<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ANC Refuses to Pick Favorite Hine School Development Proposal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2009/07/01/anc-refuses-to-pick-favorite-hine-school-development-proposal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2009/07/01/anc-refuses-to-pick-favorite-hine-school-development-proposal/</link>
	<description>D.C. Real Estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:18:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2009/07/01/anc-refuses-to-pick-favorite-hine-school-development-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-5291</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/?p=7369#comment-5291</guid>
		<description>As long as they don&#039;t select that crapper of an idea. Plan 2:The Plan Without a Plan:National Leadership Campus/Western Development Group</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as they don&#8217;t select that crapper of an idea. Plan 2:The Plan Without a Plan:National Leadership Campus/Western Development Group</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Riehle</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2009/07/01/anc-refuses-to-pick-favorite-hine-school-development-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-5108</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Riehle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/?p=7369#comment-5108</guid>
		<description>I want to correct one thing I wrote.  In making fun of CHRS&#039;s zoning committee Chairman Gary Peterson, I mentioned that he left some of our friends in the excellent residents&#039; group Eyes on Hine feeling disgruntled.  
 
Peterson boasted about the influential importance of CHRS by saying the city appended CHRS &quot;criteria&quot; to the RFP for Hine.  Eyes on Hine residents had tried to do the same, as &quot;the most affected&quot; residents, and Councilmember Wells personally interceded on their behalf in seeking to have an Eyes on Hine appendix to the RFP as well.  
 
Alas, no such Eyes on Hine appendix was included, but just to be clear, it was not Wells who left the Eyes on Hine criteria off the RFP, but rather the Deputy Mayor for Economic Development who decided not to include it.  Their loss.  The Eyes on Hine criteria were better-researched, more thoughtful and insightful than the silly CHRS criteria, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to correct one thing I wrote.  In making fun of CHRS&#8217;s zoning committee Chairman Gary Peterson, I mentioned that he left some of our friends in the excellent residents&#8217; group Eyes on Hine feeling disgruntled.  </p>
<p>Peterson boasted about the influential importance of CHRS by saying the city appended CHRS &#8220;criteria&#8221; to the RFP for Hine.  Eyes on Hine residents had tried to do the same, as &#8220;the most affected&#8221; residents, and Councilmember Wells personally interceded on their behalf in seeking to have an Eyes on Hine appendix to the RFP as well.  </p>
<p>Alas, no such Eyes on Hine appendix was included, but just to be clear, it was not Wells who left the Eyes on Hine criteria off the RFP, but rather the Deputy Mayor for Economic Development who decided not to include it.  Their loss.  The Eyes on Hine criteria were better-researched, more thoughtful and insightful than the silly CHRS criteria, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Layman</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2009/07/01/anc-refuses-to-pick-favorite-hine-school-development-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-5099</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Layman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/?p=7369#comment-5099</guid>
		<description>you did a nice job in coming up with short hand descriptions for each proposal...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you did a nice job in coming up with short hand descriptions for each proposal&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Riehle</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2009/07/01/anc-refuses-to-pick-favorite-hine-school-development-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-5048</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Riehle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/?p=7369#comment-5048</guid>
		<description>Wow.  That&#039;s quite an upset!

I thought the &quot;All-Knowing&quot; Plan, Stanton, &quot;was all about reminding Capitol Hillers that the developers already knew them. Architect Amy Weinstein showed off all her past buildings and projects in the area...&quot;  I guess to be known by them is not necessarily to love them.  

If Stanton was not able to earn an endorsement from their local ANC, maybe the fix is not in for Stanton.  To me, that&#039;s a big win for the visiting team from Street Sense.  The message:  Time for new blood and new ideas on Capitol Hill.

Ten people spoke in favor of Stanton, 7 of them tenants or partners or would-be tenants of the developer.

Ten people spoke in favor of Street Sense, 0 of them with any connection to Street Sense.

The Street Sense supporters were civilian residents in the neighborhood who each did a lot of homework, met with all the developers, and then presented strong reasons to support Street Sense. 

The most humorous testimony came right off the bat, from Gary Peterson, head of the Capitol Hill Restoration Society zoning committee, who arrogated to his organization pride of place by going first in a room jammed with 60 people waiting to speak.  

Peterson of the CHRS endeared himself to residents, such as those from the Eyes on Hine residents&#039; group, who had been promised by Councilmember Wells that he would personally see to it that criteria they wrote as the &quot;most affected residents&quot; (across 8th Street from Hine) would be included in the RFP the city sent out.  

Wells welched on that promise, because, as Peterson pointed out last night, criteria written by CHRS were stapled to the city&#039;s RFP, and I guess if CHRS has written criteria and ordered the city to staple it to an RFP, no other group&#039;s criteria may be attached to that same RFP.

Peterson read some of the Greatest Hits from CHRS&#039;s 11 criteria, but left out the most important part, which reads:  &quot;CHRS supports the closing and then demolition of Hine School and development of the site in coordination with the Town Center development of the Eastern Market Metro Plaza...[m]aking Eastern Market Metro the town square...&quot;  He left it out because even CHRS finally understands that among Hill residents, there is almost nothing less popular than the &quot;Town Square scheme&quot; (the neighbors think re-routing Pennsylvania Avenue SE is stoooopid).  One group that knows that for sure:  Stanton, whose principal is on the Town Square Task Force and whose designer, Amy Weinstein, is also designer for the Town Square scheme.  

Peterson understood that reading the Harumph! Preamble to the Criteria, Harumph! would further cinch the rope that ties the albatross of Town Square to Stanton&#039;s proposal for Hine.

Instead of the Preamble, Peterson read a CHRS endorsement of Stanton, then left.  Maybe in the past that would have been enough to get the ANC to endorse Stanton.  Tonight, it was not, as the ANC declined to endorse any of the proposals.

Tonight, July 1, anyone interested in an early fireworks display should definitely come to St. Peter&#039;s Church, 2nd and C Street SE, at 7 pm, where for a sixth (and it is to be hoped, final) time, the Town Square Task Force will once again try to convince an angry group of residents to support re-routing Pennsylvania Avenue SE.

Dick Wolf, No-Longer President of CHRS, has already helped win over the hearts and minds of residents by stating, regarding opposition to Town Square Scheme plans that re-route Pennsylvania Avenue, &quot;Some residents like this area the way it is, but the issue is larger than them.&quot;  

So c&#039;mon out tonight, all you tiny little residents.  The Town Square Task Force will explain that what you think is wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  That&#8217;s quite an upset!</p>
<p>I thought the &#8220;All-Knowing&#8221; Plan, Stanton, &#8220;was all about reminding Capitol Hillers that the developers already knew them. Architect Amy Weinstein showed off all her past buildings and projects in the area&#8230;&#8221;  I guess to be known by them is not necessarily to love them.  </p>
<p>If Stanton was not able to earn an endorsement from their local ANC, maybe the fix is not in for Stanton.  To me, that&#8217;s a big win for the visiting team from Street Sense.  The message:  Time for new blood and new ideas on Capitol Hill.</p>
<p>Ten people spoke in favor of Stanton, 7 of them tenants or partners or would-be tenants of the developer.</p>
<p>Ten people spoke in favor of Street Sense, 0 of them with any connection to Street Sense.</p>
<p>The Street Sense supporters were civilian residents in the neighborhood who each did a lot of homework, met with all the developers, and then presented strong reasons to support Street Sense. </p>
<p>The most humorous testimony came right off the bat, from Gary Peterson, head of the Capitol Hill Restoration Society zoning committee, who arrogated to his organization pride of place by going first in a room jammed with 60 people waiting to speak.  </p>
<p>Peterson of the CHRS endeared himself to residents, such as those from the Eyes on Hine residents&#8217; group, who had been promised by Councilmember Wells that he would personally see to it that criteria they wrote as the &#8220;most affected residents&#8221; (across 8th Street from Hine) would be included in the RFP the city sent out.  </p>
<p>Wells welched on that promise, because, as Peterson pointed out last night, criteria written by CHRS were stapled to the city&#8217;s RFP, and I guess if CHRS has written criteria and ordered the city to staple it to an RFP, no other group&#8217;s criteria may be attached to that same RFP.</p>
<p>Peterson read some of the Greatest Hits from CHRS&#8217;s 11 criteria, but left out the most important part, which reads:  &#8220;CHRS supports the closing and then demolition of Hine School and development of the site in coordination with the Town Center development of the Eastern Market Metro Plaza&#8230;[m]aking Eastern Market Metro the town square&#8230;&#8221;  He left it out because even CHRS finally understands that among Hill residents, there is almost nothing less popular than the &#8220;Town Square scheme&#8221; (the neighbors think re-routing Pennsylvania Avenue SE is stoooopid).  One group that knows that for sure:  Stanton, whose principal is on the Town Square Task Force and whose designer, Amy Weinstein, is also designer for the Town Square scheme.  </p>
<p>Peterson understood that reading the Harumph! Preamble to the Criteria, Harumph! would further cinch the rope that ties the albatross of Town Square to Stanton&#8217;s proposal for Hine.</p>
<p>Instead of the Preamble, Peterson read a CHRS endorsement of Stanton, then left.  Maybe in the past that would have been enough to get the ANC to endorse Stanton.  Tonight, it was not, as the ANC declined to endorse any of the proposals.</p>
<p>Tonight, July 1, anyone interested in an early fireworks display should definitely come to St. Peter&#8217;s Church, 2nd and C Street SE, at 7 pm, where for a sixth (and it is to be hoped, final) time, the Town Square Task Force will once again try to convince an angry group of residents to support re-routing Pennsylvania Avenue SE.</p>
<p>Dick Wolf, No-Longer President of CHRS, has already helped win over the hearts and minds of residents by stating, regarding opposition to Town Square Scheme plans that re-route Pennsylvania Avenue, &#8220;Some residents like this area the way it is, but the issue is larger than them.&#8221;  </p>
<p>So c&#8217;mon out tonight, all you tiny little residents.  The Town Square Task Force will explain that what you think is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
