<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disney&#8217;s Closeted Gay Agenda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/26/disneys-closeted-gay-agenda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/26/disneys-closeted-gay-agenda/</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:10:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: no</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/26/disneys-closeted-gay-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-22042</link>
		<dc:creator>no</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4671#comment-22042</guid>
		<description>Oh calm down sir jackass poster #1.

It&#039;s called HUMOR. I highly doubt they&#039;re being hardcore serious with this. and even if they were, suck it up and grow a pair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh calm down sir jackass poster #1.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s called HUMOR. I highly doubt they&#8217;re being hardcore serious with this. and even if they were, suck it up and grow a pair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/26/disneys-closeted-gay-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-11217</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4671#comment-11217</guid>
		<description>You had a few good points in your article, but you began to dig too deep with High School Musical and you focused on it a bit too much.

High School Musical is not an allegory for homosexuals.  It can relate to us and help inspire us, if that&#039;s how we choose to view it, but the writers intended for it to be just as it was: A story where the characters struggle to do what they truly want against social pressures.  Although homosexuality is among the list, there are other interests a kid might have in high school that his or her friends might make fun of them for it.  Homosexuality is not the only thing to make a kid feel left out or want to change themselves to be accepted and liked.

I would have liked to hear more about Ling King&#039;s Scar, and the fact that Disney portrays homosexuals, more often than not, as old, bitter and lonely men.  We&#039;re all destined to die alone, it seems! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You had a few good points in your article, but you began to dig too deep with High School Musical and you focused on it a bit too much.</p>
<p>High School Musical is not an allegory for homosexuals.  It can relate to us and help inspire us, if that&#8217;s how we choose to view it, but the writers intended for it to be just as it was: A story where the characters struggle to do what they truly want against social pressures.  Although homosexuality is among the list, there are other interests a kid might have in high school that his or her friends might make fun of them for it.  Homosexuality is not the only thing to make a kid feel left out or want to change themselves to be accepted and liked.</p>
<p>I would have liked to hear more about Ling King&#8217;s Scar, and the fact that Disney portrays homosexuals, more often than not, as old, bitter and lonely men.  We&#8217;re all destined to die alone, it seems! ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Zamen</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/26/disneys-closeted-gay-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-11136</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Zamen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4671#comment-11136</guid>
		<description>The essential message here is that Disney and a large segment of society still regard gay men and women as second-class citizens - or worse. That is the salient point of my recently released biographical novel, Broken Saint. It is based on my forty-year friendship with a gay man, and chronicles his internal and external struggles as he battles for acceptance (of himself and by others). More information on the book is available at www.eloquentbooks.com/BrokenSaint.html. (Given Disney&#039;s current stance on this sort of subject matter, you can bet they&#039;ll never opt to make my book into a movie!)

Mark Zamen, author</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The essential message here is that Disney and a large segment of society still regard gay men and women as second-class citizens &#8211; or worse. That is the salient point of my recently released biographical novel, Broken Saint. It is based on my forty-year friendship with a gay man, and chronicles his internal and external struggles as he battles for acceptance (of himself and by others). More information on the book is available at <a href="http://www.eloquentbooks.com/BrokenSaint.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.eloquentbooks.com/BrokenSaint.html</a>. (Given Disney&#8217;s current stance on this sort of subject matter, you can bet they&#8217;ll never opt to make my book into a movie!)</p>
<p>Mark Zamen, author</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdesus</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/26/disneys-closeted-gay-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-10364</link>
		<dc:creator>mdesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4671#comment-10364</guid>
		<description>this shit is just dumb (not your article).  The reasoning behind the idea that a positive portrayal of hetero relationships somehow paints non-hetero relationships as strange, and possibly evil is flawed, and vaguely retarded (we can say that now right?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this shit is just dumb (not your article).  The reasoning behind the idea that a positive portrayal of hetero relationships somehow paints non-hetero relationships as strange, and possibly evil is flawed, and vaguely retarded (we can say that now right?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
