Housing Complex

Competition Sucks

Much has been made over the last few months about the District's decision to auction off spaces to car-sharing companies, rather than allow the market's first mover—Zipcar—have them all for free. The argument for doing so is that charging market prices for the use of curbside parking spaces will raise cash for the city, and that competition will lead to better services and lower prices for consumers.

Some observers complain that forcing car-sharing companies to pay a lot more than an individual car owner would for their space is a tax on something that the government should instead be encouraging. Others point out that companies won't necessarily lower their prices that much to attract customers.

The bigger question, it seems to me, is whether we need competition at all. The inaugural auction led to Zipcar losing 80 percent of its curbside parking spaces. That doesn't dramatically impact the total number of spaces available to Zipcar users, since most of them are on private land. But it definitely lessens the utility of the service. Furthermore, I presume that the new players in the market will be going after private spaces as well, which will confine Zipcar's ability to expand, and likely drive up the prices of those spaces.

The thing is, car-sharing isn't like many other markets, where you're free to choose between a bunch of options that have equal access to resources. There's a finite number of spaces, so the convenience of belonging to any one service—and let's face it, nobody wants to pay membership fees for more than one—decreases with the number of companies they're split between.

Sure, it's never a good idea to allow one company to have a complete monopoly. But governments have long coped with this problem by creating regulated monopolies, like power utilities, that are subject to price restrictions and have an obligation to provide equal access to services.

This makes most sense in systems where greater scale conveys direct benefits to users. Think of it in terms of Capital Bikeshare: The city awarded one contract, and sets prices, and is helping the contractor build out more infrastructure as quickly as possible. If the city allowed multiple competitors into the bikesharing market, consumers would likely lose out.

It's water under the bridge now, but I'm surprised more thought wasn't given to the idea of awarding Zipcar an exclusive contract for public parking spaces in return for certain concessions, like say expanding its reach in underserved areas and keeping prices at reasonable levels. Now, I just have to walk further to pick up a car.

  • Native American JD

    Because that would be socialism and lord knows that when socialism works, capitalist thieves lose!

  • http://twitter.com/elcolin Colin

    Regulated monopolies suck -- the last thing we need is another Comcast.

    As a Zipcar customer I am glad that they will finally face some competition. If history is any guide that will only provide benefits.

    Oh, and the supply of parking is only finite in the same sense that food or anything else is finite. More parking spaces can always be built or rented out for the right price.

  • http://fluff.info/blog b

    It's still early. Maybe you'll find that the spot nearest your house is taken up by somebody with lower prices or better service. Maybe whatever new competitor and Zipcar will arrange cross-service sharing arrangements. Maybe the new companies will flop out of business quickly and sell their parking-rights asset to Zipcar anyway. Maybe one of the new competitors will win out and you'll cancel your Zipcar membership in two years.

    You're right that car sharing is a bit like other geographically-based monopolies, because lots of people only care about the car closest to their house, but it's also open competition, because users find themselves needing a car on other blocks of the city pretty regularly, and often have a real choice as to which spot to walk/transit to.

  • Really?

    Boo-Hoo! Zip car had the instead track when ole boy Gabe was in charge of transpo and who happens to be a part owner. They were able to corner the market and brand themselves in the DC area

    What you didn't share is that zipcar also runs the fleet for DC Gov't.

    So they won't be hurtin if they get a little competition.

  • CP

    Competition is good. IMHO -- Zipcar has lots of customer service issues. Having lived in NYC, other car sharing companies can be much more customer friendly. (i.e., giving you time credits for filling up the car, crediting you time you don't use). And cheaper rates to boot! I can't wait for more choices here in DC.

  • Eli

    I'm not following your argument wrt Capital Bikeshare. Isn't it profitable? In theory, then, they would have an incentive to expand even without the city's help.

    Your point about the limited number of parking spaces is well taken--more competition might lead to a rise in prices (assuming efficiencies aren't found elsewhere, as they probably will be). But the response is no different from what smart-growth people tell drivers who complain about the high cost of car ownership all the time: Take public transportation. Why should driving be cheap?

  • Tom M.

    I always try to agree with Lydia. After all, shouldn't the same argument hold for rental car companies as for Zip Cars? Wouldn't we all be better off with "wasteful competition" of multiple choices at the airport with multiple parking lots, shuttle buses, rental desks? It would be "more efficient" with a government regulated monopoly. Also, the same argument might hold for airlines -- too many of those bastards flying only partly full planes. Let's cut down the competition and set a rate of return over costs. They will manage costs very efficiently the. Come to think of it, competition is generally a bad idea. Too many choices. Too many variations of price, costs, convenience. Let's have government pick the winners. Government, after all, is doing such a good job for us in their core areas of public safety, education, environmental protection, DMV services, etc.....

  • DCUnionGuy

    One of the problems with regulated monopolies is the issue of regulatory capture. Staff move between industry and government and back again. One company gets in good with politcians, builds relationships with regulators etc and it all can go south pretty quickly.
    Not that such a thing could ever happen in our fair City of course :)

  • Paul S

    Gotta agree with the others. Private parking spaces really aren't so scarce that for-profit companies can't afford them. The competition may lead to marginally higher prices but not to the extreme that the answer is to create a regulated monopoly.

  • yup

    Private lots are useless when I have to jump through hoops to get in & out. It's called ZIPcar, people: what's the point of renting for an hour when I have to wait for someone to let me into the building, have to walk around 5 minutes looking for the car, then have to find the keycard to get me out of the lot? Street parking was soooo much easier :/

  • Anon

    I love your article Lydia. It really highlights a bit of raging hypocrisy on your part. You were elated with the demise of the tourmobile and its exclusive contract but somehow believe that DC should given an exclusive contract that stifles competition in a DIFFERENT area. Why? Because you wont have to walk as far.


  • drez

    I have to agree with Lydia. When carsharing first came to dc there was zipcar and flexcar, and it was a pain in the ass to pay redundant fees to belong to both.
    People benefit from the standardization.

  • http://blog.robpitingolo.org Rob

    Like it or not, markets like this trend toward monopoly. Already, we once had two competitors that folded into one. I can see a future with several competitors eventually becoming fewer competitors.

    Look at airlines for cues. There are fewer and fewer airlines these days because companies take advantage of economies of scale and operate more efficiently.

    I've had great customer service with Zipcar. They've gone above and beyond for me on several occasions. I don't expect everyone will have had the same good experience, but I do think that what people hate aren't monopolies, per se, but rather "bad monopolists".

  • Christine

    I agree with Lydia too. Zipcar got only 12 of the 200 spaces they had access to previously. The remainder of the spaces are going to be split among three vendors. I'm not going to belong to four car sharing services, so this means my access to on-street car sharing has been reduced by 80%. I don't know what effect this will have on Zipcar, but it's bad for me as a customer.

  • Anon

    Your real gripe is with Zipcar who was too cheap to bid for the rest of the parking spots. Dont start getting mad at the invisible hand because Zipcar chose to do something different.

  • Scoot

    Zipcar estimated that less than 10% of its fleet would be impacted by the loss of those 74 on-street spaces, and it plans to acquire private parking spaces to offset the loss. If you divide the percentage of impacted vehicles by the number of Zipcar members in the immediate vicinity of the public spaces , you end up with an incredibly small chance that any one customer will be severely impacted by the change.

    But principally, The District of Columbia does not really have a demonstrated interest in forgoing hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars in revenue so that a handful of residents in specific neighborhoods won't have to walk an extra few minutes to access a private car sharing service.

  • Scoot

    @ Christine "Zipcar got only 12 of the 200 spaces they had access to previously."

    That's not true -- Zipcar got access to 12 of the 84 spaces they had access to previously.

  • please

    Yeah, even at a base bid of $3,600 bucks a year, Zipcar got off easy.

    For those of you whining that Zipcar pays more for their spots than do individuals who won private cars, you are 100% wrong because you are comparing apples to oranges.

    Comparing residental street parking to high cost metered downtown street parking is just dumb. Zipcar had free spots for years (then highly subsized ones) in high traffic commercial metered areas like 14th st, K street, 15th st etc. Places where the rest of us feed meters 2 bucks an hour, 12 hours a day 6 days a week for the privlige to park.

    So lets see, assuming $3,600 bucks a year, spread over 6 days a week (Sundays are free for everyone) that means Zipcar is paying $11.50 a day per spot. Since these spots would otherwise be earning the city $2 bucks an hour, that means Zipcar pays the market rate to lease these spots for 6 hours a day, getting them for free for the other 6 hours.

    Seems to me that Zipcar (and the others) are still getting a substantial subsidy to have dedicated 24/7 parking in the most high traffic and expensive areas in the city.

  • http://urbanplacesandspaces.blogspot.com Richard Layman

    please -- so how much "substantial subsidy" is gained by car owners with residential parking permits? Thousands of dollars. Why should they, car owners, be subsidized, and not me, a "car user" albeit of Zipcar. But by using Zipcar we help reduce the demand for parking inventory by 10-15 spaces per car, which is a good thing for the city.

  • Anon

    Richard - you're missing the point. No one is arguing that car sharing shouldnt be subsidized. Rather, the DC government shouldnt be picking the best company to get hte subsidy. They should set a subsidized price and open the market to any qualified car sharing company that wants to purchase them. There should be no favorites and there should be stiff competition in order to force car sharing companies to excel.

  • Pingback: Should Government Regulate the Car Sharing Industry? « Spatial Orientation

  • http://www.ewtnnews.com Irina Debello

    I was very happy to discover this great site.I must thank you for this unique terrific read!! Truly taking advantage of every sentence of it and I book marked to see new articles you post.

  • http://libbiebures.com Jake Bivona

    I had been pretty pleased to look for this site.I want to thank you for this unique terrific post!! Undoubtedly savoring each part of it and I bookmarked to follow new stuff you put up.

  • JW

    "If the city allowed multiple competitors into the bikesharing market, consumers would likely lose out."

    Lydia, dear, got to school; learn something.

  • http://www.bov.se/cither.htm ニューバランス 1400 ネイビー

    Places to Find Custom Tattoo Designers You might find zillions of tattoo designs on the Net, in books and magazines, and at the tattoo parlor, but most people prefer to have a custom tattoo design that reflects their preferences, rather than a conventional design. You can source custom tattoo designers in many places that encourage custom design creation, and have one designed especially for you. Owning a custom design will means a lot to you, and fortunately, tattoo artists understand your feelings. Here are some tips to find your ideal custom designer who will create your dream design. 鈥?Discuss particular tattoo artists: Custom designers get more work when a customer is happy with their work and with the cleanliness and hygiene level of their parlors. So, word of mouth advertising works best here. If you're looking for a good custom tattoo artist, talk to people who have had tattoos done. Ask for the names of those who created their tattoos, how clean their parlors were and the artists' quality and level of professionalism. If your friends are happy with the tattoos done for them, they will spread the word about that artist in particular. 鈥?Find out about hygiene levels in the tattoo shop: You must find out the cleanliness levels of the shop. Also, find out if they use fresh ink and disposable needles for every customer. The quality of their tattoos is also important. You might come across shops advertising "specials" to attract more business. Steer clear of these shops till you get enough information about them. Only if you are satisfied with what you hear should you go there for a tattoodon't be attracted by low prices at such shops. 鈥?Read about tattoo designers in tattoo magazines: Tattoo contests are held all over the country, so you there may be some in your city too. So, look out for them and check out the names of the winners of these contests. A lot of their work will be found in magazines, so you could find out something about them there, too. 鈥?Ask for references, check their portfolios: After you find your designer, look at his design portfolio and ask him for references. From his designs, you will be able to tell his area of excellence. If you're looking for a mystical design but your artist is good at tribal designs, then he's obviously not going to be your choice of artist. 鈥?Is he enthusiastic and willing to work hard? Don't give in to pressure if your prospective designer tries to get you to accept a particular design of his, particularly if it's not even remotely close to what you want. Check that he is an eager beaver, enthusiastic to create the kind of tattoo that you have in mind and will work hard to achieve it. He should be receptive to your wishes and only if you get a positive vibe about him should he pick up his needles and ink. Kristen Dunn is a tattoo enthusiast and professional tattoo designer who has created thousands of thought provoking, elegant, and funky tattoos for her clients. She has a vast collection of custom designs to her credit. Winner of several awards and accolades, Kristen is now a founding member of the world's largest custom tattoo design community at CreateMyTattoo. View her tattoo collection or read more on her blog here.

  • http://www.gustafhellstrom.se/feedbcack.htm adidas スニーカー

    Its Not Your Dream To Own A Karen Millen Dress Go understated yet glamorous that have an asymmetrical draped teeinspired dress from Helmut Lang, or prefer something fitted yet flattering like Jennifer Lawrence, who might look like she was practically poured into her gown! along these lines pintucked sheath by Nicole Miller. For something decidedly fairly dressier, by BCBGMAXAZRIA has some gorgeous draped detailing, but nevertheless flatters the figure having its pleated bodice and cinched waist, and finally, the lace trend lives on through spring due to this Oasis Lace and Chiffon shift dress, which is equals parts sexy and sophisticated.Stephanie Nichols, creator and head designer of Judith March, knows by pointing out passion for the right feminine spring dress, and her karen millen urban luxe cotton coat is actually difficult to resist. The gathering of carefully embroidered mini dresses embraces the season headon with fun, bright colors, festive florals, and other bold, cheery prints which have been the best mixture of romantic but casual and easytowear. Though bohemian and vintageinspired, the product really has an abundance of modern updates like asymmetrical necklines, bright patterns, and appliques that keep your looks fresh and unique. Wear having contrasting cardigan to beat the preSpring chill and a couple of this coming year's ultrahigh platform wedges and also've got yourself a cute goto search to transport you from spring to summer! We've found a girlfriend in the office therefore we're toying with the thinking behind aKaren Millen Skirts surprise on her. Hopefully, she doesn't look into the blog but hey, we'll go ahead and take chance. We're brainstorming what ideas might possibly be fun for your girlfriend. You will find, we understand desserts the day before your wedding reception is not really exactly ideal but hey, it's a celebration! Once you're considering throwing a bachelorette party with cupcakes then butt in your thinking on top of that, we'd adore to hear them.I've had the privilege of attending several graduations of ladies on the Lincoln home and for that reason a number of these girls have experienced abuse inside their karen millen silver dress, that led them down a path of self destruction, pain, confusion and deep hurt, making continuous wrong life choices.Damage even as we decide to make our little Pillowcase Dresses, were helping show a bit of girl that the woman with loved and cared about and then we're helping her be protected from potential abuse. MERCY MINISTRIES is loving on these girls, showing them that they're loved and thought about as well as have selfworth and the Jesus loves them unconditionally.