Housing Complex

Anti-Walmart Bills Would Affect Everybody

Upon further examination of the legislation proposed by Councilmember Phil Mendelson yesterday intended to force new big box stores to pay living wages and negotiate community benefits agreements, it's worth pointing out that these might not run into objections only from Walmart and its lobbying heavyweights. Eventually, both laws would apply to the Targets, Giants, and Safeways of the world as well–none of which negotiate CBAs or pay a living wage to starting employees.

The first piece, essentially a rehash of a similar bill from 2007, would require all retailers over 75,000 square feet and grossing over $1 billion per year to pay a base rate of $11.75 per hour, though the employer may pay up to $2.00 less than that for the a new hire's first 90 days on the job. It also contains certain protections for worker organizing, and would not preclude collective bargaining at stores that have unions.

In his community meeting spiel, Walmart spokesman Keith Morris usually points out that the four new stores will be paying "competitive" wages–no more and no less than the $8.75 or so that starting employees get at Safeway and Giant. Activists counter that Walmart has already pushed the bar lower at its stores ringing the District, and as the world's biggest retailer, ought to set a higher standard that other grocery stores will rise to meet. So even though Safeway and Giant might object to a new law that will cost them more money, there's something to be said for a law that covers everybody, eliminating the competitive disadvantage of paying higher wages.

Same goes for the bill requiring community benefits agreements to be signed by any retailer obtaining or renewing a basic business license, which happens every two years. Community benefits agreements usually cover things like education programs, funding for local parks, and infrastructure improvements. I tend to view grocery stores as community benefits in themselves, so I don't really see the case for this bill. Traditional Walmarts, of course, are different than most grocery stores, driving local businesses that offer the same goods out of the market. But these aren't traditional Walmarts, and so the distinction is less stark.

Another thing worth considering is that D.C. already has a supermarket tax exemption, and last year passed legislation that will help tailor it to food deserts. So even though Mendelson's legislation is a barrier to new retailers locating in the District, the Council still provides incentives for them to do so.

  • Rick Mangus

    Meddling Mendelson strikes again, living wage my ass this is why no one wants to open a business in DC because of stupid legislation like this! If you were in the desert and thirsty and someone offered you a half of glass of water would you say no because it's not a full glass! The unemployed in this city are thirsty for work and $8.75 an hour for unskilled labor is a God scent! Meddling Mendelson is a union stooge who gets his marching orders and talking points from Joseph Hansen and Tom McNutt of UFCW and could care less about getting people employed in this city!

  • Jason

    Cashier is not a career. It's unskilled job that even teenagers or elderly could easily handle. In my hometown 2/3 of the grocery store, blockbusters, etc are in fact manned by people at either age of the age spectrum. So I don't see why it needs to be mandated to pay a living wage in DC. Instead I suggest that Walmart pay the typical $8.75 but provide financial assistance for community college courses...

  • http://www.malnurturedsnay.net Malnurtured Snay

    Godsend.

  • Wrack

    What could possibly be the connection between the size of the store's square footage and the duties it has to pay off nearby ANC wackos by executing a community benefits agreement? What if a store is small in space but rakes in tons of revenues? Or, what if it's 300,000 square feet but is locally-owned, locally-operated, and otherwise responsible?

    Come on, Mendelson. You already tax businesses. The point of that tax is to redirect their economic activity to help those who are in need, either through government programs or by offsetting tax cuts to the poor and downtrodden. If I were one of these companies, I'd rather pay a few points more in taxes than have to work with the incredibly vague concept of "the community" to execute some agreement.

  • Pingback: Montgomery County moves fast to confine Walmart. Will it matter more than it has in D.C.? - Housing Complex

...