<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mike Riggs Is Trailer Trash Zombie. But Is It Sexy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/03/mike-riggs-is-trailer-trash-zombie-but-is-it-sexy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/03/mike-riggs-is-trailer-trash-zombie-but-is-it-sexy/</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:24:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: murcielago</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/03/mike-riggs-is-trailer-trash-zombie-but-is-it-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-21928</link>
		<dc:creator>murcielago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7325#comment-21928</guid>
		<description>It&#039;d probably be sexy on...er...someone hot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It'd probably be sexy on...er...someone hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jules</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/03/mike-riggs-is-trailer-trash-zombie-but-is-it-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-21907</link>
		<dc:creator>jules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7325#comment-21907</guid>
		<description>I know its irrational, but I just HATE looking at guy&#039;s thighs in shorts!  I hate it!  That being said, I think Mike looks VERY sexy in this picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know its irrational, but I just HATE looking at guy's thighs in shorts!  I hate it!  That being said, I think Mike looks VERY sexy in this picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/03/mike-riggs-is-trailer-trash-zombie-but-is-it-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-21804</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7325#comment-21804</guid>
		<description>Offensive (the &#039;trailer trash&#039; part, not the zombie part; although that&#039;s the worst zombie makeup I&#039;ve ever seen, he looks more like a smudged clown.) And not remotely sexy. My opinion of the costume is about the same as my opinion of Riggs&#039; consistently obnoxious dudebro writing style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Offensive (the 'trailer trash' part, not the zombie part; although that's the worst zombie makeup I've ever seen, he looks more like a smudged clown.) And not remotely sexy. My opinion of the costume is about the same as my opinion of Riggs' consistently obnoxious dudebro writing style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/03/mike-riggs-is-trailer-trash-zombie-but-is-it-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-21606</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7325#comment-21606</guid>
		<description>Sexy as shit. Riggs and his zombie g-thang were the sex nexus of Ryan Engstrom&#039;s swingin&#039; Halloween bash. Sexy cops be damned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sexy as shit. Riggs and his zombie g-thang were the sex nexus of Ryan Engstrom's swingin' Halloween bash. Sexy cops be damned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

