Housing Complex

The Incredible Shrinking Housing Authority Funding

D.C. Housing Authority headquarters, on North Capitol Street.

D.C. Housing Authority headquarters, on North Capitol Street.

Times are getting leaner for the D.C. Housing Authority.

Late last week, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development announced its annual Capital Fund grants to around 3,100 public housing agencies across the country to pay for the development and maintenance of public housing. D.C.'s share, HUD reported, would be $13,677,447.

That figure represents a slight decline from last year's $14.1 million, which itself was a shadow of previous years' funding. Between 2006 and 2010, Capital Fund grants to the D.C. Housing Authority were over $20 million each year.

“In recent years we received more than $20 million to accomplish the same tasks we are expected to accomplish this year with a $13.6 million grant," says Housing Authority Executive Director Adrianne Todman in a statement. "While we welcome the federal assistance, cutting public housing funds by more than 30% suggests a regrettable level of disregard by our national leaders for the children, seniors and vulnerable families who receive housing assistance in the District of Columbia and the country.”

The Housing Authority controls more than 8,000 housing units across the city, serving as landlord to nearly 20,000 residents. It relies on the Capital Fund Program to maintain, modernize, and rebuild the city's public housing stock. This year's Capital Fund grant represents only about $700 per Housing Authority tenant.

Fortunately, the Housing Authority could soon see a different source of revenue: It's looking for a developer to rebuild its squat North Capitol Street headquarters, create a mixed-use development—and give "substantial payments" to the agency for the value of the land.

Update 4:45 p.m.: HUD spokeswoman clarifies that the decline in funding given to D.C. comes from the top. "Congressional appropriations were down across the government for [fiscal year] '13," she says.

Image via Google Maps

Comments

  1. #1

    yes, but if they've done tons of rehab and new building over the past few years (which DCHA seems to indicate they did)they should have lower maintenance costs now. It shouldn't cost as much to maintain something that was rehabbed or built in 2010 as something last rehabbed or built decades ago.

    I'm not sure if that's the whole story, but it should be part of it.

  2. #2

    Landlord to one of their properties they provide for housing.

    Hello City Paper, just trying to find a link to report on DC housing and the unprofessional staff representing their organization. The relations with management is "horrible". They authorize street mentality inspectors to determine a timeframe to complete correction issues to inhabit a better living environment. Management is unreachable! No direct contact numbers or email addresses. If you're in an inspection period, they wait until the process goes into abatement before upper management gets involved. Which shuts off payment to the property that you're providing for the services that's credits them! I desperately need a good source to expose these shady folks!

Leave a Comment

Blogs Linking to this Article

  1. On Affordable Housing, the Feds Pull Back Their Helping Hand - Housing Complex

    [...] month, I reported that the funding from the federal government for the D.C. Housing Authority had declined sharply. [...]

Comments Shown. Turn Comments Off.
...