<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More To Love: Sending the Wrong Message?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:24:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/comment-page-1/#comment-14201</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5769#comment-14201</guid>
		<description>Just because you are thin doesn&#039;t mean you are healthy.  There are thin people (as well as not thin people) who are unhealthy in other areas of their lives (i.e., they may drink too much, do drugs, not eat enough, exercise compulsively, not get enough sleep, sleep around, stress issues, etc.).  Being thin does not automatically mean &quot;healthy&quot; the same way NOT being thin does not automatically mean &quot;unhealthy&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because you are thin doesn't mean you are healthy.  There are thin people (as well as not thin people) who are unhealthy in other areas of their lives (i.e., they may drink too much, do drugs, not eat enough, exercise compulsively, not get enough sleep, sleep around, stress issues, etc.).  Being thin does not automatically mean "healthy" the same way NOT being thin does not automatically mean "unhealthy".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our Morning Roundup: When It Comes to Phelps, Only Bad News Matters - City Desk - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/comment-page-1/#comment-13419</link>
		<dc:creator>Our Morning Roundup: When It Comes to Phelps, Only Bad News Matters - City Desk - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5769#comment-13419</guid>
		<description>[...] Obesity is apparently off limits, but I&#8217;m pretty sure it&#8217;s still OK to call smokers &#8220;addicts.&#8221; Thankfully, there&#8217;s a less unhealthy alternative on shelves as we sprechen! From Jacob Sullum at Reason: A new review of 89 studies confirms that the cancer risk associated with smokeless tobacco is tiny when compared to the cancer risk associated with cigarettes&#8230;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obesity is apparently off limits, but I&#8217;m pretty sure it&#8217;s still OK to call smokers &#8220;addicts.&#8221; Thankfully, there&#8217;s a less unhealthy alternative on shelves as we sprechen! From Jacob Sullum at Reason: A new review of 89 studies confirms that the cancer risk associated with smokeless tobacco is tiny when compared to the cancer risk associated with cigarettes&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on More to Love &#124; TakePart Social Action Network™</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/comment-page-1/#comment-12724</link>
		<dc:creator>More on More to Love &#124; TakePart Social Action Network™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5769#comment-12724</guid>
		<description>[...] addiction to make light of in our society. But obesity can kill people. An article in the Washington City Paper makes this great point: &#8220;If the source of the contestants’ hardships were something more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] addiction to make light of in our society. But obesity can kill people. An article in the Washington City Paper makes this great point: &#8220;If the source of the contestants’ hardships were something more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/comment-page-1/#comment-12723</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5769#comment-12723</guid>
		<description>Why do all these commenters keep saying this a feminist blog?  It&#039;s a sex blog.

Great post Mike. I&#039;ve actually seen the show in question, and it&#039;s not much more than &quot;comfort food&quot; for the heavy set single ladies out there.  I&#039;d love to see your angry readers explain to their doctors why it&#039;s not unhealthy to be fat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do all these commenters keep saying this a feminist blog?  It's a sex blog.</p>
<p>Great post Mike. I've actually seen the show in question, and it's not much more than "comfort food" for the heavy set single ladies out there.  I'd love to see your angry readers explain to their doctors why it's not unhealthy to be fat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jules</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/comment-page-1/#comment-12722</link>
		<dc:creator>jules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5769#comment-12722</guid>
		<description>Putting overweight people on TV and making them process, out loud, on camera their insecurities just seems...mean.  And exploitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putting overweight people on TV and making them process, out loud, on camera their insecurities just seems...mean.  And exploitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/comment-page-1/#comment-12720</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5769#comment-12720</guid>
		<description>I think the oddity is that you don&#039;t see people with a BMI over 25 on t.v. It&#039;s as if they are a part of the overlooked population, unrepresented by mass media, unless they are conforming to society&#039;s standard of beauty. We can find on t.v. representation of homosexuality, dwarfism, bigamy, polygamy, religion, race, transgenders, etc. What we don&#039;t find is a t.v. show that represents &quot;fat&quot; people as normal. Not saying that being &quot;fat&quot; is normal, but define fat? The average woman is a size 14-16, not a size 0-4. But for all intents and purpose we think of fatness as a disease. Young girls (and boys) for that matter grow up with complexes and eating disorders because they are so afraid of being fat; they are so afraid of not being reflected in their favorite pop star/ movie star. 
Granted, I&#039;m not saying that &#039;More to Love&#039; is a perfect premise to enlighten the world about the lives, difficulties, and loves of overweight people but maybe it&#039;s a start. As we all know, the first season of every show is a little hazy. It takes a few seasons to really perfect it. But it&#039;s the journey, the intricacies, that make a show worth watching. I think maybe if we can have more of a real world perspective in our reality t.v. we wouldn&#039;t need segregated shows such as &#039;More to Love&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the oddity is that you don't see people with a BMI over 25 on t.v. It's as if they are a part of the overlooked population, unrepresented by mass media, unless they are conforming to society's standard of beauty. We can find on t.v. representation of homosexuality, dwarfism, bigamy, polygamy, religion, race, transgenders, etc. What we don't find is a t.v. show that represents "fat" people as normal. Not saying that being "fat" is normal, but define fat? The average woman is a size 14-16, not a size 0-4. But for all intents and purpose we think of fatness as a disease. Young girls (and boys) for that matter grow up with complexes and eating disorders because they are so afraid of being fat; they are so afraid of not being reflected in their favorite pop star/ movie star.<br />
Granted, I'm not saying that 'More to Love' is a perfect premise to enlighten the world about the lives, difficulties, and loves of overweight people but maybe it's a start. As we all know, the first season of every show is a little hazy. It takes a few seasons to really perfect it. But it's the journey, the intricacies, that make a show worth watching. I think maybe if we can have more of a real world perspective in our reality t.v. we wouldn't need segregated shows such as 'More to Love'.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel M. Laenker</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/comment-page-1/#comment-12718</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel M. Laenker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5769#comment-12718</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I made an offhand reference to the biggest weight-related reality TV show currently on the air in an effort to show that I THINK IT’S OK FOR A REALITY TV SHOW TO REVOLVE AROUND HEAVY PEOPLE.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s nice. Unfortunately, the one you highlight as &quot;OK&quot; is pretty damned exploitative by design, so unless you have a better idea of what&#039;s an acceptable paradigm for fatness in American media, I&#039;m still going to have to question your judgment here.

To be fair, I think that there are a number of structural issues that cause an alarming amount of obesity in America, from the systematic destruction of the neighborhood as a self-contained unit to the implementation of public agricultural policy and food subsidy. But even if we assume that most obesity comes from cultural or individual choices, shaming people into losing weight is not going to make people more healthy, it&#039;s just going to make them neurotic and miserable.

It&#039;s like trying to teach people not to speak in a vernacular dialect not by highlighting the difference in a respectful way, but humiliating them for &quot;talking funny&quot;. That doesn&#039;t teach people to speak standard English in all circumstances, it just teaches them to stutter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I made an offhand reference to the biggest weight-related reality TV show currently on the air in an effort to show that I THINK IT’S OK FOR A REALITY TV SHOW TO REVOLVE AROUND HEAVY PEOPLE.</i></p>
<p>That's nice. Unfortunately, the one you highlight as "OK" is pretty damned exploitative by design, so unless you have a better idea of what's an acceptable paradigm for fatness in American media, I'm still going to have to question your judgment here.</p>
<p>To be fair, I think that there are a number of structural issues that cause an alarming amount of obesity in America, from the systematic destruction of the neighborhood as a self-contained unit to the implementation of public agricultural policy and food subsidy. But even if we assume that most obesity comes from cultural or individual choices, shaming people into losing weight is not going to make people more healthy, it's just going to make them neurotic and miserable.</p>
<p>It's like trying to teach people not to speak in a vernacular dialect not by highlighting the difference in a respectful way, but humiliating them for "talking funny". That doesn't teach people to speak standard English in all circumstances, it just teaches them to stutter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megs</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/comment-page-1/#comment-12715</link>
		<dc:creator>Megs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5769#comment-12715</guid>
		<description>I think being morbidly obese is a health problem and it&#039;s unnatural and a result of eating too large a quantity of unhealthy food. It stresses every system in your body and causes emotional imbalances. I think obese people should be treated with compassion and respect, but as a recovering addict myself...I recognize the delusion and rationalization in people who just can&#039;t stop eating. Why do you think most of in recovery for drugs and alcohol gain a lot of weight and/or fuck a lot when we first get sober? We are trying to fill the void within ourselves. I couldn&#039;t deal with cravings on my own, and it makes me feel weak, but with the tools I learned and the support of other addicts, I was able to overcome my obsession. (And bulemia/anorexia is an obsession as well)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think being morbidly obese is a health problem and it's unnatural and a result of eating too large a quantity of unhealthy food. It stresses every system in your body and causes emotional imbalances. I think obese people should be treated with compassion and respect, but as a recovering addict myself...I recognize the delusion and rationalization in people who just can't stop eating. Why do you think most of in recovery for drugs and alcohol gain a lot of weight and/or fuck a lot when we first get sober? We are trying to fill the void within ourselves. I couldn't deal with cravings on my own, and it makes me feel weak, but with the tools I learned and the support of other addicts, I was able to overcome my obsession. (And bulemia/anorexia is an obsession as well)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikki</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/comment-page-1/#comment-12712</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5769#comment-12712</guid>
		<description>I wanna see Luke take one of his bachelorettes&#039; out for an eating contest date.  All you can eat tacos baby, oink oink!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanna see Luke take one of his bachelorettes' out for an eating contest date.  All you can eat tacos baby, oink oink!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/comment-page-1/#comment-12710</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5769#comment-12710</guid>
		<description>See, what everyone else seems to be complaining about in that blog post?  I sure as hell don&#039;t see their points.

Well, except the socially aligned part.  I was The Fat Kid growing up, and I was constantly criticized over my weight, both by other kids and by my (equally fat) parents and extended family.

But mainly it looks like people are just reading into your post more than they should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, what everyone else seems to be complaining about in that blog post?  I sure as hell don't see their points.</p>
<p>Well, except the socially aligned part.  I was The Fat Kid growing up, and I was constantly criticized over my weight, both by other kids and by my (equally fat) parents and extended family.</p>
<p>But mainly it looks like people are just reading into your post more than they should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brie</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/comment-page-1/#comment-12701</link>
		<dc:creator>brie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 04:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5769#comment-12701</guid>
		<description>Do you think you&#039;re being some badass rebel or something talking about this when &quot;we’re not supposed to comment on or disapprove of fatness&quot;? Do you think you&#039;re being transgressive or smarter than everyone else or something?

Because you&#039;re not. Being fat isn&#039;t (like you say) something that&#039;s not &quot;openly maligned.&quot; Have you ever been to celebrity gossip website? Or a girl&#039;s locker room? (Actually, I&#039;m sure you haven&#039;t actually experienced the last one, which may explain why you&#039;re so insensitive about this.) I&#039;d like you to name me a place where it&#039;s okay or not maligned to be fat (and NOT this show, which is just as manipulative and exploitative as the rest of the cesspool that is reality TV).

But I&#039;ve got to hand it to you: your reasoning is flawless. All fat people are &quot;addicts&quot;? Even if you&#039;re only talking about the people on the show, I think you&#039;d be hard-pressed to prove that they&#039;re all compulsive over-eaters. But, no, don&#039;t worry about it, let&#039;s all lump them together. They&#039;re like cattle anyway, right? Size-wise? You&#039;re sooooo rebellious!

I bet you write this stuff without thinking about, but you&#039;re what gives millions of girls (of all ages) across this country eating disorders. When you write off people like this or even comment on this exploitative trash, you&#039;re furthering a way of thought (whether you&#039;re doing it on purpose or not) that causes girls to think that stick-think is the only way to be attractive or even vaguely human.

How can you feel good about doing that, just look like some smartass rebel or make some pointless point about a stupid show? How can you run such rancid anti-woman bile in a feminist column?

It&#039;s not dumb, outwardly ignorant people who are the problem; it&#039;s people like you, loud white men who pretend like they can be sensitive and empathize women and gays and lesbians and different races all while spewing this same stupid shit. People like you who pretend they get it but don&#039;t have a clue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think you're being some badass rebel or something talking about this when "we’re not supposed to comment on or disapprove of fatness"? Do you think you're being transgressive or smarter than everyone else or something?</p>
<p>Because you're not. Being fat isn't (like you say) something that's not "openly maligned." Have you ever been to celebrity gossip website? Or a girl's locker room? (Actually, I'm sure you haven't actually experienced the last one, which may explain why you're so insensitive about this.) I'd like you to name me a place where it's okay or not maligned to be fat (and NOT this show, which is just as manipulative and exploitative as the rest of the cesspool that is reality TV).</p>
<p>But I've got to hand it to you: your reasoning is flawless. All fat people are "addicts"? Even if you're only talking about the people on the show, I think you'd be hard-pressed to prove that they're all compulsive over-eaters. But, no, don't worry about it, let's all lump them together. They're like cattle anyway, right? Size-wise? You're sooooo rebellious!</p>
<p>I bet you write this stuff without thinking about, but you're what gives millions of girls (of all ages) across this country eating disorders. When you write off people like this or even comment on this exploitative trash, you're furthering a way of thought (whether you're doing it on purpose or not) that causes girls to think that stick-think is the only way to be attractive or even vaguely human.</p>
<p>How can you feel good about doing that, just look like some smartass rebel or make some pointless point about a stupid show? How can you run such rancid anti-woman bile in a feminist column?</p>
<p>It's not dumb, outwardly ignorant people who are the problem; it's people like you, loud white men who pretend like they can be sensitive and empathize women and gays and lesbians and different races all while spewing this same stupid shit. People like you who pretend they get it but don't have a clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedrymock</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/comment-page-1/#comment-12700</link>
		<dc:creator>thedrymock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 02:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5769#comment-12700</guid>
		<description>Sorry, bad editing in my comment - when I say &quot;I think you are underestimating how rare that is for fat women,&quot; I don&#039;t mean finding a lover at all (because that&#039;s really not rare), I mean finding one who doesn&#039;t criticize your weight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, bad editing in my comment - when I say "I think you are underestimating how rare that is for fat women," I don't mean finding a lover at all (because that's really not rare), I mean finding one who doesn't criticize your weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedrymock</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/comment-page-1/#comment-12699</link>
		<dc:creator>thedrymock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 02:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5769#comment-12699</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s great that you think it&#039;s okay for a reality show to revolve around heavy people, but I think you&#039;re missing Alix&#039;s point. Please do take a look around at Shapely Prose (www.kateharding.net). You might want to start with this post: http://kateharding.net/but-dont-you-realize-fat-is-unhealthy/

Leaving aside the show itself for the moment, you&#039;re making a lot of basic assumptions in your post, including:
1) Fat people are all fat because they overeat and don&#039;t exercise
2) Being overweight or obese necessarily causes health problems
3) Losing weight in and of itself (independent of the health benefits of exercising and eating healthy foods) improves health
4) It is possible for most people to lose weight and keep it off

Even if 1-3 were true (and please check out the post I linked for refutation of those), 4 clearly isn&#039;t -- as you sort of acknowledge when you admit that &quot;evidence suggests that some people are genetically predisposed to obesity or plain old chubbiness.&quot; The fact is that 95% of people who lose weight regain it (and often some extra for good measure) within 5 years. If those women have &quot;the conviction that fatness is forever,&quot; as you put it, it&#039;s because every single one of them has tried NOT to be fat, has probably spent a huge amount of time and energy on that effort, and it hasn&#039;t worked for them. (And in the process of trying to lose weight, they&#039;ve quite possibly made themselves less healthy overall by losing and regaining weight multiple times.)

But the most ridiculously wrong assertion you make is that &quot;we’re not supposed to comment on or disapprove of fatness.&quot; I don&#039;t know if you are or have ever been fat, but I&#039;ll be shocked if you have been and can still make that assertion. Being fat is almost universally seen as a moral failure, and fat people -- especially women (and from what I&#039;ve heard you can see that gender differential in the show) -- take all kinds of shit just for existing. Why do you think the women in this show have dealt with so much &quot;weight-related anxiety, depression, isolation, and rejection&quot;? You seem conscious that women especially do suffer from these things because of their weight, but somehow you haven&#039;t put two and two together there.

Your point that it&#039;s ridiculous to think that finding a lover is a panacea for all ills is well taken, but I think you are underestimating how rare that is for fat women and how much better it can make you feel about yourself to be with someone who really doesn&#039;t think you need to spend the rest of your life eating 800 calories a day in order to be good enough for them. Clearly, going on a dating show like this is probably not the way to do that, but given that the Bachelor/ette and other similar dating shows have the exact same premise, I&#039;m not sure why you&#039;re making that criticism of this show and not the others.

Lastly, you keep talking about &quot;addiction,&quot; and I cannot figure out what you&#039;re referring to. It sounds like you&#039;re saying that all fat people overeat and that overeating counts as an addiction. There is such a thing as compulsive overeating, but it&#039;s extremely unlikely that most of the contestants on this show suffer from that. It&#039;s an eating disorder, and it is a serious problem -- but the same goes for anorexia, which somehow I doubt you&#039;d refer to as an addiction.

I&#039;m sorry if you feel &quot;hated on,&quot; and I&#039;m trying to be polite here, but you posted on a feminist site about how fat people (and fat women in particular, as there are 20x as many of them on this show as fat men) just need to be criticized more and then they&#039;ll lose weight. You&#039;re gonna get some backlash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's great that you think it's okay for a reality show to revolve around heavy people, but I think you're missing Alix's point. Please do take a look around at Shapely Prose (www.kateharding.net). You might want to start with this post: <a href="http://kateharding.net/but-dont-you-realize-fat-is-unhealthy/" rel="nofollow">http://kateharding.net/but-dont-you-realize-fat-is-unhealthy/</a></p>
<p>Leaving aside the show itself for the moment, you're making a lot of basic assumptions in your post, including:<br />
1) Fat people are all fat because they overeat and don't exercise<br />
2) Being overweight or obese necessarily causes health problems<br />
3) Losing weight in and of itself (independent of the health benefits of exercising and eating healthy foods) improves health<br />
4) It is possible for most people to lose weight and keep it off</p>
<p>Even if 1-3 were true (and please check out the post I linked for refutation of those), 4 clearly isn't -- as you sort of acknowledge when you admit that "evidence suggests that some people are genetically predisposed to obesity or plain old chubbiness." The fact is that 95% of people who lose weight regain it (and often some extra for good measure) within 5 years. If those women have "the conviction that fatness is forever," as you put it, it's because every single one of them has tried NOT to be fat, has probably spent a huge amount of time and energy on that effort, and it hasn't worked for them. (And in the process of trying to lose weight, they've quite possibly made themselves less healthy overall by losing and regaining weight multiple times.)</p>
<p>But the most ridiculously wrong assertion you make is that "we’re not supposed to comment on or disapprove of fatness." I don't know if you are or have ever been fat, but I'll be shocked if you have been and can still make that assertion. Being fat is almost universally seen as a moral failure, and fat people -- especially women (and from what I've heard you can see that gender differential in the show) -- take all kinds of shit just for existing. Why do you think the women in this show have dealt with so much "weight-related anxiety, depression, isolation, and rejection"? You seem conscious that women especially do suffer from these things because of their weight, but somehow you haven't put two and two together there.</p>
<p>Your point that it's ridiculous to think that finding a lover is a panacea for all ills is well taken, but I think you are underestimating how rare that is for fat women and how much better it can make you feel about yourself to be with someone who really doesn't think you need to spend the rest of your life eating 800 calories a day in order to be good enough for them. Clearly, going on a dating show like this is probably not the way to do that, but given that the Bachelor/ette and other similar dating shows have the exact same premise, I'm not sure why you're making that criticism of this show and not the others.</p>
<p>Lastly, you keep talking about "addiction," and I cannot figure out what you're referring to. It sounds like you're saying that all fat people overeat and that overeating counts as an addiction. There is such a thing as compulsive overeating, but it's extremely unlikely that most of the contestants on this show suffer from that. It's an eating disorder, and it is a serious problem -- but the same goes for anorexia, which somehow I doubt you'd refer to as an addiction.</p>
<p>I'm sorry if you feel "hated on," and I'm trying to be polite here, but you posted on a feminist site about how fat people (and fat women in particular, as there are 20x as many of them on this show as fat men) just need to be criticized more and then they'll lose weight. You're gonna get some backlash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Riggs</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/comment-page-1/#comment-12697</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Riggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5769#comment-12697</guid>
		<description>Hey Alix, thanks for commenting today! (Before I get started, I&#039;d like to point out that you&#039;re the second person to criticize this post without first watching the show. Would it help y&#039;all to provide some Hulu links?)

Re your points:

&lt;em&gt;How much help is promoting the message that to fall in love, women need to change themselves as opposed to finding men who are attracted to them just as they are?&lt;/em&gt;

I didn&#039;t write that. In essence (that seems to be what you&#039;re referencing--the &quot;essence&quot; of my argument), I&#039;m disappointed that the contestants, from what we&#039;ve seen so far, think that exercise is exclusively for trying to get skinny; that a positive attitude about their body is a substitute for a realistic attitude about their health; and that there&#039;s a nostalgic treatment of over-eating. One woman even remarked (paraphrasing here) that she was tired of getting up in the morning to diet and be skinny. So, to you I say, How is promoting an addiction feminist?

&lt;em&gt;but to say that fat people should only be allowed on TV when they’re trying to lose weight? Fuck you.&lt;/em&gt;

Didn&#039;t write that either. I made an offhand reference to the biggest weight-related reality TV show currently on the air in an effort to show that I THINK IT&#039;S OK FOR A REALITY TV SHOW TO REVOLVE AROUND HEAVY PEOPLE. It&#039;s kind of stupid to hate on me when there aren&#039;t any other reality TV shows about heavy people (unless you want to count that brief series A&amp;E did about morbidly obese people).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Alix, thanks for commenting today! (Before I get started, I'd like to point out that you're the second person to criticize this post without first watching the show. Would it help y'all to provide some Hulu links?)</p>
<p>Re your points:</p>
<p><em>How much help is promoting the message that to fall in love, women need to change themselves as opposed to finding men who are attracted to them just as they are?</em></p>
<p>I didn't write that. In essence (that seems to be what you're referencing--the "essence" of my argument), I'm disappointed that the contestants, from what we've seen so far, think that exercise is exclusively for trying to get skinny; that a positive attitude about their body is a substitute for a realistic attitude about their health; and that there's a nostalgic treatment of over-eating. One woman even remarked (paraphrasing here) that she was tired of getting up in the morning to diet and be skinny. So, to you I say, How is promoting an addiction feminist?</p>
<p><em>but to say that fat people should only be allowed on TV when they’re trying to lose weight? Fuck you.</em></p>
<p>Didn't write that either. I made an offhand reference to the biggest weight-related reality TV show currently on the air in an effort to show that I THINK IT'S OK FOR A REALITY TV SHOW TO REVOLVE AROUND HEAVY PEOPLE. It's kind of stupid to hate on me when there aren't any other reality TV shows about heavy people (unless you want to count that brief series A&#038;E did about morbidly obese people).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alix</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/08/05/more-to-love-sending-the-wrong-message/comment-page-1/#comment-12696</link>
		<dc:creator>alix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=5769#comment-12696</guid>
		<description>Yikes. How is fat-hate feminist? How much help is promoting the message that to fall in love, women need to change themselves as opposed to finding men who are attracted to them just as they are?

Not that I&#039;m defending the show- but to say that fat people should only be allowed on TV when they&#039;re trying to lose weight? Fuck you.

Do you think that if there was less fixation on weight, and more fixation on health (how the FUCK do you know that these women overeat/ get no physical exercise?), we&#039;d have a healthier society?

I think you need to spend a bit of time at Shapely Prose (http://kateharding.net), and then report back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes. How is fat-hate feminist? How much help is promoting the message that to fall in love, women need to change themselves as opposed to finding men who are attracted to them just as they are?</p>
<p>Not that I'm defending the show- but to say that fat people should only be allowed on TV when they're trying to lose weight? Fuck you.</p>
<p>Do you think that if there was less fixation on weight, and more fixation on health (how the FUCK do you know that these women overeat/ get no physical exercise?), we'd have a healthier society?</p>
<p>I think you need to spend a bit of time at Shapely Prose (<a href="http://kateharding.net" rel="nofollow">http://kateharding.net</a>), and then report back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

