<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Body Is Not Defined By Pregnancy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/01/my-body-is-not-defined-by-pregnancy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/01/my-body-is-not-defined-by-pregnancy/</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:40:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Hess</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/01/my-body-is-not-defined-by-pregnancy/comment-page-1/#comment-8272</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4177#comment-8272</guid>
		<description>Karen,

Thanks for writing in! Perhaps when I get home I will submit a &quot;23 years old, 6 fried plantains&quot; belly.

One thing I didn&#039;t mention in my post is that I by no means mean to take away from the experiences of women who DO consider their bodies in terms of their reproductive histories. As a woman with a very abbreviated reproductive history, perhaps I can&#039;t share in the body-image dynamic. I do hope, however, that if I choose to expand my reproductive repertoire, it doesn&#039;t come at the expense of the other ways I use my body.

A simple &quot;35 years old, lawyer&quot; might tell us as much about body-image expectations as a pregnancy history---I hope some women decide to contextualize themselves that way, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen,</p>
<p>Thanks for writing in! Perhaps when I get home I will submit a &#8220;23 years old, 6 fried plantains&#8221; belly.</p>
<p>One thing I didn&#8217;t mention in my post is that I by no means mean to take away from the experiences of women who DO consider their bodies in terms of their reproductive histories. As a woman with a very abbreviated reproductive history, perhaps I can&#8217;t share in the body-image dynamic. I do hope, however, that if I choose to expand my reproductive repertoire, it doesn&#8217;t come at the expense of the other ways I use my body.</p>
<p>A simple &#8220;35 years old, lawyer&#8221; might tell us as much about body-image expectations as a pregnancy history&#8212;I hope some women decide to contextualize themselves that way, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Rayne</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/01/my-body-is-not-defined-by-pregnancy/comment-page-1/#comment-8270</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Rayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4177#comment-8270</guid>
		<description>Amanda and readers,

We would be delighted to publish a belly with the heading &quot;Just ate a big sandwich&quot; or &quot;Bike to work daily&quot; and nothing else.  What information people want associated with their bellies is expanding, as you&#039;ve noticed if you&#039;ve looked through them all.  Pushing that boundary sounds fabulous!  

Our submissions seem to come in cohorts: Right now we&#039;re in the middle of a bunch of 20-somethings with no pregnancies.  For a long while we had only 30-somethings with multiple pregnancies.  Feel free to take us out of both paradigms and into a place where people are defining their body by whatever rubric they find most appealing and relevant.

Choosing to be child-free is frankly a choice I wish more people felt comfortable making.  And most women, even those who choose to become mothers, feel that same bothersomeness of fertility.  With the exception of about three months I&#039;ve spent a lot of time since I was 17 working to not become pregnant.

Sincerely,
Karen Rayne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amanda and readers,</p>
<p>We would be delighted to publish a belly with the heading &#8220;Just ate a big sandwich&#8221; or &#8220;Bike to work daily&#8221; and nothing else.  What information people want associated with their bellies is expanding, as you&#8217;ve noticed if you&#8217;ve looked through them all.  Pushing that boundary sounds fabulous!  </p>
<p>Our submissions seem to come in cohorts: Right now we&#8217;re in the middle of a bunch of 20-somethings with no pregnancies.  For a long while we had only 30-somethings with multiple pregnancies.  Feel free to take us out of both paradigms and into a place where people are defining their body by whatever rubric they find most appealing and relevant.</p>
<p>Choosing to be child-free is frankly a choice I wish more people felt comfortable making.  And most women, even those who choose to become mothers, feel that same bothersomeness of fertility.  With the exception of about three months I&#8217;ve spent a lot of time since I was 17 working to not become pregnant.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Karen Rayne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/06/01/my-body-is-not-defined-by-pregnancy/comment-page-1/#comment-8247</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=4177#comment-8247</guid>
		<description>Wow looks like my dad submitted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow looks like my dad submitted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
