Housing Complex

Higher Minimum Wage Will Have Minimal Effect for Many Families, Study Finds

Screen Shot 2014-08-11 at 9.57.12 PM

It's been slightly more than half a year since Mayor Vince Gray signed a bill to raise D.C.'s minimum wage, and more than a month since it took effect, bringing the lowest allowable hourly wage to $9.50 before it gradually rises to $11.50 in July 2016 and then changes with inflation. But the effect the legislation is having and will have remains unclear. Certainly, July 1 didn't bring a spike in unemployment or new fortunes to the District's working masses. But what will happen when the full wage hike is in place?

According to a report out today from the Urban Institute, the impact may be smaller than some residents anticipate.

Back when Gray signed the bill, the D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute's Elissa Silverman, who advocated for a higher minimum wage and is now running for a D.C. Council seat, gave me a back-of-the-envelope calculation indicating that slightly more than 40,000 D.C. residents are likely to get a bump in wages due to the law by July 2016. That's not an insignificant number; it represents about 12 percent of working Washingtonians.

The Urban Institute arrives at a nearly identical figure, finding that 41,000 people living and working in the District will be affected by the $11.50 minimum wage. But the study concludes that for many of those people, the financial impact will be minimal. Taking into account the increased taxes these people will pay and the decrease in government benefits they'll receive, the median worker affected by the wage hike will gain only about $1,000 annually.

The reason, says the report's lead author, Gregory Acs, is that the competitive employment market, driven in part by the high cost of living in the District, has already raised many D.C. wages above the minimum—if not quite beyond $11.50, then close enough that the new law doesn't make a huge difference.

"The District is basically a high-wage urban area," he says. "If you look at the experience of other high-wage urban areas that raised their minimum wage, like San Francisco, you see that the range in which the wage increased ended up not having profound effects, largely because by the time you get around to raising the minimum wage, the market has already gotten around to raising the wage."

The industry where most workers will be affected is food services, the study finds, constituting 16 percent of affected workers. Health and social services (14 percent) and retail (11 percent) follow.

While the majority of affected workers are black and nearly a quarter are Hispanic, the study emphasizes that the affected workers don't conform to stereotypes that people might hold. Only 11 percent of beneficiaries are single parents (the overwhelming majority have no children); 28 percent receive food stamps, or SNAP; and just 13 percent live in public and subsidized housing. Nineteen percent fall below the poverty line. Just over half are women.

The effect that the wage hike will have on workers varies substantially by their family situation. A single, childless resident working 40 hours a week, making the minimum $8.25 an hour prior to the July increase, and receiving SNAP and the Earned Income Tax Credit would experience a 25 percent increase in income—from $15,736 to $19,694—after accounting for increased taxes and decreased benefits. By contrast, a single parent of two working under the same conditions would gain only 4 percent in income, although starting and ending at a much higher level ($30,240 and $31,568, respectively) due to higher SNAP payments and tax credits for workers with children.

The study also tested three scenarios: one in which the wage hike has no effect on unemployment; one in which each 10 percent increase in hourly wages brings a 1 percent decrease in the average worker's employment; and one in which the decreased employment affects just workers under 25. The scenarios produced small differences in average income changes. "There’s probably a disemployment effect, and it’s probably small," says Acs, basing his conclusion off ample research by others. He says the study's assumptions under the disemployment scenarios fall about in the middle of the possible range, but that "even if you double our effect, you still get less than 1,000 folks displaced."

For 13 percent of families with a worker who'd otherwise be making under $11.50 in 2016, the effect of the wage hike is big, producing more than $2,500 in additional income. But for most D.C. families affected by the new law, while the higher wage is certainly welcome, it might not be the game-changer it was sometimes portrayed as during the heated political battle leading up to the bill's signing.

Chart from the report

  • Northwesterneer

    Aaron clearly knows nothing about economics and the theory of Marginal Utility. The addition of that $1000 or whatever has the greatest impact among the poor because of the curve of the arc which tracks marginal utility. In other words, that extra $1000 to someone at $20k means more food, at $30k a better apartment, at $40k, internet service for the kids, but at $120k the extra $1k is going into savings or otherwise not really being used. Marginal Utility is missing from this article.

  • sbc

    The tax impact would also vary depending on whether the Earned Income Tax Credit is adjusted.

  • i’m going there

    FPI never saw a handout to which they didn't object.

  • Hmmm

    "Taking into account the increased taxes these people will pay and the decrease in government benefits they'll receive, the median worker affected by the wage hike will gain only about $1,000 annually."

    So basically a low minimum wage means the social welfare system is subsiding low wage employers ;)

    Note, the higher min wage means more people getting more of their money from their work, and less from the social welfare systems, which, if conservatives are correct, is good for their souls and will teach them middle class virtues.

  • Alan


    An extra $1,000 a year is not "minimal" to a lot of people in this city. That's real money that a lot of good working people can use.

  • Alan

    ps: I know sometimes that editors (not writers) choose headlines.

    pps: "For 13 percent of families with a worker who'd otherwise be making under $11.50 in 2016, the effect of the wage hike is big, producing more than $2,500 in additional income." An extra $2,500 for 13% of the poorest working families in the city is a win for everybody. That's more spending money, which equals more sales tax revenue and more support for local businesses. Win, win, win.

  • Alan

    Ignore the first half of the prior comment, you double down on the "minimal" comment in the body of the article. Sigh.

  • Eric

    Yeah I don't understand this article. $1,000 on average is a huge difference. It would be for me. Considering this comes without having to "earn" a raise or work more hours or take on more responsibility, it really is a win, no matter how you slice it.

  • rob

    the city paper is drastically overpaying its writers if $1,300 is a "minimal" raise

  • http://nyirkaijoslat.beep.com ufobrain


    Még negyven és néhány!

    A Nagykövet cselt vet, összeesküvést sző. Korábbi ellenfelek összefognak. Rést vágnak a kerítésen. Meglazítják a medvebocs láncát,a kétfarkú

    oroszlán ketrecének rácsát is. Nem hálásak. A vörös tüzet okádó sárkány ebbe belebetegszik. Harsona jelzi a szabadság kezdetét.
    A szürke marhát napos legelőre engedik. A csorda megszédül a szabadságtól. A barmok egymást öklelik. A nép elkergeti a kapuk nyitogatóit.
    A Jóindulatú Beteg kerül élre. Mások intézkednek. A földművestől elveszik örökét,és dobra verik. A senkiháziak vérszemet kapnak. Bitangok

    tékozolják a fényt.
    Gyülekeznek a dögmadarak. A Nagy Tengert átröpüli a Napból szálló, galambnak álcázott karvaly. Megérkezik a Kánya is - osztozkodni. Megint

    terelgetik a népet. Hiteket erőltetnek. Szaporodnak a pénzért fönnhangon imádkozók. BOLDOGASSZONYUNK-at elfelejtik, buta lúddá tekerítik. Jaj

    pedig, ha ISTENÜNK ASSZONY-FELE elfordul tőlünk, vagy mink őtőle!
    A Régi Nagy Csata Városában EZEK papjai dűlőre jutnak, és új lovat nyergelnek. Összeesküsznek Isten Képmása ellen a Könyörtelenség

    A galambnak álcázott karvaly és a kánya, Égigérő fára segítik a Kiskanászt. Szívében király, álmaiban császár. Szépen szól, rondán

    cselekszik. Zsákja feneketlen. Letaszítják - újra mászik!
    A döglött sárkány kutyái új gazdát találnak!

  • Pingback: URL

  • Pingback: https://www.menage-genial.com/a-propos-entretien-menager-femme-de-menage-montreal-laval-longueuil.html

  • Pingback: hampton bay fans

  • Pingback: chota bheem games online play

  • Pingback: temple run games online play free

  • Pingback: chota bheem games online free to play

  • Pingback: mr bean games

  • Pingback: more information hampton bay sore online

  • Pingback: here for more hampton bay lighting ceiling fans

  • Pingback: Busty London Escorts at palacevip.com

  • Pingback: additional hints

  • Pingback: warehouse for sale Miami

  • Pingback: warehouses for sale

  • Pingback: warehouses

  • Pingback: commercial mortgage finance

  • Pingback: buy steroids anavarhttp://testosterone.1steroids.biz/buy testosterone acetatehttp://stanozolol.1steroids.biz/buy stanozolol tablets

  • Pingback: Blue Coaster33

  • Pingback: does xenical really work

  • Pingback: DIRECTV packages

  • Pingback: fue

  • Pingback: where to buy anabolic steroids in australia

  • Pingback: YouTube favorites kopen

  • Pingback: stop parking

  • Pingback: pay per day loans plan

  • Pingback: pay per day loan plans

  • Pingback: plumbers plumbing roseburg or

  • Pingback: water ionizer loan

  • Pingback: house blue

  • Pingback: bell system electrician scissors

  • Pingback: plan

  • Pingback: pay plan

  • Pingback: here

  • Pingback: alkaline water

  • Pingback: http://makemoney.camkingz.com/

  • Pingback: link