Housing Complex

Congressional Panel Approves Minor Change to Height Act

This skyline's not going anywhere for the time being.

This skyline's not going anywhere for the time being.

After more than a century, the 1910 Height of Buildings Act is finally on its way to being amended. You'll hardly notice the difference.

A congressional committee voted today to approve a change to the federal law that regulates the maximum heights of D.C. buildings. The change doesn't allow the city to build higher than the 130-foot limit on commercial streets or to gain autonomy over building heights, as city officials had recommended. Instead, it would allow human occupancy of certain penthouses that are currently limited to mechanical uses.

If that doesn't sound like much of a victory, you can thank your elected D.C. Council. Rep. Darrell Issa, the California Republican who's emerged as the District's most powerful ally on Capitol Hill, asked the District and the National Capital Planning Commission to study potential changes to the Height Act and recommend changes to the law. The city pushed for greater autonomy over height limits, as well as a relaxed limit in the downtown area, while the NCPC advocated no major change. But then the Council shocked some observers by voting nearly unanimously in favor of a symbolic resolution from Chairman Phil Mendelson in opposition to any Height Act changes, including a change that would hand power from Congress to the Council itself.

Issa, who chairs the House of Representatives committee with oversight of District affairs, once again expressed his dismay today at the Council's vote. "I understand that in this case, there may be some question about whether the city trusts itself with this responsibility," Issa said at the hearing, according to the Washington Business Journal.

The bill now moves to the full House for consideration. It's not clear whether Congress will undertake further changes to the Height Act. Issa spokeswoman Caitlin Carroll says in an email that Issa is "not ruling anything out for the future, but this is the only change we’re considering at this time."

The change approved today won't do much to change the skyline. According to the text of the bill, it amends the Height Act

by striking ‘‘and no floor or compartment thereof shall be constructed or used for human occupancy above the top story of the building upon which such structures are placed’’ and inserting ‘‘and, except in the case of a penthouse which is erected to a height of one  story of 20 feet or less above the level of the roof, no floor or compartment thereof shall be constructed or used for human occupancy above the top story of the building upon which such structures are placed’’.

For better or worse, D.C., don't expect major changes to your cityscape anytime soon.

Photo from the NCPC

Comments

  1. #1

    "don't expect major changes to your cityscape anytime soon."

    Yeah, but do expect more maxed-out, gigantic, butt-ugly penthouses sprouting on luxury condos. Pop-ups for billionaires.

  2. #2

    GREAT VIEW LTREZ!!!

    . . . AND THE HEIGHT CREEP BEGINS.

  3. #3

    You're "shocked" that the DC Council voted against any significant change to the Height Act?! You shouldn't be, because they listen to their constituents. Tregoning ignored the opinions of DC residents, and happily now she's gone. Passed over for NYC planning director, she found a mid-level consolation job at HUD that's not even a direct report to the Secretary.

  4. #4

    The DC Council didn't vote against changing the Height Act; they voted against home rule. If they were serious, they would have passed their own version of the Height Act and asked Congress to repeal the federal version. Instead, they looked like idiots to the oversight committee, arguing against the very thing they complain about on a daily basis.

Leave a Comment

Blogs Linking to this Article

  1. Morning Links - Loose Lips

    [...] Small Height Act change wins congressional approval. [Housing Complex] [...]

Comments Shown. Turn Comments Off.
...