Comments on: Man Madness: International Brotherhood of Teamsters Vs. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/11/26/man-madness-international-brotherhood-of-teamsters-vs-united-food-and-commercial-workers-international-union/ Sex and Gender in D.C. Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:24:38 -0400 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: Amanda Hess http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/11/26/man-madness-international-brotherhood-of-teamsters-vs-united-food-and-commercial-workers-international-union/comment-page-1/#comment-928 Amanda Hess Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:38:08 +0000 http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1331#comment-928 union woman! thank you for being a watchdog here. i would certainly consider a recount, but that would go against the all-important "arbitrary" clause of the contest, which requires me to rate workplaces as easily and randomly as possible. review the rules here: http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/15/the-manliest-workplace-competition/ thanks for your interest in the Manliest Workplace in D.C. Tournament. union woman! thank you for being a watchdog here. i would certainly consider a recount, but that would go against the all-important "arbitrary" clause of the contest, which requires me to rate workplaces as easily and randomly as possible.

review the rules here:

http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/10/15/the-manliest-workplace-competition/

thanks for your interest in the Manliest Workplace in D.C. Tournament.

]]> By: union woman http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2008/11/26/man-madness-international-brotherhood-of-teamsters-vs-united-food-and-commercial-workers-international-union/comment-page-1/#comment-926 union woman Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:35:59 +0000 http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/?p=1331#comment-926 wait - why did you use local union people for the UFCW, but not for the teamsters? I demand a recount! wait - why did you use local union people for the UFCW, but not for the teamsters? I demand a recount!

]]>