Housing Complex

This Week in Walmart News

Since there's enough news about Walmart to fill a blog all by itself, I think I'll start doing a digest once in a while. Here's what we learned this week:

  • Nick, Claude, and Bill. (Lydia DePillis)

    Walmart may be all about everyday low prices, but it's not skimping on its local help: Along with David Wilmot, the company has retained Venable's Claude Bailey, who can be found sitting in the back of the room at most community meetings. As general counsel to the D.C. Sports and Entertainment Commission, Bailey oversaw the construction of the Nationals Ballpark, Washington Convention Center, and Verizon Center. And he appears to be well-known in D.C. government circles, greeting people like the Department of Public Works' Bill Howland and DCRA's Nick Majett with grins and backslaps.

  • Last week, the developer for the Ward 5 Walmart submitted his large tract review application before speaking with the Office of Planning, which director Harriet Tregoning says is unprecedented in her tenure. Tregoning met with the development team on Tuesday, and told me she thinks she'll be able to work with them to improve how the store addresses the street on New York Avenue and Bladensburg Road, as well as access for pedestrians and bicyclists.
  • A workforce development plan is coming together with the University of the District of Columbia and the Department of Employment Services. Although Walmart would fund the program, it's starting to look like the company will be outsourcing its employee training to the District government, in a model that could be replicated for other large retailers. "They've got the logistics to run it," says Walmart community affairs guy Keith Morris, referring to UDC and DOES.
  • Although Ward 4 has been most outspoken in its opposition to a Walmart on Georgia Avenue, Ward 7 community groups are perhaps the most organized and unified. The local ANCs and civic associations have put together a draft community benefits agreement with things like funding for scholarships and workforce development programs that would become a legally binding component of the planned unit development that has to be okayed by the Zoning Commission. Right now, that agreement only includes the co-developers, A&R Development and the D.C. Housing Authority, though local leaders hope to bring Walmart into it as well.
  • Unfortunately for them, Ward 7 Councilmember Yvette Alexander doesn't seem to know how to enforce these kinds of agreements, even if they do become binding. "Whether someone upholds the law is a tricky question that we don't have any control over," she told constituents last night. "Do people follow the law? We hope they do. But sometimes they don't follow the law." Um, councilmember, isn't that your job?
  • Pingback: Tweets that mention This Week in Walmart News - Housing Complex - Washington City Paper -- Topsy.com

  • http://urbanplacesandspaces.blogspot.com Richard Layman

    1. WRT the first paragraph, well, you're learning how development dealings work. You know the song lyric "this is how we do it to you" ... cf. chapter 4 in _Dream City_.


    - and the lyric in "Is it love" by the Gang of Four:

    No one lives in the future, no one lives in the past
    The men who own the city make more sense than we do
    Their actions are clear, their lives are their own

    2. WRT the last paragraph, CBA are part of zoning orders and are enforceable. You have a plan and a process for implementation. CM Alexander needs to learn more about zoning.

    It's great to hear about the W7 effort. Don't worry, we have some tricks up our sleeves in W4, although we are limited by the framework that we have to work within.

  • Rick Mangus

    What ever happen to just opening up a business being simple! Now we have the union stooges getting involved, who don't even live in this city and then there is all these shakedown conditions worthy of Jesse Jackson! This is why no one wants to open a business in DC!

  • Steve

    All the Walmart developments should be required to be mixed use, with housing, and other commercial development included. Walmart should be the anchor store, but not the only store.

    Instead of big boxing Washington, why can't Walmart identify worthy development proposals that need anchor stores and foster their development. A Walmart would guarantee those developments' viability. That is the type of public benefit Washington should demand. Walmart should foster beneficial development, not squash it.

  • http://urbanplacesandspaces.blogspot.com Richard Layman

    Because walmart doesn't care about worthy development proposals. Neither do most of the developers that are seeking Walmart for their sites.

    You can't demand that private property owners maximize value. The irony is that people think the zoning code is designed to maximize value. It doesn't really. Mostly it enables minimal responses.

    So if the developer of a site isn't already inclined to do the right thing, you're screwed.

  • Rick Mangus

    "Mixed Use", my ass!

  • Java Master

    Stupid DC residents should not oppose Walmart!
    No wonder retailers do not seek to build in DC anymore.
    ANC's are filled with self-interested hacks.