<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WJLA&#8217;s Breast Cancer Report Won&#8217;t Blur Boobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/29/wjlas-breast-cancer-report-wont-blur-boobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/29/wjlas-breast-cancer-report-wont-blur-boobs/</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:24:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jf1</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/29/wjlas-breast-cancer-report-wont-blur-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-21304</link>
		<dc:creator>jf1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7251#comment-21304</guid>
		<description>...no &quot;before and after&quot; shots of the double masectomy, again, to inspire women to do regular checkups? 

Yikes. How sad, she finds a lump in her boob and loses both of them and is scarred for life. At 28. I&#039;m sure that&#039;s truly inspiring. Seems like there&#039;s a lot more to this story than meets the eye, no pun intended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>...no "before and after" shots of the double masectomy, again, to inspire women to do regular checkups? </p>
<p>Yikes. How sad, she finds a lump in her boob and loses both of them and is scarred for life. At 28. I'm sure that's truly inspiring. Seems like there's a lot more to this story than meets the eye, no pun intended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: U.S. Citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/29/wjlas-breast-cancer-report-wont-blur-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-21225</link>
		<dc:creator>U.S. Citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7251#comment-21225</guid>
		<description>I just say this on WJLA ABC7 and the colored woman showed was fat with cow breasts. Why didn&#039;t they show some hot blond with nice breasts like Pamela Anderson. Who wants to see cow titees like Madea? LOL LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just say this on WJLA ABC7 and the colored woman showed was fat with cow breasts. Why didn't they show some hot blond with nice breasts like Pamela Anderson. Who wants to see cow titees like Madea? LOL LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freddie</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/29/wjlas-breast-cancer-report-wont-blur-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-21187</link>
		<dc:creator>freddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7251#comment-21187</guid>
		<description>You lot really need to get a grip on the real world. Here in Europe womens exposed breasts are common place on TV in the media etc all in the name of advertising, porn and otherwise. So what is all the fuss about when it can potentially educate and hopefully prevent this awful disease from taking Mothers, Daughters and Sisters at an early age...Please don&#039;t give the reason as, &#039;it&#039;s inappropriate, or likely to cause offence&#039;
Good luck, stay healthy and look forward to the first screening of testicular cancer examinations eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You lot really need to get a grip on the real world. Here in Europe womens exposed breasts are common place on TV in the media etc all in the name of advertising, porn and otherwise. So what is all the fuss about when it can potentially educate and hopefully prevent this awful disease from taking Mothers, Daughters and Sisters at an early age...Please don't give the reason as, 'it's inappropriate, or likely to cause offence'<br />
Good luck, stay healthy and look forward to the first screening of testicular cancer examinations eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnetic Crow</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/29/wjlas-breast-cancer-report-wont-blur-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-21112</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnetic Crow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7251#comment-21112</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still waiting for this absurd idea that womens&#039; chests are somehow more inherently &quot;inappropriate&quot; than mens&#039; to die away. That there should even be a QUESTION as to whether it&#039;s permissible on a health show is absurd.
:\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm still waiting for this absurd idea that womens' chests are somehow more inherently "inappropriate" than mens' to die away. That there should even be a QUESTION as to whether it's permissible on a health show is absurd.<br />
:\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jefrir</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/29/wjlas-breast-cancer-report-wont-blur-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-21089</link>
		<dc:creator>Jefrir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7251#comment-21089</guid>
		<description>So a segment about breasts will feature breasts? Oh my! How shocking!
Is this seriously something that has not been done on US TV before? Because here in the UK, the idea that you would try to cover the boobs in something like this would be absurd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So a segment about breasts will feature breasts? Oh my! How shocking!<br />
Is this seriously something that has not been done on US TV before? Because here in the UK, the idea that you would try to cover the boobs in something like this would be absurd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/29/wjlas-breast-cancer-report-wont-blur-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-21083</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7251#comment-21083</guid>
		<description>So lets get down to brass tacks here (so to speak).  Are these going to be attractive topless women on the tv or unattractive topless women on the tv?

(yes this is a joke, before you get your feathers all ruffled.  I&#039;m not going to watch it either way.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So lets get down to brass tacks here (so to speak).  Are these going to be attractive topless women on the tv or unattractive topless women on the tv?</p>
<p>(yes this is a joke, before you get your feathers all ruffled.  I'm not going to watch it either way.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reeseswithcoffee</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/29/wjlas-breast-cancer-report-wont-blur-boobs/comment-page-1/#comment-21080</link>
		<dc:creator>Reeseswithcoffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=7251#comment-21080</guid>
		<description>It woulda been nice if you had included a few shots of boobs with this story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It woulda been nice if you had included a few shots of boobs with this story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

