do with it. I think her qualifications are more impressive than the marxist  tool that is in office now.<br />
  I love how you feminazis foam at the mouth when an attractive and intelligent woman who believes in Christian values is successful and popular.<br />
 Stacey  suggests that our "fears and panic" about the economy are baseless but if you look at the numbers it is easy to see that Obama and his policies have failed.<br />
  Cloward and Piven strategy is what is going on here and while you fools want to bury your heads in the sand others have connected the dots and are about to take our government back.<br />
 I enjoy watching and listening to liberals in full blown panic over a female politician that they have no chance of stopping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bapril</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23682</link>
		<dc:creator>Bapril</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23682</guid>
		<description>Great article...I thought the exact same thing when I heard her complain about the Newsweek cover.  So it&#039;s okay for her (and the Republican Party) to use her sex/gender to their benefit, but it&#039;s off limits to everyone else?  

I have actually always liked John McCain and consider myself neither a Republican or Democrat so my vote is always up in the air, but, as a woman, I was extremely offended that the boys in the Republican Party thought they could throw any &#039;ole woman up there and all of us dumb females in the country would just fall in line and vote for McCain because of Palin.  

They seriously underestimated the woman of this country (well, at least the intelligent ones).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article...I thought the exact same thing when I heard her complain about the Newsweek cover.  So it's okay for her (and the Republican Party) to use her sex/gender to their benefit, but it's off limits to everyone else?  </p>
<p>I have actually always liked John McCain and consider myself neither a Republican or Democrat so my vote is always up in the air, but, as a woman, I was extremely offended that the boys in the Republican Party thought they could throw any 'ole woman up there and all of us dumb females in the country would just fall in line and vote for McCain because of Palin.  </p>
<p>They seriously underestimated the woman of this country (well, at least the intelligent ones).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comrade Al Gonzales</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23660</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade Al Gonzales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23660</guid>
		<description>Palin is just the working class version of Dan Quayle, only Quayle was cuter. How he ended up with that horse-faced wife, who knows. At least he wasn&#039;t as vulgar as Palin.

Palin&#039;s whole public existence is based on being attractive to working class white men. Is it sexist to use sex to denigrate a person whose very existence depends on sex? Answer: No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin is just the working class version of Dan Quayle, only Quayle was cuter. How he ended up with that horse-faced wife, who knows. At least he wasn't as vulgar as Palin.</p>
<p>Palin's whole public existence is based on being attractive to working class white men. Is it sexist to use sex to denigrate a person whose very existence depends on sex? Answer: No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23630</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23630</guid>
		<description>If Palin ever got in office, it would be a sad day. But I guarantee you she will never make it. She&#039;s made a fool of herself, and she&#039;s not stable enough to be our leader. 
I remember that whole thing about her &quot;praying for the gays&quot; at her church. Jesus Christ... *facepalm* Of all things to worry about... When there are so many things you CAN change in this world, that need it, she goes off to &quot;pray for the gays&quot; (to CURE them)... I don&#039;t want someone like her in office. I believe women are just as smart, if not smarter in some case (and vice versa) than men, and just as capable of being in office. But she is making political women everywhere look terrible. 
And Ronny, if it was true that she wanted what we all want, then she would have said so during elections, and if she did, obviously, she wasn&#039;t what we wanted. So no, that&#039;s not true. And have you ever &quot;LISTENED&quot; to Obama?
All Palin is doing now is trying to get more attention and probably more money for more clothes. She&#039;s just drawing on people&#039;s panic and fear about the economy and the issues going on right now. I&#039;m willing to bet she would do a far worse job than Bush...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Palin ever got in office, it would be a sad day. But I guarantee you she will never make it. She's made a fool of herself, and she's not stable enough to be our leader.<br />
I remember that whole thing about her "praying for the gays" at her church. Jesus Christ... *facepalm* Of all things to worry about... When there are so many things you CAN change in this world, that need it, she goes off to "pray for the gays" (to CURE them)... I don't want someone like her in office. I believe women are just as smart, if not smarter in some case (and vice versa) than men, and just as capable of being in office. But she is making political women everywhere look terrible.<br />
And Ronny, if it was true that she wanted what we all want, then she would have said so during elections, and if she did, obviously, she wasn't what we wanted. So no, that's not true. And have you ever "LISTENED" to Obama?<br />
All Palin is doing now is trying to get more attention and probably more money for more clothes. She's just drawing on people's panic and fear about the economy and the issues going on right now. I'm willing to bet she would do a far worse job than Bush...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Bent-Me</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23616</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Bent-Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23616</guid>
		<description>Ronny- Listen to her?  Are you fucking retarded?  Have you really listened to her?  She makes Bush sound like Churchill at times.  It&#039;s beyond painful.  Haven&#039;t you fucking fundies Christos realized that Bush is not like you guys and neither is she.  They played a part and tricked morons like you all into believe that they are &quot;good Christian people&quot;. 


There is an innate contracdiction in what she&#039;s promoting.  She doesn&#039;t hold the same values as you, she&#039;s lying.  All the fundies values she claims, has she really lived up to them?  No.  People are more concerned with her fugly ass than what she really stands for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronny- Listen to her?  Are you fucking retarded?  Have you really listened to her?  She makes Bush sound like Churchill at times.  It's beyond painful.  Haven't you fucking fundies Christos realized that Bush is not like you guys and neither is she.  They played a part and tricked morons like you all into believe that they are "good Christian people". </p>
<p>There is an innate contracdiction in what she's promoting.  She doesn't hold the same values as you, she's lying.  All the fundies values she claims, has she really lived up to them?  No.  People are more concerned with her fugly ass than what she really stands for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23613</link>
		<dc:creator>The Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23613</guid>
		<description>Gee, Ronny - how about you pull your pants up, squeegee clean your Sarah Palin poster, and get back to work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, Ronny - how about you pull your pants up, squeegee clean your Sarah Palin poster, and get back to work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronny Dunn</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23610</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronny Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23610</guid>
		<description>Wow! You pitiful uninformed masses are  a bunch of vendictive ill informed touts.
I&#039;ll bet most of you were interviewed by Jay Leno on the street and asked who the vice president was and you couldn&#039;t  get it right either.
Women are a viable attribute to our society and if you haven&#039;t looked around lately in the house and senate i suggest you sit down and get educated. There are a lot of them and more each year. Trouble is most of them are down right ugly. But they have  people savy and thats what we need . We need to get  all these lifers out of congress and the senate and get new blood in the white house. And we need a person who can give an address without a teleprompter, or  insuring we the audience only ask the scripted questions.
I am going to have such a great time watching you  people start yelling when you get your health tax bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! You pitiful uninformed masses are  a bunch of vendictive ill informed touts.<br />
I'll bet most of you were interviewed by Jay Leno on the street and asked who the vice president was and you couldn't  get it right either.<br />
Women are a viable attribute to our society and if you haven't looked around lately in the house and senate i suggest you sit down and get educated. There are a lot of them and more each year. Trouble is most of them are down right ugly. But they have  people savy and thats what we need . We need to get  all these lifers out of congress and the senate and get new blood in the white house. And we need a person who can give an address without a teleprompter, or  insuring we the audience only ask the scripted questions.<br />
I am going to have such a great time watching you  people start yelling when you get your health tax bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronny Dunn</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23609</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronny Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23609</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it something if all these ugly nasty mouthed people stopped blowing hate at Palin and actually listened to her. While  i beleive initially I was sexest male  I was prejudice against her because she was a woman. Then I actually listened to her.
Guess what she is exactly what we need in the white house. She actually has morals which are basicaly non existant in our women leaders today.
She has political savy when it comes to peoples rights.
I am now a convert and if you actually listen to her  and compare your needs and thoughts to what our country needs  you will also become  a Palinite. She wants us out of the wars, she wants a balanced budget, she wants  health care, she wants womens rights she want equality in the work place , she wants  to redo NAFTA and bring jobs home she wants care for the elderly, she wants, a strong army, she wants fair treatment to ndocumented workers.Jesus she wantswhat most of us want. Put aside your sexist attitude and all you  not so georgeous womenstop hating her because she is beautiful. So are you in your own way. Look beyond the beauty and you will find a mom that is happy, a wife that loves her husband and a governor that prospered  for her stat.e</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn't it something if all these ugly nasty mouthed people stopped blowing hate at Palin and actually listened to her. While  i beleive initially I was sexest male  I was prejudice against her because she was a woman. Then I actually listened to her.<br />
Guess what she is exactly what we need in the white house. She actually has morals which are basicaly non existant in our women leaders today.<br />
She has political savy when it comes to peoples rights.<br />
I am now a convert and if you actually listen to her  and compare your needs and thoughts to what our country needs  you will also become  a Palinite. She wants us out of the wars, she wants a balanced budget, she wants  health care, she wants womens rights she want equality in the work place , she wants  to redo NAFTA and bring jobs home she wants care for the elderly, she wants, a strong army, she wants fair treatment to ndocumented workers.Jesus she wantswhat most of us want. Put aside your sexist attitude and all you  not so georgeous womenstop hating her because she is beautiful. So are you in your own way. Look beyond the beauty and you will find a mom that is happy, a wife that loves her husband and a governor that prospered  for her stat.e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DIck</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23606</link>
		<dc:creator>DIck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23606</guid>
		<description>For those of you that think that is in any way a sexy photo........ get a life. Isnt it a shame an attractive and smart woman has to deal with such stupidity. You go Sarah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you that think that is in any way a sexy photo........ get a life. Isnt it a shame an attractive and smart woman has to deal with such stupidity. You go Sarah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Typical DC BS</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23572</link>
		<dc:creator>Typical DC BS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23572</guid>
		<description>Yes, Palin is woefully unqualified for any job involving the upper echelons of government.  Sort of like our current president, OBA MAO.  Selling us out to the Chinese even more than the Bushwhacker ever could have.

We are all morons in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Palin is woefully unqualified for any job involving the upper echelons of government.  Sort of like our current president, OBA MAO.  Selling us out to the Chinese even more than the Bushwhacker ever could have.</p>
<p>We are all morons in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Bear</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23569</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23569</guid>
		<description>A point also overlooked in the article: in order to achieve the office of governor, she had to run in a state where the ratio of men to women is 9:1.  In another state, where she could have been scrutinized more on qualifications and political platforms, she wouldn&#039;t have made it onto the ballot.  Moreover, remember the biggest liars yell, &quot;Liar!&quot; the most at everyone else, so it seems her constant accusations of sexism shows she&#039;s thinking of the uses of sexuality in self-promotion.  She has minimal qualifications, keeps pointing to the measly experience she has, and so tries to press the idea she&#039;s smart, but she comes off like Fredo Corleone in Godfather II, screaming, &quot;I&#039;m smart!  I know stuff!&quot;  The conservative excuse for her poor performance in the Katie Couric interview was, &quot;Well, she wasn&#039;t prepared.&quot;  We would hope a contender for president could think on their feet, and so that excuse only serves to sink her ship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A point also overlooked in the article: in order to achieve the office of governor, she had to run in a state where the ratio of men to women is 9:1.  In another state, where she could have been scrutinized more on qualifications and political platforms, she wouldn't have made it onto the ballot.  Moreover, remember the biggest liars yell, "Liar!" the most at everyone else, so it seems her constant accusations of sexism shows she's thinking of the uses of sexuality in self-promotion.  She has minimal qualifications, keeps pointing to the measly experience she has, and so tries to press the idea she's smart, but she comes off like Fredo Corleone in Godfather II, screaming, "I'm smart!  I know stuff!"  The conservative excuse for her poor performance in the Katie Couric interview was, "Well, she wasn't prepared."  We would hope a contender for president could think on their feet, and so that excuse only serves to sink her ship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Bent-Me</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23549</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Bent-Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23549</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it. Palin herself used the fact that she was a woman to have people sympathize with her.  How many times did she stump on the trail using various images of &quot;hockey mom&quot; and &quot;pitbull will lipstick&quot;.  This wasn&#039;t seen as sexist.  Yet ever freaking time she opened her stupid mouth and someone pointed out that she also happened to be a woman, they&#039;re sexist.  It&#039;s a convenient way for her to cop out because she&#039;s too stupid to handle it on her own.

Hilary Clinton did a marevelous job, but reverted to the sexism talk when it was covenient.  I thought it was bullshit.  She even fucking cried because the media was tough on her.  What the fuck, isn&#039;t that playing into the hype.

Palin, like Bush, is simply a moron who is utilizing an image to advance her bottom line.  Bush used Jesus, Plain, her vagina.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't get it. Palin herself used the fact that she was a woman to have people sympathize with her.  How many times did she stump on the trail using various images of "hockey mom" and "pitbull will lipstick".  This wasn't seen as sexist.  Yet ever freaking time she opened her stupid mouth and someone pointed out that she also happened to be a woman, they're sexist.  It's a convenient way for her to cop out because she's too stupid to handle it on her own.</p>
<p>Hilary Clinton did a marevelous job, but reverted to the sexism talk when it was covenient.  I thought it was bullshit.  She even fucking cried because the media was tough on her.  What the fuck, isn't that playing into the hype.</p>
<p>Palin, like Bush, is simply a moron who is utilizing an image to advance her bottom line.  Bush used Jesus, Plain, her vagina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23546</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23546</guid>
		<description>AH! Ok...I&#039;m not from there and didn&#039;t hear about that.  Fair enough.  I guess I should have said, I didn&#039;t know of any national &quot;news&quot; publications that used that photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AH! Ok...I'm not from there and didn't hear about that.  Fair enough.  I guess I should have said, I didn't know of any national "news" publications that used that photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Hess</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23543</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23543</guid>
		<description>that cover was terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that cover was terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23542</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23542</guid>
		<description>@Katie &quot;@anonymous…nobody used a picture of Barack Obama shirtless on a cover&quot;

I have do disagree with you. The Washingtonian did, and put &quot;OUR NEIGHBORS ARE HOT&quot; on the front cover. Very controversial cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Katie "@anonymous…nobody used a picture of Barack Obama shirtless on a cover"</p>
<p>I have do disagree with you. The Washingtonian did, and put "OUR NEIGHBORS ARE HOT" on the front cover. Very controversial cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Stretts aka the Doo</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23537</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Stretts aka the Doo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23537</guid>
		<description>FS- that&#039;s not what the article is about...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FS- that's not what the article is about...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Former Staffer</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23536</link>
		<dc:creator>Former Staffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23536</guid>
		<description>BSatD - Her ass isn&#039;t MILF&#039;y.  Her political values alone make everything about her repulsive.  Using the term MILF is in itself sexist, because it reduces her to her physical shell.  It&#039;s her lack of a brain that&#039;s repulsive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BSatD - Her ass isn't MILF'y.  Her political values alone make everything about her repulsive.  Using the term MILF is in itself sexist, because it reduces her to her physical shell.  It's her lack of a brain that's repulsive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Stretts aka the Doo</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23534</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Stretts aka the Doo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23534</guid>
		<description>The author makes a very keen observation: Palin loves to throw the sexism flag with every chance she gets (rightfully so in many cases)...BUT, if it wasn&#039;t for sexism to begin with she never would&#039;ve made it to the national political stage! Using your MILF&#039;y ass to rally political support is using sexism in your favor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The author makes a very keen observation: Palin loves to throw the sexism flag with every chance she gets (rightfully so in many cases)...BUT, if it wasn't for sexism to begin with she never would've made it to the national political stage! Using your MILF'y ass to rally political support is using sexism in your favor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Former Staffer</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23533</link>
		<dc:creator>Former Staffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23533</guid>
		<description>Did you have to Amanda.  This puppet&#039;s 15 minutes are up.  I bet she resigns from the book tour before she reaches Iowa.

Seriously, we have much more substantive issues to confront, a hyper-partisan hack is not one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you have to Amanda.  This puppet's 15 minutes are up.  I bet she resigns from the book tour before she reaches Iowa.</p>
<p>Seriously, we have much more substantive issues to confront, a hyper-partisan hack is not one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Hess</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23523</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23523</guid>
		<description>anonymous: Please read before commenting. &quot;she has all sort of horrible ideas for our country, shes the worst candidate for the president, and yet women will vote for her because shes a woman. not only will you vote for her, youll vouch for her shitty ideas BECAUSE shes a woman. not all women obviously, but enough. thats sexism. youre deciding something based on gender, and not on policy, intelligence, or anything useful.&quot;

That IS sexism. And that is exactly my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anonymous: Please read before commenting. "she has all sort of horrible ideas for our country, shes the worst candidate for the president, and yet women will vote for her because shes a woman. not only will you vote for her, youll vouch for her shitty ideas BECAUSE shes a woman. not all women obviously, but enough. thats sexism. youre deciding something based on gender, and not on policy, intelligence, or anything useful."</p>
<p>That IS sexism. And that is exactly my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Jass</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23500</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Jass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23500</guid>
		<description>So when does Newsweek put out the cover with Biden wearing a speedo &amp; a wifebeater?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when does Newsweek put out the cover with Biden wearing a speedo &amp; a wifebeater?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Jass</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23499</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Jass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23499</guid>
		<description>Like a chick could be president.  Please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like a chick could be president.  Please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23497</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23497</guid>
		<description>@anonymous...nobody used a picture of Barack Obama shirtless on a cover.  Quitting a job doesn&#039;t mean she all of a sudden deserves whatever she gets, without limitation.  Sarah Palin was selected for VP under the MISGUIDED assumption that women would support her just because she&#039;s a woman.  For the vast majority of non-Republicans, that didn&#039;t turn out true, at all.  I don&#039;t know what sources you&#039;re reading, but nobody is supporting her just because she&#039;s a woman.  I am ONLY willing to support her in this one area, because she&#039;s being treated in a sexist way.  Like I said earlier, she is a joke of a politician.  The reference to playgirl is tired - it does not even have widespread female readership.  Calling her ugly  proves nothing.  

Oh, and that respectable woman candidate?  Her name is Hillary, she DID experience sexism (no ironic quote marks here), and it wasn&#039;t so small.  And, uh, we did complain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@anonymous...nobody used a picture of Barack Obama shirtless on a cover.  Quitting a job doesn't mean she all of a sudden deserves whatever she gets, without limitation.  Sarah Palin was selected for VP under the MISGUIDED assumption that women would support her just because she's a woman.  For the vast majority of non-Republicans, that didn't turn out true, at all.  I don't know what sources you're reading, but nobody is supporting her just because she's a woman.  I am ONLY willing to support her in this one area, because she's being treated in a sexist way.  Like I said earlier, she is a joke of a politician.  The reference to playgirl is tired - it does not even have widespread female readership.  Calling her ugly  proves nothing.  </p>
<p>Oh, and that respectable woman candidate?  Her name is Hillary, she DID experience sexism (no ironic quote marks here), and it wasn't so small.  And, uh, we did complain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23494</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23494</guid>
		<description>she isnt the target of sexism.  thats preposterous.  just because shes a woman doesnt mean that the media cant post a picture of her wearing short shorts.  how in the hell is that sexist?!  she POSED for that shot for another magazine!  remember the picture of obama shirtless on the beach?  thats just as sexist as this is.  and he was wearing less!  she quit her job as governer (QUIT.  that means shes a damned quitter.), she has all sort of horrible ideas for our country, shes the worst candidate for the president, and yet women will vote for her because shes a woman.  not only will you vote for her, youll vouch for her shitty ideas BECAUSE shes a woman.  not all women obviously, but enough.  thats sexism.  youre deciding something based on gender, and not on policy, intelligence, or anything useful.  anyone who thinks palin is a victim of sexism is living a dream.  every candidate is up to the public for intense scrutiny, regardless of race or gender.

this article seems to misplace sexism though.  a link to playboy?!  there IS a playgirl you know.  men get naked for cash too.  oh, and she NOT hot.  so you can ignore that whole sentence about sexism, that it &quot;allows women to earn an insane amount of political power for simply being a hot conservative lady.&quot;  its not her beauty, its her religion that gives her &quot;insane amounts of political power&quot;.

wait for a respectable woman to run for president.  when she experiences the small amount of &quot;sexism&quot; she will inevitably experience, then you will have something justifiable to actually complain about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>she isnt the target of sexism.  thats preposterous.  just because shes a woman doesnt mean that the media cant post a picture of her wearing short shorts.  how in the hell is that sexist?!  she POSED for that shot for another magazine!  remember the picture of obama shirtless on the beach?  thats just as sexist as this is.  and he was wearing less!  she quit her job as governer (QUIT.  that means shes a damned quitter.), she has all sort of horrible ideas for our country, shes the worst candidate for the president, and yet women will vote for her because shes a woman.  not only will you vote for her, youll vouch for her shitty ideas BECAUSE shes a woman.  not all women obviously, but enough.  thats sexism.  youre deciding something based on gender, and not on policy, intelligence, or anything useful.  anyone who thinks palin is a victim of sexism is living a dream.  every candidate is up to the public for intense scrutiny, regardless of race or gender.</p>
<p>this article seems to misplace sexism though.  a link to playboy?!  there IS a playgirl you know.  men get naked for cash too.  oh, and she NOT hot.  so you can ignore that whole sentence about sexism, that it "allows women to earn an insane amount of political power for simply being a hot conservative lady."  its not her beauty, its her religion that gives her "insane amounts of political power".</p>
<p>wait for a respectable woman to run for president.  when she experiences the small amount of "sexism" she will inevitably experience, then you will have something justifiable to actually complain about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23493</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23493</guid>
		<description>Im still trying to figure out how President Obama had more executive experience than Sarah....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im still trying to figure out how President Obama had more executive experience than Sarah....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23431</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23431</guid>
		<description>I meant to finish that by saying, she doesn&#039;t deserve criticism for being a woman who has legs and long hair and posed for a running magazine picture...in runner&#039;s clothes.  I&#039;m not saying that&#039;s what you&#039;re going for.  But I don&#039;t think the answer to unnecessarily glorifying Sarah Palin is unnecessarily denigrating her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to finish that by saying, she doesn't deserve criticism for being a woman who has legs and long hair and posed for a running magazine picture...in runner's clothes.  I'm not saying that's what you're going for.  But I don't think the answer to unnecessarily glorifying Sarah Palin is unnecessarily denigrating her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23430</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23430</guid>
		<description>@Comrade, I&#039;m not sure calling her an ugly hooker is any vast improvement over whatever winking sexual antics she&#039;s responsible for in the past.  The whole point, as far as I&#039;m concerned, is that her looks have nothing to do with anything.  Or they shouldn&#039;t.  I really don&#039;t think she has &quot;baited&quot; sexist behavior.  She&#039;s gotten it because she&#039;s a woman.  She absolutely deserves criticism for being a ridiculous joke of a candidate, a recklessly misleading author, and a general nutcase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Comrade, I'm not sure calling her an ugly hooker is any vast improvement over whatever winking sexual antics she's responsible for in the past.  The whole point, as far as I'm concerned, is that her looks have nothing to do with anything.  Or they shouldn't.  I really don't think she has "baited" sexist behavior.  She's gotten it because she's a woman.  She absolutely deserves criticism for being a ridiculous joke of a candidate, a recklessly misleading author, and a general nutcase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comrade Al Gonzales</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23427</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade Al Gonzales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23427</guid>
		<description>Anyone who saw this hideous creature winking during the &quot;debate&quot; with Biden cannot seriously argue that her entire phenomena is not based upon overt sexism. She&#039;s Barbie with a Bazooka - nothing more, nothing less. 

Only un-evolved Neanderthals find her attractive. She looks and acts like a $20 coke-head hooker on a Seattle street.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who saw this hideous creature winking during the "debate" with Biden cannot seriously argue that her entire phenomena is not based upon overt sexism. She's Barbie with a Bazooka - nothing more, nothing less. </p>
<p>Only un-evolved Neanderthals find her attractive. She looks and acts like a $20 coke-head hooker on a Seattle street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whet moser</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-entire-existence-is-sexist/comment-page-1/#comment-23414</link>
		<dc:creator>whet moser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7560#comment-23414</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a deeper question for you: what the fuck is the Newsweek article actually about? I can&#039;t make heads or tails of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a deeper question for you: what the fuck is the Newsweek article actually about? I can't make heads or tails of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

