<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spot Your Local Tucker Max Douchebag!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:24:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goodbye! - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-4/#comment-82885</link>
		<dc:creator>Goodbye! - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-82885</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve written The Sexist, I&#8217;ve offended Catholics, sorority sisters, former homosexuals, Tucker Max fans, breast massagers, a child&#8217;s sense of innocence, the Huffington Post, heterosexual men, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve written The Sexist, I&#8217;ve offended Catholics, sorority sisters, former homosexuals, Tucker Max fans, breast massagers, a child&#8217;s sense of innocence, the Huffington Post, heterosexual men, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Film Critic Says Misogyny a Small Price to Pay for Jokes about Alf and Legwarmers &#171; Hysteria!</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-4/#comment-57176</link>
		<dc:creator>Film Critic Says Misogyny a Small Price to Pay for Jokes about Alf and Legwarmers &#171; Hysteria!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 03:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-57176</guid>
		<description>[...] As feminists, we&#8217;re experts at recognizing offenses like misogyny and homophobia on the Big Screen.  We point out the flaws in Jason Segel&#8217;s attempt to romanticize the &#8220;emosogynist.&#8221;  We call shenanigans when directors cast convicted rapists in their films.  We point out the problems with Tucker Max&#8217;s entire existence [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As feminists, we&#8217;re experts at recognizing offenses like misogyny and homophobia on the Big Screen.  We point out the flaws in Jason Segel&#8217;s attempt to romanticize the &#8220;emosogynist.&#8221;  We call shenanigans when directors cast convicted rapists in their films.  We point out the problems with Tucker Max&#8217;s entire existence [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Thor</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-28535</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Thor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-28535</guid>
		<description>omg i just read this and the comments on here.  i just realized that people exist who find tucker max funny.  i figured no one actually did based on the exceptionally poor showing of the film (assuming all ticket sales were ironic).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omg i just read this and the comments on here.  i just realized that people exist who find tucker max funny.  i figured no one actually did based on the exceptionally poor showing of the film (assuming all ticket sales were ironic).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Maketh a Bro? - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-22356</link>
		<dc:creator>What Maketh a Bro? - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-22356</guid>
		<description>[...] to personally agree with Bans&#8217; definition of &#8220;douchebag.&#8221; After all, Tucker Max, douchebag du jour, meets all of Bans&#8217; criteria. But perhaps our agreement on &#8220;douchbag&#8221; is more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to personally agree with Bans&#8217; definition of &#8220;douchebag.&#8221; After all, Tucker Max, douchebag du jour, meets all of Bans&#8217; criteria. But perhaps our agreement on &#8220;douchbag&#8221; is more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-17823</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-17823</guid>
		<description>&quot;What&#039;s your porn name?&quot; &quot;Scott Peterson.&quot; I&#039;m not much of a Tucker fan, but that was funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"What's your porn name?" "Scott Peterson." I'm not much of a Tucker fan, but that was funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozob</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-17160</link>
		<dc:creator>ozob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-17160</guid>
		<description>&quot;save me! save me!&quot; he cries (ok, tweets...), and the loyal fan base comes running to his rescue with foul mouths, ad hominems and colorful descriptions of other people&#039;s body parts... (minus #139)  wow, there seems to be a lot of anger, fear and resentment in Tucker Max&#039;s fan base.  y&#039;all might want to get that checked by your doctors, if you are lucky enough to have health care.  stress and high blood pressure are real killers.

i have no respect for any self-styled &quot;humorists&quot; or &quot;comedians&quot; who prey on vulnerable people for cheap shots...cowardly and lazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"save me! save me!" he cries (ok, tweets...), and the loyal fan base comes running to his rescue with foul mouths, ad hominems and colorful descriptions of other people's body parts... (minus #139)  wow, there seems to be a lot of anger, fear and resentment in Tucker Max's fan base.  y'all might want to get that checked by your doctors, if you are lucky enough to have health care.  stress and high blood pressure are real killers.</p>
<p>i have no respect for any self-styled "humorists" or "comedians" who prey on vulnerable people for cheap shots...cowardly and lazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lolz</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-16900</link>
		<dc:creator>lolz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-16900</guid>
		<description>you know amanda i think fox news is looking for a new journalist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know amanda i think fox news is looking for a new journalist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trojan</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-16845</link>
		<dc:creator>Trojan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-16845</guid>
		<description>breath johnson &lt;3&#039;s the cock so much she hates it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>breath johnson &lt;3&#039;s the cock so much she hates it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breath Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-16275</link>
		<dc:creator>Breath Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-16275</guid>
		<description>I love that all the Tucker Max robots parrot the same bullshit argument like good little worshipers of his crap-covered temple. Glad you sheep all followed him from Twitter to recite his tired talking points.

Stock phrases like &quot;you&#039;re probably too fat to get laid&quot; or &quot;Tucker Max probably turned you down (because you&#039;re fat, ugly, liberal, feminist, etc)&quot; are just weak little programmed retorts that ignore the actual point and unsurprisingly oversimplify it down to the brain-dead, obvious &quot;hey, the dude is getting laid!&quot; &quot;the dude bangs a ton of chicks&quot; and &quot;I bet he&#039;s boned more chicks than you!&quot; arguments, which actually makes sense considering the only people that take this ball of mediocrity seriously are sex-obsessed frat boys and sex-starved college guys who WISH they could be the frat boys. Oh, and lets not forget the college girls with low self esteem that pretend to like garbage like this in hopes of reeling in one of these losers. 

Enjoy college, kids. It&#039;s all downhill from here. I promise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love that all the Tucker Max robots parrot the same bullshit argument like good little worshipers of his crap-covered temple. Glad you sheep all followed him from Twitter to recite his tired talking points.</p>
<p>Stock phrases like "you're probably too fat to get laid" or "Tucker Max probably turned you down (because you're fat, ugly, liberal, feminist, etc)" are just weak little programmed retorts that ignore the actual point and unsurprisingly oversimplify it down to the brain-dead, obvious "hey, the dude is getting laid!" "the dude bangs a ton of chicks" and "I bet he's boned more chicks than you!" arguments, which actually makes sense considering the only people that take this ball of mediocrity seriously are sex-obsessed frat boys and sex-starved college guys who WISH they could be the frat boys. Oh, and lets not forget the college girls with low self esteem that pretend to like garbage like this in hopes of reeling in one of these losers. </p>
<p>Enjoy college, kids. It's all downhill from here. I promise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CP</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-16274</link>
		<dc:creator>CP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-16274</guid>
		<description>What?  A rich frat guy found drunk girls who were willing to have sex with him?  That&#039;s probably almost never happened before.  Oh wait, that happens all the time at EVERY college EVER.  Mr. Max isn&#039;t exactly breaking any new ground here.  
Also, U of Chicago and Duke law... great use of a top level education, Mr. Max.  I&#039;m sure that all those kids who couldn&#039;t get in are really happy with your use of those degrees.  It must be nice, not only to be able to afford to go to those schools, but to decide that instead of busting your ass to pay off student loans, you will just write shitty books about how awesome it is to be rich and crap on the rest of society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What?  A rich frat guy found drunk girls who were willing to have sex with him?  That's probably almost never happened before.  Oh wait, that happens all the time at EVERY college EVER.  Mr. Max isn't exactly breaking any new ground here.<br />
Also, U of Chicago and Duke law... great use of a top level education, Mr. Max.  I'm sure that all those kids who couldn't get in are really happy with your use of those degrees.  It must be nice, not only to be able to afford to go to those schools, but to decide that instead of busting your ass to pay off student loans, you will just write shitty books about how awesome it is to be rich and crap on the rest of society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-16265</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-16265</guid>
		<description>As a 26 year old woman who had a great time during college, I enjoyed reading TM&#039;s book 2 years ago. I plan on seeing his movie. My husband, on the other hand, did not enjoy the book. He thought TM was very childish. He didn&#039;t perceive him as a rapist. As someone who was raped freshman year by my ex, I think I would have found TM very appalling. He is someone who writes about his activities because people find them funny. Nobody is going to take his book as the next bible. It&#039;s his antics and nothing else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a 26 year old woman who had a great time during college, I enjoyed reading TM's book 2 years ago. I plan on seeing his movie. My husband, on the other hand, did not enjoy the book. He thought TM was very childish. He didn't perceive him as a rapist. As someone who was raped freshman year by my ex, I think I would have found TM very appalling. He is someone who writes about his activities because people find them funny. Nobody is going to take his book as the next bible. It's his antics and nothing else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tucker Max Fans Fight Rape With Racism - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-16156</link>
		<dc:creator>Tucker Max Fans Fight Rape With Racism - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-16156</guid>
		<description>[...] submissions here. I agree with some of Max&#8217;s defenders that &#8220;Tucker Max culture&#8221; encourages a hatred of pretty much everyone&#8212;not just women, fat women, or black people. I don&#8217;t agree, however, that it hates [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] submissions here. I agree with some of Max&#8217;s defenders that &#8220;Tucker Max culture&#8221; encourages a hatred of pretty much everyone&#8212;not just women, fat women, or black people. I don&#8217;t agree, however, that it hates [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kza</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-16136</link>
		<dc:creator>kza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-16136</guid>
		<description>Few people capitalize people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few people capitalize people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-16102</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-16102</guid>
		<description>Post #17 nailed it, but I think the writer really should clean that sand out of her vagina, and get the pole out of her ass.

I bet Tucker would love to help with that though, if you were looking or someone to help out.


And People are not stupid. Some people are stupid. Most people just don&#039;t care. And then the rest are smart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post #17 nailed it, but I think the writer really should clean that sand out of her vagina, and get the pole out of her ass.</p>
<p>I bet Tucker would love to help with that though, if you were looking or someone to help out.</p>
<p>And People are not stupid. Some people are stupid. Most people just don't care. And then the rest are smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-16067</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-16067</guid>
		<description>If women are stupid enough to sleep with him then that&#039;s their problem not his. 

People are stupid, it&#039;s quite obvious, getting angry at them is sure not to solve anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If women are stupid enough to sleep with him then that's their problem not his. </p>
<p>People are stupid, it's quite obvious, getting angry at them is sure not to solve anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-16063</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-16063</guid>
		<description>I only hope that his book is fiction being passed off of reality. Because if he honestly did all that, the worst thing of all is that he&#039;s become rich from being a horrible human being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only hope that his book is fiction being passed off of reality. Because if he honestly did all that, the worst thing of all is that he's become rich from being a horrible human being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kza</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-16036</link>
		<dc:creator>kza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-16036</guid>
		<description>Boooo Chris is&#039;nt that lame is he? If he is there&#039;s a role in I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell 2 for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boooo Chris is'nt that lame is he? If he is there's a role in I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell 2 for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Walken</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15993</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Walken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 04:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15993</guid>
		<description>I stumbled upon this website, searching. Rats. They had infested all of my many rooms, gnawing on my drywall and interrupting my sleep. That was an unfortunate annoyance, but these feminists-these feminists could drive you fucking crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stumbled upon this website, searching. Rats. They had infested all of my many rooms, gnawing on my drywall and interrupting my sleep. That was an unfortunate annoyance, but these feminists-these feminists could drive you fucking crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shala</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15990</link>
		<dc:creator>shala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 03:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15990</guid>
		<description>@mem: 
ahh, another voice in the crowd claiming they&#039;re not affected by what they see/hear in the media. Meanwhile Tucker, instead of being a joke, is idolized. Rather than hanging on the fringes of society he&#039;s what everyone&#039;s talking about. Because apparently he has written the best piece of literature since &quot;how to make love like a porn star,&quot; Janet Jameson&#039;s bestseller. Yes, we know all the names of all the big porn stars and top Hollywood skanks. We read the grutty mags and make fun of women who don&#039;t have barbie bodies. And we fill our television hours with reality shows about shallow, despicable people who whine over everything and fight over nothing.  
So let me ask you, if people aren&#039;t effected by the attitudes they see on television and read in raunch books, why is that attitude becoming ever more acceptable? Because it&#039;s morally preferable? LOL. 
Nope, this trash that permeates our culture does so because that&#039;s what the corporate media sells us, because it&#039;s easy. And people buy it and buy into it, again and again. And every time you see a strip club in a movie, the more you think that it&#039;s a place you want to go. And every time you see these charismatic, happy-go-lucky strippers in movies, the more you buy into the idea that that&#039;s what strippers are actually like. And the more likely you are (as a woman) to sign up for a pole dancing class. Ever hear of those being offered a few years ago?  Now they&#039;re all over rural OHIO!
And the only defense people can offer this culture, this type of behavior, is that it&#039;s about freedom of speech/actions. Okay, that&#039;s true. But at what point in our culture did people lose the ability to think past whether or not they CAN do something to whether or not they SHOULD do it? You know, just because you CAN go around calling women every name in the book, getting wasted off your ass and boning complete strangers doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s always a good idea. I can think of lots of things that I have a &quot;right&quot; to do that I wouldn&#039;t, because I&#039;m smart enough to consider the implications and consequences of my actions, not only toward myself, but those around me as well. But, since I have a &quot;right&quot; not to give a f**k about anyone around me, maybe I should stop caring. Apparently everyone else has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mem:<br />
ahh, another voice in the crowd claiming they're not affected by what they see/hear in the media. Meanwhile Tucker, instead of being a joke, is idolized. Rather than hanging on the fringes of society he's what everyone's talking about. Because apparently he has written the best piece of literature since "how to make love like a porn star," Janet Jameson's bestseller. Yes, we know all the names of all the big porn stars and top Hollywood skanks. We read the grutty mags and make fun of women who don't have barbie bodies. And we fill our television hours with reality shows about shallow, despicable people who whine over everything and fight over nothing.<br />
So let me ask you, if people aren't effected by the attitudes they see on television and read in raunch books, why is that attitude becoming ever more acceptable? Because it's morally preferable? LOL.<br />
Nope, this trash that permeates our culture does so because that's what the corporate media sells us, because it's easy. And people buy it and buy into it, again and again. And every time you see a strip club in a movie, the more you think that it's a place you want to go. And every time you see these charismatic, happy-go-lucky strippers in movies, the more you buy into the idea that that's what strippers are actually like. And the more likely you are (as a woman) to sign up for a pole dancing class. Ever hear of those being offered a few years ago?  Now they're all over rural OHIO!<br />
And the only defense people can offer this culture, this type of behavior, is that it's about freedom of speech/actions. Okay, that's true. But at what point in our culture did people lose the ability to think past whether or not they CAN do something to whether or not they SHOULD do it? You know, just because you CAN go around calling women every name in the book, getting wasted off your ass and boning complete strangers doesn't mean it's always a good idea. I can think of lots of things that I have a "right" to do that I wouldn't, because I'm smart enough to consider the implications and consequences of my actions, not only toward myself, but those around me as well. But, since I have a "right" not to give a f**k about anyone around me, maybe I should stop caring. Apparently everyone else has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kza</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15986</link>
		<dc:creator>kza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15986</guid>
		<description>From now on I think its safe if you address people as @tucker or @tucker rimmer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From now on I think its safe if you address people as @tucker or @tucker rimmer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: recursiveparadox</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15985</link>
		<dc:creator>recursiveparadox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15985</guid>
		<description>@kza:

You make me giggle. XD

@Infowars: 

Man, I&#039;m pretty sure I&#039;d have to smoke some pot just to understand what the fuck you just said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kza:</p>
<p>You make me giggle. XD</p>
<p>@Infowars: </p>
<p>Man, I'm pretty sure I'd have to smoke some pot just to understand what the fuck you just said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: recursiveparadox</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15984</link>
		<dc:creator>recursiveparadox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15984</guid>
		<description>@John:

&quot;If this is a problem for someone, then it is their responsibility to not put themselves into this situation. Just like a person is responsible for not getting behind the wheel of a car while intoxicated.&quot;

Did you know? Part of what you responded to referenced the guy. Yes that&#039;s right, the guy could be a problem too. And the girl does not know how well the guy can interpret shit or understand things.

The responsibility for that falls on the guy. Tucker Max doesn&#039;t care about that though. It doesn&#039;t even occur to him that he might not know if a girl needs to stop.

&quot;Should he, or anyone in his position really care about the person they’re bedding?&quot;

Would you be okay with it if a girl you hooked up with gave you herpes? Not having an emotional attachment is different from taking such an apathetic take on someone that you could literally seriously harm them.

I&#039;m sure Tucker would whine like fuck if a drunk girl gave him HIV. Oh well, she doesn&#039;t need to care about him, right?

&quot;To tell you the truth: yes, I do.&quot;

Alright, that&#039;s fair. He does draw a lot of flak. And it would be godawfully stupid of him not to take precautions.

Of course, if he has the view you seem to hold above, he will consider himself absolved of all responsibility simply because the girl is drunk. If one has a dangerous ideological view, then why would he change that out of caution?

Now, let&#039;s say for an instant that yes, we know for absolute sure that he takes all the precautions, talks to the girls ahead of time, let&#039;s them know the safeword, the out and sets it up that way.

Is that shown in his books? Does he give any impression of doing any of this responsibly? No. Absolutely not. So even if he&#039;s being a stand up guy and being responsible, he&#039;s teaching a huge number of guys to do it wrong, very very wrong.

And that&#039;s a problem.

&quot;Why do you think that? Can you reference something specifically that suggests he would (or did) do that?

[...]

It seems like you’re projecting characteristics onto him that aren’t there.&quot;

It&#039;s possible. Some of his attitudes suggest it to me. The blanket statements of women being whores, the idea of pushing things beyond the point of reason, without checking first (like the videotaped anal sex incident) all say that he has a dangerous attitude.

I can&#039;t make a perfect analysis though. I haven&#039;t met the guy. So I&#039;ll hold off on making statements about him personally and deal with the image he presents instead. After all, writers do embellish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John:</p>
<p>"If this is a problem for someone, then it is their responsibility to not put themselves into this situation. Just like a person is responsible for not getting behind the wheel of a car while intoxicated."</p>
<p>Did you know? Part of what you responded to referenced the guy. Yes that's right, the guy could be a problem too. And the girl does not know how well the guy can interpret shit or understand things.</p>
<p>The responsibility for that falls on the guy. Tucker Max doesn't care about that though. It doesn't even occur to him that he might not know if a girl needs to stop.</p>
<p>"Should he, or anyone in his position really care about the person they’re bedding?"</p>
<p>Would you be okay with it if a girl you hooked up with gave you herpes? Not having an emotional attachment is different from taking such an apathetic take on someone that you could literally seriously harm them.</p>
<p>I'm sure Tucker would whine like fuck if a drunk girl gave him HIV. Oh well, she doesn't need to care about him, right?</p>
<p>"To tell you the truth: yes, I do."</p>
<p>Alright, that's fair. He does draw a lot of flak. And it would be godawfully stupid of him not to take precautions.</p>
<p>Of course, if he has the view you seem to hold above, he will consider himself absolved of all responsibility simply because the girl is drunk. If one has a dangerous ideological view, then why would he change that out of caution?</p>
<p>Now, let's say for an instant that yes, we know for absolute sure that he takes all the precautions, talks to the girls ahead of time, let's them know the safeword, the out and sets it up that way.</p>
<p>Is that shown in his books? Does he give any impression of doing any of this responsibly? No. Absolutely not. So even if he's being a stand up guy and being responsible, he's teaching a huge number of guys to do it wrong, very very wrong.</p>
<p>And that's a problem.</p>
<p>"Why do you think that? Can you reference something specifically that suggests he would (or did) do that?</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>It seems like you’re projecting characteristics onto him that aren’t there."</p>
<p>It's possible. Some of his attitudes suggest it to me. The blanket statements of women being whores, the idea of pushing things beyond the point of reason, without checking first (like the videotaped anal sex incident) all say that he has a dangerous attitude.</p>
<p>I can't make a perfect analysis though. I haven't met the guy. So I'll hold off on making statements about him personally and deal with the image he presents instead. After all, writers do embellish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: recursiveparadox</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15983</link>
		<dc:creator>recursiveparadox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15983</guid>
		<description>@Jen:

How is it ridiculous?  Do you think people are magically born rapists? Certain attitudes need to be in place for one to actually go out and rape someone. And certain attitudes need to be in place for one to accidently rape someone (yes it can be done.)

&quot;If one girl said ‘no’ there would be others available, I’m sure.&quot;

How sure are you he wouldn&#039;t try to &quot;convince&quot; her to say yes after all? And when I say convince, I mean keep on going while trying to verbally convince her that she wants it.

It sucks to get in bed with someone when you&#039;re all wound up and ready to go and suddenly they don&#039;t want it anymore. Know this from experience.

&quot;And, he didn’t “get them trashed”, they got themselves trashed. If they feel they aren’t capable of making responsible decisions under the influence, they should refrain from drinking.&quot;

I&#039;ve got no problem with people having drunken sex. I&#039;ve got a problem with people not safely having drunken sex.

Guy and girl both say, &quot;fuck condoms, we&#039;ll be fine&quot;. Girl gets pregnant. Guy&#039;s fault, girl&#039;s fault or both?

You seem like you would only blame it on the girl. Little bit stupid really.

&quot;At least hold them equally responsible if you intend to vilify this type of behavior.&quot;

I engage in such behavior at times. Just safely, responsibly, with safewords and with questions as to how well one is able to communicate when drunk.

Does Tucker do that? Does Tucker&#039;s girls do that? If not then there is a fucking problem here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jen:</p>
<p>How is it ridiculous?  Do you think people are magically born rapists? Certain attitudes need to be in place for one to actually go out and rape someone. And certain attitudes need to be in place for one to accidently rape someone (yes it can be done.)</p>
<p>"If one girl said ‘no’ there would be others available, I’m sure."</p>
<p>How sure are you he wouldn't try to "convince" her to say yes after all? And when I say convince, I mean keep on going while trying to verbally convince her that she wants it.</p>
<p>It sucks to get in bed with someone when you're all wound up and ready to go and suddenly they don't want it anymore. Know this from experience.</p>
<p>"And, he didn’t “get them trashed”, they got themselves trashed. If they feel they aren’t capable of making responsible decisions under the influence, they should refrain from drinking."</p>
<p>I've got no problem with people having drunken sex. I've got a problem with people not safely having drunken sex.</p>
<p>Guy and girl both say, "fuck condoms, we'll be fine". Girl gets pregnant. Guy's fault, girl's fault or both?</p>
<p>You seem like you would only blame it on the girl. Little bit stupid really.</p>
<p>"At least hold them equally responsible if you intend to vilify this type of behavior."</p>
<p>I engage in such behavior at times. Just safely, responsibly, with safewords and with questions as to how well one is able to communicate when drunk.</p>
<p>Does Tucker do that? Does Tucker's girls do that? If not then there is a fucking problem here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kza</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15958</link>
		<dc:creator>kza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15958</guid>
		<description>Why would I want a man I&#039;m not gay...not to bright are you hun? Or should I say bro ;)

Tucker has gone on message boards and posed as different people before hasn&#039;t he? With 0 budget i don&#039;t blame him for promoting his product in such a lame way lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would I want a man I'm not gay...not to bright are you hun? Or should I say bro ;)</p>
<p>Tucker has gone on message boards and posed as different people before hasn't he? With 0 budget i don't blame him for promoting his product in such a lame way lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mem</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15957</link>
		<dc:creator>mem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15957</guid>
		<description>this is one of the most poorly written articles i have ever read. first of all, get a thesaurus. i know for a fact that there are other words that you could use to describe someone. perhaps read his book and take some notes. tucker uses wonderful imagery. second, using personal opinions based in no way on truth or fact will never get you anywhere. no real publishing company will ever respect or hire you.

i am personally offended that you would refer to his fans, an entire group of people, as &quot;douchebags&quot; and &quot;minions&quot; do you use the same kind of judgment when referring to other large groups of people? to be considered a minion i would have to live exactly by his teachings correct? i can guarantee that only a very small percentage of his fans can be considered minions. none of my friends who have read his book and website have ever set out to be more like him. 

are you afraid that other people have no will and are compelled to be like every person they read about? celebrities are only that. they are famous, but people who look to them as role models need to seriously reevaluate their own lives. 

i read his books, because he is funny. legitimately. the analogies and description alone are amazing. i did not read it because i needed a new bible, set of values, and commandments like you are making it seem. do you have a story that you like to tell? so does he. that&#039;s all he did. he never tried to convert people to his ways, just wrote down some of his funniest stories for others to enjoy. seems like a pretty selfless act to want to spread joy, doesn&#039;t it?

i have so many more issues with you and your &quot;article&quot; but i think most of them have already been stated. i hope that you do think more before you speak or write next time. your generalization of people could end up very poorly for you in the future. you don&#039;t always get to hide behind your computer every time you fuck up. next time you write a slanderous and libelous article you will probably be sued. you can read his statement http://www.ihopetheyservebeerinhell.com/30-days-out-here-come-the-protesters/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is one of the most poorly written articles i have ever read. first of all, get a thesaurus. i know for a fact that there are other words that you could use to describe someone. perhaps read his book and take some notes. tucker uses wonderful imagery. second, using personal opinions based in no way on truth or fact will never get you anywhere. no real publishing company will ever respect or hire you.</p>
<p>i am personally offended that you would refer to his fans, an entire group of people, as "douchebags" and "minions" do you use the same kind of judgment when referring to other large groups of people? to be considered a minion i would have to live exactly by his teachings correct? i can guarantee that only a very small percentage of his fans can be considered minions. none of my friends who have read his book and website have ever set out to be more like him. </p>
<p>are you afraid that other people have no will and are compelled to be like every person they read about? celebrities are only that. they are famous, but people who look to them as role models need to seriously reevaluate their own lives. </p>
<p>i read his books, because he is funny. legitimately. the analogies and description alone are amazing. i did not read it because i needed a new bible, set of values, and commandments like you are making it seem. do you have a story that you like to tell? so does he. that's all he did. he never tried to convert people to his ways, just wrote down some of his funniest stories for others to enjoy. seems like a pretty selfless act to want to spread joy, doesn't it?</p>
<p>i have so many more issues with you and your "article" but i think most of them have already been stated. i hope that you do think more before you speak or write next time. your generalization of people could end up very poorly for you in the future. you don't always get to hide behind your computer every time you fuck up. next time you write a slanderous and libelous article you will probably be sued. you can read his statement <a href="http://www.ihopetheyservebeerinhell.com/30-days-out-here-come-the-protesters/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ihopetheyservebeerinhell.com/30-days-out-here-come-the-protesters/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariel</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15956</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15956</guid>
		<description>skc, actually I saw this on my facebook page and wanted to check it out. I didn&#039;t even read the page to see if it truly did say that the fans should check it out. kza, please stop hating on him because you hate men for not giving you the attention you were craving. The women having sex with Tucker willingly did so and you cannot blame him for that. Never in my life have I ever, EVER, gotten too drunk that I couldn&#039;t articulate myself and NEVER had I had sex when I didn&#039;t want to. If I had sex drunk, I wanted to and I never assumed that the man coerced me into it. Never would I even begin to think to claim rape. Honestly, I am embarrassed to be a woman because of these &quot;feminists.&quot; If you are going to call yourself that, maybe you should work towards empowering women and gaining true equality not bitching about a man who wouldn&#039;t want your messy drunk ass and basically degrading a huge number of people. 

kza you claim that Tucker gets on this lame excuse of an article with numerous names and such, but honestly it makes it seem that you are just Amanda trying to pretend you have support. My name is Ariel Tymeson and you can look me up if you truly believe we&#039;re all Tucker Max.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>skc, actually I saw this on my facebook page and wanted to check it out. I didn't even read the page to see if it truly did say that the fans should check it out. kza, please stop hating on him because you hate men for not giving you the attention you were craving. The women having sex with Tucker willingly did so and you cannot blame him for that. Never in my life have I ever, EVER, gotten too drunk that I couldn't articulate myself and NEVER had I had sex when I didn't want to. If I had sex drunk, I wanted to and I never assumed that the man coerced me into it. Never would I even begin to think to claim rape. Honestly, I am embarrassed to be a woman because of these "feminists." If you are going to call yourself that, maybe you should work towards empowering women and gaining true equality not bitching about a man who wouldn't want your messy drunk ass and basically degrading a huge number of people. </p>
<p>kza you claim that Tucker gets on this lame excuse of an article with numerous names and such, but honestly it makes it seem that you are just Amanda trying to pretend you have support. My name is Ariel Tymeson and you can look me up if you truly believe we're all Tucker Max.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kza</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15948</link>
		<dc:creator>kza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15948</guid>
		<description>I wonder which is greater. The number of fingers on my hand or the number of good reviews this movie gets. I&#039;m betting the former.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder which is greater. The number of fingers on my hand or the number of good reviews this movie gets. I'm betting the former.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infowars com</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15947</link>
		<dc:creator>infowars com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15947</guid>
		<description>Come on people, the REAL problem has not been addressed yet! Grow up, stop being mind controlled slaves, take some Entheogens and wake up to reality! This world, ALL of you, and myself, have a long way to go with real knowledge before any of us are anywhere near healed enough people to comment on others. Have any of you ever wondered why such nasty activities and such low standards of respect of life for men and women alike have surfaced, and what has caused it? All of us are very uneducated despite what you THINK you learned in  your past institutionalized public education system and even college. &quot;You people are a joke. You hear Moloch&#039;s back in town, you think &quot;Oh, boy! Let&#039;s gang up and bust him!&quot; You think that matters? You think that solves anything?&quot; -Edward Blake/The Comedian (Watchmen-full of metaphors!). I challenge those of you that &quot;think&quot; you have any sort of self-respect, to stop believing in social control mechanisms that have been ingrained into you all your life. Start making your own decisions about ALL of your &quot;opinions&quot; mainly concerning entheogens, and marijuana. I ask this because in ALL honesty, the few that have found the truth (not referring to people labeled as &quot;Hippies&quot; either) look down on not just &quot;sluts&quot; and &quot;douchebags&quot; but ALL of society. Stop listening to the lies of the media, and the government! THEY DON&#039;T CARE ABOUT YOU they murder people every day, and use US citizens unknowingly for biological agent testing! &quot;We&#039;re all puppets, Laurie. I&#039;m just a puppet who can see the strings.&quot; -Jon Osterman/Doctor Manhattan. The evidence is out there start searching for what they don&#039;t want you to know and what they don&#039;t advertise on any major media! Start gaining your individuality back, this is only one of many lifetimes, so start now! Lets work on making an environment on this Earth that does not support such activities because here is the big kicker, never has mutual consent automatically deamed any act ethical or positive! People addicted to sex are no better then addicts of HARMFUL substances. The human body becomes ADDICTED TO THE FEELINGS WE EXPERIENCE. It becomes harder to control your own emotional ACTIONS/REACTIONS! Society is on a downward spiral and the few who realize it are a minority but ever growing. Now is when you ask yourself do you want to be another sheep in the heard that they butcher at will, or an individual on the outside looking into the masses wondering why the herd does not understand OBVIOUS tyranny in their shepherds (leaders)? The choice is yours, it always has and will be. Stop thinking &quot;It wont happen to me/us&quot;, continue to be distracted by society and face the negative consequences that ARE COMING, or become part of a movement and be someone above the scum filled stockyards they created that we call civilization. Start your own research, remember &quot;A fact is a fact, is a fact!&quot;
Turn on, tune in, drop out!
Love, Kaibigan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on people, the REAL problem has not been addressed yet! Grow up, stop being mind controlled slaves, take some Entheogens and wake up to reality! This world, ALL of you, and myself, have a long way to go with real knowledge before any of us are anywhere near healed enough people to comment on others. Have any of you ever wondered why such nasty activities and such low standards of respect of life for men and women alike have surfaced, and what has caused it? All of us are very uneducated despite what you THINK you learned in  your past institutionalized public education system and even college. "You people are a joke. You hear Moloch's back in town, you think "Oh, boy! Let's gang up and bust him!" You think that matters? You think that solves anything?" -Edward Blake/The Comedian (Watchmen-full of metaphors!). I challenge those of you that "think" you have any sort of self-respect, to stop believing in social control mechanisms that have been ingrained into you all your life. Start making your own decisions about ALL of your "opinions" mainly concerning entheogens, and marijuana. I ask this because in ALL honesty, the few that have found the truth (not referring to people labeled as "Hippies" either) look down on not just "sluts" and "douchebags" but ALL of society. Stop listening to the lies of the media, and the government! THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT YOU they murder people every day, and use US citizens unknowingly for biological agent testing! "We're all puppets, Laurie. I'm just a puppet who can see the strings." -Jon Osterman/Doctor Manhattan. The evidence is out there start searching for what they don't want you to know and what they don't advertise on any major media! Start gaining your individuality back, this is only one of many lifetimes, so start now! Lets work on making an environment on this Earth that does not support such activities because here is the big kicker, never has mutual consent automatically deamed any act ethical or positive! People addicted to sex are no better then addicts of HARMFUL substances. The human body becomes ADDICTED TO THE FEELINGS WE EXPERIENCE. It becomes harder to control your own emotional ACTIONS/REACTIONS! Society is on a downward spiral and the few who realize it are a minority but ever growing. Now is when you ask yourself do you want to be another sheep in the heard that they butcher at will, or an individual on the outside looking into the masses wondering why the herd does not understand OBVIOUS tyranny in their shepherds (leaders)? The choice is yours, it always has and will be. Stop thinking "It wont happen to me/us", continue to be distracted by society and face the negative consequences that ARE COMING, or become part of a movement and be someone above the scum filled stockyards they created that we call civilization. Start your own research, remember "A fact is a fact, is a fact!"<br />
Turn on, tune in, drop out!<br />
Love, Kaibigan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kza</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15940</link>
		<dc:creator>kza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15940</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad that there will be 10 nominations for best picture at the oscars this year. Now Tucker can finally get that Academy Award nod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm glad that there will be 10 nominations for best picture at the oscars this year. Now Tucker can finally get that Academy Award nod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shala</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15939</link>
		<dc:creator>shala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15939</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t call what Tucker does anti-feminist, it&#039;s not exactly right either. And it&#039;s not just Tucker, it&#039;s the entire culture. In her book, Ariel Levy refers to it as the raunch culture. Individuals seem to have no sense of respect, either for themselves or others around them (IE the woman who lets a man spit snuff into her mouth WTF!?) And allow themselves to be selfish above all else.
There is also an interesting pressure on women to go along with this culture. Yes, women like sex. But do they like being sex objects? You wouldn&#039;t think so, unless of course that&#039;s the only way men will accept them. If I&#039;m against Tucker, I&#039;m an ugly uptight prude, even when i&#039;m actually I&#039;m a 121 lb &quot;hottie&quot; who loves sex. If I don&#039;t display my boobs for a girls gone wild camera it&#039;s the same thing. Men let women know that the only way they can get attention is by acting like &quot;sluts,&quot; and then ironically put them down for being sluts. 
We have turned sex not into something that two people should share only when they really want to, but something to be attained at all costs, a game. We also show a very narrow definition of sex and sexy. Our media tells us that only straight, young attractive people can have sex. Where are all the cosmo magazines telling you how to be a better lesbian lover? Where is the gay Tucker Max?
Anyway, those are just some points, and while I think that some of the protesters took it too far, I would not hesitate to call Tucker or his most hardcore followers douchebags. Now, go let someone spit on your face, or read Ariel Levy: Female chauvinist pigs: women and the rise of the raunch culture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn't call what Tucker does anti-feminist, it's not exactly right either. And it's not just Tucker, it's the entire culture. In her book, Ariel Levy refers to it as the raunch culture. Individuals seem to have no sense of respect, either for themselves or others around them (IE the woman who lets a man spit snuff into her mouth WTF!?) And allow themselves to be selfish above all else.<br />
There is also an interesting pressure on women to go along with this culture. Yes, women like sex. But do they like being sex objects? You wouldn't think so, unless of course that's the only way men will accept them. If I'm against Tucker, I'm an ugly uptight prude, even when i'm actually I'm a 121 lb "hottie" who loves sex. If I don't display my boobs for a girls gone wild camera it's the same thing. Men let women know that the only way they can get attention is by acting like "sluts," and then ironically put them down for being sluts.<br />
We have turned sex not into something that two people should share only when they really want to, but something to be attained at all costs, a game. We also show a very narrow definition of sex and sexy. Our media tells us that only straight, young attractive people can have sex. Where are all the cosmo magazines telling you how to be a better lesbian lover? Where is the gay Tucker Max?<br />
Anyway, those are just some points, and while I think that some of the protesters took it too far, I would not hesitate to call Tucker or his most hardcore followers douchebags. Now, go let someone spit on your face, or read Ariel Levy: Female chauvinist pigs: women and the rise of the raunch culture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skc</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15938</link>
		<dc:creator>Skc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15938</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad Tucker Max exists. It makes it easy to weed out the world&#039;s more pathetic life forms-- just look for his minions.

Obeying someone&#039;s Twitter Orders? Wow. You sure are independent and have a spine, just like a real man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm glad Tucker Max exists. It makes it easy to weed out the world's more pathetic life forms-- just look for his minions.</p>
<p>Obeying someone's Twitter Orders? Wow. You sure are independent and have a spine, just like a real man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaft</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15904</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15904</guid>
		<description>Bitch please. This chocolate ain&#039;t meltin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bitch please. This chocolate ain't meltin'.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tucker Max Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15854</link>
		<dc:creator>Tucker Max Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15854</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tucker for posting the link to this. AND to the &quot;author&quot; of this article I would encourage you to view any of the videos Tucker has on his site including &quot;thoughts on rehearsal.&quot; I&#039;ve said and I&#039;ll say it again. THIS is why I adore Tucker as an author and will read his next book. I would also encourage &quot;Amanda&quot; to expand your mind a bit....even consider having an understanding about the subject in which you choose to write about. Objective is really possible if you care enough to honor those that have gone before you as authors that really have talent by understanding your subject matter in your writing.  Try it. You jjust might learn something. IHTSBIH opens the 26th? I&#039;m there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tucker for posting the link to this. AND to the "author" of this article I would encourage you to view any of the videos Tucker has on his site including "thoughts on rehearsal." I've said and I'll say it again. THIS is why I adore Tucker as an author and will read his next book. I would also encourage "Amanda" to expand your mind a bit....even consider having an understanding about the subject in which you choose to write about. Objective is really possible if you care enough to honor those that have gone before you as authors that really have talent by understanding your subject matter in your writing.  Try it. You jjust might learn something. IHTSBIH opens the 26th? I'm there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seriously?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15853</link>
		<dc:creator>seriously?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15853</guid>
		<description>JoJo: &quot;To label a fanbase as “douches” and try and ridicule them for enjoying someone’s stories is simple-minded and hateful and makes the writer look worse than the person she is writing about.&quot;

Truer words have never been said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JoJo: "To label a fanbase as “douches” and try and ridicule them for enjoying someone’s stories is simple-minded and hateful and makes the writer look worse than the person she is writing about."</p>
<p>Truer words have never been said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady J (PhD)</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15850</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady J (PhD)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 08:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15850</guid>
		<description>My favourite part, Amanda, if I can address you by your amply generic moniker, is your plentiful inclusion of the word &#039;douche&#039; in your &quot;Art-icle&quot;  Your blatant disregard for womens&#039; health is  1000x more disgusting and pathetic than anything that Tucker Max will accomplish in his life.  I can only believe that your mind is saturated with the word &quot;Douche&quot; because you see it 100 times when you open your filthy medicine cabinet for your daily-dirty-vagina-cleaning ritual. (Amanda&#039;s DD-VAC)  

Oho, and since we can plainly see that sex isn&#039;t on or anywhere near your menu, the only use you have for them will be to combat VAGINAL FUNGUS.  It&#039;s obvious you&#039;ve had toxic shock syndrome plenty of times, stop blaming the world for your bad hygeine habits, you fat cunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favourite part, Amanda, if I can address you by your amply generic moniker, is your plentiful inclusion of the word 'douche' in your "Art-icle"  Your blatant disregard for womens' health is  1000x more disgusting and pathetic than anything that Tucker Max will accomplish in his life.  I can only believe that your mind is saturated with the word "Douche" because you see it 100 times when you open your filthy medicine cabinet for your daily-dirty-vagina-cleaning ritual. (Amanda's DD-VAC)  </p>
<p>Oho, and since we can plainly see that sex isn't on or anywhere near your menu, the only use you have for them will be to combat VAGINAL FUNGUS.  It's obvious you've had toxic shock syndrome plenty of times, stop blaming the world for your bad hygeine habits, you fat cunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: missdk</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15845</link>
		<dc:creator>missdk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 07:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15845</guid>
		<description>Wow. So much total misunderstanding about rape in these comments it&#039;s MIND BOGGLING. I recommend you all read this:

http://www.scarleteen.com/article/boyfriend/how_you_guys_thats_right_you_guys_can_prevent_rape</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. So much total misunderstanding about rape in these comments it's MIND BOGGLING. I recommend you all read this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scarleteen.com/article/boyfriend/how_you_guys_thats_right_you_guys_can_prevent_rape" rel="nofollow">http://www.scarleteen.com/article/boyfriend/how_you_guys_thats_right_you_guys_can_prevent_rape</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15840</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 04:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15840</guid>
		<description>@recursiveparadox:

&quot;How likely do you think a trashed out of her mind girl will be able to articulate that in a way a trashed of his mind guy will understand?&quot;

If this is a problem for someone, then it is their responsibility to not put themselves into this situation.  Just like a person is responsible for not getting behind the wheel of a car while intoxicated.

&quot;His whole attitude is very… neglectful is putting it lightly. It’s pretty clear that he doesn’t give much of a shit about the women he sleeps with,&quot;

Should he, or anyone in his position really care about the person they&#039;re bedding?  The thing about hookups is that neither party cares about the other:  its all about the sex.  That&#039;s the point.  If you&#039;re not personally comfortable with the idea of people having sex with no emotional attachment, then feel free to not partake.  Keep in mind, too, that while he doesn&#039;t seem to care about most of the women he sleeps with, they don&#039;t seem to care about him, either.


&quot;so really, do you think he’s going to have the backup shit necessary to not end up raping someone?&quot;

To tell you the truth: yes, I do.  A guy like him has a BIG target painted on his back.  A saying I once heard sums it up nicely: &quot;jealousy is the tax one pays on success.&quot;  You hear this over and over again from famous people but in different ways.  The more successful a person is, the more people there are trying to bring them down.  And nevermind the psychotic women with past history of abuse who project their issues on everyone around them.  There are quite a few misandrists out there.  So yes, considering this and that he is an intelligent guy, I would think that he does watch what he does very closely.

&quot;Although honestly, he strikes me as the kind of guy who, if a girl said no, he’d keep on pushing her to say yes, getting more and more in her face and asinine the more times she said no.&quot;

Why do you think that?  Can you reference something specifically that suggests he would (or did) do that?

Since becoming popular, it seems like he has absolutely no reason to force himself on any woman; they just voluntarily throw themselves at him constantly.  When a girl turns him down, he can just go to the next one.  Even IF (and that&#039;s a big IF--which I don&#039;t believe) he happened to be that kind of a guy in the past, he certainly has no reason to take that sort of a risk anymore.

It seems like you&#039;re projecting characteristics onto him that aren&#039;t there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@recursiveparadox:</p>
<p>"How likely do you think a trashed out of her mind girl will be able to articulate that in a way a trashed of his mind guy will understand?"</p>
<p>If this is a problem for someone, then it is their responsibility to not put themselves into this situation.  Just like a person is responsible for not getting behind the wheel of a car while intoxicated.</p>
<p>"His whole attitude is very… neglectful is putting it lightly. It’s pretty clear that he doesn’t give much of a shit about the women he sleeps with,"</p>
<p>Should he, or anyone in his position really care about the person they're bedding?  The thing about hookups is that neither party cares about the other:  its all about the sex.  That's the point.  If you're not personally comfortable with the idea of people having sex with no emotional attachment, then feel free to not partake.  Keep in mind, too, that while he doesn't seem to care about most of the women he sleeps with, they don't seem to care about him, either.</p>
<p>"so really, do you think he’s going to have the backup shit necessary to not end up raping someone?"</p>
<p>To tell you the truth: yes, I do.  A guy like him has a BIG target painted on his back.  A saying I once heard sums it up nicely: "jealousy is the tax one pays on success."  You hear this over and over again from famous people but in different ways.  The more successful a person is, the more people there are trying to bring them down.  And nevermind the psychotic women with past history of abuse who project their issues on everyone around them.  There are quite a few misandrists out there.  So yes, considering this and that he is an intelligent guy, I would think that he does watch what he does very closely.</p>
<p>"Although honestly, he strikes me as the kind of guy who, if a girl said no, he’d keep on pushing her to say yes, getting more and more in her face and asinine the more times she said no."</p>
<p>Why do you think that?  Can you reference something specifically that suggests he would (or did) do that?</p>
<p>Since becoming popular, it seems like he has absolutely no reason to force himself on any woman; they just voluntarily throw themselves at him constantly.  When a girl turns him down, he can just go to the next one.  Even IF (and that's a big IF--which I don't believe) he happened to be that kind of a guy in the past, he certainly has no reason to take that sort of a risk anymore.</p>
<p>It seems like you're projecting characteristics onto him that aren't there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15831</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15831</guid>
		<description>Amen, Lauren!

Alexa, how can you condone murder but not name calling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, Lauren!</p>
<p>Alexa, how can you condone murder but not name calling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15829</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15829</guid>
		<description>Ok, I&#039;m not going to pretend I read every post, so I may be repeating other intelligent people.  Supporters of this article, people who believe what is written here is fact, you need to do your research.

REAL feminists believe that women should be able to make their own choices.  By calling a woman that sleeps around a whore is just as bad as saying that a woman can&#039;t do anything but cook and clean.  If a woman wants to sleep around that is her choice, if a woman wants to wait until marriage to have sex that is her choice, and neither should be looked down upon.  It seems to me that the people against Tucker Max are more at fault of degrading woman than Tucker Max is.  He believes that people should do whatever they want when they want and to live the life they have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I'm not going to pretend I read every post, so I may be repeating other intelligent people.  Supporters of this article, people who believe what is written here is fact, you need to do your research.</p>
<p>REAL feminists believe that women should be able to make their own choices.  By calling a woman that sleeps around a whore is just as bad as saying that a woman can't do anything but cook and clean.  If a woman wants to sleep around that is her choice, if a woman wants to wait until marriage to have sex that is her choice, and neither should be looked down upon.  It seems to me that the people against Tucker Max are more at fault of degrading woman than Tucker Max is.  He believes that people should do whatever they want when they want and to live the life they have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexa</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15828</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15828</guid>
		<description>&quot;But if a women acts like a whore, she should be called one, just as a man is when he’s being a douche.&quot;

&quot;If you&#039;re a slut you&#039;ll be treated like one.&quot;


EX-FUCKING-SCUSE ME? what if a man acts like &quot;whore?&quot; how the fuck does that work out? i need to be virginal yet you want to be able to fuck me? god, you should be shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"But if a women acts like a whore, she should be called one, just as a man is when he’s being a douche."</p>
<p>"If you're a slut you'll be treated like one."</p>
<p>EX-FUCKING-SCUSE ME? what if a man acts like "whore?" how the fuck does that work out? i need to be virginal yet you want to be able to fuck me? god, you should be shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kza</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15827</link>
		<dc:creator>kza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15827</guid>
		<description>I wonder which number will be greater. The number of fake names he will post under on this site or the number of theaters his movie will play in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder which number will be greater. The number of fake names he will post under on this site or the number of theaters his movie will play in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15826</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15826</guid>
		<description>Saying that anybody is a &quot;rapist in training&quot; is totally ridiculous. He has sex. With consenting adults. It&#039;s not a fucking crime. If one girl said &#039;no&#039; there would be others available, I&#039;m sure.  It&#039;s not like he&#039;s some hideous cretin.

People can have sex without being rapists. And they can drink without being alcoholics. And still be considered an adult, capable of making adult decisions.

People who drink socially use alcohol as a social lubricant. It just makes things go more smoothly and less awkwardly. Try it sometime.

And, he didn&#039;t &quot;get them trashed&quot;, they got themselves trashed. If they feel they aren&#039;t capable of making responsible decisions under the influence, they should refrain from drinking.

If anybody here really wants to take a stand for women, take a stand for the fact that they are capable of making their own decisions, whether that involves drinking or sex. At least hold them equally responsible if you intend to vilify this type of behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying that anybody is a "rapist in training" is totally ridiculous. He has sex. With consenting adults. It's not a fucking crime. If one girl said 'no' there would be others available, I'm sure.  It's not like he's some hideous cretin.</p>
<p>People can have sex without being rapists. And they can drink without being alcoholics. And still be considered an adult, capable of making adult decisions.</p>
<p>People who drink socially use alcohol as a social lubricant. It just makes things go more smoothly and less awkwardly. Try it sometime.</p>
<p>And, he didn't "get them trashed", they got themselves trashed. If they feel they aren't capable of making responsible decisions under the influence, they should refrain from drinking.</p>
<p>If anybody here really wants to take a stand for women, take a stand for the fact that they are capable of making their own decisions, whether that involves drinking or sex. At least hold them equally responsible if you intend to vilify this type of behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Week&#8217;s Most Popular Blog Posts - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15822</link>
		<dc:creator>The Week&#8217;s Most Popular Blog Posts - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15822</guid>
		<description>[...] way over to this Glenn Beck post again, but I&#8217;m not counting it because fuck that guy. 1. Spot Your Local Tucker Max Douchebag!, in which calling other people &#8220;douchebags&#8221; makes me a douchebag, and possibly a rapist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] way over to this Glenn Beck post again, but I&#8217;m not counting it because fuck that guy. 1. Spot Your Local Tucker Max Douchebag!, in which calling other people &#8220;douchebags&#8221; makes me a douchebag, and possibly a rapist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: recursiveparadox</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15819</link>
		<dc:creator>recursiveparadox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15819</guid>
		<description>@John:

&quot;Yes, a person always has the option of revoking that consent at any time for any reason, but where in Max’s writing does he force himself on someone or suggest that doing so is an acceptable act?&quot;

How likely do you think a trashed out of her mind girl will be able to articulate that in a way a trashed of his mind guy will understand?

I know when I&#039;m unbelievably drunk, it&#039;s hard as hell to understand what people are saying or even hear them. And it&#039;s tough to articulate words or push someone away if they aren&#039;t noticing you saying no in your drunk voice.

Tucker isn&#039;t a potential rapist because he has sex with someone who is drunk. One can do a great job with the drunken sex thing, you just need to be sober enough to spot warning signs and listen and actually make sure that some kind of safeword is around so that there&#039;s something distinct that you can know to stop with if either of you is too drunk to do it that great.

His whole attitude is very... neglectful is putting it lightly. It&#039;s pretty clear that he doesn&#039;t give much of a shit about the women he sleeps with, so really, do you think he&#039;s going to have the backup shit necessary to not end up raping someone?

Although honestly, he strikes me as the kind of guy who, if a girl said no, he&#039;d keep on pushing her to say yes, getting more and more in her face and asinine the more times she said no. Now if you&#039;re doing that during sex, when she needs to stop, then that makes you a complete piece of shit and a rapist in training. If you get physical about your attempts to &quot;convince&quot; her (like trying to start it up again, when she said no) then you are sexually assaulting her.

Tucker is the sort of man who is playing russian roulette with a rape conviction. He skirts the edges as close as he can by doing the most godawfully stupid, dangerous and awful things to women he can and someday soon (or perhaps already) he&#039;s gonna end up being a rapist because of it.

But hey, I guess he&#039;s a really cool guy, right? I&#039;m sure you&#039;d love it if someone secretly videotaped you during sex, or a guy got you trashed and buttsexed you. XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John:</p>
<p>"Yes, a person always has the option of revoking that consent at any time for any reason, but where in Max’s writing does he force himself on someone or suggest that doing so is an acceptable act?"</p>
<p>How likely do you think a trashed out of her mind girl will be able to articulate that in a way a trashed of his mind guy will understand?</p>
<p>I know when I'm unbelievably drunk, it's hard as hell to understand what people are saying or even hear them. And it's tough to articulate words or push someone away if they aren't noticing you saying no in your drunk voice.</p>
<p>Tucker isn't a potential rapist because he has sex with someone who is drunk. One can do a great job with the drunken sex thing, you just need to be sober enough to spot warning signs and listen and actually make sure that some kind of safeword is around so that there's something distinct that you can know to stop with if either of you is too drunk to do it that great.</p>
<p>His whole attitude is very... neglectful is putting it lightly. It's pretty clear that he doesn't give much of a shit about the women he sleeps with, so really, do you think he's going to have the backup shit necessary to not end up raping someone?</p>
<p>Although honestly, he strikes me as the kind of guy who, if a girl said no, he'd keep on pushing her to say yes, getting more and more in her face and asinine the more times she said no. Now if you're doing that during sex, when she needs to stop, then that makes you a complete piece of shit and a rapist in training. If you get physical about your attempts to "convince" her (like trying to start it up again, when she said no) then you are sexually assaulting her.</p>
<p>Tucker is the sort of man who is playing russian roulette with a rape conviction. He skirts the edges as close as he can by doing the most godawfully stupid, dangerous and awful things to women he can and someday soon (or perhaps already) he's gonna end up being a rapist because of it.</p>
<p>But hey, I guess he's a really cool guy, right? I'm sure you'd love it if someone secretly videotaped you during sex, or a guy got you trashed and buttsexed you. XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: recursiveparadox</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15817</link>
		<dc:creator>recursiveparadox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15817</guid>
		<description>@Joe Law

&quot;Tucker Max is not MANIPULATING anyone, he is pretty much doing what any good salesman does everyday, making a pitch to a women and stating why they should choose him.&quot;

Getting people trashed is a sales pitch? o_O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joe Law</p>
<p>"Tucker Max is not MANIPULATING anyone, he is pretty much doing what any good salesman does everyday, making a pitch to a women and stating why they should choose him."</p>
<p>Getting people trashed is a sales pitch? o_O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilfred</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15816</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15816</guid>
		<description>I was going to press Tucker Max&#039;s case but as i scrolled down the page it became clear that this was not need as these &quot;douches&quot; have clearly demonstrated that the author of this article and supporters of this author are awesomely biased and trying to push their way of thinking as right.

So i salute those in the above comments that have set these people right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to press Tucker Max's case but as i scrolled down the page it became clear that this was not need as these "douches" have clearly demonstrated that the author of this article and supporters of this author are awesomely biased and trying to push their way of thinking as right.</p>
<p>So i salute those in the above comments that have set these people right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15814</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15814</guid>
		<description>One thing that hasn&#039;t been mentioned is that the law holds accountable those who are intoxicated and/or under the influence of drugs.  If I get drunk or high, then plow into another car, I would be held responsible.  I wouldn&#039;t be able to say, &quot;but your Honor, I was totally blasted when I dozed off and wiped out that entire family.  Its not my fault!&quot;  Yes, it is.

Thus, a person who consents to sex while drunk STILL CONSENTED.  Yes, a person always has the option of revoking that consent at any time for any reason, but where in Max&#039;s writing does he force himself on someone or suggest that doing so is an acceptable act?  Show this, and your claims will hold water.  Fail to back up your claims with facts and references, and you&#039;ll be dismissed as yet another emotional train wreck who projects their biases out onto the world.

If Max truly broke the law and committed rape, he would be the easiest person in the world to prosecute: he&#039;s written and published stories depicting his actions (i.e.: he freely admitted to what he&#039;s done), and the women he supposedly violated would be easy to find and interview.  The fact that after all these years of popularity he has not been arrested nor convicted shows that the hundreds or thousands of prosecutors around the country do not think that his actions constitute rape.

The only logical argument you can possibly present is that the current laws should be changed to fit your PERSONAL OPINIONS regarding consent while intoxicated.  Of course, I, and many others, would strongly oppose that idea, but still... you could try that without necessarily making yourself look like a douchebag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that hasn't been mentioned is that the law holds accountable those who are intoxicated and/or under the influence of drugs.  If I get drunk or high, then plow into another car, I would be held responsible.  I wouldn't be able to say, "but your Honor, I was totally blasted when I dozed off and wiped out that entire family.  Its not my fault!"  Yes, it is.</p>
<p>Thus, a person who consents to sex while drunk STILL CONSENTED.  Yes, a person always has the option of revoking that consent at any time for any reason, but where in Max's writing does he force himself on someone or suggest that doing so is an acceptable act?  Show this, and your claims will hold water.  Fail to back up your claims with facts and references, and you'll be dismissed as yet another emotional train wreck who projects their biases out onto the world.</p>
<p>If Max truly broke the law and committed rape, he would be the easiest person in the world to prosecute: he's written and published stories depicting his actions (i.e.: he freely admitted to what he's done), and the women he supposedly violated would be easy to find and interview.  The fact that after all these years of popularity he has not been arrested nor convicted shows that the hundreds or thousands of prosecutors around the country do not think that his actions constitute rape.</p>
<p>The only logical argument you can possibly present is that the current laws should be changed to fit your PERSONAL OPINIONS regarding consent while intoxicated.  Of course, I, and many others, would strongly oppose that idea, but still... you could try that without necessarily making yourself look like a douchebag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: man</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15811</link>
		<dc:creator>man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15811</guid>
		<description>holy shit your a cunt. everyone knows these people exsist we just ignore them and let them live there stupid lives. The only people who care are the people who fought for the ability for women to vote and look where the fuck that got us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>holy shit your a cunt. everyone knows these people exsist we just ignore them and let them live there stupid lives. The only people who care are the people who fought for the ability for women to vote and look where the fuck that got us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kza</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15809</link>
		<dc:creator>kza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15809</guid>
		<description>His advertising consists of a party and comments on a blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His advertising consists of a party and comments on a blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdn</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/comment-page-3/#comment-15804</link>
		<dc:creator>cdn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=6357#comment-15804</guid>
		<description>why does it matter who this guy fucks and who fucks him, his stories are hillarious, anyone is capable of being drunk ass whore. he writes about we read it and laugh, is there any more than that, if you dont like drunk whores dont be one dont fuck&#039;em dont read about&#039;em. other than that shut the fuck up, really, if your strong vocabulary and prudent lifestyle were so satisfying what in the fuck are you doing on here raiseing awarness to people who get a kick outa this shit, because the only way i heard your winey voices was cause i subscribed as a fan of the book on facebook,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why does it matter who this guy fucks and who fucks him, his stories are hillarious, anyone is capable of being drunk ass whore. he writes about we read it and laugh, is there any more than that, if you dont like drunk whores dont be one dont fuck'em dont read about'em. other than that shut the fuck up, really, if your strong vocabulary and prudent lifestyle were so satisfying what in the fuck are you doing on here raiseing awarness to people who get a kick outa this shit, because the only way i heard your winey voices was cause i subscribed as a fan of the book on facebook,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

