<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Facebook Avatar a Dude?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/21/is-the-facebook-avatar-a-dude/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/21/is-the-facebook-avatar-a-dude/</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:24:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/21/is-the-facebook-avatar-a-dude/comment-page-1/#comment-13436</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3651#comment-13436</guid>
		<description>&quot;And those biologists say female is the default gender of an unfertilized embryo. How ironic!&quot;

You mean the genetic material carried by a woman is exclusively female!?  How ironic indeed!

On topic, I always assumed it was the silhouette of the dude that made that placeholder graphic.  You&#039;re supposed to add your own pictures silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"And those biologists say female is the default gender of an unfertilized embryo. How ironic!"</p>
<p>You mean the genetic material carried by a woman is exclusively female!?  How ironic indeed!</p>
<p>On topic, I always assumed it was the silhouette of the dude that made that placeholder graphic.  You're supposed to add your own pictures silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mindclot</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/21/is-the-facebook-avatar-a-dude/comment-page-1/#comment-11000</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindclot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3651#comment-11000</guid>
		<description>Ok well I see what your saying I have to say that if you don&#039;t like the option you can simple upload your down photo to your profile or use the female version provided. You got to realize in most countries women have thier hair long as men have them short. Its more of a western culture that has reverse the roles of gender, now a days men are wearing their hair longer, use make up, have earrings and seem to be going through the same physical and mental problems of mainstream medias views of what they should look like. 

The world turns things change and life definitely isn&#039;t fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok well I see what your saying I have to say that if you don't like the option you can simple upload your down photo to your profile or use the female version provided. You got to realize in most countries women have thier hair long as men have them short. Its more of a western culture that has reverse the roles of gender, now a days men are wearing their hair longer, use make up, have earrings and seem to be going through the same physical and mental problems of mainstream medias views of what they should look like. </p>
<p>The world turns things change and life definitely isn't fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin 'PenaltyKillah' Lai</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/21/is-the-facebook-avatar-a-dude/comment-page-1/#comment-7900</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin 'PenaltyKillah' Lai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3651#comment-7900</guid>
		<description>I guess Sociological Images was all fired up... but here&#039;s the deal:

Facebook&#039;s default avatar is also the male avatar used in the &#039;global connection&#039; image on Facebook&#039;s sign-up page. A separate female avatar was also created for that purpose.

When a stick figure is drawn, with no hair or a little, it is immediately considered to be &#039;male&#039; by, well, at least by a lot of people. Only when the hair flows down to shoulder-length and a skirt is added does the stick figure be considered as &#039;female&#039;. (Bon Jovi stickmen will never be mistaken! lol) 

No offence, Amanda, if that&#039;s your picture above. I think we can all agree that your hairdo isn&#039;t stereotypically feminine, but who cares about that? Definitely not me. ;)

(And here&#039;s an idea: why not the Facebook guys or gals (&lt;- for political correctness) replace the default avatar with the female one from that sign-up image, just for a day? Let&#039;s see how many users will care about that. And those biologists say female is the default gender of an unfertilized embryo,,, (http://everything2.com/title/Default%2520sex) How ironic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Sociological Images was all fired up... but here's the deal:</p>
<p>Facebook's default avatar is also the male avatar used in the 'global connection' image on Facebook's sign-up page. A separate female avatar was also created for that purpose.</p>
<p>When a stick figure is drawn, with no hair or a little, it is immediately considered to be 'male' by, well, at least by a lot of people. Only when the hair flows down to shoulder-length and a skirt is added does the stick figure be considered as 'female'. (Bon Jovi stickmen will never be mistaken! lol) </p>
<p>No offence, Amanda, if that's your picture above. I think we can all agree that your hairdo isn't stereotypically feminine, but who cares about that? Definitely not me. ;)</p>
<p>(And here's an idea: why not the Facebook guys or gals (&lt;- for political correctness) replace the default avatar with the female one from that sign-up image, just for a day? Let's see how many users will care about that. And those biologists say female is the default gender of an unfertilized embryo,,, (<a href="http://everything2.com/title/Default%2520sex" rel="nofollow">http://everything2.com/title/Default%2520sex</a>) How ironic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Hess</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/21/is-the-facebook-avatar-a-dude/comment-page-1/#comment-5467</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3651#comment-5467</guid>
		<description>&quot;You&#039;re boring, and you look like a man.&quot;

:(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"You're boring, and you look like a man."</p>
<p>:(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/21/is-the-facebook-avatar-a-dude/comment-page-1/#comment-5466</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3651#comment-5466</guid>
		<description>So what? Who cares? And yes, that guy in the photograph looks like the Facebook avatar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what? Who cares? And yes, that guy in the photograph looks like the Facebook avatar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Hess</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/21/is-the-facebook-avatar-a-dude/comment-page-1/#comment-5445</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3651#comment-5445</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately I believe they are confined to sociological images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately I believe they are confined to sociological images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/21/is-the-facebook-avatar-a-dude/comment-page-1/#comment-5444</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3651#comment-5444</guid>
		<description>Socialogical images need to find something more productive to argue about. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Socialogical images need to find something more productive to argue about. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Marquez</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/04/21/is-the-facebook-avatar-a-dude/comment-page-1/#comment-5442</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael Marquez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=3651#comment-5442</guid>
		<description>This was good! I never saw it as male or female or of any particular race, I saw it as a generic person icon. I&#039;m glad I wasn&#039;t the only person who sees that avatar that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was good! I never saw it as male or female or of any particular race, I saw it as a generic person icon. I'm glad I wasn't the only person who sees that avatar that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

