<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Housing Complex &#187; wireless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/tag/wireless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex</link>
	<description>D.C. Real Estate, Development, and Urbanism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:24:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Walking the Last Mile: Can D.C.&#8217;s New Internet Service Actually Connect the Masses?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2011/12/15/walking-the-last-mile-can-d-c-s-new-internet-service-actually-connect-the-masses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2011/12/15/walking-the-last-mile-can-d-c-s-new-internet-service-actually-connect-the-masses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lydia DePillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dc-can]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dc-net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[octo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/?p=22766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Mayor Vince Gray announced the connection of the nation's first 100-gigabit municipal fiber network, called DC-CAN. With the backbone funded by a federal stimulus grant, it's a huge step forward for internet connections in government facilities like recreation centers and police stations. It's also a very good deal for big non-profits like Bread [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_22771" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/files/2011/12/Link1_BB.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-22771" title="Link1_BB" src="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/files/2011/12/Link1_BB-300x192.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="192" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The first big connection. (dcnet.dc.gov)</p></div>
<p>Last week, Mayor <strong>Vince Gray</strong> <a href="http://mayor.dc.gov/DC/Mayor/About+the+Mayor/News+Room/District+to+Become+Americas+First+100-Gigabit+City">announced</a> the connection of the nation's first <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100_Gigabit_Ethernet">100-gigabit </a>municipal fiber network, called DC-CAN. With the backbone funded by a federal stimulus grant, it's a huge step forward for internet connections in government facilities like recreation centers and police stations. It's also a very <a href="http://www.breadforthecity.org/2011/12/bridging-the-digital-divide-with-the-dc-community-access-network/">good deal for big non-profits</a> like Bread for the City and So Others Might Eat, which need strong, reliable, secure connections&#8212;and can afford the $470 per month<a href="http://dcnet.dc.gov/DC/DCNET/Support/Product+Information/DC-CAN+Pricing+Guide"> baseline cost</a>.</p>
<p>One of the system's <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2011/02/17/broadband-of-brothers-d-c-%E2%80%99s-new-fiber-optic-network-will-need-lots-of-small-fries-to-step-up/">big selling points</a>, though, was that it would allow entrepreneurs a chance to build out the "last mile" connection from that fiber backbone into homes and small businesses in underserved areas, since the D.C. government is prohibited by law from doing so itself. In addition, because the routers D.C. is using aren't "meshable," it's harder for the institutions that have hooked into the network to easily spread their wireless signal over long distances (like <a href="http://www.broadbandbridge.org/">what's going on in Bloomingdale</a>, which has the potential to cover a<a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2011/02/19/why-cant-we-put-a-wireless-cloud-over-the-whole-city/"> much larger area</a>). <span id="more-22766"></span></p>
<p>That part, it seems, isn't moving very quickly. Right now, DC-CAN is offering its "backhaul" at prices that aren't significantly less than commercial providers like Comcast and Verizon already offer. <strong>Martha Huizenga</strong>, of Capitol Hill-based internet service provider D.C. Access, says it's not worth her while to work with DC-CAN.</p>
<p>"In the future we hope to, but the pricing we received initially was not as good as the pricing we have with our current vendors," she says. “If you're not drastically less expensive than a big telecom company, then why would I go with you over them? I guess I really want to see a big price differential, because that's what they keep talking about.”</p>
<p>The Office of the Chief Technology Officer's <strong>Jack Burbridge</strong> says that their service isn't cheaper because it's better: More reliable and secure, with guaranteed service, and discounts if you don't use the full bandwidth. Which is great if you're someone who needs to handle things like medical records, but not such a bargain if you just need basic access.</p>
<p>Burbridge says that OCTO is in discussions with the private sector to start building out the last mile to consumers, but wouldn't name the companies (although he says Comcast and Verizon are among them). To entice them into underserved areas, OCTO will be putting together a package of incentives that will offer the service at lower rates in wards 5, 7, and 8&#8212;which will hopefully bring it within reach of the smaller, local businesses that can then bring internet to their neighbors (it's been <a href="http://gigaom.com/broadband/d-c-well-see-your-1-gig-raise-you-100-gig/">done successfully elsewhere</a>).</p>
<p>At the moment, though, Comcast is already offering <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/comcast-and-fcc-chairman-genachowski-unveil-internet-essentials-an-ambitious-and-comprehensive-broadband-adoption-program-2011-09-20">very cheap internet</a> to low-income families with kids in D.C. through a program arranged as a consequence of its merger with NBC. That's great, but right now it doesn't do much to encourage investment in longer-term connections through DC-CAN. The Comcast program expires after three years. After that, it's likely that families will let their subscriptions lapse, or just buy what they're used to, at market rate.</p>
<p>So, high hopes for D.C.'s municipal wireless internet infrastructure. Big improvements necessary to make it live up to its potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2011/12/15/walking-the-last-mile-can-d-c-s-new-internet-service-actually-connect-the-masses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adventures in Wireless Internet Poaching</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2009/06/25/adventures-in-wireless-internet-poaching/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2009/06/25/adventures-in-wireless-internet-poaching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housing Complex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Complex Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/?p=6902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
As someone who writes on the Internet all day for a living, you'd think I'd just suck it up and spring for the wireless. Hell, you'd think my employer would suck it up and spring for the wireless. But you would be  underestimating my laziness, cheapness, and hubris&#8212;not to mention the whole bankruptcy thing.
I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/30/39593706_022169262f.jpg?v=0" alt="" width="420" height="315" /></p>
<p>As someone who writes on the Internet all day for a living, you'd think I'd just suck it up and spring for the wireless. Hell, you'd think my <em>employer </em>would suck it up and spring for the wireless. But you would be  underestimating my laziness, cheapness, and hubris&#8212;not to mention <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/09/29/city-paper-owner-files-for-bankruptcy/">the whole bankruptcy thing</a>.</p>
<p>I used to be like you. I had my own ten-character password consisting of numbers, letters, and symbols. I could stream entire episodes of <em>Lost</em> without interruption. I paid for the Internet. But a few months ago, one of my house-mates moved out and, in a bizarre act of vindication&#8212;long story&#8212;took our shared wireless router with her. My housemates and I are still "thinking about getting wireless." In the meantime, I've been living on the edge, searching for rogue, unprotected wireless connections that lurk just within my windows.</p>
<p>Join me.</p>
<p><span id="more-6902"></span></p>
<p>* <strong>Survey the landscape. </strong>Boot up your laptop. (If you don't have a laptop, buy a laptop and boot it up). Take a look at your neighbor's Internet connection names that pop up in your wireless menu. Begin speculating as to which neighbor chose the name "fuzznuggets." Take note of the names that aren't password-protected, and prepare to both cherish and resent them, depending on their signal strength. "Linksys," baby, if you're reading this, I appreciate everything you've done for me.</p>
<p>* <strong>Maneuver</strong>. Make sure your laptop is good and charged, and then stalk through every floor and room of your house, holding the computer open and checking signal strength every couple of steps. Check out the front and back yards, too&#8212;you might be putting in some overtime on the stoop this summer. Take care to scope out the wireless scene near walls and windows, but don't discount the idea that there may be some pockets of signal strength in the interior. If you find a good spot and then lose the connection, moving or rotating the machine a couple inches can sometimes work wonders.</p>
<p>*<strong> Rearrange your furniture to fit the hot spots</strong>. In my living arrangement, the desk is pushed all the way to the back of the house for a reason. Our other workspace (okay, my bed) is pushed all the way to the front. Downstairs, you'll often find a stray living-room chair cozied up next to the trash near the back door of the kitchen&#8212;it may not be the loveliest space in the house, but it's the sweetest spot we've got.</p>
<p>* <strong>Prepare to brew some conspiracy theories</strong>. I am firm in my belief that the nearly-transluscent bedroom curtain that hangs between my laptop and the open window causes airspace interference, and must be tied back for optimal connection speeds. My boyfriend, who finds this preposterous, believes that the couple squatting in the abandoned row-house next door lack electricity, but still shell out the cash for their own wireless signal. Alas, it is password-protected.</p>
<p>* <strong>Don't try to watch videos</strong>. It's not worth it.</p>
<p>* <strong>Don't panic</strong>. A couple months ago, there were a few days where we thought our main source of poached Internet would be lost to us forever. This particular access-point is kind of like the neighborhood bicycle of Internet connections&#8212;we can get it in the front of the house, in the back of the house, on the first floor and on the third. The connection didn't suddenly decide to require a password to access it&#8212;it just disappeared. For days. It eventually came back, but there was an upside to it leaving us unconnected for a time&#8212;we were forced to find another unprotected connection that we've been hooking up with ever since.</p>
<p>*<strong> Look on the bright side</strong>. On days when the rogue Internet connections just aren't coming your way, take it as an opportunity to leave your work&#8212;and useless online procrastination&#8212;in the office. Also, take a step back and realize that you've begun bestowing your neighbors' Internet connections with pet names. ("Here, neener neener!") Sometimes, it's good to <a href="http://news.santacruz.com/2009/06/25/in_defense_of_slow_reading/">take a break</a>.</p>
<p>* <strong>Know the risks</strong>. The FCC defers to local law-enforcement on this one. On the local level, unauthorized use of another's wireless network is usually only prosecuted when a crime is committed&#8212;if you use the network to download illegal pornography, say, or to send out spam.</p>
<p>* <strong>Never tell your neighbors that you do this</strong>.</p>
<p>* <strong>Give back to the community</strong>. When you get your own Internet connection, you can always leave it unprotected in an act of solidarity. For a more secure option, you can also <a href="http://www.openpark.net/about_us.html">give a donation</a> to Open Park, a local non-profit committed to providing free public Internet in hotspots around the Washington, D.C. area. Some open wireless networks are meant to be that way&#8212;<a href="http://www.openpark.net/access.html">find one near you</a>.</p>
<p><em>Photo by<strong> <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/altemark/39593706/">altemark</a></strong>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2009/06/25/adventures-in-wireless-internet-poaching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

