<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Morning After: Coulter Ban Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/12/the-morning-after-coulter-ban-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/12/the-morning-after-coulter-ban-edition/</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:24:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meghan Mccain</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/12/the-morning-after-coulter-ban-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-1891</link>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Mccain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1989#comment-1891</guid>
		<description>[...] The Morning After: Coulter Ban Edition - The Sexist - Washington ... (washingtoncitypaper.com) - January 12, 2009Meghan McCain blogs again! Her friends are having babies and she gets to go the White House next week for a day for Barack Obama to make nice with her dad. McCain Blogette will return again in earnest&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Morning After: Coulter Ban Edition - The Sexist - Washington ... (washingtoncitypaper.com) - January 12, 2009Meghan McCain blogs again! Her friends are having babies and she gets to go the White House next week for a day for Barack Obama to make nice with her dad. McCain Blogette will return again in earnest&hellip; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Scheinman</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/12/the-morning-after-coulter-ban-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-1884</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Scheinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1989#comment-1884</guid>
		<description>Dude, that beach photo of the McCain family is unreal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, that beach photo of the McCain family is unreal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/01/12/the-morning-after-coulter-ban-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-1882</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1989#comment-1882</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d advise against buying anything item of which color is important based on what your monitor shows you.  Human perception of color as it is presented via electronics isn&#039;t the best, and if you wanted it to match the dress perfectly, you&#039;d need to optimize the image at the source as well as calibrating your own monitor as an end user (something typically done by computer animators using monitors far more expensive than anything I&#039;ve stood near)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'd advise against buying anything item of which color is important based on what your monitor shows you.  Human perception of color as it is presented via electronics isn't the best, and if you wanted it to match the dress perfectly, you'd need to optimize the image at the source as well as calibrating your own monitor as an end user (something typically done by computer animators using monitors far more expensive than anything I've stood near)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

