<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meghan McCain Schooled, Spanked, Murdered: Political Debate Or Snuff Porn?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/24/meghan-mccain-schooled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/24/meghan-mccain-schooled/</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:24:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Hess</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/24/meghan-mccain-schooled/comment-page-1/#comment-11535</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4602#comment-11535</guid>
		<description>JoeL, I&#039;m not a Republican. I&#039;m also not mourning my apparent sudden drop in machismo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JoeL, I'm not a Republican. I'm also not mourning my apparent sudden drop in machismo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeldm</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/24/meghan-mccain-schooled/comment-page-1/#comment-11529</link>
		<dc:creator>joeldm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 04:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4602#comment-11529</guid>
		<description>More whiney BS from the Far Right. How is it that the rough, tough right can&#039;t take it anymore? There was a time when Democrats were the whiners, but now it&#039;s the Right, the big, tough, macho right wing of the Republican Party!

Your comment is JUST as dumb as Meghan&#039;s was. Begala&#039;s point, that Reagan spent much of his administration complaining about what he inherited from Carter (in fact the GOP is STILL complaining about it!) is not less relevant because it happened 30 years ago!

That&#039;s why we study history, to understand past events and apply them to present circumstances! I mean, if we&#039;re talking about shelf life then don&#039;t talk to me about Jesus. I mean, really, it was a LONG TIME AGO, let it go! 

Begala &quot;invokes Regan for no apparent reason!!??&quot; You have GOT to be kidding. Republicans cannot be this stupid! Really! And no wonder the audience howled! This is Big Boy stuff, not sorority night at Ole Miss. If Meghan (and I actually appreciate the moderation she brings to the GOP) is going to get on stage with a bunch of tough, smart media-types, left or right, she&#039;s gotta be prepared to take some hits and hit back, but the fact his, she&#039;s just a very nice person with a Blog who gets attention because her Dad ran for Prez and he&#039;s a guy a lot of us on the Left respect for his service and the way he (once a long time ago, but no more) took on Bush. 

I hope Begala apologized after because I&#039;m betting he let his reflexes get the better of him and actually thought of her as an equal political adversary and she&#039;s not.

Say your sorry Paul, and Meghan, get off the stage or find a venue that is more fitting.

JoeL
Atlanta</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More whiney BS from the Far Right. How is it that the rough, tough right can't take it anymore? There was a time when Democrats were the whiners, but now it's the Right, the big, tough, macho right wing of the Republican Party!</p>
<p>Your comment is JUST as dumb as Meghan's was. Begala's point, that Reagan spent much of his administration complaining about what he inherited from Carter (in fact the GOP is STILL complaining about it!) is not less relevant because it happened 30 years ago!</p>
<p>That's why we study history, to understand past events and apply them to present circumstances! I mean, if we're talking about shelf life then don't talk to me about Jesus. I mean, really, it was a LONG TIME AGO, let it go! </p>
<p>Begala "invokes Regan for no apparent reason!!??" You have GOT to be kidding. Republicans cannot be this stupid! Really! And no wonder the audience howled! This is Big Boy stuff, not sorority night at Ole Miss. If Meghan (and I actually appreciate the moderation she brings to the GOP) is going to get on stage with a bunch of tough, smart media-types, left or right, she's gotta be prepared to take some hits and hit back, but the fact his, she's just a very nice person with a Blog who gets attention because her Dad ran for Prez and he's a guy a lot of us on the Left respect for his service and the way he (once a long time ago, but no more) took on Bush. </p>
<p>I hope Begala apologized after because I'm betting he let his reflexes get the better of him and actually thought of her as an equal political adversary and she's not.</p>
<p>Say your sorry Paul, and Meghan, get off the stage or find a venue that is more fitting.</p>
<p>JoeL<br />
Atlanta</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Milbank vs Nico Pitney=Old Media Trying to Stuff New Media in Locker &#171; Daily Dose</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/24/meghan-mccain-schooled/comment-page-1/#comment-10711</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Milbank vs Nico Pitney=Old Media Trying to Stuff New Media in Locker &#171; Daily Dose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4602#comment-10711</guid>
		<description>[...] this animosity was central to the recent Meghan McCain/Paul Begala dustup on Bill Maher, and the attendant glee at Meg&#8217;s supposed enschooling.  Begala waas clearly trying to put Meghan, the upstart [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this animosity was central to the recent Meghan McCain/Paul Begala dustup on Bill Maher, and the attendant glee at Meg&#8217;s supposed enschooling.  Begala waas clearly trying to put Meghan, the upstart [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Last Week&#8217;s Most Popular Blog Posts - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/24/meghan-mccain-schooled/comment-page-1/#comment-10369</link>
		<dc:creator>Last Week&#8217;s Most Popular Blog Posts - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4602#comment-10369</guid>
		<description>[...] week on the Sexist: 1. Meghan McCain Schooled, Spanked, Murdered: Political Debate or Snuff Porn?, because Paul Begala BDSM is not what I&#8217;d prefer to conjure up with my morning news.  2. 5C [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week on the Sexist: 1. Meghan McCain Schooled, Spanked, Murdered: Political Debate or Snuff Porn?, because Paul Begala BDSM is not what I&#8217;d prefer to conjure up with my morning news.  2. 5C [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suf</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/24/meghan-mccain-schooled/comment-page-1/#comment-10080</link>
		<dc:creator>Suf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4602#comment-10080</guid>
		<description>See this is where we run into problems. Whenever a woman is beating in an argument because she said something stupid or indefensible like what Mccain said, than all of a sudden it becomes sexist. Forget about the fact that she really did say something stupid and tried to insult Paul Begala first, nooo, we shouldn&#039;t look at that. If a woman had done the same exact hing, it would have been &quot;empowering&quot; or some bullshit like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See this is where we run into problems. Whenever a woman is beating in an argument because she said something stupid or indefensible like what Mccain said, than all of a sudden it becomes sexist. Forget about the fact that she really did say something stupid and tried to insult Paul Begala first, nooo, we shouldn't look at that. If a woman had done the same exact hing, it would have been "empowering" or some bullshit like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchy</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/24/meghan-mccain-schooled/comment-page-1/#comment-10071</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4602#comment-10071</guid>
		<description>First, &quot;schooled&quot; and &quot;spanked&quot; don&#039;t have to have sexual overtones.  If I get schooled or spanked on a basketball court, I don&#039;t go through an identity crisis and start dating men.

But I do agree that Begala&#039;s rejoinder was a little inane, and invoking the French Revolution and that he knows about it was snarky.  To say that McCain, though, was being anything but self-deprecating in the &quot;I wasn&#039;t born yet, so I wouldn&#039;t know&quot; comment, and was indeed trying to imply that the argument was irrelevant, is wishful thinking.  Begala was simply highlighting the hypocrisy (partisan-wise) of McCain&#039;s argument, and McCain got nervous.

The only thing that McCain could&#039;ve learned from this &quot;school,&quot; though, is how to dissemble and dance around an issue, answer nothing, and become the victor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, "schooled" and "spanked" don't have to have sexual overtones.  If I get schooled or spanked on a basketball court, I don't go through an identity crisis and start dating men.</p>
<p>But I do agree that Begala's rejoinder was a little inane, and invoking the French Revolution and that he knows about it was snarky.  To say that McCain, though, was being anything but self-deprecating in the "I wasn't born yet, so I wouldn't know" comment, and was indeed trying to imply that the argument was irrelevant, is wishful thinking.  Begala was simply highlighting the hypocrisy (partisan-wise) of McCain's argument, and McCain got nervous.</p>
<p>The only thing that McCain could've learned from this "school," though, is how to dissemble and dance around an issue, answer nothing, and become the victor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/24/meghan-mccain-schooled/comment-page-1/#comment-10009</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4602#comment-10009</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed the piece! My response can be found here: http://www.duolynoted.com/2009/06/meghan-mccain.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed the piece! My response can be found here: <a href="http://www.duolynoted.com/2009/06/meghan-mccain.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.duolynoted.com/2009/06/meghan-mccain.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Hess</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/24/meghan-mccain-schooled/comment-page-1/#comment-9959</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4602#comment-9959</guid>
		<description>a typo :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a typo :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/24/meghan-mccain-schooled/comment-page-1/#comment-9956</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4602#comment-9956</guid>
		<description>What is a a pretty east argument?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is a a pretty east argument?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huh?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/24/meghan-mccain-schooled/comment-page-1/#comment-9955</link>
		<dc:creator>huh?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4602#comment-9955</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s one thing to try to &quot;bridge a divide&quot;, which is quite admirable, and it&#039;s another thing to not know what the fuck you&#039;re talking about.  Clearly this woman does not know enough to have a substantive debate on important issues.  Look, I know I&#039;d love for there not to be any partisanship, but I don&#039;t think that Democrats or liberals should go along to get along when the other side has fucked things up so badly.  Their feelings are hurt?  WAaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.  Think about how many people have died because of the previous administration.  Anyone want to take a bet on how many?  Fuck McCain and Fuck Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's one thing to try to "bridge a divide", which is quite admirable, and it's another thing to not know what the fuck you're talking about.  Clearly this woman does not know enough to have a substantive debate on important issues.  Look, I know I'd love for there not to be any partisanship, but I don't think that Democrats or liberals should go along to get along when the other side has fucked things up so badly.  Their feelings are hurt?  WAaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.  Think about how many people have died because of the previous administration.  Anyone want to take a bet on how many?  Fuck McCain and Fuck Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M@</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/24/meghan-mccain-schooled/comment-page-1/#comment-9952</link>
		<dc:creator>M@</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4602#comment-9952</guid>
		<description>As an independent, I agree w/ everything she said about the partisanship in media. It&#039;s very typical of a &quot;partisan&quot; to think independents hate &quot;partisanship&quot; and that we favor bi-partisanship. Actually, that&#039;s even worse. We need multi-partisanship.... I think the comments are fair b/c she&#039;s a political figure and that&#039;s what happens when you play w/ the big boys. I just think she needs to up her game.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an independent, I agree w/ everything she said about the partisanship in media. It's very typical of a "partisan" to think independents hate "partisanship" and that we favor bi-partisanship. Actually, that's even worse. We need multi-partisanship.... I think the comments are fair b/c she's a political figure and that's what happens when you play w/ the big boys. I just think she needs to up her game.....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

