<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only Ten More Condos Available at Union Row</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2009/10/30/only-ten-more-condos-available-at-union-row/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2009/10/30/only-ten-more-condos-available-at-union-row/</link>
	<description>D.C. Real Estate, Development, and Urbanism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:30:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: And Then There Was One (at Union Row) - Housing Complex - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2009/10/30/only-ten-more-condos-available-at-union-row/comment-page-1/#comment-12024</link>
		<dc:creator>And Then There Was One (at Union Row) - Housing Complex - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/?p=10426#comment-12024</guid>
		<description>[...] End of an era here folks! Union Row, the enormous condo complex at 14th and V Streets&#8212;heck, the &#8220;Second Best Condominium&#8221; in D.C.&#8212;is almost sold out. For the past eight months, I&#8217;ve been getting alerts about its remaining units. By late October, there were only ten left out of an original total of roughly 270.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] End of an era here folks! Union Row, the enormous condo complex at 14th and V Streets&#8212;heck, the &#8220;Second Best Condominium&#8221; in D.C.&#8212;is almost sold out. For the past eight months, I&#8217;ve been getting alerts about its remaining units. By late October, there were only ten left out of an original total of roughly 270.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ten Ten Mass Sold Out - Housing Complex - Washington City Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2009/10/30/only-ten-more-condos-available-at-union-row/comment-page-1/#comment-9881</link>
		<dc:creator>Ten Ten Mass Sold Out - Housing Complex - Washington City Paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/?p=10426#comment-9881</guid>
		<description>[...] week, we heard that Union Row, the mammoth 14th Street complex with some 270 units, was nearly sold out. This week, McWilliams&#124;Ballard announced that Ten Ten Mass, located near Mount Vernon Square, had [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, we heard that Union Row, the mammoth 14th Street complex with some 270 units, was nearly sold out. This week, McWilliams|Ballard announced that Ten Ten Mass, located near Mount Vernon Square, had [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth Samuelson</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2009/10/30/only-ten-more-condos-available-at-union-row/comment-page-1/#comment-9645</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Samuelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/?p=10426#comment-9645</guid>
		<description>There really aren&#039;t very many &quot;new&quot; condo buildings in D.C.--in the sense that they reached construction completion in the last 12 months. So, I consider &quot;new&quot; buildings to be buildings still actively marketing original, never-been-sold units.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There really aren't very many "new" condo buildings in D.C.--in the sense that they reached construction completion in the last 12 months. So, I consider "new" buildings to be buildings still actively marketing original, never-been-sold units.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stella</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2009/10/30/only-ten-more-condos-available-at-union-row/comment-page-1/#comment-9643</link>
		<dc:creator>stella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/?p=10426#comment-9643</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the definition of &quot;new&quot; being used here? I agree it&#039;s a great building, but it&#039;s been selling for how many years now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What's the definition of "new" being used here? I agree it's a great building, but it's been selling for how many years now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

