<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Maine Potheads Hate Gays?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:24:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-22384</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-22384</guid>
		<description>Maybe they were so stoned they just decided to check &quot;yes&quot; to everything.  They were just trying to keep it positive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they were so stoned they just decided to check "yes" to everything.  They were just trying to keep it positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiffani W</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-22134</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiffani W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-22134</guid>
		<description>My main theory would be that anti-gay marriage people specifically came to vote on that issue, while many fewer people would be enraged enough at the potentiality of legal medical marijuana to turn out specifically for the purpose of voting against it.  People might have skipped other props that they weren&#039;t as interested in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My main theory would be that anti-gay marriage people specifically came to vote on that issue, while many fewer people would be enraged enough at the potentiality of legal medical marijuana to turn out specifically for the purpose of voting against it.  People might have skipped other props that they weren't as interested in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jules</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-21918</link>
		<dc:creator>jules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-21918</guid>
		<description>@Simone:  No, Simone we should take it VERY SERIOUSLY, this is a BLOG POST, practically the word of GOD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Simone:  No, Simone we should take it VERY SERIOUSLY, this is a BLOG POST, practically the word of GOD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THe Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-21901</link>
		<dc:creator>THe Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-21901</guid>
		<description>Well, where&#039;s the fun in that?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, where's the fun in that?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simone</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-21887</link>
		<dc:creator>Simone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-21887</guid>
		<description>You guys...?

I think this article is supposed to be tongue-in-cheek.  The author is just pointing out that it&#039;s a little bizarre for a state to abolish gay marriage, and legalize marijuana; I don&#039;t think we&#039;re supposed to take the actual statistics all that seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys...?</p>
<p>I think this article is supposed to be tongue-in-cheek.  The author is just pointing out that it's a little bizarre for a state to abolish gay marriage, and legalize marijuana; I don't think we're supposed to take the actual statistics all that seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THe Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-21828</link>
		<dc:creator>THe Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-21828</guid>
		<description>The conclusion that all of those who voted against gay marriage are homophobic is also false.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conclusion that all of those who voted against gay marriage are homophobic is also false.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THe Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-21827</link>
		<dc:creator>THe Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-21827</guid>
		<description>Coleman,

Props!!!  woot woot!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coleman,</p>
<p>Props!!!  woot woot!  :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THe Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-21826</link>
		<dc:creator>THe Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-21826</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what more full of shit: the bible, or people who cite it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't know what more full of shit: the bible, or people who cite it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-21816</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-21816</guid>
		<description>Remember everyone, the bible teaches us that homosexuality is a sin.  It also teaches us that God put all the plants an animals on the earth for our benifit.  If you&#039;re trying to figure out that 12%, you need only to look to the Lord&#039;s word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember everyone, the bible teaches us that homosexuality is a sin.  It also teaches us that God put all the plants an animals on the earth for our benifit.  If you're trying to figure out that 12%, you need only to look to the Lord's word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-21812</link>
		<dc:creator>Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-21812</guid>
		<description>Yo, pass the Dutch!

...no homo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo, pass the Dutch!</p>
<p>...no homo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Em</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-21800</link>
		<dc:creator>Em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-21800</guid>
		<description>I consistently favor legalization of marijuana, medical or otherwise - but don&#039;t even smoke. Ever.

Of course, I am also not homophobic, but the conclusion that some of the homophobic voters were also potheads is not necessarily accurate.

To the last commenter - the &quot;amount&quot; is not trivial or nontrivial because of the proportion it represents of a particular larger population. 1% of Maine voters is a large number of people.

Doesn&#039;t mean the article is all that meaningful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I consistently favor legalization of marijuana, medical or otherwise - but don't even smoke. Ever.</p>
<p>Of course, I am also not homophobic, but the conclusion that some of the homophobic voters were also potheads is not necessarily accurate.</p>
<p>To the last commenter - the "amount" is not trivial or nontrivial because of the proportion it represents of a particular larger population. 1% of Maine voters is a large number of people.</p>
<p>Doesn't mean the article is all that meaningful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-21795</link>
		<dc:creator>A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-21795</guid>
		<description>sorry, this article fails.  the percentages you give are for people who actually voted on that proposition.  in terms of everyone who voted that day, there is only about a 1% difference between the gay marriage and weed proposition.  also, not everyone who voted on one prop may have voted for the other because some people didnt even vote on them at all. this distorts the 1% even further to a trivial amount.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, this article fails.  the percentages you give are for people who actually voted on that proposition.  in terms of everyone who voted that day, there is only about a 1% difference between the gay marriage and weed proposition.  also, not everyone who voted on one prop may have voted for the other because some people didnt even vote on them at all. this distorts the 1% even further to a trivial amount.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mj</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-21790</link>
		<dc:creator>mj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-21790</guid>
		<description>It is 12%, not 6%. No on Question 1 is the pro-marriage-equality position, which got 47%. Yes on the marijuana question legalizes it. So 59% say legalize marijuana, 47% say let every couple marry. That&#039;s 12%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is 12%, not 6%. No on Question 1 is the pro-marriage-equality position, which got 47%. Yes on the marijuana question legalizes it. So 59% say legalize marijuana, 47% say let every couple marry. That's 12%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Em</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-21787</link>
		<dc:creator>Em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-21787</guid>
		<description>I mean, it&#039;s only 6%, but isn&#039;t 6% of any population frat guys?  (admittedly, that math took way longer in my brain than it should have).

Maybe activists should be marketing to frat guys!  Give out free booze at the rallies and put scantily clad women on the fliers.  They may not even know what they&#039;re voting for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean, it's only 6%, but isn't 6% of any population frat guys?  (admittedly, that math took way longer in my brain than it should have).</p>
<p>Maybe activists should be marketing to frat guys!  Give out free booze at the rallies and put scantily clad women on the fliers.  They may not even know what they're voting for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THe Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-21782</link>
		<dc:creator>THe Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-21782</guid>
		<description>THAT explains it!  Sorry!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THAT explains it!  Sorry!  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Hess</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-21780</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-21780</guid>
		<description>I purposefully avoided doing any math!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purposefully avoided doing any math!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THe Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/04/which-maine-potheads-hate-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-21776</link>
		<dc:creator>THe Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7355#comment-21776</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t think it was possible, but your math is worse than your writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn't think it was possible, but your math is worse than your writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

