<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Carrie Prejean Shaming Has Gone Too Far</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/05/06/the-carrie-prejean-shaming-has-gone-too-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/05/06/the-carrie-prejean-shaming-has-gone-too-far/</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:24:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sexism On A Liberal Web Site Is Still Sexism - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/05/06/the-carrie-prejean-shaming-has-gone-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-8810</link>
		<dc:creator>Sexism On A Liberal Web Site Is Still Sexism - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3865#comment-8810</guid>
		<description>[...] on, Siskind. I&#8217;m right with you on that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on, Siskind. I&#8217;m right with you on that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sock puppet</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/05/06/the-carrie-prejean-shaming-has-gone-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-6385</link>
		<dc:creator>sock puppet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 14:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3865#comment-6385</guid>
		<description>maybe you should try it on the Catholic University campus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe you should try it on the Catholic University campus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Hess</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/05/06/the-carrie-prejean-shaming-has-gone-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-6281</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3865#comment-6281</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s true, Mrs. D. I only caught one of the leaked pictures, and---I&#039;m just sayin&#039;---it was more Miley Cyrus Vanity Fair than Playboy pinup.(In other words, it&#039;s all back). I can see how some would argue it doesn&#039;t fall under the topless category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's true, Mrs. D. I only caught one of the leaked pictures, and---I'm just sayin'---it was more Miley Cyrus Vanity Fair than Playboy pinup.(In other words, it's all back). I can see how some would argue it doesn't fall under the topless category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. D</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/05/06/the-carrie-prejean-shaming-has-gone-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-6279</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3865#comment-6279</guid>
		<description>A well-structured argument.  However, she would not be the first, and probably not the last, beauty pageant contestant criticized and/or dethroned for participating in questionable photo shoots.  Just sayin&#039;, them are the rules, and the assumption is that the participants are literate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A well-structured argument.  However, she would not be the first, and probably not the last, beauty pageant contestant criticized and/or dethroned for participating in questionable photo shoots.  Just sayin', them are the rules, and the assumption is that the participants are literate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaker Caitiecat</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/05/06/the-carrie-prejean-shaming-has-gone-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-6278</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaker Caitiecat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3865#comment-6278</guid>
		<description>I love love LOVE that you defend women you don&#039;t agree with from sexist attack.  Feminizzum: ur doin it rite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love love LOVE that you defend women you don't agree with from sexist attack.  Feminizzum: ur doin it rite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

