<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bitter Pill: How the District&#8217;s Pharmacies Fail Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/17/bitter-pill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/17/bitter-pill/</link>
	<description>Sex and Gender in D.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:45:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seshaya</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/17/bitter-pill/comment-page-1/#comment-3195</link>
		<dc:creator>Seshaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1659#comment-3195</guid>
		<description>To start earning money with your blog, initially use Google Adsense but gradually as your traffic increases, keep adding more and more money making programs to your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To start earning money with your blog, initially use Google Adsense but gradually as your traffic increases, keep adding more and more money making programs to your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Morning After: English Pill Edition - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/17/bitter-pill/comment-page-1/#comment-1621</link>
		<dc:creator>The Morning After: English Pill Edition - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1659#comment-1621</guid>
		<description>[...] obtain contraception without a doctor&#8217;s prescription. The program, however, would place more power over women&#8217;s health decisions in the hands of the pharmacist: Under the program, women seeking nonprescription oral contraception will undergo an interview with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] obtain contraception without a doctor&#8217;s prescription. The program, however, would place more power over women&#8217;s health decisions in the hands of the pharmacist: Under the program, women seeking nonprescription oral contraception will undergo an interview with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Lipin</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/17/bitter-pill/comment-page-1/#comment-1570</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Lipin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1659#comment-1570</guid>
		<description>If you are looking for cheap prescription drug pharmacy, I would recommend you all to shop at eshoprx.com They are reliable, fast and believe me CHEAPEST.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are looking for cheap prescription drug pharmacy, I would recommend you all to shop at eshoprx.com They are reliable, fast and believe me CHEAPEST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Карасики</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/17/bitter-pill/comment-page-1/#comment-1564</link>
		<dc:creator>Карасики</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1659#comment-1564</guid>
		<description>Латвийский Портал Рыболова : Просмотр темы - Бабитские караси</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Латвийский Портал Рыболова : Просмотр темы &#8211; Бабитские караси</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Hess</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/17/bitter-pill/comment-page-1/#comment-1557</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1659#comment-1557</guid>
		<description>Hey stacey. Thanks for your input on the situation. I&#039;ll definitely look into the scenarios you&#039;re talking about.

I have to respectfully disagree that 90 percent of CVS pharmacies having the drug is good enough. CVS has a national policy to provide that contraception and if they can&#039;t, they&#039;re required to tell you where to get it. The reps I talked to seemed to totally disregard the fact that 72 hours is too long to wait to take the morning after pill.

But the CVS survey was just one example---this piece was a capstone of a project I&#039;ve been doing that rates many local pharmacies on their commitment to providing for women&#039;s health. CVS is one of the better ones. There are some Catholic pharmacies in there, too. You can find the whole series here:

http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/capitol-pill/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey stacey. Thanks for your input on the situation. I&#8217;ll definitely look into the scenarios you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
<p>I have to respectfully disagree that 90 percent of CVS pharmacies having the drug is good enough. CVS has a national policy to provide that contraception and if they can&#8217;t, they&#8217;re required to tell you where to get it. The reps I talked to seemed to totally disregard the fact that 72 hours is too long to wait to take the morning after pill.</p>
<p>But the CVS survey was just one example&#8212;this piece was a capstone of a project I&#8217;ve been doing that rates many local pharmacies on their commitment to providing for women&#8217;s health. CVS is one of the better ones. There are some Catholic pharmacies in there, too. You can find the whole series here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/capitol-pill/" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/capitol-pill/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stacey</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/17/bitter-pill/comment-page-1/#comment-1553</link>
		<dc:creator>stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1659#comment-1553</guid>
		<description>I do feel strongly that more legislation and enforcement is needed for both pharmacists and doctors, both of whom report in large numbers, in anonymous surveys administered by the AMA, that they refuse to discuss or inform patients of medical options that they morally object to, in shocking frequency.  

HOWEVER, this article does nothing to help the situation.  90% of pharmacies reported in the article had the drug in question.  The pharmacist who declined to fill a prescription for cytocec WAS following procedure:  the FDA has approved the drug for oral use only, and without confirmation from a doctor, it would have been neglectful of the pharmacist to fill the prescription.  The patient clearly was able to obtain the prescription elsewhere, and if she couldn&#039;t she should have contacted the doctor&#039;s after-hours number herself.

Not all birth control is an emergency; neither is taking a prescription the night before an IUD is inserted. 
This article could have been vastly more effective if it focused on true emergency situations--denial of morning-after prescription-writing for rape victims treated at Catholic hospitals when not given the choice of which treatment facility they are taken to, for example; or pharmacists who refuse to fill prescriptions for rape victims, forcing them to relive their trauma by going pharmacy to pharmacy looking for a professional who can do their job without judging their customer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do feel strongly that more legislation and enforcement is needed for both pharmacists and doctors, both of whom report in large numbers, in anonymous surveys administered by the AMA, that they refuse to discuss or inform patients of medical options that they morally object to, in shocking frequency.  </p>
<p>HOWEVER, this article does nothing to help the situation.  90% of pharmacies reported in the article had the drug in question.  The pharmacist who declined to fill a prescription for cytocec WAS following procedure:  the FDA has approved the drug for oral use only, and without confirmation from a doctor, it would have been neglectful of the pharmacist to fill the prescription.  The patient clearly was able to obtain the prescription elsewhere, and if she couldn&#8217;t she should have contacted the doctor&#8217;s after-hours number herself.</p>
<p>Not all birth control is an emergency; neither is taking a prescription the night before an IUD is inserted.<br />
This article could have been vastly more effective if it focused on true emergency situations&#8211;denial of morning-after prescription-writing for rape victims treated at Catholic hospitals when not given the choice of which treatment facility they are taken to, for example; or pharmacists who refuse to fill prescriptions for rape victims, forcing them to relive their trauma by going pharmacy to pharmacy looking for a professional who can do their job without judging their customer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita Amero</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/17/bitter-pill/comment-page-1/#comment-1349</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita Amero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1659#comment-1349</guid>
		<description>We live in a capitalist society. The pharmacies that don&#039;t want to supply what the market demands should fall by the way side. In short ladies (and gentlemen), it&#039;s time to organize some boycotts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We live in a capitalist society. The pharmacies that don&#8217;t want to supply what the market demands should fall by the way side. In short ladies (and gentlemen), it&#8217;s time to organize some boycotts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Illinois Pharmacists Take Consceince to Court - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/17/bitter-pill/comment-page-1/#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>Illinois Pharmacists Take Consceince to Court - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1659#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>[...] if Vander Bleek and Kosirog lose, they can always open up a pharmacy in Washington, D.C.  SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Illinois Pharmacists Take Consceince to Court&quot;, url: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if Vander Bleek and Kosirog lose, they can always open up a pharmacy in Washington, D.C.  SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &#8220;Illinois Pharmacists Take Consceince to Court&#8221;, url: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bush Rules &#8220;Conscience&#8221; Over Contraception - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/17/bitter-pill/comment-page-1/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>Bush Rules &#8220;Conscience&#8221; Over Contraception - The Sexist - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1659#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>[...] of interest: For this week&#039;s paper, I wrote a story about how pharmacists are denying birth control based on &quot;conscience&quot;---or, you know, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of interest: For this week&#8217;s paper, I wrote a story about how pharmacists are denying birth control based on &#8220;conscience&#8221;&#8212;or, you know, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Hess</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/17/bitter-pill/comment-page-1/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1659#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>Hey SteveRO.  I&#039;ve reviewed many local pharmacies based on their access to women&#039;s health for the paper. If you&#039;re interested, you can find them at this tag:

http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/capitol-pill/

Some score really well. Some don&#039;t (if a pharmacy gets low marks on its access to women&#039;s health, I guess that&#039;s what passes for a &quot;hit piece&quot;).

I do think that the way a pharmacist discusses women&#039;s health---or decides not to discuss it---is important. When I call a pharmacy, and they tell me that they have birth control, then I ask specifically about the morning after pill---and that over-the-counter non-prescribed medicine is for some reason off the table---it gives me pause as to whether that pharmacy supports a woman&#039;s right to contraception. 

Women need to take the morning after pill as soon as possible. And that means that they have to know where it is, and when it&#039;s there. It&#039;s not surprising that a CVS wouldn&#039;t have something in stock---it&#039;s a little surprising that a pharmacist would tell me I could come back in three days, as if oblivious to the time-sensitivity of the drug.

I believe the point with the last pharmacist was that she did not call the doctor to verify the prescription.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey SteveRO.  I&#8217;ve reviewed many local pharmacies based on their access to women&#8217;s health for the paper. If you&#8217;re interested, you can find them at this tag:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/capitol-pill/" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/tag/capitol-pill/</a></p>
<p>Some score really well. Some don&#8217;t (if a pharmacy gets low marks on its access to women&#8217;s health, I guess that&#8217;s what passes for a &#8220;hit piece&#8221;).</p>
<p>I do think that the way a pharmacist discusses women&#8217;s health&#8212;or decides not to discuss it&#8212;is important. When I call a pharmacy, and they tell me that they have birth control, then I ask specifically about the morning after pill&#8212;and that over-the-counter non-prescribed medicine is for some reason off the table&#8212;it gives me pause as to whether that pharmacy supports a woman&#8217;s right to contraception. </p>
<p>Women need to take the morning after pill as soon as possible. And that means that they have to know where it is, and when it&#8217;s there. It&#8217;s not surprising that a CVS wouldn&#8217;t have something in stock&#8212;it&#8217;s a little surprising that a pharmacist would tell me I could come back in three days, as if oblivious to the time-sensitivity of the drug.</p>
<p>I believe the point with the last pharmacist was that she did not call the doctor to verify the prescription.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveRO</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/12/17/bitter-pill/comment-page-1/#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveRO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1659#comment-1220</guid>
		<description>Totally non-sensical article.  1 CVS store out of 10 doesnn&#039;t have a single produce and that is suddenly newsworthy?  Pharmacists are &quot;weirdos&quot; because they aren&#039;t willing to discuss their business practices with a reporter for a free newspaper looking to write a hit piece? A pharmicist dares to call a doctor to verify an off-lable prescription and is now part of some vast conspiracy to deny women their rights?

Wow.  This may be one of the worst thigs the City Paper has published in a long, long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally non-sensical article.  1 CVS store out of 10 doesnn&#8217;t have a single produce and that is suddenly newsworthy?  Pharmacists are &#8220;weirdos&#8221; because they aren&#8217;t willing to discuss their business practices with a reporter for a free newspaper looking to write a hit piece? A pharmicist dares to call a doctor to verify an off-lable prescription and is now part of some vast conspiracy to deny women their rights?</p>
<p>Wow.  This may be one of the worst thigs the City Paper has published in a long, long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
